Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
2.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 57(10): 1507-1513, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35768571

ABSTRACT

The Myeloma X trial provided a platform to explore genetics in relation to systematic assessment of patient-reported outcomes at key points during salvage treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Blood DNA was obtained in 191 subjects for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. By univariable analysis, the non-coding rs2562456 SNP, upstream of LINC00664, was associated with several relevant pain and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) scores at 100 days after allocation to consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation or weekly cyclophosphamide. Presence of the minor (C) allele was associated with lower pain interference (p = 0.014) and HRQoL pain (p = 0.003), and higher HRQoL global health status (p = 0.011) and physical functioning (p = 0.007). These effects were not modified by treatment arm and were no longer significant at 6 months. Following induction therapy, the rs13361160 SNP near the CCT5 and FAM173B genes was associated with higher global health (p = 0.027) and physical functioning (p = 0.013). This exploratory study supports associations between subjective parameters in MM with SNPs previously identified in genome-wide association studies of pain. Conversely, SNPs in candidate genes involved in opioid and transporter pathways showed no effect. Further studies are warranted in well-defined cancer populations, and potentially assisted by whole genome sequencing with germline analysis in routine diagnostics in haematological cancers.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Analgesics, Opioid , Cyclophosphamide , DNA , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pain , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Transplantation, Autologous , United Kingdom
5.
Oncogene ; 39(27): 5001-5014, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32523091

ABSTRACT

Proteasome inhibitors have provided a significant advance in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Consequently, there is increasing interest in developing strategies to target E3 ligases, de-ubiquitinases, and/or ubiquitin receptors within the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, with an aim to achieve more specificity and reduced side-effects. Previous studies have shown a role for the E3 ligase HUWE1 in modulating c-MYC, an oncogene frequently dysregulated in MM. Here we investigated HUWE1 in MM. We identified elevated expression of HUWE1 in MM compared with normal cells. Small molecule-mediated inhibition of HUWE1 resulted in growth arrest of MM cell lines without significantly effecting the growth of normal bone marrow cells, suggesting a favorable therapeutic index. Studies using a HUWE1 knockdown model showed similar growth inhibition. HUWE1 expression positively correlated with MYC expression in MM bone marrow cells and correspondingly, genetic knockdown and biochemical inhibition of HUWE1 reduced MYC expression in MM cell lines. Proteomic identification of HUWE1 substrates revealed a strong association of HUWE1 with metabolic processes in MM cells. Intracellular glutamine levels are decreased in the absence of HUWE1 and may contribute to MYC degradation. Finally, HUWE1 depletion in combination with lenalidomide resulted in synergistic anti-MM activity in both in vitro and in vivo models. Taken together, our data demonstrate an important role of HUWE1 in MM cell growth and provides preclinical rationale for therapeutic strategies targeting HUWE1 in MM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Lenalidomide/pharmacology , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Female , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, SCID , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Therapeutic Index, Drug , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics , Ubiquitination/drug effects
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(19): 1617-1628, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30969846

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (sASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after a prior autologous stem-cell transplantation leads to increased remission duration and overall survival. We report a comprehensive study on patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL) and pain in sASCT. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either sASCT or nontransplantation consolidation (NTC). Pain and QoL were assessed as secondary outcomes using validated QoL instruments (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and myeloma-specific module, QLQ-MY20; the Brief Pain Inventory [Short Form]; and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [Self-Assessment] scale). RESULTS: A total of 288 patients (> 96%) consented to the QoL substudy. The median follow-up was 52 months. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 Global health status scores were higher (better) in the NTC group at 100 days after random assignment (P = .0496), but not at later time points. Pain interference was higher (worse) in the sASCT group than in the NTC group at 6 months after random assignment (P = .0267), with patients with sASCT reporting higher scores for Pain interference with daily living for up to 2 years after random assignment. Patients reporting lower concerns about adverse effects of treatment after sASCT had a time to progression advantage. CONCLUSION: Patients with sASCT with relapsed MM demonstrated a comparative reduction in QoL and greater impact of treatment adverse effects lasting for 6 months and up to 2 years for pain, after which patients who had received sASCT reported better outcomes. Patients who experienced lower adverse effects after sASCT had longer time to progression and overall survival, showing the need to improve symptom management peritransplantation. To our knowledge, this study provides the most comprehensive picture of QoL before and after sASCT in patients with relapsed MM.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life , Remission Induction , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , Salvage Therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome
7.
Br J Haematol ; 185(3): 450-467, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30729512

