Factors associated with tracheostomy-associated infection treatment: A multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize factors that influence the decision to treat suspected pediatric bacterial tracheostomy-associated respiratory infections (bTRAINs; e.g., pneumonia, tracheitis). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study of children with pre-existing tracheostomy hospitalized at six children's hospitals for a suspected bTRAIN (receipt of respiratory culture plus ≥1 doses of an antibiotic within 48 h). The primary predictor was respiratory culture growth categorized as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. aeruginosa + ≥1 other bacterium, other bacteria alone, or normal flora/no growth. Our primary outcome was bTRAIN treatment with a complete course of antibiotics as documented by the discharge team. We used logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to identify the association between our primary predictor and outcome and to identify demographic, clinical, and diagnostic testing factors associated with treatment. RESULTS: Of the 440 admissions among 289 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 307 (69.8%) had positive respiratory culture growth. Overall, 237 (53.9%) of admissions resulted in bTRAIN treatment. Relative to a negative culture, a culture positive for P. aeruginosa plus ≥1 other organism (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-5.0)] or ≥1 other organism alone (aOR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.4-5.6)] was associated with treatment. Several clinical and diagnostic testing (respiratory Gram-stain and chest radiograph) findings were also associated with treatment. Positive respiratory viral testing was associated with reduced odds of treatment (aOR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Positive respiratory cultures as well as clinical indicators of acute illness and nonculture test results were associated with bTRAIN treatment. Clinicians may be more comfortable withholding antibiotics when a virus is identified during testing.

Frequency of Treatment Failure of UTIs in Children With Congenital Urinary Tract Anomalies.

OBJECTIVES: Children with certain congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and neurogenic bladder (CAKUT/NGB) are at higher risk of treatment failure for urinary tract infections (UTIs) than children with normal genitourinary anatomy, but the literature describing treatment and outcomes is limited. The objectives of this study were to describe the rate of treatment failure in children with CAKUT/NGB and compare duration of antibiotics between those with and without treatment failure. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort of children 0 to 17 years old with CAKUT/NGB who presented to the emergency department with fever or hypothermia and were diagnosed with UTI between 2017 and 2018. The outcome of interest was treatment failure, defined as subsequent emergency department visit or hospitalization for UTI because of the same pathogen within 30 days of the index encounter. Descriptive statistics and univariates analyses were used to compare covariates between groups. RESULTS: Of the 2014 patient encounters identified, 482 were included. Twenty-nine (6.0%) of the 482 included encounters had treatment failure. There was no difference in the mean duration of intravenous antibiotics (3.4 ± 2.5 days, 3.5 ± 2.8 days, P = .87) or total antibiotics between children with and without treatment failure (10.2 ± 3.8 days, 10.8 ± 4.0 days, P = .39) Of note, there was a higher rate of bacteremia in children with treatment failure (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In children with CAKUT/NGB and UTI, 6.0% of encounters had treatment failure. Duration of antibiotics was not associated with treatment failure. Larger studies are needed to assess whether bacteremia modifies the risk of treatment failure.

Noninvasive Respiratory Support for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) for pediatric critical asthma includes CPAP; bi-level positive airway pressure (BPAP); and heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). We used the Virtual Pediatric System database to estimate NRS by prescribing rates for pediatric critical asthma and characterize patient clinical features and in-patient outcomes by the initial NRS device applied. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study from 125 participating pediatric ICUs among children 2-17 years of age hospitalized for critical asthma and prescribed NRS from 2017 through 2021. The primary outcomes were NRS modality prescribing rates and trends. Secondary outcomes were descriptive and included demographics, comorbidities, severity of illness indices, and NRS failure rates (defined as escalation from the initial NRS modality to invasive ventilation, HFNC to BPAP or CPAP, or CPAP to BPAP). RESULTS: Of the 10,083 encounters studied, the initial NRS modalities prescribed varied widely by hospital center (HFNC: 69.7 ± 29.6%; BPAP: 27.2 ± 7.1%; CPAP: 3.1 ± 5.9%). The mean rates of HFNC use increased from 59.7% in 2017 to 71.9% in 2021 (+2.5%/y). In contrast, BPAP (-1.6%/y) and CPAP (-0.8%/y) utilization declined throughout the study period. Older children who were obese and with a higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality III-Probability of Mortality score were more frequently prescribed BPAP and CPAP compared with HFNC. Those children on HFNC experienced higher noninvasive respiratory support failure rates versus BPAP (7.3% vs 2.4%; P < .001) but a lower subsequent invasive ventilation rate versus BPAP (0.8% vs 2.4%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multi-center cohort study, we observed that children with critical asthma are increasingly exposed to HFNC compared with BPAP and CPAP. Rates of HFNC failure were greater than those of BPAP failure, but a majority were transitioned to BPAP without subsequent invasive ventilation. The next steps include prospective trials, including practical end points such as patient comfort and optimal delivery of nebulized treatments to distinguish device superiority and suitable NRS utilization.

