Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Everolimus: A Consensus Report.

In 2014, the Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology called a meeting of international experts to provide recommendations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice. EVR is a potent inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection and for the treatment of various types of cancer and tuberous sclerosis complex. EVR fulfills the prerequisites for TDM, having a narrow therapeutic range, high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, and established drug exposure-response relationships. EVR trough concentrations (C0) demonstrate a good relationship with overall exposure, providing a simple and reliable index for TDM. Whole-blood samples should be used for measurement of EVR C0, and sampling times should be standardized to occur within 1 hour before the next dose, which should be taken at the same time everyday and preferably without food. In transplantation settings, EVR should be generally targeted to a C0 of 3-8 ng/mL when used in combination with other immunosuppressive drugs (calcineurin inhibitors and glucocorticoids); in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, the EVR target C0 range should be 6-10 ng/mL. Further studies are required to determine the clinical utility of TDM in nontransplantation settings. The choice of analytical method and differences between methods should be carefully considered when determining EVR concentrations, and when comparing and interpreting clinical trial outcomes. At present, a fully validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay is the preferred method for determination of EVR C0, with a lower limit of quantification close to 1 ng/mL. Use of certified commercially available whole-blood calibrators to avoid calibration bias and participation in external proficiency-testing programs to allow continuous cross-validation and proof of analytical quality are highly recommended. Development of alternative assays to facilitate on-site measurement of EVR C0 is encouraged.

Clinical consequences of a miscalibrated digoxin immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: A routine audit revealed that the analytical method used to measure digoxin concentrations by our statewide pathology provider in 2009 was underestimating digoxin concentrations by 10%. The assay was recalibrated by the manufacturer in 2010, but clinical outcomes of the underestimation were never measured. This is a pilot study to describe the prescribing behavior around out-of-range digoxin concentrations and to assess whether miscalibrated digoxin immunoassays contribute to clinically relevant effects, as measured by inappropriate alterations in digoxin doses. METHODS: About 30,000 digoxin concentrations across the State Hospital system were obtained in 2 periods before and after recalibration of the digoxin assay. Digoxin concentration means were calculated and compared and were statistically significantly different. Subsequently, a single-centered retrospective review of 50 randomly chosen charts was undertaken to study the clinical implications of the underestimated concentrations. RESULTS: Mean digoxin concentrations for 2009 and 2011 were significantly different by 8.8% (confidence interval, 7.0%-10.6%). After recalculating the 2009 concentrations to their "corrected" values, there was a 16% increase in the number of concentrations within the range when compared with the 2011 concentrations (41.48% versus 48.04%). However, overall, this did not cause unnecessary dose changes in patients who were "borderline" or outside the therapeutic range when compared with controls (P = 0.10). The majority of decisions were based on the clinical impression rather than concentration alone (85.1% versus 14.9%), even when the concentration was outside the "therapeutic range." CONCLUSIONS: Although recalculating digoxin concentrations measured during 2009 to their corrected values produced a significant change in concentration and values inside and outside the range, this does not seem to have had an influence on patient treatment. Rather, clinicians tended to use the clinical impression to dose digoxin.

Ropivacaine (total and unbound) and AGP concentrations after transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to assess the safety of single bolus dose of ropivacaine (ROP) followed by continuous infusion through transversus abdominis plane block catheter. The aim was to determine ROP absorbed from the infusion site, changes in protein binding after surgery, and clinical determinants of adverse effects. METHODS: Twelve patients undergoing laparotomy, received bilateral transversus abdominis plane block under ultrasound guidance using a 20-mL bolus of 0.5% ROP followed by 10 mL/h of 0.2% ROP infusion for 48 hours. Serial blood samples were drawn presurgery and to 48 hours postbolus. Plasma concentrations of total and unbound ROP were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Alpha-1 acid glycoprotein concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were monitored for any signs or symptoms of central nervous system and chorionic villus sampling toxicity. RESULTS: After the bolus dose, the mean (±SD) peak plasma total (bound plus unbound) ROP concentration (Cmax) was 2.1 (±0.8) mg/L and unbound ROP concentration was 0.04 (±0.02) mg/L. During the infusion phase, total ROP concentration continued to rise to a mean (±) Cmax of 3.3 (±1.6) mg/L, and the peak unbound concentration was 0.06 (±0.0) mg/L. No patients showed symptoms of ROP toxicity or unacceptable QTc intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Although the total ROP concentrations approached or exceeded reported neurotoxicity thresholds, no patients had unbound ROP concentrations approaching the unbound toxicity threshold, nor showed any signs or symptoms of toxicity. This result was consistent with changes in protein binding to alpha-1 acid glycoprotein after surgery.