ABSTRACT

The Myeloma X trial (ISCRTN60123120) registered patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Participants were randomised between salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or weekly cyclophosphamide following re-induction therapy. Cytogenetic analysis performed at trial registration defined t(4;14), t(14;16) and del(17p) as high-risk. The effect of cytogenetics on time to progression (TTP) and overall survival was investigated. At 76 months median follow-up, ASCT improved TTP compared to cyclophosphamide (19 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 16-26) vs. 11 months (9-12), hazard ratio [HR]: 0·40, 95% CI: 0·29-0·56, P < 0·001), on which the presence of any single high-risk lesion had a detrimental impact [likelihood ratio test (LRT): P = 0·011]. ASCT also improved OS [67 months (95% CI 59-not reached) vs. 55 months (44-67), HR: 0·64, 95% CI: 0·42-0·99, P = 0·0435], with evidence of a detrimental impact with MYC rearrangement (LRT: P = 0·021). Twenty-one (24·7%) cyclophosphamide patients received an ASCT post-trial, median OS was not reached (95% CI: 39-not reached) for these participants compared to 31 months (22-39), in those who did not receive a post-trial ASCT. The analysis further supports the benefit of salvage ASCT, which may still be beneficial after second relapse in surviving patients. There is evidence that this benefit reduces in cytogenetic high-risk patients, highlighting the need for targeted study in this patient group.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14/ultrastructure , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/ultrastructure , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17/ultrastructure , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4/genetics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4/ultrastructure , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Salvage Therapy , Sequence Deletion , Translocation, Genetic , Transplantation, Autologous
8.
Lancet Haematol ; 3(7): e340-51, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27374467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Myeloma X trial previously reported improved durability of response (time to disease progression) in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma with salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) compared with oral cyclophosphamide in patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after a first ASCT. We report the final overall survival results of the trial. METHODS: BSBMT/UKMF Myeloma X was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 51 centres in the UK. Eligible patients with multiple myeloma relapsing after a previous ASCT were re-induced with intravenous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, 11), intravenous doxorubicin (9 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-4), and oral dexamethasone (40 mg/day on days 1-4, 8-11, and 15-18 during cycle 1 and days 1-4 during cycles 2-4), with supportive care as per local institutional protocols before randomisation in a 1:1 ratio to either high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) and salvage ASCT or weekly oral cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m(2) per week for 12 weeks). Randomisation was by permuted blocks stratified by length of first remission and response to re-induction treatment. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression; the study was also powered to detect a difference in the secondary endpoint, overall survival. Further secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving an objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, toxic effects and safety, pain, and quality of life. Prespecified exploratory endpoints included time to second objective disease progression (PFS2). Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00747877, and the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2006-005890-24, and is now in long-term follow-up. FINDINGS: Between April 16, 2008, and Nov 19, 2012, 297 patients were registered into the study and 174 were randomly assigned to receive either high-dose melphalan and salvage ASCT (n=89) or oral weekly cyclophosphamide (n=85). 