Comparison of Caregiver and Provider Food Insecurity Screening Preferences Within a Health System.

Food insecurity is a public health concern associated with poor health. Evidence guiding how to best implement screening for food insecurity across a pediatric health care system is lacking. We performed a single-center, multi-department, cross-sectional study of caregivers and health care providers in outpatient and inpatient settings to describe the beliefs, barriers, preferences, and preferred food insecurity screening location. Most providers and caregivers underestimated the pervasiveness of food insecurity while acknowledging the benefit of screening. Caregivers are overall receptive to food insecurity screening and disagree with feelings of discomfort or shame when disclosing food insecurity status. Providers acknowledged perceived caregiver discomfort, lack of community food resources, and lack of a validated screening tool as barriers to screening. Both caregivers and providers identified the primary care setting as the preferred screening setting.

Optimal Donor Allograft Function: The Search for the Lowest Acceptable Donor Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Pediatric Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The availability of heart donors is limited by organ shortage. Due to concerns of reduced survival, donors with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) have been cautiously used in pediatric heart transplantation. One strategy to expand the donor pool is to re-evaluate whether lower donor LVEF may be acceptable for transplantation. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients <18 y receiving heart transplants from April 2007 to September 2021 using the United Network of Organ Sharing dataset. We excluded retransplants and multiorgan transplants. Cut-point analyses of LVEF was performed and Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare 1-y survival for new cut-points and the standard (LVEF >50%). RESULTS: The analytic sample consisted of 5255 patients. Recipients receiving hearts with lower LVEFs were more likely to be on ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Recipients did not differ in waitlist times or transplant status. Cut-point analysis identified LVEF 45% as a potentially new cutoff. One-year survival of recipients of donors with LVEF ≥45% (92.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3%-92.8%) was similar to that of LVEF >50% (92.1%; CI, 91.4%-92.9%). Survival for the LVEF 45%-49% (88.8%; CI, 72.9%-95.7%) cohort was slightly lower than the ≥50% cohort, albeit nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival among pediatric heart transplants using a donor heart LVEF threshold of 45% or 40% was similar to a threshold of 50%. However, the finding is based on a small number of patients with LVEF <50%, and future larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm the findings of this study before a lower LVEF threshold is considered.

Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Rounds on an Academic Inpatient Pediatric Unit.

OBJECTIVES: Virtual rounds enable remote participation in bedside clinical encounters. Their effects on education remain poorly characterized and limited by lack of foundational evidence establishing that this approach is welcomed among learners and educators. We assessed technical feasibility and acceptability of incorporating video conferencing into daily work rounds of pediatric residents and attending physicians. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study of attending observers and pediatric residents participating in rounds both at the bedside and via video teleconferencing from September to December 2020. Participant experiences were assessed and summarized using parametric Likert-type questions regarding technical issues, efficiency, educational experience, and engagement. Associations between technical aspects and individual perceptions of virtual rounds and self-reported engagement were also measured. RESULTS: Of 75 encounters, 29% experienced technical issues, 45% of which were attributable to a low-quality tablet stand. Negative impacts of virtual rounding on efficiency were reported in 6% of responses. Virtual participants were engaged (70%) and reported educational value for 65% of encounters. Comfort with virtually asking questions (odds ratio 3.3; 95% confidence interval 2.0-5.7) and performing clinical tasks for other patients (odds ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9) were associated with engagement (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual participation in rounds was technically feasible and maintained educational value and engagement for residents in the majority of encounters, without sacrificing efficiency. Even as restrictions from the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are lifted, this rounding model has many important applications, including increasing educational opportunities for remote learners and making multidisciplinary rounds more accessible.

