Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Combined Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema in the IPF-PRO Registry.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of concomitant emphysema on outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). METHODS: The IPF-PRO Registry is a US registry of patients with IPF. The presence of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) at enrollment was determined by investigators' review of an HRCT scan. Associations between emphysema and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 934 patients, 119 (12.7%) had CPFE. Compared with patients with IPF alone, patients with CPFE were older (median 72 vs 70 years); higher proportions were current/former smokers (88.2% vs 63.7%), used oxygen with activity (49.6% vs 31.9%) or at rest (30.8% vs 18.4%), had congestive heart failure (13.6% vs 4.8%) and had prior respiratory hospitalization (25.0% vs 16.7%); they had higher FVC (median 71.8 vs 69.4% predicted) and lower DLco (median 35.3 vs 43.6% predicted). In patients with CPFE and IPF alone, respectively, at 1 year, rates of death or lung transplant were 17.5% (95% CI: 11.7, 25.8) and 11.2% (9.2, 13.6) and rates of hospitalization were 21.6% (14.6, 29.6) and 20.6% (17.9, 23.5). There were no significant associations between emphysema and any outcome after adjustment for baseline variables. No baseline variable predicted outcomes better in IPF alone than in CPFE. CONCLUSION: Approximately 13% of patients in the IPF-PRO Registry had CPFE. Physiologic characteristics and comorbidities of patients with CPFE differed from those of patients with IPF alone, but the presence of emphysema did not drive outcomes after adjustment for baseline covariates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01915511; registered August 5, 2013.

Comparison of Forceps, Cryoprobe, and Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease - The CHILL Study.

RATIONALE: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has emerged as a less invasive method to obtain a tissue diagnosis in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The diagnostic yield of TBLC compared to surgical lung biopsy (SLB) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of forceps transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and TBLC compared to SLB when making the final diagnosis based on multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the study underwent sequential TBLB and TBLC followed immediately by SLB. De-identified cases, with blinding of the biopsy method, were reviewed by a blinded pathologist and then discussed at a multidisciplinary conference. MAIN RESULTS: Between August 2013 and October 2017, we enrolled 16 patients. The raw agreement between TBLC and SLB for the MDD final diagnosis was 68.75% with a Cohen's kappa of 0.6 (95% CI 0.39, 0.81). Raw agreement and Cohen's kappa of TBLB versus TBLC and TBLB versus SLB for the MDD final diagnosis were much lower (50%, 0.21 [95% CI 0, 0.42] and 18.75%, 0.08 [95% CI -0.03, 0.19], respectively). TBLC was associated with mild bleeding (grade 1 bleeding requiring suction to clear) in 56.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ILD who have an uncertain type based on clinical and radiographic data and require tissue sampling to obtain a specific diagnosis, TBLC showed moderate correlation with SLB when making the diagnosis with MDD guidance. TBLB showed poor concordance with both TBLC and SLB MDD diagnoses.

Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI and Spectroscopy of Gas-Exchange Abnormalities in Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia.

Background Recent studies demonstrate that antifibrotic drugs previously reserved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may slow progression in other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), creating an urgent need for tools that can sensitively assess disease activity, progression, and therapy response across ILDs. Hyperpolarized xenon 129 (129Xe) MRI and spectroscopy have provided noninvasive measurements of regional gas-exchange abnormalities in IPF. Purpose To assess gas exchange function using 129Xe MRI in a group of study participants with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) compared with healthy control participants. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with NSIP and healthy control participants were enrolled between November 2017 and February 2020 and underwent 129Xe MRI and spectroscopy. Quantitative imaging provided three-dimensional maps of ventilation, interstitial barrier uptake, and transfer into the red blood cell (RBC) compartment. Spectroscopy provided parameters of the static RBC and barrier uptake compartments, as well as cardiogenic oscillations in RBC signal amplitude and chemical shift. Differences between NSIP and healthy control participants were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results Thirty-six participants with NSIP (mean age, 57 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 27 women) and 15 healthy control participants (mean age, 39 years ± 18; two women) were evaluated. Participants with NSIP had no difference in ventilation compared with healthy control participants (median, 4.4% [first quartile, 1.5%; third quartile, 8.7%] vs 6.0% [first quartile, 2.8%; third quartile, 6.9%]; P = .91), but they had a higher barrier uptake (median, 6.2% [first quartile, 1.8%; third quartile, 23.9%] vs 0.53% [first quartile, 0.33%; third quartile, 2.9%]; P = .003) and an increased RBC transfer defect (median, 20.6% [first quartile, 11.6%; third quartile, 27.8%] vs 2.8% [first quartile, 2.3%; third quartile, 4.9%]; P < .001). NSIP participants also had a reduced ratio of RBC-to-barrier peaks (median, 0.24 [first quartile, 0.19; third quartile, 0.31] vs 0.57 [first quartile, 0.52; third quartile, 0.67]; P < .001) and a reduced RBC chemical shift (median, 217.5 ppm [first quartile, 217.0 ppm; third quartile, 218.0 ppm] vs 218.2 ppm [first quartile, 217.9 ppm; third quartile, 218.6 ppm]; P = .001). Conclusion Participants with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia had increased barrier uptake and decreased red blood cell (RBC) transfer compared with healthy controls measured using xenon 129 gas-exchange MRI and reduced RBC-to-barrier ratio and RBC chemical shift measured using spectroscopy. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wild in this issue.

