SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Advancements in the Microbiome.

The microbiome plays a major role in human physiology by influencing obesity, inducing inflammation, and impacting cancer therapies. During the 60th Annual Meeting of the Society of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT) at the State-of-the-Art Conference, experts in the field discussed the influence of the microbiome. This paper is a summary of the influence of the microbiome on obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatic cancer, cancer therapies, and gastrointestinal optimization. This review shows how the microbiome plays an important role in the development of diseases and surgical complications. Future studies are needed in targeting the gut microbiome to develop individualized therapies.

Patient views through the keyhole: new perspectives on single-incision vs. multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) may be associated with less pain, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results than multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC). Advocates suggest that patients prefer SILC, although research directly addressing the question of patient preferences is limited. This study aimed to assess patient preferences using currently available evidence. METHODS: Patients awaiting elective cholecystectomy were shown a series of postoperative images taken after SILC or MLC and asked which procedure this led them to prefer. This was repeated after patients had completed a questionnaire constructed using published objective data comparing patient-reported outcomes of SILC and MLC. RESULTS: The study was completed by 113 consecutive patients. After their initial viewing of the images, 16% of subjects preferred MLC. Younger age, lower body mass index and female sex were associated with choosing SILC. After completing the questionnaire, 88% of patients preferred MLC (P < 0.001). Patients ranked the level of risk for complications and postoperative pain above cosmetic results in determining their choice of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' initial preference when presented with cosmetic appearance was for SILC. When contemporary outcome data were included, the majority chose MLC. This underlines the need to fully inform patients during the consent process and indicates that patient views of SILC may differ from the views of those introducing the technology.

Patients with non-diagnostic hyperamylasaemia must be investigated and managed as per acute pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The identification of hyperamylasaemia insufficient to confidently diagnose acute pancreatitis in patients with epigastric pain poses a clinical dilemma. The aim of this study was to identify a cohort of such patients and review their presentation, investigation and outcome. DESIGN: Patients admitted through the emergency surgical intake during a 12-month period with serum amylase levels of 100-400 IU/L were identified and case notes reviewed to confirm those presenting with upper abdominal pain. Subsequent radiological and biochemical investigations were recorded. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 25 patients with non-diagnostic hyperamylasaemia. SETTING: Ward patients in a University Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Amylase level, eventual diagnosis, drug history. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified with a mean age of 46.7 years. The median serum amylase level was 230 IU/L (range 102-358 IU/L). Twenty-two patients underwent transabdominal ultrasound at presentation, with gallstones identified in nine cases. The remaining three had documented gallstones and were awaiting elective cholecystectomy. Of the 13 patients with no evidence of cholelithiasis, six were taking medications known to cause pancreatitis, seven patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans that identified chronic pancreatitis in three, and were non-diagnostic in four cases. These four patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation of the biliary tree identifying microlithiasis in one but no pathology in the remaining three cases. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hyperamylasaemia not diagnostic of pancreatitis should be carefully investigated, as gallstones will be identified in at least 50%. An accurate drug history is also invaluable.

Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava: clinical experience with four cases.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava is a rare tumor that presents in an insidious manner with non-specific symptoms. Given its rarity, there are no consensus guidelines to its management. The aim of this study was to report the clinical experience in the management of patients presenting to our institution during a 12 year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with leiomyosarcomas of the inferior vena cava were managed at our institution during the period reviewed. Patient details were identified through a search of the pathology department computerized database, and case notes were retrospectively reviewed to obtain details of presentation and management. RESULTS: There were 3 females and 1 male with a mean age of 59 years. All tumors were identified within 2 months of first symptoms. Three of the 4 had localized tumors whilst 1 patient had lung metastases at presentation. The three patients with resectable tumors underwent radical surgical excision of the tumor, and two patients had postoperative radiotherapy. One patient died of recurrence at 7 months, and another at 30 months. The third patient is currently well and disease free at 16 months. The fourth patient with metastatic disease was treated with chemotherapy alone and survived 36 months. CONCLUSION: Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava is an uncommon tumor that presents with non-specific symptoms. At the time of presentation, tumors are usually large and resection is challenging but probably offers the best opportunity for long-term survival.

Upper gastrointestinal complications after renal transplantation: a 3-yr sequential study.

BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal complications have historically resulted in considerable morbidity and mortality to renal transplant recipients. Over the last decade, antiulcer prophylaxis with proton-pump inhibitors and immunosuppression with tacrolimus-based regimes have been introduced. Little has been written about foregut complications after renal transplantation since the use of these agents. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of upper gastrointestinal complications after renal transplantation in patients treated with (i) omeprazole vs. ranitidine, and (ii) tacrolimus vs. cyclosporin based immunosuppression. METHODS: Information on 236 patients undergoing renal transplantation between January 1996 and December 1998 was collected prospectively onto a computerized database. RESULTS: Overall, 20 patients (8%) developed upper gastrointestinal complications, opportunistic infections accounted for 9/20 (45%). No patient developed gastroduodenal ulceration, required laparotomy, suffered graft loss or died. There was no significant difference in the frequency of complications between patients that received antisecretory therapy with omeprazole (9/118, 8%) and those that received ranitidine (11/118, 9%), nor between those that were on tacrolimus (7/101, 7%) and those on cyclosporin (13/135, 10%) based immunosuppression regimes. Patients that developed foregut complications were significantly older than those not developing complications (mean age 50 vs. 43 yrs, p=0.05). Further, patients that developed opportunistic infections were more frequently diabetic than those in whom opportunistic infections were not seen (4/31, 13% vs. 5/205, 2%), p=0.02. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a low frequency (8%) of upper gastrointestinal tract complications after renal transplantation. There was no difference in the frequency of complications between patients on tacrolimus and those on cyclosporin based immunosuppression. Furthermore, the complication rates were similar in those that received omeprazole and those that received ranitidine as antiulcer prophylaxis, indicating the equivalence of these two agents in this setting.