A randomized double-blind clinical trial of a continuous 96-hour levobupivacaine infiltration after open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery for postoperative pain management--including clinically important changes in protein binding.

BACKGROUND: Continuous local anesthetic infiltration has been used for pain management after open colorectal surgery. However, its application to patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery has not been examined. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to study the use of a commercial infiltration device in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery, along with plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine, its acute-phase binding protein (alpha-1 acid glycoprotein, AAG), and the stress marker, cortisol. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive a continuous infiltration of either levobupivacaine or placebo using a commercial device (ON-Q PainBuster) inserted in the preperitoneal layer at the end of surgery. Blood was sampled for determination of levobupivacaine and AAG and cortisol concentrations. Other outcomes measured were pain scores, morbidity and mortality, time to bowel movement, mobilization, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS: In patients having open surgery, the levobupivacaine treatment showed a trend toward reduced total opioid consumption. No patients reported adverse effects attributable to levobupivacaine, despite 11 patients having concentrations at some time(s) during the 96-hour infiltration of up to 5.5 mg/L exceeding a putative toxicity threshold of 2.7 mg/L. AAG concentrations measured postsurgery increased by a mean of 55% (P < 0.001) at 48 hours. Cortisol concentrations also increased significantly by a mean of 191% at 1 hour. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous local anesthetic infiltration may be more beneficial in open surgery. The threshold for adverse effects from highly bound local anesthetic drugs established in healthy volunteers is of limited usefulness in clinical scenarios in which AAG concentration increases in response to surgical stress. Hence, there is scope to adopt higher doses to enhance therapeutic benefit.

Validation of an LC-MS/MS method to measure tacrolimus in rat kidney and liver tissue and its application to human kidney biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) has a narrow therapeutic index and high interindividual and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variability, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage. Recent evidence suggests that intragraft TAC concentrations may better predict transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop a method for the quantification of TAC in small biopsy-sized samples of rat kidney and liver tissue, which could be applied to clinical biopsy samples from kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: Kidneys and livers were harvested from Mrp2-deficient TR- Wistar rats administered TAC (4 mg·kg·d for 14 days, n = 8) or vehicle (n = 10). Tissue samples (0.20-1.00 mg of dry weight) were solubilized enzymatically and underwent liquid-liquid extraction before analysis by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. TAC-free tissue was used in the calibrator and quality control samples. Analyte detection was accomplished using positive electrospray ionization (TAC: m/z 821.5 → 768.6; internal standard ascomycin m/z 809.3 → 756.4). RESULTS: Calibration curves (0.04-2.6 µg/L) were linear (R > 0.99, n = 10), with interday and intraday calibrator coefficients of variation and bias <17% at the lower limit of quantification and <15% at all other concentrations (n = 6-10). Extraction efficiencies for TAC and ascomycin were approximately 70%, and matrix effects were minimal. Rat kidney TAC concentrations were higher (range 109-190 pg/mg tissue) than those in the liver (range 22-53 pg/mg of tissue), with median tissue/blood concentrations ratios of 72.0 and 17.6, respectively. In 2 transplant patients, kidney TAC concentrations ranged from 119 to 285 pg/mg of tissue and were approximately 20 times higher than whole blood trough TAC concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The method displayed precision and accuracy suitable for application to TAC measurement in human kidney biopsy tissue.

Mass or molar? Recommendations for reporting concentrations of therapeutic drugs.