2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of GIOP prevention and treatment options. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence. We used a group consensus process to determine the final recommendations and grade their strength. The guideline addresses initial assessment and reassessment in patients beginning or continuing long-term (≥3 months) glucocorticoid (GC) treatment, as well as the relative benefits and harms of lifestyle modification and of calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonate, raloxifene, teriparatide, and denosumab treatment in the general adult population receiving long-term GC treatment, as well as in special populations of long-term GC users. RESULTS: Because of limited evidence regarding the benefits and harms of interventions in GC users, most recommendations in this guideline are conditional (uncertain balance between benefits and harms). Recommendations include treating only with calcium and vitamin D in adults at low fracture risk, treating with calcium and vitamin D plus an additional osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred) in adults at moderate-to-high fracture risk, continuing calcium plus vitamin D but switching from an oral bisphosphonate to another antifracture medication in adults in whom oral bisphosphonate treatment is not appropriate, and continuing oral bisphosphonate treatment or switching to another antifracture medication in adults who complete a planned oral bisphosphonate regimen but continue to receive GC treatment. Recommendations for special populations, including children, people with organ transplants, women of childbearing potential, and people receiving very high-dose GC treatment, are also made. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making treatment decisions. Clinicians and patients should use a shared decision-making process that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.

2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of GIOP prevention and treatment options. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used to rate the quality of evidence. We used a group consensus process to determine the final recommendations and grade their strength. The guideline addresses initial assessment and reassessment in patients beginning or continuing long-term (≥3 months) glucocorticoid (GC) treatment, as well as the relative benefits and harms of lifestyle modification and of calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonate, raloxifene, teriparatide, and denosumab treatment in the general adult population receiving long-term GC treatment, as well as in special populations of long-term GC users. RESULTS: Because of limited evidence regarding the benefits and harms of interventions in GC users, most recommendations in this guideline are conditional (uncertain balance between benefits and harms). Recommendations include treating only with calcium and vitamin D in adults at low fracture risk, treating with calcium and vitamin D plus an additional osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred) in adults at moderate-to-high fracture risk, continuing calcium plus vitamin D but switching from an oral bisphosphonate to another antifracture medication in adults in whom oral bisphosphonate treatment is not appropriate, and continuing oral bisphosphonate treatment or switching to another antifracture medication in adults who complete a planned oral bisphosphonate regimen but continue to receive GC treatment. Recommendations for special populations, including children, people with organ transplants, women of childbearing potential, and people receiving very high-dose GC treatment, are also made. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making treatment decisions. Clinicians and patients should use a shared decision-making process that accounts for patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.

Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Experience from 92 Sites in an Open-Label US Expanded Access Program.

