Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery may improve surgical performance during minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy but comparative studies are lacking. This study assessed the impact of robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy on surgical performance and operative time using a standardized biotissue model for pancreatico- and hepatico-jejunostomy using pooled data from two randomized controlled crossover trials (RCTs). METHODS: Pooled analysis of data from two RCTs with 60 participants (36 surgeons, 24 residents) from 11 countries (December 2017-July 2019) was conducted. Each included participant completed two pancreatico- and two hepatico-jejunostomies in biotissue using 3D-robotic surgery, 3D-laparoscopy, or 2D-laparoscopy. Primary outcomes were the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS: 12-60) rating, scored by observers blinded for 3D/2D and the operative time required to complete both anastomoses. Sensitivity analysis excluded participants with excess experience compared to others. RESULTS: A total of 220 anastomoses were completed (robotic 80, 3D-laparoscopy 70, 2D-laparoscopy 70). Participants in the robotic group had less surgical experience [median 1 (0-2) versus 6 years (4-12), p < 0.001], as compared to the laparoscopic group. Robotic surgery resulted in higher OSATS ratings (50, 43, 39 points, p = .021 and p < .001) and shorter operative time (56.5, 65.0, 81.5 min, p = .055 and p < .001), as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy, respectively, which remained in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: In a pooled analysis of two RCTs in a biotissue model, robotic surgery resulted in better surgical performance scores and shorter operative time for biotissue pancreatic and biliary anastomoses, as compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy.

Artificial intelligence to assess body composition on routine abdominal CT scans and predict mortality in pancreatic cancer- A recipe for your local application.

BACKGROUND: Body composition is associated with mortality; however its routine assessment is too time-consuming. PURPOSE: To demonstrate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) to extract body composition measures from routine studies, we aimed to develop a fully automated AI approach to measure fat and muscles masses, to validate its clinical discriminatory value, and to provide the code, training data and workflow solutions to facilitate its integration into local practice. METHODS: We developed a neural network that quantified the tissue components at the L3 vertebral body level using data from the Liver Tumor Challenge (LiTS) and a pancreatic cancer cohort. We classified sarcopenia using accepted skeletal muscle index cut-offs and visceral fat based its median value. We used Kaplan Meier curves and Cox regression analysis to assess the association between these measures and mortality. RESULTS: Applying the algorithm trained on LiTS data to the local cohort yielded good agreement [>0.8 intraclass correlation (ICC)]; when trained on both datasets, it had excellent agreement (>0.9 ICC). The pancreatic cancer cohort had 136 patients (mean age: 67 ± 11 years; 54% women); 15% had sarcopenia; mean visceral fat was 142 cm2. Concurrent with prior research, we found a significant association between sarcopenia and mortality [mean survival of 15 ± 12 vs. 22 ± 12 (p < 0.05), adjusted HR of 1.58 (95% CI: 1.03-3.33)] but no association between visceral fat and mortality. The detector analysis took 1 ± 0.5 s. CONCLUSIONS: AI body composition analysis can provide meaningful imaging biomarkers from routine exams demonstrating AI's ability to further enhance the clinical value of radiology reports.

Added value of 3D-vision during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy anastomoses in biotissue (LAEBOT 3D2D): a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

BACKGROUND: We tested the added value of 3D-vision on procedure time and surgical performance during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy anastomoses in biotissue. Robotic surgery has the advantage of articulating instruments and 3D-vision. Consensus is lacking on the added value of 3D-vision during laparoscopic surgery. Given the improved dexterity with robotic surgery, the added value of 3D-vision may be even less with robotic surgery. METHODS: In this experimental randomized controlled cross-over trial, 20 surgeons and surgical residents from 5 countries performed robotic pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy anastomoses in a biotissue organ model using the da Vinci® system and were randomized to start with either 3D- or 2D-vision. Primary endpoint was the time required to complete both anastomoses. Secondary endpoint was the objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS; range 12-60) rating; scored by two observers blinded to 3D/2D. RESULTS: Robotic 3D-vision reduced the combined operative time from 78.1 to 57.3 min (24.6% reduction, p < 0.001; 20.8 min reduction, 95% confidence intervals 12.8-28.8 min). This reduction was consistent for both anastomoses and between surgeons and residents, p < 0.001. Robotic 3D-vision improved OSATS performance by 6.1 points (20.8% improvement, p = 0.003) compared to 2D (39.4 to 45.1 points, ± 5.5). CONCLUSION: 3D-vision has a considerable added value during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy anastomoses in biotissue in both time reduction and improved surgical performance as compared to 2D-vision.

Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk predicts rehabilitation placement after pancreatic resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection frequently require rehabilitation facilities after hospital discharge. We evaluated the predictive role of validated markers of frailty on rehabilitation facility placement to identify patients who may require this service. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent pancreatic resection from 2010 to 2015. 90-day morbidity and mortality were calculated. Postoperative validated markers of frailty (Activities of Daily Living scale, Braden scale [assesses pressure ulcer risk, lower scores = higher risk] and Morse fall scale) were evaluated via multivariate regression to identify predictors of discharge to rehabilitation facility. RESULTS: 470 patients with complete data were included. Mean age was 62 and 49.2% were male. Postoperative median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (IQR 7-10). 92 (19.66%) patients were discharged to rehabilitation facilities and 138 (29.49%) patients were readmitted within 90 days. On multivariate analysis, age, sex, LOS > 8 days, inpatient Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and initial Braden scale were predictive of rehabilitation placement. CONCLUSION: A marker of frailty routinely collected daily by nursing staff, the Braden scale, is available to help surgeons predict the need for postoperative rehabilitation placement after pancreatic resection. Engaging discharge planning services for at-risk patients may help prevent delayed hospital discharge and should be further evaluated.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the elderly is often complicated by comorbidities that preclude surgery, chemotherapy and/or conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has thus garnered interest in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of 26 patients of age ≥ 80 with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with definitive SBRT+/-chemotherapy from 2007-2011 was performed. Twenty-seven percent of patients were stage I, 38% were stage II, 27% were stage III and 8% were stage IV. Patients most commonly received 24 Gy/1 fraction or 30-36 Gy/3 fractions. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), cause specific survival (CSS) and freedom-from-metastatic disease (FFMD). RESULTS: The median age was 86 (range 80-91), and median follow-up was 11.6 months (3.5-24.6). The median planning target volume was 21.48 cm3 (6.1-85.09). Median OS was 7.6 months with 6/12 month OS rates of 65.4%/34.6%, respectively. Median LC was 11.5 months, 6-month and 12-month actuarial LC rates were 60.1% and 41.2%, respectively. There were no independent predictors for LC, but there was a trend for improved LC with prescription dose greater than 20 Gy (p = 0.063). Median CSS was 6.3 months, and 6-month and 12-month actuarial CSS were 53.8% and 23.1%, respectively. Median FFMD was 8.4 months, and 6-month and 12-month actuarial rates were 62.0% and 41.4%, respectively. Nine patients (47%) had local failures, 11 (58%) had distant metastasis, and 7 (37%) had both. There were no acute or late grade 3+ toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive SBRT is feasible, safe and effective in elderly patients who have unresectable disease, have comorbidities precluding surgery or decline surgery.

EUS-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiotherapy in locally advanced and recurrent pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been approved for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Placement of gold fiducials is required for real-time tracking and delivery of a high-dose therapeutic beam of radiation to the tumor. Traditionally, fiducials have been placed either intraoperatively or percutaneously. Recently, EUS-guided fiducial placement has been reported, but the safety and feasibility of this approach is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and limitations of EUS-guided placement of 0.8 x 5.0 mm fiducials via a 19-gauge needle for locally advanced and recurrent pancreatic cancer. DESIGN: Prospective study of patients with either locally advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer referred for EUS-guided fiducial placement for SBRT at our institution over a 3-year period. SETTING: Tertiary referral center conducting >1800 EUS procedures annually. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measurements included success, complications, and technical limitations of EUS-guided fiducial placement in pancreatic cancer. In addition, the percentage of patients successfully completing SBRT after EUS-guided fiducial placement was determined. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (mean age 73 years; 57% male) with locally advanced (n = 36) and recurrent (n = 15) pancreatic cancer were referred for EUS-guided fiducial placement. Fiducials were successfully placed in 46 patients (90%), with technical failures occurring in 4 patients (8%) with recurrent cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy. In 3 patients (7%), the fiducials spontaneously migrated from the original site of injection, thereby requiring a second EUS procedure for placement of additional fiducials. Of the 46 patients with fiducials placed under EUS guidance, 42 patients (91%) successfully completed SBRT. Two patients experienced disease progression before SBRT, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 1 patient experienced a complication at ERCP that precluded further therapy. Only 1 complication (2%), of mild pancreatitis, occurred in a patient undergoing simultaneous placement of fiducials and celiac plexus neurolysis for intractable abdominal pain. LIMITATIONS: Single-center experience and lack of a formal follow-up protocol to assess for complications. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided fiducial placement for SBRT in locally advanced and recurrent pancreatic cancer is safe and feasible. Successful placement was achieved in 90% of patients, with a low complication rate (2%). Furthermore, 91% of patients successfully completed SBRT after EUS-guided fiducial delivery. Although fiducials can spontaneously migrate from the initial injection site, the rate of migration is relatively low (7%), and no migration-related complications occurred over the course of this study. Limitations to EUS-guided fiducial placement may include surgically altered anatomy (pancreaticoduodenectomy) in patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer.

A phase I/II study of a MUC1 peptide pulsed autologous dendritic cell vaccine as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic and biliary tumors.