A working party (WP) from the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists, Australasian Society of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacologists and Toxicologists, Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Royal Australasian College of Physicians recommends the following: *mass units should be used for reporting therapeutic drug concentrations in Australia and New Zealand; and the litre (L) should be used as the denominator when expressing concentration. Examples of these units are mg/L and µg/L Exceptions to these principles include: *drugs for which there is current uniformity of reporting and supporting information using molar units, notably lithium (mmol/L) and methotrexate (µmol/L); *drugs that are also present as endogenous substances, where the units used routinely should continue to be used. This applies to many substances, including minerals (eg, iron; µmol/L), vitamins (eg, vitamin D; nmol/L) and hormones (eg, thyroxine; pmol/L). *drugs for which the denominator is not a 198 of fluid and there is international uniformity of reporting (eg, thiopurine metabolites; per 109 red blood cells). These recommendations relate to drugs that are used therapeutically, whether measured for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes or for assessment of overdose. Other substances, such as drugs of misuse, heavy metals or environmental toxins, were not considered by the WP and are thus not covered by this document. These recommendations should also be applied to other supporting documentation such as published guidelines, journal articles and websites. The implementation of these recommendations in New Zealand is subject to local confirmation.

Measurement of cyclosporine A in rat tissues and human kidney transplant biopsies--a method suitable for small (<1 mg) samples.

Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to individualize cyclosporine A (CsA) dosing after transplantation. However, immunosuppressant concentrations within the graft may better predict clinical outcomes, including toxicity. This study aimed to develop a method suitable for CsA measurement using routine fine-needle biopsy samples. CsA was quantified retrospectively in kidney and liver tissues from 10 rats administered CsA, and 21 core needle kidney biopsies taken from renal transplant patients with suspected graft dysfunction. Dried biopsies were weighed (mean ± SD weights of 0.22 ± 0.18 mg), enzymatically solubilized, and then CsA was extracted and quantified using online 2-dimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The method was linear (r² > 0.997, n = 10), accurate, and precise (quality control and calibrator coefficient of variation and bias <15%), with minimal matrix effects (coefficient of variation and bias <15%). Reproducibility of tissue weight measurements was confirmed by retrospective DNA quantitation, with a significant linear correlation between weight and total DNA concentration (r² = 0.988). In rats, there was a significant linear correlation between CsA concentrations in liver and kidney tissues (r² = 0.996) but there was no correlation between blood (C0) and tissue CsA concentrations (Spearman r = 0.430 and 0.503, P > 0.05). Similarly, in 16 transplant patients, for whom blood CsA concentrations (C2) were available within 1 day of the renal biopsy being performed, there was no significant correlation between CsA concentrations in blood and kidney tissue (Spearman r = 0.168, P > 0.05). In situ CsA measurements acquired using this method could make an easy transition into clinical use due to their retrospective nature and minimal disruption to current clinical protocols and could provide an additional tool for optimizing clinical outcomes in the future.

Effects of aging, renal dysfunction, left ventricular systolic impairment, and weight on steady state pharmacokinetics of perhexiline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients at steady-state on long-term perhexiline were identified retrospectively. The ratio of maintenance dose to steady-state plasma concentration (dose:[Px]) was correlated with the following putative determinants via simple and multiple linear regression analyses: age, weight, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and creatinine clearance (CrCl, Cockroft-Gault formula). A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to determine if severe left ventricular systolic impairment affected maintenance dose. RESULTS: Advanced age, left ventricular systolic impairment, and renal impairment were frequently encountered. Using simple linear regression, age was a negative correlate of dose:[P] (R = 0.23, P = 0.001), whereas weight (R = 0.27, P = 0.0001) and CrCl (R = 0.30, P < 0.0001) were positive correlates. Mann-Whitney U analysis showed no difference between dose: [Px] among patients with LVEF of less than 30% versus 30% or greater. Advancing age was strongly associated with decreasing weight (R = -0.45, P < 0.00001) and calculated CrCl varied directly with weight, as expected (R = 0.66, P < 0.0001). Stepwise multiple linear regression using age, LVEF, CrCl, and weight as potential predictors of dose:[P] yielded only weight as a significant determinant. DISCUSSION: Perhexiline has become a "last-line" agent for refractory angina as a result of complex pharmacokinetics and potential toxicity. Use has increased predictably in the aged and infirm who have exhausted standard medical and surgical therapeutic options. Beyond genotype, the effect of patient characteristics on maintenance dose has not been explored in detail. In this study, dose requirement declined with age in a frail and wasting population as a result of weight-related pharmacokinetic factors. LVEF had no apparent effect on maintenance dose and should not be considered a contraindication to use. CONCLUSION: A weight-adjusted starting dose may facilitate the safe and effective prescription of perhexiline and is calculated by 50 + 2 × weight (kg) mg/d, rounded to the closest 50 mg/day.

