Errors in Electronic Health Record-Based Data Query of Statin Prescriptions in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Clinic Practice.

BACKGROUND: With the recent implementation of the Medicare Quality Payment Program, providers face increasing accountability for delivering high-quality care. Such pay-for-performance programs aim to leverage systematic data captured by electronic health record (EHR) systems to measure performance; however, the fidelity of EHR query for assessing performance has not been validated compared with manual chart review. We sought to determine whether our institution's methodology of EHR query could accurately identify cases in which providers failed to prescribe statins for eligible patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 9459 patients with coronary artery disease were seen at least twice at the Emory Clinic between July 2014 and June 2015, of whom 1338 (14.1%, 95% confidence interval 13.5-14.9%) had no statin prescription or exemption per EHR query. A total of 120 patient cases were randomly selected and reviewed by 2 physicians for further adjudication. Of the 120 cases initially classified as statin prescription failures, only 21 (17.5%; 95% confidence interval, 11.7-25.3%) represented true failure following physician review. CONCLUSIONS: Sole reliance on EHR data query to measure quality metrics may lead to significant errors in assessing provider performance. Institutions should be cognizant of these potential sources of error, provide support to medical providers, and form collaborative data management teams to promote and improve meaningful use of EHRs. We propose actionable steps to improve the accuracy of EHR data query that require hypothesis testing and prospective validation in future studies.

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure.

Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a treatment for cryptogenic stroke and migraine headache. The goal of this study was to assess long-term outcomes of patients treated with percutaneous PFO closure. Records of patients with percutaneous PFO closure at Emory University Hospital from February 2002 to July 2009 were reviewed. Follow-up telephone questionnaire and chart review assessed recurrent stroke, migraine, and complications. Data was reviewed on 414 consecutive patients. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 207 of patients, and mean follow up was 4.6 ± 2.0 years. Cryptogenic stroke was the primary indication for intervention in 193 (93%) patients. Thirteen (7%) patients had a recurrent neurologic event post closure. In patients with multiple neurological events at baseline, 17% (n = 11) had a recurrent event, compared with 2% (n = 2) of patients with a single neurological event prior to PFO-closure (P < 0.002). Post closure, migraine frequency and severity declined from 4.5 to 1.1 migraine/month (P < 0.01) and 7.2 to 3.6 out of 10 (P < 0.01) in patients with history of migraine (n = 60). Thirty-day mortality was 1% (n = 2). One patient had device erosion 5 years post-procedure requiring emergent surgery. Atrial fibrillation was newly diagnosed in 8 (4%) patients within 6 months. In conclusion, the long-term rate of recurrent stroke after PFO closure is low in patients with a single neurological event at baseline. Serious long-term complications after PFO closure are rare. PFO closure may decrease the frequency and severity of migraine.

Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for the treatment of left main coronary stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting is standard of care for left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is an alternative therapy, combining a minimally invasive, sternal-sparing, off-pump left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary anastomosis with percutaneous coronary stent placement through the LM into the circumflex coronary artery. METHODS: From October 8, 2003, to April 23, 2010, 27 patients with LM coronary disease had HCR at a US academic center. These patients were matched 3:1 to 81 contemporaneous patients treated with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting through a sternotomy by an optimal matching algorithm using seven preoperative variables. In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and repeat revascularization during the study period were compared between groups. All-cause mortality was compared using the National Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: Patency of the left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary anastomosis was confirmed in all cases before LM stenting, which was successful in all patients. There was no perioperative death, stroke, or myocardial infarction among the HCR patients. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar between groups. During a median of 3.2 years of follow-up, patients treated with HCR had a higher incidence of repeat revascularization than those treated with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (2 of 27, 7.4% versus 1 of 81, 1.2%; p = 0.09), but this was not statistically significant. The incidence of blood transfusion was higher with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (50 of 81, 61.7% versus 9 of 27 33.3%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid revascularization is a safe, feasible, and minimally invasive alternative to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of LM coronary disease. Further investigation into the comparative effectiveness of this alternative strategy is warranted to identify optimal candidates for HCR.

Hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines a minimally invasive (3-cm anterolateral thoracotomy), sternal-sparing, off-pump left internal mammary artery-left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) coronary artery anastomosis with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to non-LAD coronary arteries. We compared outcomes of HCR versus traditional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Between October 8, 2003 and April 23, 2010, 147 patients with multivessel coronary disease were treated with HCR at a US academic center. These were matched 4:1 to 588 contemporaneous patients treated with multivessel OPCAB by sternotomy using an optimal matching algorithm with 8 preoperative variables: age, gender, ejection fraction, presence of diabetes, myocardial infarction (MI), number of diseased vessels, left main coronary artery disease, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risk of mortality (PROM) score. In-hospital major adverse events (MACCE) and the need for repeated revascularization during follow-up were compared between groups. All-cause mortality was determined using the Social Security Death Index (SSDI). RESULTS: Matching produced groups with similar coronary anatomy and statistically similar preoperative risk factors. The incidence of MACCE was similar between groups (3/147 HCR versus 12/588 OPCAB). During a median 3.2 years of follow up, the need for repeated revascularization was higher for HCR than for OPCAB (18/147 [12.2%] versus 22/588 [3.7%]; p < 0.001). The incidence of blood transfusion was higher for the OPCAB group. Estimated 5-year survival was similar between groups (OPCAB, 84.3% versus HCR, 86.8%; p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid coronary revascularization is a minimally invasive treatment for multivessel CAD. Although repeated revascularization was greater with HCR, both in-hospital and midterm outcomes were comparable with those of traditional OPCAB. Further investigation into the comparative effectiveness of this alternative strategy is warranted.

Transesophageal echo to help percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defect post acute myocardial infarction.

Ventricular septal defect after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a complication associated with poor outcome in the absence of intervention. We report a case of successful TEE guided transcatheter closure of a post myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defect (VSD) with an Amplatzer occluder in a 79 years old male with cardiogenic shock.

Combined impact of age and estimated glomerular filtration rate on in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry).

Age and chronic kidney disease are major risk factors for poor cardiovascular outcome; however, renal function is often estimated on the basis of serum creatinine levels, and advanced renal impairment may be hidden behind near normal creatinine levels. We assessed the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on in-hospital mortality in young (<65 years old), old (65 to 84 years old), and very old (> or = 85 years old) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction. The adjusted risk of death was calculated in 169,826 patients from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction. Younger patients had fewer co-morbidities, higher estimated GFR, less frequent multivessel disease, and lower unadjusted mortality rates than older patients (p <0.0001 for all comparisons). However, the adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality for patients with severe renal insufficiency (estimated GFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) compared with those with normal renal function (estimated GFR > or = 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher in young patients (adjusted odds ratio = 7.58, 95% confidence interval 6.18 to 9.29) than old (adjusted odds ratio = 4.75, 95% confidence interval 4.14 to 5.45) and very old patients (adjusted odds ratio = 3.50, confidence interval 2.50 to 4.89). In conclusion, severe renal insufficiency is associated with a greater risk of in-hospital mortality in young than old and very old patients after primary PCI. Risk stratification for patients with acute myocardial infarction should incorporate an assessment of renal function with estimated GFR values rather than absolute serum creatinine levels as done in the currently utilized risk scoring algorithms.

Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass: a prospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: : Hybrid coronary revascularization is offered as an alternative strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). We present our experience and provide a comparative analysis to off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). METHODS: : Ninety-one patients with multivessel CAD underwent minimally invasive left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending grafting in combination with percutaneous coronary intervention of nonleft anterior descending targets (HYBRID). The primary end point of this study was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as death, stroke, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. MACCE in the HYBRID group were compared with 4175 contemporaneously performed OPCAB operations by logistic (30-day outcomes) and Cox proportional hazards (long-term survival) regression methods. Propensity scoring was used to adjust for potential selection bias. RESULTS: : The 30-day MACCE (death/stroke/nonfatal myocardial infarction) rate was 1.1% for the HYBRID group (0%/0%/1.1%) and 3.0% for the OPCAB group (1.8%/1.1%/0.5%) (odds ratio = 0.47, P = 0.48). Angiographic left internal mammary artery evaluation was obtained in 95.6% of patients (87 of 91) revealing FitzGibbon A patency in 98.0% (96 of 98). The reintervention rate at 1 year for the HYBRID group was 5.5% (5 of 91) and was limited to repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. Three-year survival was statistically similar for the two groups (hazard ratio = 0.44, P = 0.18, see Kaplan-Meier figure). CONCLUSIONS: : Hybrid coronary revascularization may be noninferior to OPCAB with respect to early MACCE and 3-year survival in the treatment of multivessel CAD.

Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of an integrated coronary revascularization strategy that combines minimally invasive left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery anastomosis with drug-eluting stent implantation to non-left anterior descending coronary artery lesions. METHODS: Over 18 months, 47 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease underwent thoracoscopic harvesting of the left internal thoracic artery to graft the left anterior descending coronary artery. Anastomoses were constructed by hand, off-pump, and under direct vision through a 4-cm non-rib-spreading, muscle-sparing chest incision. Non-left anterior descending coronary artery lesions were then treated percutaneously using sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Within the first 90 days of hospitalizations, there were no deaths, myocardial infarctions, neurologic events, or wound complications. Forty patients underwent left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery grafting, and 7 patients underwent left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery/diagonal sequential grafting for a total of 54 anastomoses. Angiographic patency scores were FitzGibbon A 96.2% (52/54) and FitzGibbon A + B 100% (54/54). A total of 65 drug-eluting stents were implanted in 61 non-left anterior descending coronary artery coronary lesions of which 49.1% (30/61) were type B2 or C lesions, including 5 left main lesions. Diabetes was present in 53.2% of patients (25/47). At a mean follow-up time of 7.0 +/- 4.8 months, the target lesion or vessel repeat revascularization rate was 6.6% (4/61) for drug-eluting stents and 1.9% (1/54) for left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery grafting. One anastomosis required balloon dilation, but no patients have required repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated coronary revascularization using drug-eluting stents is feasible and safe. There are sufficient data to justify a randomized comparison of integrated coronary revascularization with standard coronary artery bypass grafting.

Impact of diabetes on five-year outcomes after vein graft interventions performed prior to the drug-eluting stent era.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in 5-year outcomes among diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing saphenous vein graft (SVG) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to the era of distal protection and drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: PCI of native coronary arteries is known to be associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic patients. However, the impact of diabetes on long-term outcomes after SVG interventions is not as well established. We conducted an evaluation of 5-year outcomes after SVG PCI in the two decades prior to the availability of distal protection devices and drug-eluting stents. METHODS: Data on 2,556 subjects (1,780 nondiabetic and 776 diabetic) undergoing SVG PCI at Emory Hospital from 1981 to 2001 were collected and entered into a computerized database and analyzed for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to the nondiabetic group, the diabetic group had worse 1-year (87.7% vs. 94.9%; p < 0.0001) and 5-year survival rates (62.9% vs. 78.5%; p < 0.0001). In the subset of patients receiving stents, 5-year survival remained significantly worse in the diabetic group (78.2% vs. 87.1%; p = 0.009). After multivariate analysis, diabetes was an independent predictor of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.5-2.5; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Diabetic patients undergoing vein graft PCI prior to the distal protection and drug-eluting stent era had significantly worse long-term outcomes compared to nondiabetic patients. The effect on long-term outcomes using these newer devices in diabetic subjects undergoing SVG PCI must be established for a true assessment of their impact.