Performance Characteristics of a Machine-Learning Tool to Predict 7-Day Hospital Readmissions.

OBJECTIVES: To develop an institutional machine-learning (ML) tool that utilizes demographic, socioeconomic, and medical information to stratify risk for 7-day readmission after hospital discharge; assess the validity and reliability of the tool; and demonstrate its discriminatory capacity to predict readmissions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a combined single-center, cross-sectional, and prospective study of pediatric hospitalists assessing the face and content validity of the developed readmission ML tool. The cross-sectional analyses used data from questionnaire Likert scale responses regarding face and content validity. Prospectively, we compared the discriminatory capacity of provider readmission risk versus the ML tool to predict 7-day readmissions assessed via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 80% (15 of 20) of hospitalists reported being somewhat to very confident with their ability to accurately predict readmission risk; 53% reported that an ML tool would influence clinical decision-making (face validity). The ML tool variable exhibiting the highest content validity was history of previous 7-day readmission. Prospective provider assessment of risk of 413 discharges showed minimal agreement with the ML tool (κ = 0.104 [95% confidence interval 0.028-0.179]). Both provider gestalt and ML calculations poorly predicted 7-day readmissions (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.67 vs 0.52; P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: An ML tool for predicting 7-day hospital readmissions after discharge from the general pediatric ward had limited face and content validity among pediatric hospitalists. Both provider and ML-based determinations of readmission risk were of limited discriminatory value. Before incorporating similar tools into real-time discharge planning, model calibration efforts are needed.

Heliox Prescribing Trends for Pediatric Critical Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Children with asthma exacerbations requiring pediatric ICU (PICU) admission, known as critical asthma (CA), are prescribed a variety of therapeutic interventions including heliox. Delivered invasively and noninvasively, heliox is employed to enhance deposition of aerosolized medications, improve obstructive pulmonary pathophysiology, and avoid complications associated with invasive mechanical ventilation. We used the Virtual Pediatric Systems database to update estimates of heliox prescription and explore for relationships between heliox and mechanical ventilation frequency and duration. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from 97 PICUs among children 3-17 y of age admitted for CA from 2013-2019. The primary outcome was heliox prescribing rates and trends. Subgroup analyses assessed mechanical ventilation rates and duration by heliox exposure. RESULTS: Of 43,238 subjects studied, 1,070 (2.5%) were prescribed heliox. Mean heliox prescribing rates fell from 4.11% in 2013 to 2.37% in 2019. Heliox use was greater from centers in the South (2.6%) and Midwest (3.3%) as compared to the West (1.6%) and Northeast United States (1.6%, P < .001). In the subgroup assessing mechanical ventilation frequency, mechanical ventilation rates were 273/39,739 (0.7%) and greater for those provided heliox (1.9% vs 0.7%, P < .001). In the subgroup assessing mechanical ventilation duration, no differences in median mechanical ventilation duration were observed (4.94 [interquartile range [IQR] 3.04-6.36] vs 4.63 [IQR 3.11-7.30] d; P = .35) for those with and without heliox. In exploratory adjusted models, noninvasive heliox was not associated with mechanical ventilation. Mortality was rare (206/43,238 [0.47%]) and predominantly among subjects intubated prehospitalization (188/206 [91.3%]). CONCLUSIONS: Heliox as adjunctive therapy for children with CA is uncommon (2.5%) and not associated with mechanical ventilation or decreased mechanical ventilation duration in adjusted models. Updated estimates provided herein inform prospective controlled trial development to better define the role of heliox for CA.

Enoxaparin Thromboprophylaxis in Children Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis among pediatric patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. We sought to evaluate safety, dose-finding, and preliminary efficacy of twice-daily enoxaparin as primary thromboprophylaxis among children hospitalized for symptomatic COVID-19, including primary respiratory infection and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MISC). METHODS: We performed a phase 2, multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm clinical trial of twice-daily enoxaparin (initial dose: 0.5mg/kg per dose; max: 60mg; target anti-Xa activity: 0.20-0.49IU/mL) as primary thromboprophylaxis for children <18 years of age hospitalized for symptomatic COVID-19. Study endpoints included: cumulative incidence of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined clinically relevant bleeding; enoxaparin dose-requirements; and cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism within 30-days of hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics summarized endpoint estimates that were further evaluated by participant age (±12 years) and clinical presentation. RESULTS: Forty children were enrolled and 38 met analyses criteria. None experienced clinically relevant bleeding. Median (interquartile range) dose to achieve target anti-Xa levels was 0.5 mg/kg (0.48-0.54). Dose-requirement did not differ by age (0.5 [0.46-0.52] mg/kg for age ≥12 years versus 0.52 [0.49-0.55] mg/kg for age <12 years, P = .51) but was greater for participants with MISC (0.52 [0.5-0.61] mg/kg) as compared with primary COVID-19 (0.48 [0.39-0.51] mg/kg, P = .010). Two children (5.3%) developed central-venous catheter-related venous thromboembolism. No serious adverse events were related to trial intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Among children hospitalized for COVID-19, thromboprophylaxis with twice-daily enoxaparin appears safe and warrants further investigation to assess efficacy.

Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of pediatric tracheostomy-associated infections: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Children with tracheostomy are frequently admitted to the hospital for tracheostomy-associated respiratory infections (TRAINs). However, there remains a paucity of evidence to direct the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of TRAINs. An important first step to addressing this knowledge gap is to synthesize existing data regarding TRAINs to inform current practice and facilitate innovation. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to October 2020. Original research articles and published abstracts including children and young adults 0-21 years of age with tracheostomy were included. Included studies assessed the clinical definitions of and risk factors for TRAINs, microbiologic epidemiology and colonization of tracheostomies, and treatment and outcomes of TRAINs. DATA SYNTHESIS: Out of 5755 studies identified in the search, 78 full-text studies were included in the final review. A substantial number of studies focused on the detection of specific pathogens in respiratory cultures including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Several different definitions of TRAIN including clinical, microbiologic, and laboratory testing results were utilized; however, no uniform set of criteria were identified. The few studies focused on treatment and prevention of TRAIN emphasized the role of empiric antimicrobial therapy and the use of inhaled antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a growing number of research articles studying TRAINs, there is a paucity of prospective interventional trials to guide the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of respiratory disease in this vulnerable population. Future research should include studies of interventions designed to improve short- and long-term respiratory-related outcomes of children with tracheostomy.

Heliox for Pediatric Critical Asthma: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Registry-Based Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: In cases of critical asthma (CA), heliox may be applied as an adjunctive rescue therapy to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), improve deposition of aerosolized medications, and enhance laminar airflow through obstructed airways. Using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) registry, we evaluate heliox prescribing and explored for differences in MV rates and hospital length of stay (LOS) among children with and without heliox exposure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using PHIS data from 42 pediatric intensive care units among children 5-17 years of age admitted for CA from 2010 through 2019. Primary outcomes were heliox prescribing rates and trends. Secondary outcomes were invasive MV rates and LOS assessed in a subgroup of children receiving ≥ 1 adjunctive intervention(s). RESULTS: Of the 19,780 studied, heliox was prescribed in 12.5% and linearly declined from 16.1% in 2010 to 5.6% in 2019. The overall MV rate was 12.8% and was lower in subjects receiving heliox alone (4.9%) compared to heliox plus alternative adjunctive therapies [31.2%] or children receiving non-heliox adjunctive therapies [22.1%], P < .01). Accounting for MV, no difference in LOS was observed. In exploratory adjusted models, MV free hospitalization was associated with heliox-only exposure (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < .01) and exposure to multiple adjunctive therapies was associated with MV (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.56-3.94, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective study from 42 children's hospitals, heliox prescribing for CA declined over the last decade. Subjects receiving multiple adjunctive therapies more commonly required invasive MV perhaps indicating a greater severity of illness. At this time, prospective trials needed to identify the role of heliox for pediatric CA.