Comparison of blood sirolimus, tacrolimus and everolimus concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, HPLC-UV and immunoassay methods.

OBJECTIVES: An LC-MS/MS method was developed for simultaneous quantitation of tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in whole blood, and compared to HPLC-UV and immunoassay methods. DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood (0.1mL) was analysed following solid-phase extraction and chromatographic resolution using a C18 column (45°C) and mobile phase of methanol/40mM ammonium acetate/glacial acetic acid (83/17/0.1) at 200µL/min, with positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-day imprecision and inaccuracy were ≤12.2% over a 1.5-40µg/L calibration range. An external quality assurance programme confirmed acceptable inaccuracy and imprecision of the LC-MS/MS method, but highlighted problems with immunoassay quantitation, particularly for everolimus, showing a >30% bias in FPIA everolimus concentrations measured in pooled patient samples versus spiked drug-free whole blood. CONCLUSIONS: LC-MS/MS provides significant accuracy and precision advantages compared to HPLC and immunoassays. Discrepancies in everolimus concentrations measured by the Seradyn FPIA immunoassay require further investigation.

Current status of therapeutic drug monitoring in Australia and New Zealand: a need for improved assay evaluation, best practice guidelines, and professional development.

The measurement of drug concentrations, for clinical purposes, occurs in many diagnostic laboratories throughout Australia and New Zealand. However, the provision of a comprehensive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service requires the additional elements of pre- and postanalytical advice to ensure that concentrations reported are meaningful, interpretable, and clinically applicable to the individual patient. The aim of this project was to assess the status of TDM services in Australia and New Zealand. A range of professions involved in key aspects of TDM was surveyed by questionnaire in late 2007. Information gathered included: the list of drugs assayed; analytical methods used; interpretation services offered; interpretative methods used; and further monitoring advice provided. Fifty-seven responses were received, of which 42% were from hospitals (public and/or private); 11% a hospital (public and/or private) and pathology provider; and 47% a pathology provider only (public and/or private). Results showed that TDM is applied to a large number of different drugs. Poorly performing assay methods were used in some cases, even when published guidelines recommended alternative practices. Although there was a wide array of assays available, the evidence suggested a need for better selection of assay methods. In addition, only limited advice and/or interpretation of results was offered. Of concern, less than 50% of those providing advice on aminoglycoside dosing in adults used pharmacokinetic tools with six of 37 (16.2%) respondents using Bayesian pharmacokinetic tools, the method recommended in the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic. In conclusion, the survey highlighted deficiencies in the provision of TDM services, in particular assay method selection and both quality and quantity of postanalytical advice. A range of recommendations, some of which may have international implications, are discussed. There is a need to include measures of impact on clinical decision-making when assessing assay methodologies. Best practice guidelines and professional standards of practice in TDM are needed, supported by an active program of professional development to ensure the benefits of TDM are realized. This will require significant partnerships between the various professions involved.