173 (58%) of 297 patients relapsed after more than 24 months from first ASCT. 75 (43%) of 174 randomised patients had died at follow-up: salvage ASCT (n=31 [35%]) versus oral weekly cyclophosphamide (n=44 [52%]). Updated time to disease progression shows continued advantage in the salvage ASCT group compared with the weekly cyclophosphamide group (19 months [95% CI 16-26] vs 11 months [9-12]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·31-0·64] log-rank p<0·0001). Median overall survival was superior in the salvage ASCT group compared with weekly cyclophosphamide group (67 months [95% CI 55-not estimable] vs 52 months [42-60]; log-rank p=0·022; HR 0·56 [0·35-0·90], p=0·0169). Time to second objective disease progression was superior in the salvage ASCT group compared with the weekly cyclophosphamide group (67 months [52-not estimable] vs 35 months [31-43]; HR 0·37 [0·24-0·57], log-rank p<0·0001). During extended follow-up, no further treatment-related or treatment-unrelated adverse events were reported. 15 second primary malignancies were reported in 12 patients (salvage ASCT [n=7] vs oral weekly cyclophosphamide [n=5]). The cumulative incidence of second primary malignancies at 60 months after trial entry was 5·2% (2·1-8·2). INTERPRETATION: Salvage ASCT increases overall survival during consolidation of re-induction treatment in patients with multiple myeloma at first relapse after a first ASCT. The delay of salvage ASCT to third-line treatment or later might not confer the same degree of advantage as seen with salvage ASCT at first relapse. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Janssen-Cilag, and Chugai Pharma UK.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Salvage Therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Autologous
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 15(8): 874-85, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24948586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Relapsed multiple myeloma has no standard treatment, and the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has not been fully defined. We aimed to compare high-dose melphalan plus salvage ASCT with cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had previously undergone ASCT. METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study recruited patients aged at least 18 years with multiple myeloma who needed treatment for first progressive or relapsed disease at least 18 months after a previous ASCT from 51 centres across the UK. Before randomisation, eligible patients received bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) induction therapy and then underwent peripheral blood stem-cell mobilisation and harvesting if applicable. Eligible patients (with adequate stem-cell harvest) were randomly assigned (1:1), using an automated telephone randomisation line, to either high-dose melphalan 200 mg/m(2) plus salvage ASCT or oral cyclophosphamide (400mg/m(2) per week for 12 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by length of first remission or plateau and response to PAD re-induction therapy. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00747877, and EudraCT, number 2006-005890-24. FINDINGS: Between April 16, 2008, and Nov 19, 2012, 297 patients were registered, of whom 293 received PAD re-induction therapy. Between Aug 26, 2008, and Nov 16, 2012, 174 patients with sufficient PBSCs were randomised to salvage ASCT (n=89) or cyclophosphamide (n=85). After a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 19-42), median time to progression was significantly longer in the salvage ASCT than in the cyclophosphamide group (19 months [95% CI 16-25] vs 11 months [9-12]; hazard ratio 0·36 [95% CI 0·25-0·53]; p<0·0001). Frequently reported (in >10% of patients) grade 3-4 adverse events with PAD induction, salvage ASCT, and cyclophosphamide were: neutropenia (125 [43%] of 293 patients after PAD, and 63 [76%] of 83 patients in the salvage ASCT group vs 11 [13%] of 84 patients in the cyclophosphamide group), thrombocytopenia (150 [51%] after PAD, and 60 [72%] vs four [5%], respectively), and peripheral neuropathy (35 [12%] after PAD, and none vs none, respectively). INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence for the improved efficacy of high-dose melphalan plus salvage ASCT when compared with cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for intensive therapy, which might help to guide clinical decisions regarding the management of such patients. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Consolidation Chemotherapy/methods , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Salvage Therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Bortezomib , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Disease Progression , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Proportional Hazards Models , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Retreatment , Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous
11.
J Leukoc Biol ; 88(4): 807-11, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20643815

