Two-Year Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab Following 104 Weeks of Continuous Treatment for Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the LUCENT-3 Open-Label Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: Mirikizumab, a p19-directed interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, is efficacious in inducing clinical remission at week 12 (W12) and maintaining clinical remission at W52 in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Results are presented from the open-label extension study through W104. METHODS: Clinical, symptomatic, quality-of-life, and adverse event outcomes are reported for mirikizumab induction responders and extended induction responders, including biologic-failed patients, who entered LUCENT-3, with data shown for W52 maintenance responders or remitters. Discontinuations or missing data were handled by nonresponder imputation (NRI), modified NRI (mNRI), and observed case (OC). RESULTS: Among W52 mirikizumab responders, clinical response at W104 was 74.5%, 87.2%, and 96.7% and clinical remission was 76.6%, 89.0%, and 98.3% for NRI, mNRI, and OC, respectively. Among W52 mirikizumab remitters, clinical response at W104 was 54.0%, 62.8%, and 70.1% and clinical remission was 65.6%, 76.1%, and 84.2%. Using mNRI, remission rates at W104 for W52 clinical remitters were 74.7% corticosteroid-free, 79.5% endoscopic, 63.9% histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission, 85.9% symptomatic, 59.8% bowel urgency, 80.5% Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (using NRI), 71.2% histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and 77.5% bowel urgency improvement. Previous biologic-failed vs not-biologic-failed patient data were generally similar. Extended induction mNRI clinical response was 81.9%. Serious adverse events were reported in 5.2% of patients; 2.8% discontinued treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic, histologic, symptomatic, and quality-of-life outcomes support the long-term benefit of mirikizumab treatment up to 104 weeks in patients with ulcerative colitis, including biologic-failed patients, with no new safety concerns.

Long-term clinical response/remission, endoscopic, histologic, and symptomatic data from an open-label study in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis demonstrate that 2-year continuous mirikizumab treatment maintained clinical remission in a majority of induction clinical responders, regardless of previous biologic failure status.

Association of Bowel Urgency With Quality-of-Life Measures in Patients With Moderately-to-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase 3 LUCENT-1 (Induction) and LUCENT-2 (Maintenance) Studies.

Background: Improvement in bowel urgency (BU) was associated with better clinical outcomes in phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance) studies in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed association of BU with quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. Methods: LUCENT-1: 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2: 544 mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo Q4W through Week (W) 40 (W52 of continuous treatment). Patients reported BU severity in the past 24 hours using a validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). In patients with baseline Urgency NRS ≥3, the association between BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI; ≥3-point decrease) and remission (score 0 or 1) with patient-reported outcomes was assessed at W12 and W52. Results: A significantly greater proportion of patients with versus without BU Remission achieved IBDQ remission (W12: 87.3% vs 42.7%, P < .0001; W52: 91.4% vs 45.5%, p < .0001). Similarly, BU Remission was associated with more patients achieving CMI in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (W12: 69.0% vs 44.4%, P < .0001; W52: 77.5% vs 42.1%, P < .0001) and Mental Component Summary (W12: 53.5% vs 41.0%, P = .0019; W52: 62.0% vs 38.3%, P < .0001) scores. At W12 and W52, patients with BU CMI or Remission showed significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:UC scores. Significant improvements were also seen in fatigue, abdominal pain, and nocturnal stool. Conclusions: In patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, improvement in BU was associated with improved QoL in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies. Clinical Studies: LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092.

Extended Induction and Prognostic Indicators of Response in Patients Treated with Mirikizumab with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis in the LUCENT Trials.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab, a p19-targeted anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis was demonstrated previously. We evaluated clinical response, baseline characteristics, and clinical status in patients not responding by 12 weeks (W) of induction who then received extended induction treatment. METHOD: Patients unresponsive to 300 mg of intravenous (IV) mirikizumab every 4 weeks by W12 received 3 additional 300 mg IV doses every 4 weeks. Week-4 responders received 200 mg mirikizumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously until W52. Patients responding by W12 but subsequently losing response received rescue therapy with 300 mg IV for 3 doses every 4 weeks. Logistic regression modelling was performed for patients not achieving W12 clinical response to assess baseline characteristics and W12 efficacy parameters and potential prognostic factors of clinical response at W24. RESULTS: Of patients not achieving clinical response during induction, 53.7% achieved response following extended induction. After 52W, 72.2%, 43.1%, and 36.1% of patients achieved clinical response, endoscopic, and clinical remission, respectively. Of induction responders who subsequently lost response, 63.2% and 36.8% achieved symptomatic response and remission, respectively, after receiving rescue therapy No prior biologic or tofacitinib treatment, no immunomodulators at baseline, age older than 40 years, and W12 modified Mayo Score improvement were positively associated with a response to extended induction. The safety profile was similar to initial induction, with 38.3% treatment emergent adverse events, mostly mild. CONCLUSION: With "extended induction," total of 80.3% mirikizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response by W24. Potential prognostic factors determining response include disease severity, disease phenotype, C-reactive protein, and previous biologic therapy.