Discordant results from "real-world" patient samples assayed for digoxin.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index and is primarily renally eliminated. To optimize dosing of digoxin, therapeutic drug monitoring has been important since assays became available in the 1970s. Immunoassays are not specific, and cross-reactivity with endogenous and exogenous compounds has been reported for more than 20 years. Interassay concordance has not been investigated in recent years in "real-world" patient samples. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether different digoxin immunoassays produce clinically different results in real-world situations, estimate the frequency of discordance, and determine whether an equation-based estimate compares well with digoxin immunoassays. METHODS: Plasma samples were sent to 2 accredited laboratories simultaneously and the digoxin results were compared. Results of immunoassays conducted using the Cedia DRI Digoxin Assay and the DGNA Digoxin Assay were compared with an equation-based estimate of plasma digoxin concentration. RESULTS: Thirty-six digoxin samples were assayed; in 39% of these, digoxin concentrations were discordant and different dosage adjustments would have followed. The presence of digoxin-like immunoreactive substances may explain some of this discordance. The mean of the equation-based result was similar to the immunoassay results, but marked variability was evident. The DGNA assay produced higher results on 24 samples; 9 higher values occurred with the DRI method. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial digoxin immunoassays frequently produce clinically significant discordant results. The equation-based estimate does not appear to be an acceptable alternative to therapeutic drug monitoring. Immunoassay manufacturers should be required to improve assay performance by including real-world blood samples in development and clinicians should consider digoxin assay results warily.

Seradyn quantitative microsphere system lamotrigine immunoassay on a Hitachi 911 analyzer compared with HPLC-UV.

Lamotrigine (LTG) is used currently as monotherapy or, more frequently, as add-on therapy with other antiepileptic drugs. It demonstrates efficacy against partial seizures, primary and secondary tonic clonic seizures, absence seizures, and drop attacks. LTG pharmacokinetics is complicated by coadministration with other antiepileptic drugs such as valproic acid, phenytoin, or carbamazepine. The wide interpatient variability in LTG dosage required to attain therapeutic plasma LTG concentrations for seizure control suggests that LTG is a good candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). In this study, we compared the quantitative microsphere system (QMS) LTG immunoassay with the LTG high-performance liquid chromatography-ultra violet (HPLC-UV) assay routinely employed for TDM in our laboratory. Samples tested by these methods were patient samples presented for TDM and from a quality assurance program. Quality control material demonstrated within- and between-run (n = 6) coefficient of variation and biases of less than 10%. Patient samples demonstrated a Deming regression of QMS = 1.09 HPLC-UV - 0.17 and quality assurance program samples had a Deming regression of QMS = 1.03 HPLC-UV - 0.11. Patient samples demonstrated a mean bias of 6.1% and quality assurance program samples had a mean bias of 0.2%. The QMS LTG assay had a clinically small but significant overestimation of plasma LTG concentrations. It may be useful as a convenient alternative method that would provide TDM guidance if a chromatographic assay was not available.

Measuring the unbound concentration fails to resolve analytic interferences in digoxin immunoassays.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of digoxin is well established in the clinical management of cardiac patients treated with the drug. Recently, target concentrations have been revised in patients with congestive heart failure to 0.5 to 0.8 microg/L, challenging the sensitivity limits of most immunoassays. These widely used methods are often criticized, particularly on specificity grounds resulting from interference from exogenous and endogenous sources. One solution to remove higher molecular weight interference has been to ultrafilter plasma samples before assaying. The present study included 261 patient digoxin samples and compared two commercial ultrafiltration devices (Centrifree and Micrcon) that share the same separation membrane (YM-30). The results showed widely discordant apparent unbound digoxin concentrations in the ultrafiltrate from these devices with a Deming regression line of Centrifree = 1.31 x Micrcon + 0.042 (95% confidence interval for slope of 1.237 to 1.391) and apparent unbound fractions ranging from 15% to 610% of the unfiltered plasma digoxin concentrations, suggesting that ultrafiltration did not resolve such interference issues. The concept of measuring lower unbound digoxin concentrations as a result of lower therapeutic range for total (bound plus unbound) digoxin will also render most immunoassays insensitive and inappropriately calibrated. There is a strong imperative to review digoxin monitoring practices in the light of current clinical imperatives for both specificity and sensitivity reasons.

Glucuronidation of mycophenolic acid by Wistar and Mrp2-deficient TR- rat liver microsomes.