High-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure for pediatric status asthmaticus: a single center, retrospective descriptive and comparative cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to describe patient characteristics and clinical outcomes for children hospitalized for status asthmaticus (SA) receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP). METHODS: We performed a single center, retrospective cohort study among 39 children admitted for SA aged 5-17 years from January 2016 to May 2019 to a quaternary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Cohorts were defined by BiPAP versus HFNC exposure and assessed to determine if differences existed in demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, asthma severity indices, historical factors, duration of noninvasive ventilation, and asthma-related clinical outcomes (i.e. length of stay, mechanical ventilation rates, exposure to concurrent sedatives/anxiolysis, and rate of adjunctive therapy exposure). RESULTS: Thirty-three percent (n = 13) received HFNC (33%) and 67% (n = 26) BiPAP. Children receiving BiPAP had greater age (10.9 ± 3.7 vs. 6.8 ± 2.2 years, P < 0.01), asthma severity (proportion with severe NHLBI classification: 38% vs. 0%, P < 0.01; median pediatric asthma severity score: 13[12,14] vs. 10[9,12], P < 0.01), previous PICU admissions (62% vs. 15%, P = 0.01), frequency of prescribed anxiolysis/sedation (42% vs. 8%, P = 0.02), and median duration of continuous albuterol (1.7[1,3.1] vs. 0.9[0.7,1.6] days, P = 0.03) compared to those on HFNC. Those on HFNC more commonly were treated comorbid bacterial pneumonia (69% vs. 19%, P < 0.01). No differences in NIV duration, mortality, mechanical ventilation rates, or LOS were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a trial of BiPAP or HFNC appears well tolerated in children with SA. Prospective trials are needed to establish modality superiority and identify patient or clinical characteristics that prompt use of HFNC over BiPAP.

Venous Thromboembolism among Noncritically Ill Hospitalized Children: Key Considerations for the Pediatric Hospital Medicine Specialist.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and preventable harm among noncritically ill hospitalized children. Several clinical factors relevant to the noncritically ill hospitalized child significantly increase the risk of VTE including the presence of central venous catheters, systemic inflammation, and prolonged immobilization. Although risk mitigation strategies have been described, the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of VTE require standardization of institutional practices combined with multidisciplinary collaboration among pediatric hospitalists, hematologists, and other care providers. In this narrative review, we summarize the epidemiology of VTE, risk models identifying high-risk conditions associated with VTE, and prevention and treatment strategies. We further describe successful quality improvement efforts implementing institutional VTE risk stratification and thromboprophylaxis procedures. Finally, we highlight unique challenges facing pediatric hospital medicine specialists in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, including caring for adults admitted to pediatric hospital units, and describe future research opportunities for VTE in the noncritically ill hospitalized child.

Using simulation to increase resident comfort discussing social determinants of health.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) play an important role in pediatric health outcomes. Trainees receive little to no training on how to identify, discuss and counsel families in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to determine if a simulation-based SDoH training activity would improve pediatric resident comfort with these skills. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of a curricular intervention involving simulation cases utilizing standardized patients focused on four social determinants (food insecurity, housing insecurity, barriers to accessing care, and adverse childhood experiences [ACEs]). Residents reported confidence levels with discussing each SDoH and satisfaction with the activity in a retrospective pre-post survey with five-point Likert style questions. Select residents were surveyed again 9-12 months after participation. RESULTS: 85% (33/39) of residents expressed satisfaction with the simulation activity. More residents expressed comfort discussing each SDoH after the activity (Δ% 38-47%; all p < .05), with the greatest effect noted in post-graduate-year-1 (PGY-1) participants. Improvements in comfort were sustained longitudinally during the academic year. More PGY-1 participants reported engaging in ≥ 2 conversations in a clinical setting related to food insecurity (43% vs. 5%; p = .04) and ACEs (71% vs. 20%; p = .02). DISCUSSION: Simulation led to an increased resident comfort with discussing SDoH in a clinical setting. The greatest benefit from such a curriculum is likely realized early in training. Future efforts should investigate if exposure to the simulations and increased comfort level with each topic correlate with increased likelihood to engage in these conversations in the clinical setting.