Pancreatic and biliary cancers are relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiation and may therefore provide an opportunity for testing the potential of immunotherapy. MUC1 is an epithelial cell glycoprotein that is highly overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in many adenocarcinomas, including pancreatic tumors, providing a tumor specific antigen and target. We performed a Phase I/II clinical trial of a MUC1 peptide-loaded DC vaccine in 12 pancreatic and biliary cancer patients following resection of their primary tumors. The primary endpoints were vaccine toxicity and immunogenicity and the secondary endpoint was clinical outcome. The vaccine was well tolerated and no toxicity was observed. Three patients had pre-existing MUC1 antibody responses that remained stable post vaccination. MUC1-specific T cell responses were difficult to evaluate due to increases in activity of all CD8 and CD4 T cells following each vaccination. Prior to vaccination, patients entered onto this trial had a significantly higher percentage of FoxP3+CD4+ T cells compared to age matched healthy controls. The percentage of these cells also increased transiently following each injection, returning to baseline or below before the next injection. Vaccinated patients have been followed for over four years and four of the twelve patients are alive, all without evidence of recurrence. Study of the immune parameters in long-term survivors several years after vaccination may yield the sought after immune correlates of clinical responses that analysis of immune responses shortly after vaccination has not revealed.

The role of pancreatic cyst fluid molecular analysis in predicting cyst pathology.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current methods to detect malignancy in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas remain inadequate. The role of detailed molecular analysis in this context was investigated. METHODS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst aspirates were prospectively collected during a period of 19 months and studied for cytology, carcinoembryonic antigen level, and molecular analysis. Molecular evaluation incorporated DNA quantification (amount and quality), k-ras point mutation, and broad panel tumor suppressor linked microsatellite marker allelic loss analysis by using fluorescent capillary electrophoresis. The sequence of mutation acquisition was also calculated on the basis of a clonal expansion model, and comparison was made to the final pathology. RESULTS: Thirty-six cysts with confirmed histology were analyzed. There were 11 malignant, 15 premalignant, and 10 benign cysts. Malignant cysts could be differentiated from premalignant cysts on the basis of fluid carcinoembryonic antigen level (P=.034), DNA quality (P=.009), number of mutations (P=.002), and on the sequence of mutations acquired (P<.001). Early k-ras mutation followed by allelic loss was the most predictive of a malignant cyst (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Malignant cyst fluid contains adequate DNA to allow mutational analysis. A first hit k-ras mutation followed by allelic loss is most predictive of the presence of malignancy in a pancreatic cyst. This approach should serve as an ancillary tool to the conventional work-up of pancreatic cysts. Cumulative amount and timing of detectable mutational damage can assist in diagnosis and clinical management.

Phase I study of a MUC1 vaccine composed of different doses of MUC1 peptide with SB-AS2 adjuvant in resected and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

MUC1 is a glycoprotein overexpressed in tumors as a hypoglycosylated form. A vaccine composed of a 100-amino acid peptide corresponding to five 20-amino acid long repeats, and SB-AS2 adjuvant, was tested in a phase I study for safety, toxicity, and ability to elicit or boost MUC1-specific immune responses. Patients with resected or locally advanced pancreatic cancer without prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Escalating doses of the peptide (100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 mug) were admixed with SB-AS2 and administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks for three doses, in cohorts of four patients. Sixteen patients were enrolled. Common adverse effects were grade 1 flu-like symptoms, tenderness, and erythema at the injection site. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) sites showed few or no T cells prevaccination (Pre V), but increased T-cell infiltration postvaccination (Post V). There was an increase in the percentage of CD8(+) T cells in the peripheral blood Post V. An increase in total MUC1-specific antibody was seen in some patients, and several patients developed IgG antibody. Two of 15 resected pancreatic cancer patients are alive and disease free at follow-up of 32 and 61 months. MUC1 100mer peptide with SB-AS2 adjuvant is a safe vaccine that induces low but detectable mucin-specific humoral and T-cell responses in some patients. No difference was seen between different peptide doses. Further evaluation is warranted to examine the effect on disease-free survival and overall survival, especially in early disease and in the absence of immunosuppressive standard therapy.

Primary duodenal carcinoma showing divergent growth patterns as determined by microdissection-based mutational genotyping.

Primary duodenal adenocarcinoma accounts for less than 0.5% of all gastrointestinal cancers. We report a case of duodenal adenocarcinoma with highly divergent growth patterns consisting of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma proven to arise as a single neoplasm of monoclonal origin, as demonstrated by microdissection-based mutational profiling. Multicomponent growth patterns, as seen in this case, can occasionally be encountered in gastrointestinal malignancies and have led to speculation about the pathogenesis. The methods used to clearly establish monoclonal origin based on the unique profiling of mutational damage can address fundamental issues related to tumor development and progression, while providing cogent clinical information. Our findings confirm the great potential for intestinal epithelial cells to differentiate along different histogenetic lines during tumor progression.