In humans, mycophenolic acid (MPA) is metabolized primarily by glucuronidation in the liver to mycophenolate ether glucuronide (MPAGe) and mycophenolate acyl glucuronide (MPAGa). We have previously reported that in perfused livers of TR(-) rats (lacking the Mrp2 transporter), the clearance and hepatic extraction ratio of MPA were significantly lower compared with control Wistar rats, suggesting a difference in the capacity of the TR(-) rats to metabolize MPA in situ. There is very little information regarding the phase II metabolic capabilities of TR(-) rats; therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro glucuronidation of MPA in Wistar and TR(-) rat liver microsomal protein. A second aim was to determine whether MPAGa, cyclosporine (CsA), and/or its metabolites AM1, AM1c, and AM9 inhibit the metabolism of MPA to MPAGe in rat liver microsomes. MPAGe formation rates by Wistar and TR(-) microsomes were 0.48 and 0.65 nmol/min/mg, respectively (p = 0.33). K(m) values for control and TR(-) microsomes were 0.47 and 0.50 mM, respectively (p = 0.81). The mean (S.E.M.) ratios of MPAGe formation by Wistar rat liver microsomes incubated with 50 microM MPA plus inhibitor versus 50 microM MPA alone were MPAGa 1.2 (0.1), CsA 0.7 (0.1) (p < 0.05), AM1 2.2 (0.3) (p < 0.05), AM1c 1.2 (0.2), and AM9 1.0 (0.2). Our results suggest that lower in situ glucuronidation of MPA in TR(-) rats may be because of inhibition of glucuronidation by endogenous and exogenous compounds that accumulate in the transporter-deficient rat. Whereas CsA inhibits glucuronidation of MPA, its metabolite AM1 enhances MPAGe formation by rat liver microsomes.

Cloned enzyme donor immunoassay tacrolimus assay compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and microparticle enzyme immunoassay in liver and renal transplant recipients.

The immunosuppressant drug tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and is subject to a large variation in individual bioavailability and clearance. With its narrow therapeutic index, therapeutic drug monitoring is standard clinical practice in the management of transplant recipients. In this study, we report the evaluation of the cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) using samples obtained from liver (n = 100) and renal (n = 88) transplant recipients. Linear regression analysis showed a relationship of CEDIA = 1.24 HPLC-MS/MS -0.18 (r = 0.81). The mean bias (+/-SEM) for all patients when compared with HPLC-MS/MS was 22.2% (+/-2.1%). The precision of the CEDIA method for all samples showed a root mean square error of 3.1 microg/L. Liver transplant recipient samples showed a mean (+/-SEM) bias compared with HPLC-MS/MS of 12.5% (+/-1.6%). The precision of the CEDIA method for these samples showed a root mean square error of 1.5 microg/L. The data suggest that in the renal transplant group, the CEDIA and MEIA methods have a bias of 33.3% and 20.1%, respectively, compared with HPLC-MS/MS. The CEDIA tacrolimus immunoassay has been shown to be a rapid method for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations and may be considered when HPLC-MS/MS is not available. When used in the clinical setting with other parameters, it would be a useful adjunct in the management of liver transplant recipients, but a significant bias in renal transplant patients needs to be further investigated.

Effect of CYP2D6 metabolizer status on the disposition of the (+) and (-) enantiomers of perhexiline in patients with myocardial ischaemia.

AIMS: This study investigated the effects of increasing doses of rac-perhexiline maleate and CYP2D6 phenotype and genotype on the pharmacokinetics of (+) and (-)-perhexiline. METHODS: In a prospective study, steady-state plasma concentrations of (+) and (-)-perhexiline were quantified in 10 CYP2D6 genotyped patients following dosing with 100 mg/day rac-perhexiline maleate, and following a subsequent dosage increase to 150 or 200 mg/day. In a retrospective study, steady-state plasma concentrations of (+) and (-)-perhexiline were obtained from 111 CYP2D6 phenotyped patients receiving rac-perhexiline maleate. RESULTS: In the prospective study, comprising one poor and nine extensive/intermediate metabolizers, the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of both enantiomers increased with the number of functional CYP2D6 genes. In the nine extensive/intermediate metabolizers receiving the 100 mg/day dose, the median CL/F of (+)-perhexiline was lower than that of (-)-perhexiline (352.5 versus 440.6 l/day, P<0.01). Following the dosage increase, the median CL/F of both enantiomers decreased by 45.4 and 41.4%, respectively. In the retrospective study, the median (+)-/(-)-perhexiline plasma concentration ratio was lower (P<0.0001) in phenotypic extensive/intermediate (1.41) versus poor metabolizers (2.29). Median CL/F of (+) and (-)-perhexiline was 10.6 and 24.2 l/day (P<0.05), respectively, in poor metabolizers, and 184.1 and 272.0 l/day (P<0.001), respectively, in extensive/intermediate metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Perhexiline's pharmacokinetics exhibit significant enantioselectivity in CYP2D6 extensive/intermediate and poor metabolizers, with both enantiomers displaying polymorphic and saturable metabolism via CYP2D6. Clinical use of rac-perhexiline may be improved by developing specific enantiomer target plasma concentration ranges.