Extended induction with mirikizumab led to clinical response in more than half of primary nonresponders. Intravenous reinduction therapy in patients losing response during treatment led to more than 60% achieving symptomatic response, confirming the clinical benefit of these treatment strategies for harder to treat patients.

Validation of the bowel urgency numeric rating scale in patients with Crohn's disease: results from a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: Bowel urgency (BU) is an important symptom of Crohn's disease (CD), however there is no patient-reported outcome (PRO) scale validated in this population to assess BU severity. Here we evaluated the content validity and psychometric properties of the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). METHOD: Qualitative interviews were conducted with moderate-to-severe CD participants to confirm importance and relevance of BU in this population, cognitively debrief the Urgency NRS, and explore score interpretation and CD remission. A quantitative web survey study was conducted to explore the measurement properties of the urgency NRS. RESULTS: Qualitative Interview: 34 of 35 participants reported BU. It was most bothersome for 44%, 47% reported it daily, 18% with every bowel movement. BU had a severe impact on daily activities, causing many participants to stay home more than preferred. Patients confirmed the relevance, appropriateness, comprehensibility of the item, recall period, response options, and instructions of the Urgency NRS. Small reductions on the Urgency NRS score reflected meaningful improvements. Quantitative survey: The study sample comprised 76 participants (65.8% female). Mean Urgency NRS score was 4.7 (SD 2.26; N = 76) at Week 1, with no floor/ceiling effect. Test-retest reliability was acceptable. Construct and known-groups validity against selected PROs were overall strong and within ranges hypothesized a priori. CONCLUSION: The Urgency NRS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess BU severity in CD.

Social media in the health-care setting: benefits but also a minefield of compliance and other legal issues.

Throughout the past 20 years, the rising use of social media has revolutionized health care as well as other businesses. It allows large groups of people to create and share information, ideas, and experiences through online communications, and develop social and professional contacts easily and inexpensively. Our Gastroenterology organizations, among others, have embraced this technology. Although the health-care benefits may be many, social media must be viewed through a legal lens, recognizing the accompanying burdens of compliance, ethical, and litigation issues. Theories of liability and risk continue to evolve as does the technology. Social media usage within the medical community is fraught with potential legal issues, requiring remedial responses to meet patients' needs and comply with current laws, while not exposing physicians to medical malpractice and other tort risks.

Most doctors win: what to do if sued for medical malpractice.

All gastroenterologists are at risk of being accused of medical malpractice; few have received much training about what to do should a lawsuit occur. This article details what one can expect in a typical medical malpractice negligence claim and reviews basic relevant legal terminology. The timeline of a lawsuit is described, particularly noting the physician's role in discovery and trial. Cautions and suggestions for successful navigation of this unfamiliar and uncomfortable world are dispensed.

Legal risks of clinical practice guidelines.

Well-crafted systemically developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are intended to frame current medical knowledge in a manner that will assist health care providers in delivering high quality care. CPGs are being used in the malpractice arena to define a credible standard of care to measure the accused physician for an alleged problem addressed. This may occur despite a medical society's disclaimer that they are not intended, nor devised, for that purpose. It can be argued that CPGs may be used with greater effect by the plaintiff's bar for inculpatory evidence than by the defense as an exculpatory standard. Physicians should be aware of the legal use of CPGs and the associated risk management implications. Physicians who write guidelines for medical societies may wish to consider the potential future courtroom use of CPGs as they attempt to use evolving research to enhance patient care. A fine line may separate a "best practice" from acceptable quality care; the former may not be expected to occur in all patient care interactions. Suggestions embedded in a CPG rather than other publication may be legally interpreted incorrectly as a baseline standard of care expectation.