Automatic segmentation of cardiac structures for breast cancer radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We developed an automatic method to segment cardiac substructures given a radiotherapy planning CT images to support epidemiological studies or clinical trials looking at cardiac disease endpoints after radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used a most-similar atlas selection algorithm and 3D deformation combined with 30 detailed cardiac atlases. We cross-validated our method within the atlas library by evaluating geometric comparison metrics and by comparing cardiac doses for simulated breast radiotherapy between manual and automatic contours. We analyzed the impact of the number of cardiac atlas in the library and the use of manual guide points on the performance of our method. RESULTS: The Dice Similarity Coefficients from the cross-validation reached up to 97% (whole heart) and 80% (chambers). The Average Surface Distance for the coronary arteries was less than 10.3 mm on average, with the best agreement (7.3 mm) in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). The dose comparison for simulated breast radiotherapy showed differences less than 0.06 Gy for the whole heart and atria, and 0.3 Gy for the ventricles. For the coronary arteries, the dose differences were 2.3 Gy (LAD) and 0.3 Gy (other arteries). The sensitivity analysis showed no notable improvement beyond ten atlases and the manual guide points does not significantly improve performance. CONCLUSION: We developed an automated method to contour cardiac substructures for radiotherapy CTs. When combined with accurate dose calculation techniques, our method should be useful for cardiac dose reconstruction of a large number of patients in epidemiological studies or clinical trials.

Lens Dose Reduction by Patient Posture Modification During Neck CT.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation exposure of the lens during neck CT may increase a patient's risk of developing cataracts. Radiologists at the National Institutes of Health worked with technicians to modify the neck CT scanning procedure to include a reduction in the scanning range, a reduction in the tube potential (kilovoltage), and a change in neck positioning using a head tilt. We objectively quantified the organ dose changes after this procedure modification using a computer simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed CT images of 40 patients (20 men and 20 women) scanned before and after the procedure change. Radiation dose to the lens delivered before and after the procedure change was calculated using an in-house CT dose calculator combined with computational human phantoms deformed to match head tilt angles. We also calculated the doses to other radiosensitive organs including the brain, pituitary gland, eye globes, and salivary glands before and after the procedure change. RESULTS: Our dose calculations showed that modifying the neck position, shortening the scanning range, and reducing the tube potential reduced the dose to the lens by 89% (p < 0.0001). The median brain, pituitary gland, globes, and salivary gland doses also decreased by 59%, 52%, 66%, and 29%, respectively. We found that overranging significantly affects the lens dose. CONCLUSION: Combining head tilt and scanning range reduction is an easy and effective method that significantly reduces radiation dose to the lens and other radiosensitive head and neck organs.