Safety of 96-hour incision-site continuous infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after bowel cancer resection.

The aim of this study was to examine the safety of ropivacaine given to patients as a continuous infusion [0.2% (2 mg/mL), 5 mL/h for 96 hours] into a right lateral transverse incision using a portable elastomeric infusion pump after colon cancer resection. Blood samples were collected throughout the infusion and up to 12 hours after infusion and were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for total and unbound ropivacaine concentrations in plasma. Alpha1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations were measured at 0 and 48 hours to assess possible changes in ropivacaine protein binding after surgery. Postoperative pain control was assessed using 12 hour visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using fentanyl was freely available in parallel for breakthrough pain, with usage and consumption compared with a historical cohort. The mean +/- SD Cmax total plasma ropivacaine concentration (n = 5) from 12 hours to the end of the infusion was 4.5 +/- 2.6 mg/L, comparable with the previously published threshold for CNS toxicity in the most sensitive patient studied (3.4 mg/L). However, the corresponding maximum unbound ropivacaine concentration (ie, the pharmacologically active moiety) of 0.07 +/- 0.01 mg/L ranged from four- to sevenfold below the reported toxicity threshold (0.34 mg/L). The apparently greater safety margin seen with unbound ropivacaine may have resulted from a significant increase (mean 63%, P < 0.05) in AAG concentrations measured at 48 hours after surgery. This reduction resulted from the known AAG reaction after surgical intervention, resulting in a reducing unbound ropivacaine fraction throughout the 96 hour infusion in all patients. Mean subjective 12 hour pain scale scores at rest and on movement showed large variability between patients. No signs or symptoms of ropivacaine toxicity were observed or reported on questioning. In this limited sample, extending the infusion period from the presently approved 48 hours to 96 hours seems to be a safe alternative and/or adjunct to standard opiate analgesia after colorectal surgery using a right lateral transverse incision, hence reducing the incidence of opiate adverse effects and enhancing recovery. Unbound ropivacaine concentrations suggest there is scope for testing elevated doses to enhance efficacy further.

CEDIA mycophenolic acid assay compared with HPLC-UV in specimens from transplant recipients.

Routine monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA) has been accepted as an essential tool in the management of this therapy in transplant recipients. The availability of simple, sensitive assays that measure MPA in plasma permits individualization of dosing regimens according to pharmacokinetic principles. We report the results of an evaluation of the CEDIA Mycophenolic Acid Immunoassay (Microgenics Corporation, Fremont, California) for the measurement of plasma MPA concentrations in a range of transplant indications and compare its performance and specificity to an established HPLC/UV method. Precision and accuracy were determined both within and between runs using the quality control materials provided with the CEDIA MPA assay, which produced within run (n = 21) coefficients of variation (CV%) and biases of less than 5%. The between run analyses, performed over consecutive days following daily calibration of the assay, showed CVs and biases of less than 7%. Routine patient samples (n = 298) from 142 patients of varying transplant type were analyzed using the CEDIA MPA kit and HPLC/UV methods. Regression analysis of the patient samples gave an equation of CEDIA = 1.18 HPLC/UV + 0.45 (r = 0.83). According to the manufacturer's product information, there is 192% cross reactivity with the active mycophenolate acyl glucuronide. The data presented suggest that the CEDIA MPA immunoassay, run on the Hitachi 911 analyzer, over-estimates plasma MPA concentrations with a magnitude that is influenced by transplant type. Hence, users must interpret the immunoassay results with caution and not assume that the metabolite fraction is constant in recipients of the same organ type or in different organ transplant populations.