Volatile anesthetic agents for life-threatening pediatric asthma: A multicenter retrospective cohort study and narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetic agents are described as rescue therapy for children invasively ventilated for critical asthma. Yet, data are currently limited to case series. AIMS: Using the Virtual Pediatric Systems database, we assessed children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit invasively ventilated for life-threatening asthma and hypothesized ventilation duration and mortality rates would be lower for subjects exposed to volatile anesthetics compared with those without exposure. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study among nine institutions including children 5-17 years of age invasively ventilated for asthma from 2013 to 2019 with and without exposure to volatile anesthetics. Primary outcomes were ventilation duration and mortality. Secondary outcomes included patient characteristics, length of stay, and anesthetic-related adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed evaluating children intubated ≥2 days. RESULTS: Of 203 children included in study, there were 29 (14.3%) with and 174 (85.7%) without exposure to volatiles. No differences in odds of mortality (1.1, 95% CI: 0.3-3.9, p > .999) were observed. Subjects receiving volatiles experienced greater median difference in length of stay (4.8, 95% CI: 1.9-7.8 days, p < .001), ventilation duration (2.3, 95% CI: 1-3.3 days, p < .001), and odds of extracorporeal life support (9.1, 95% CI: 1.9-43.2, p = .009) than those without volatile exposure. For those ventilated ≥2 days, no differences were detected in mortality, ventilation duration, length of stay, arrhythmias, or acute renal failure. However, the odds of extracorporeal life support remained greater for those receiving volatiles (7.6, 95% CI: 1.3-44.5, p = .027). No children experienced malignant hyperthermia or hepatic failure after volatile exposure. CONCLUSIONS: For intubated children for asthma, no differences in mechanical ventilation duration or mortality between those with and without volatile anesthetic exposure were observed. Although volatiles may represent a viable rescue therapy for severe cases of asthma, definitive, and prospective trials are still needed.

Enteral Nutrition Improves Vital Signs in Children With Bronchiolitis on Noninvasive Ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: In children hospitalized for bronchiolitis, enteral nutrition (EN) practices during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) vary widely. We sought to assess the potential impact of EN by observing changes in physiometric indices (heart rate [HR] and respiratory rate [RR]) before and after EN initiation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in children <2 years of age hospitalized for bronchiolitis receiving NIV from 2017 to 2019 in a quaternary ICU. The primary outcome was patient HR and RR before and after EN initiation. Descriptive data included demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, NIV parameters, EN characteristics, and general hospital outcomes. Analyses included paired comparative and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 124 children studied, 85 (69%) were permitted EN at a median of 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7 to 29) hours. The route was oral (76.5%), nasogastric (15.3%), or postpyloric (8.2%) and was predominantly started during high-flow nasal cannula (71%) at flow rates of 1 (IQR: 0.7 to 1.4) L/kg per minute. After EN initiation, reductions in the median RR (percentage change: -11 [IQR: -23 to 3]; P < .01) and HR (percentage change: -5 [IQR: -12 to 1]; P < .01) were noted. Those permitted EN were younger (5 [IQR: 2 to 11] vs 11 [IQR: 3 to 17] months; P < .01) and more likely to have bronchopulmonary dysplasia (19% vs 5%; P = .04). Malnutrition rates, comorbidities, admission timing, flow rates, length of stay, and NIV duration did not differ for those provided or not provided EN. No aspiration events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions between pre- and postprandial RR after EN initiation among children hospitalized for bronchiolitis on NIV were observed without clinically significant aspiration. These findings support existing data that suggest that EN is safe during NIV and may lessen distress in some patients.

Physiometric Response to High-Flow Nasal Cannula Support in Acute Bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the rate of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) nonresponse and paired physiometric responses (changes [∆] in heart rate [HR] and respiratory rate [RR]) before and after HFNC initiation in hospitalized children with bronchiolitis. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective descriptive study in a PICU within a quaternary referral center, assessing children aged ≤2 years admitted for bronchiolitis on HFNC from November 2017 to March 2020. We excluded for cystic fibrosis, airway anomalies, pulmonary hypertension, tracheostomy, neuromuscular disease, congenital heart disease, or preadmission intubation. Primary outcomes were paired ∆ and %∆ in HR and RR before and after HFNC initiation. Secondary outcomes were HFNC nonresponse rate (ie, intubation or transition to noninvasive positive pressure ventilation). Analyses included χ2, Student's t, Wilcoxon rank, and paired testing. RESULTS: Of the 172 children studied, 56 (32.6%) experienced HFNC nonresponse at a median of 14.4 (interquartile range: 4.8-36) hours and 11 (6.4%) were intubated. Nonresponders had a greater frequency of bacterial pneumonia, but otherwise no major differences in demographics, comorbidities, or viral pathogens were noted. Responders experienced reductions in both %ΔRR (-17.1% ± 15.8% vs +5.3% ± 22.3%) and %ΔHR (-6.5% ± 10.5% vs 0% ± 10.9%) compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, observational cohort study, we provide baseline data describing expected physiologic changes after initiation of HFNC for children admitted to the PICU for bronchiolitis. In our descriptive analysis, patients with comorbid bacterial pneumonia appear to be at additional risk for subsequent HFNC nonresponse.