Coronary stent restenosis in patients treated with cilostazol.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after implantation of coronary artery stents remains a significant clinical problem. We undertook a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether cilostazol, a drug that suppresses intimal proliferation, would reduce renarrowing in patients after stent implantation in native coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assigned 705 patients who had successful coronary stent implantation to receive, in addition to aspirin, cilostazol 100 mg BID or placebo for 6 months; clopidogrel 75 mg daily was administered to all patients for 30 days. Restenosis was determined by quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months. The minimal luminal diameter at 6 months for cilostazol-treated patients was 1.77 mm for the analysis segment (stent plus 5-mm borders) compared with 1.62 mm in the placebo group (P=0.01). Restenosis, defined as > or =50% narrowing, occurred in 22.0% of patients in the cilostazol group and in 34.5% of the placebo group (P=0.002), a 36% relative risk reduction. Restenosis was significantly lower in cilostazol-treated diabetics (17.7% versus 37.7%, P=0.01) and in those with small vessels (23.6% versus 35.2%, P=0.02), long lesions (29.9% versus 46.6%, P=0.04), and left anterior descending coronary artery site (19.3% versus 39.8%, P=0.001). There was no difference in bleeding, rehospitalization, target-vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or death. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the drug cilostazol resulted in a significantly larger minimal luminal diameter and a significantly lower binary restenosis rate compared with placebo-treated patients. These favorable effects were apparent in patients at high risk for restenosis.

Prognostic implication of creatine kinase release after elective percutaneous coronary intervention in the pre-IIb/IIIa antagonist era.

BACKGROUND: The significance of mild elevations in cardiac enzymes after an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) still remains controversial. We evaluated the significance of creatine phosphokinase level (CPK) elevations in a large cohort of patients who had undergone an elective PCI before the IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist era. METHODS: All patients enrolled in the Emory databank from 1981 to 1996 who had an elective PCI were evaluated. We identified 15,637 patients who met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into 4 groups on the basis of the magnitude of the CPK elevation noted in the post-PCI period: group I (CPK <250 mg/dL, n = 14,512); group II (CPK 250-500 mg/dL, n = 715); group III (CPK 500-750 mg/dL, n = 164); and group IV (CPK >750 mg/dL, n = 246). RESULTS: CPK elevations were associated with a significant increase in the periprocedure angiographic complications. Angiographic complication rates were 14.6%, 30.5%, 40.2%, and 43.5% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively (P <.001). Long-term survival also correlated inversely with the magnitude of CPK elevations. The 10-year survival rates were 73%, 71%, 69%, and 55% in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively (P <.0001). After multivariate analysis to correct for clinical factors, a CPK elevation of at least 3-times normal (group IV) was found to be an independent predictor of diminished 30-day and long-term survival (hazard ratio 1.84, 95% CI 1.41-2.41, P <.0001). Elevations in CPK <3-times normal (groups II and III) were not independently predictive of poor long-term survival. CONCLUSION: A CPK level >3-times normal after an elective PCI is a strong independent predictor of poor long-term prognosis.

Outcomes of repeat revascularization in diabetic patients with prior coronary surgery.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated both short- and long-term outcomes of diabetic patients who underwent repeat coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after initial CABG. BACKGROUND: Although diabetic patients who have multivessel coronary disease and require initial revascularization may benefit from CABG as compared with PCI, the uncertainty concerning the choice of revascularization may be greater for diabetic patients who have had previous CABG. METHODS: Data were obtained over 15 years for diabetic patients undergoing PCI procedures or repeat CABG after previous coronary surgery. Baseline characteristics were compared between groups, and in-hospital, 5-year, and 10-year mortality rates were calculated. Multivariate correlates of in-hospital and long-term mortality were determined. RESULTS: Both PCI (n = 1,123) and CABG (n = 598) patients were similar in age, gender, years of diabetes, and insulin dependence, but they varied in presence of hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, angina severity, heart failure, ejection fraction, and left main disease. In-hospital mortality was greater for CABG, but differences in long-term mortality were not significant (10 year mortality, 68% PCI vs. 74% CABG, p = 0.14). Multivariate correlates of long-term mortality were older age, hypertension, low ejection fraction, and an interaction between heart failure and choice of PCI. The PCI itself did not correlate with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The increased initial risk of redo CABG in diabetic patients and the comparable high long-term mortality regardless of type of intervention suggest that, except for patients with severe heart failure, PCI be strongly considered in all patients for whom there is a percutaneous alternative.