ABSTRACT

Lymphocytes have long been established to play an important role in the regulation of hematopoiesis and produce many cytokines that act on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Previous studies by our group have shown that normal, unstimulated lymphocytes produce a protein that inhibits normal bone marrow GM colony formation. Adiponectin is an adipokine that has been demonstrated to act as a negative regulator of hematopoiesis and immune function. This study aimed to determine if the inhibitory molecule that we described previously was adiponectin. Here, we show transcription, translation, and secretion of adiponectin from lymphocytes and demonstrate that its receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, are expressed by bone marrow MNCs. We show that although the adiponectin expression is low in lymphocytes, it is sufficient to induce a significant inhibitory effect on GM precursors (CFU-GM) and activate the AMPK pathway in these cells. The regulation of adiponectin production by lymphocytes and its detailed function in suppressing GM colony formation need to be elucidated now. Our findings suggest a functional role for adiponectin as a negative regulator of granulopoiesis.


Subject(s)
Adiponectin/metabolism , Granulocytes/cytology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Leukopoiesis/physiology , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Bone Marrow Cells/cytology , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Granulocytes/metabolism , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Immunoblotting , Receptors, Adiponectin/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
14.
Cancer Res ; 66(12): 6379-86, 2006 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16778216

ABSTRACT

The 26S proteasome is a multicatalytic protease responsible for regulated intracellular protein degradation. Its function is mediated by three main catalytic activities: (a) chymotrypsin-like (CT-L), (b) trypsin-like, and (c) peptidylglutamyl peptide hydrolysing (PGPH). Proteasome inhibition is an emerging therapy for many cancers and is a novel treatment for multiple myeloma. Here, we profile the contributions of the three catalytic activities in multiple myeloma cell lines and compare the specificity and cytotoxicity of the novel proteasome inhibitor BzLLLCOCHO and inhibitors PS-341 (Velcade, bortezomib) and MG-132. Using fluorogenic substrates and an active site-directed probe specific for proteasome catalytic subunits, we show differential subunit specificity for each of the inhibitors. Addition of BzLLLCOCHO strongly inhibited all three catalytic activities, treatment with PS-341 completely inhibited CT-L and PGPH activities, and treatment with MG-132 resulted in weak inhibition of the CT-L and PGPH activities. Multiple myeloma cells were more sensitive to induction of apoptosis by PS-341 and MG-132 than BzLLLCOCHO. This study emphasizes the need for further investigation of the effects of these compounds on gene and protein expression in the cell to allow for the development of more specific and targeted inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proteasome Inhibitors , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/physiology , Boronic Acids/pharmacology , Bortezomib , Catalysis , Cell Line, Tumor , Glyoxal/analogs & derivatives , Glyoxal/pharmacology , HeLa Cells , Humans , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Leucine/pharmacology , Leupeptins/pharmacology , Oligopeptides/pharmacology , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Substrate Specificity
16.
Hematol J ; 5(2): 181-5, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15048070

ABSTRACT

Clinical uses for recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy continue to expand. Initial use was in anaemia associated with end-stage renal disease, but more recently there have been many reports of the benefits of erythropoietin in other clinical situations such as cancer-related anaemia. Recombinant erythropoietin reduces the need for blood transfusion and hence exposure to donor blood products as well as improving quality of life. We report four patients who were transfusion dependent, none of whom had licensed indications for the use of recombinant erythropoietin. Two patients had microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia secondary to mechanical valve haemolysis and were unsuitable for any further cardiac intervention. One patient had anaemia of chronic disease and anti-Vel red cell antibodies, making compatible blood transfusions difficult to obtain. The fourth patient had primary thrombocythaemia and developed transfusion-dependent anaemia secondary to myelosuppressive agents. All four patients had a relative deficiency in endogenous erythropoietin levels ranging between 7 and 41 IU/l. After commencing recombinant erythropoietin therapy, all had a response in haemoglobin of at least 1 g/dl with an overall improvement in their quality of life. We conclude that rHuEPO is a very convenient and useful form of treatment in transfusion-dependent anaemia and in some cases beyond the licensed indications.


Subject(s)
Anemia/drug therapy , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anemia/blood , Anemia/chemically induced , Anemia/etiology , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Group Antigens , Drug Approval , Female , Hemolysis , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Recombinant Proteins , Transfusion Reaction
17.
Br J Haematol ; 117(3): 646-9, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12028037

ABSTRACT

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) levels were studied in 23 patients (10 myeloma, 13 relapsed Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or germ cell tumours), post autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). The two groups had similar previous chemotherapy and numbers of CD34+ cells transplanted. All patients received G-CSF by injection starting 8 d post transplantation. Twenty out of 23 patients showed raised endogenous levels of G-CSF before cytokine administration. Myeloma patients showed significantly lower levels of endogenous G-CSF than the other patients (0.767 versus 3.262 ng/ml, P < 0.05). Further rises in G-CSF levels were seen following the administration of exogenous G-CSF which then fell, despite ongoing administration of G-CSF, as neutrophil recovery occurred.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/blood , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/therapeutic use , Hodgkin Disease/blood , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/blood , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/blood , Testicular Neoplasms/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...