Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for Personalized Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Review.

Attaching a cytotoxic "payload" to an antibody to form an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) provides a mechanism for selective delivery of the cytotoxic agent to cancer cells via the specific binding of the antibody to cancer-selective cell surface molecules. The first ADC to receive marketing authorization was gemtuzumab ozogamicin, which comprises an anti-CD33 antibody conjugated to a highly potent DNA-targeting antibiotic, calicheamicin, approved in 2000 for treating acute myeloid leukemia. It was withdrawn from the US market in 2010 following an unsuccessful confirmatory trial. The development of two classes of highly potent microtubule-disrupting agents, maytansinoids and auristatins, as payloads for ADCs resulted in approval of brentuximab vedotin in 2011 for treating Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and approval of ado-trastuzumab emtansine in 2013 for treating HER2-positive breast cancer. Their success stimulated much research into the ADC approach, with >60 ADCs currently in clinical evaluation, mostly targeting solid tumors. Five ADCs have advanced into pivotal clinical trials for treating various solid tumors-platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, triple-negative breast cancer, glioblastoma, and small cell lung cancer. The level of target expression is a key parameter in predicting the likelihood of patient benefit for all these ADCs, as well as for the approved compound, ado-trastuzumab emtansine. The development of a patient selection strategy linked to target expression on the tumor is thus critically important for identifying the population appropriate for receiving treatment.

Pharmacokinetic, biochemical and clinical effects of dimethyltriazenoimidazole-4-carboxamide-bischloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

We assessed whether split dosing with the methylating agent DTIC is an effective strategy for inactivating the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA-ATase in order to decrease tumour resistance to BCNU. ATase levels in PBMCs were used as a surrogate for tumour ATase depletion to determine whether this correlated with either the pharmacokinetics of DTIC and its major metabolite AIC or other clinical sequelae. Two 1 hr infusions of DTIC (400 mg/m(2)) 4 hr apart followed another 4 hr later by BCNU (75 mg/m(2)) were administered every 6 weeks in 7 patients with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. The extent and kinetics of ATase depletion and recovery in PBMCs varied not only between patients but also between cycles in the same patient. Serial FNAs showed heterogeneity in tumour ATase expression but no clear pattern of change in ATase activity. DTIC and AIC exhibited biphasic clearance from the blood, consistent with a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The AUC of AIC was strongly correlated with the percentage decrease in PBMC ATase levels. There were no clinical responses, and toxicity in neutrophils and platelets was marked. Split-dose DTIC therefore does not appear to be a clinically effective approach to overcome O(6)-alkylating agent resistance in advanced breast cancer.