INTRODUCTION: In phase 3 clinical trials, pirfenidone significantly slowed disease progression with a well-defined and medically manageable safety profile in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study examined safety events related to pirfenidone in patients with IPF in an expanded access program in the US. METHODS: The Expanded Access Program allowed patients with IPF access to pirfenidone prior to US Food and Drug Administration approval. Patients had an IPF diagnosis including a definite or possible usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, predicted forced vital capacity ≥50%, and predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥30%. Clinical laboratory data and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) deemed causally related to pirfenidone were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics. RESULTS: Of the 1620 patients treated, 1221 (75.4%) completed the program: 66.5% had definite UIP, and 33.2% had possible UIP. Mean (SD) pirfenidone exposure was 22.8 (9.6) weeks, and mean (SD) daily dose during the course of treatment was 2058.7 (399.2) mg. ADRs occurred in 64.9% of patients: 3.3% were severe and 0.2% life threatening. The most common ADRs were nausea (22.6%) and fatigue (19.6%); 13.0% of patients discontinued due to ADRs. Serious ADRs occurred in 24 patients (1.5%), which were primarily related to elevated liver function enzymes (ten patients, 0.6%). No ADRs led to death. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label study of 1620 patients with IPF, including those with possible UIP, the safety profile of pirfenidone was consistent with that of earlier clinical trials, and no new safety signals were identified. NCT02141087. FUNDING: Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche group.

Recombinant human pentraxin-2 therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: safety, pharmacokinetics and exploratory efficacy.

Abnormal fibrogenic repair response upon alveolar injury is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). PRM-151 (recombinant human pentraxin-2, also known as serum amyloid P), has been shown to reduce fibrosis in preclinical lung fibrosis models, and was well tolerated with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in an earlier single-dose phase I study.A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose trial was performed to assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of multiple doses of PRM-151 in IPF patients. Subjects in three successive cohorts (1, 5, or 10 mg·kg(-1) versus placebo) received intravenous study drug on days 1, 3, 5, 8 and 15, and were followed-up to day 57.PRM-151 was well tolerated at all dose levels, with no serious adverse reactions. Administration of PRM-151 resulted in two- to eight-fold dose-dependent increases in circulating pentraxin-2 levels. Forced vital capacity and 6-min walk test showed trends towards improvement in the combined PRM-151 dose groups. On high-resolution computed tomography scans, stable or improved lung volume unoccupied by interstitial lung abnormality was noted in some PRM-151 subjects compared to placebo subjects on day 57.The efficacy of PRM-151 in IPF remains to be investigated in dedicated future trials.

Quantitative proteomics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The proteomic analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) can give insight into pulmonary disease pathology and response to therapy. Here, we describe the first gel-free quantitative analysis of BALF in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a chronic and fatal scarring lung disease. We utilized two-dimensional reversed-phase liquid chromatography and ion-mobility-assisted data-independent acquisition (HDMSE) for quantitation of >1000 proteins in immunodepleted BALF from the right middle and lower lobes of normal controls and patients with IPF. Among the analytes that were increased in IPF were well-described mediators of pulmonary fibrosis (osteopontin, MMP7, CXCL7, CCL18), eosinophil- and neutrophil-derived proteins, and proteins associated with fibroblast foci. For additional discovery and targeted validation, BALF was also screened by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), using the JPT Cytokine SpikeMix library of >400 stable isotope-labeled peptides. A refined MRM assay confirmed the robust expression of osteopontin, and demonstrated, for the first time, upregulation of the pro-fibrotic cytokine, CCL24, in BALF in IPF. These results show the utility of BALF proteomics for the molecular profiling of fibrotic lung diseases and the targeted quantitation of soluble markers of IPF. More generally, this study addresses critical quality control measures that should be widely applicable to BALF profiling in pulmonary disease.

Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with ambrisentan: a parallel, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by formation and proliferation of fibroblast foci. Endothelin-1 induces lung fibroblast proliferation and contractile activity via the endothelin A (ETA) receptor. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ambrisentan, an ETA receptor-selective antagonist, reduces the rate of IPF progression. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00768300). SETTING: Academic and private hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with IPF aged 40 to 80 years with minimal or no honeycombing on high-resolution computed tomography scans. INTERVENTION: Ambrisentan, 10 mg/d, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Time to disease progression, defined as death, respiratory hospitalization, or a categorical decrease in lung function. RESULTS: The study was terminated after enrollment of 492 patients (75% of intended enrollment; mean duration of exposure to study medication, 34.7 weeks) because an interim analysis indicated a low likelihood of showing efficacy for the end point by the scheduled end of the study. Ambrisentan-treated patients were more likely to meet the prespecified criteria for disease progression (90 [27.4%] vs. 28 [17.2%] patients; P = 0.010; hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.66]). Lung function decline was seen in 55 (16.7%) ambrisentan-treated patients and 19 (11.7%) placebo-treated patients (P = 0.109). Respiratory hospitalizations were seen in 44 (13.4%) and 9 (5.5%) patients in the ambrisentan and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.007). Twenty-six (7.9%) patients who received ambrisentan and 6 (3.7%) who received placebo died (P = 0.100). Thirty-two (10%) ambrisentan-treated patients and 16 (10%) placebo-treated patients had pulmonary hypertension at baseline, and analysis stratified by the presence of pulmonary hypertension revealed similar results for the primary end point. LIMITATION: The study was terminated early. CONCLUSION: Ambrisentan was not effective in treating IPF and may be associated with an increased risk for disease progression and respiratory hospitalizations. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Gilead Sciences.

Bayesian probit regression model for the diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis: proof-of-principle.

BACKGROUND: The accurate diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major clinical challenge. We developed a model to diagnose IPF by applying Bayesian probit regression (BPR) modelling to gene expression profiles of whole lung tissue. METHODS: Whole lung tissue was obtained from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) undergoing surgical lung biopsy or lung transplantation. Controls were obtained from normal organ donors. We performed cluster analyses to explore differences in our dataset. No significant difference was found between samples obtained from different lobes of the same patient. A significant difference was found between samples obtained at biopsy versus explant. Following preliminary analysis of the complete dataset, we selected three subsets for the development of diagnostic gene signatures: the first signature was developed from all IPF samples (as compared to controls); the second signature was developed from the subset of IPF samples obtained at biopsy; the third signature was developed from IPF explants. To assess the validity of each signature, we used an independent cohort of IPF and normal samples. Each signature was used to predict phenotype (IPF versus normal) in samples from the validation cohort. We compared the models' predictions to the true phenotype of each validation sample, and then calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. RESULTS: Surprisingly, we found that all three signatures were reasonably valid predictors of diagnosis, with small differences in test sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first use of BPR on whole lung tissue; previously, BPR was primarily used to develop predictive models for cancer. This also represents the first report of an independently validated IPF gene expression signature. In summary, BPR is a promising tool for the development of gene expression signatures from non-neoplastic lung tissue. In the future, BPR might be used to develop definitive diagnostic gene signatures for IPF, prognostic gene signatures for IPF or gene signatures for other non-neoplastic lung disorders such as bronchiolitis obliterans.

Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, alveolar proteinosis, and abnormal proprotein trafficking resulting from a spontaneous mutation in the surfactant protein C gene.

Human surfactant protein C (hSP-C(1-197)) is synthesized as a 197 amino acid proprotein and cleaved to a mature 3.7 kD form. Although interstitial lung disease in patients with mutations of the hSP-C gene is becoming increasingly recognized, the mechanisms linking molecular events with clinical pathogenesis are not fully defined. We describe a full-term infant with respiratory insufficiency associated with a spontaneous heterozygous mutation resulting in a substitution of lysine for glutamic acid at position 66 (= E66K) of the proximal hSP-C COOH flanking propeptide. Lung histology and biochemical studies of the index patient (hSP-C(E66K)) revealed nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, increased alveolar total phospholipid lacking phosphatidylglycerol, and increased surfactant protein A. Localization of proSP-C from lung sections prepared from this patient using immunofluorescence and immunogold electron microscopy revealed abnormal proSP-C staining in endosomal-like vesicles of type II cells distinct from SP-B. To evaluate the effect of the E66K substitution on intracellular trafficking of proSP-C, fusion proteins consisting of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and hSP-C(1-197) (wild type) or mutant hSP-C(E66K) were generated and transfected into A549 cells. EGFP/hSP-C(1-197) was expressed within CD-63-positive, EEA-1-negative vesicles, whereas EGFP/hSP-C(E66K) localized to EEA-1 positive vesicles. The E66K substitution is representative of a new class of SP-C mutation associated with interstitial lung disease that is diverted from the normal biosynthetic pathway. We propose that, similar to other storage disorders, lung injury results from induction of a toxic gain of function induced by the mutant product that is subject to genetic modifiers and environmental influences.