ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Thrombosis and bleeding are recognized complications of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19), with a higher incidence described particularly in the critically ill. METHODS: A retrospective review of COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care units (ICU) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes included clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events (according to the ISTH definition) in the ICU. Secondary outcomes included mortality vis-a-vis the type of anticoagulation. RESULTS: The cohort included 144 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a median age of 64 years (IQR 54.5-75). The majority were male (85 (59.0%)) and Caucasian (90 (62.5%)) with a median BMI of 30.5 kg/m2 (IQR 25.7-36.1). The median APACHE score at admission to the ICU was 12.5 (IQR 9.5-22). The coagulation parameters at admission were a d-dimer level of 109.2 mg/mL, a platelet count of 217.5 k/mcl, and an INR of 1.4. The anticoagulation strategy at admission included prophylactic anticoagulation for 97 (67.4%) patients and therapeutic anticoagulation for 35 (24.3%) patients, while 12 (8.3%) patients received no anticoagulation. A total of 29 patients (20.1%) suffered from thrombotic or major bleeding complications. These included 17 thrombus events (11.8%)-8 while on prophylactic anticoagulation (7 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose) and 9 while on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)-and 19 major bleeding events (13.2%) (4 on no anticoagulation, 7 on prophylactic (6 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose), and 8 on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)). A higher thrombosis risk among patients who received remdesivir (18.8% vs. 5.3% (p-value = 0.01)) and convalescent serum (17.3% vs. 5.8% (p-value = 0.03%)) was noted, but no association with baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, comorbidity), coagulation parameters, or treatments (steroids, mechanical ventilation) could be identified. There were 10 pulmonary embolism cases (6.9%). A total of 99 (68.8%) patients were intubated, and 66 patients (45.8%) died. Mortality was higher, but not statistically significant, in patients with thrombotic or bleeding complications-58.6% vs. 42.6% (p-value = 0.12)-and higher in the bleeding (21.2%) vs. thrombus group (12.1%), p-value = 0.06. It did not significantly differ according to the type of anticoagulation used or the coagulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a high incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications among critically ill COVID-19 patients. The findings of thrombotic events in patients on anticoagulation and major bleeding events in patients on no or prophylactic anticoagulation pose a challenging clinical dilemma in the issue of anticoagulation for COVID-19 patients. The questions raised by this study and previous literature on this subject demonstrate that the role of anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients is worthy of further investigation.
ABSTRACT
Importance Despite growing literature, there is still limited understanding of factors that can predict outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who require intensive care. Objective To evaluate the characteristics of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and identify their associations with outcomes. Background There are limited data on the outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Pennsylvania. Design Retrospective study Setting Intensive care units in an academic health system in Western Pennsylvania. Participants Patients with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to ICUs as direct admission or transfers from regular floors between March 1, 2020, and April 30, 2020. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included complications during ICU stay, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and the need for oxygen at discharge. Categorical variables are described as frequencies and continuous variables as median with interquartile range (IQR). Regression modeling was used to identify the predictors of inpatient mortality in these patients. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed using Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas). Results The cohort included 58 consecutive patients, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 54-73), 63.8% of which were male. On presentation, constitutional symptoms were the most common (91.4%), followed by lower respiratory tract symptoms (87.9%). Tachypnea (65.5%) and hypoxia (67.2%) were the most common abnormal vital signs at presentation. Common comorbidities were cardiovascular disease (74.1%), obesity (53.5%), and diabetes (39.7%). The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score on admission to ICU was 11 (IQR 8.5-17.5). The major complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) 50.0%, shock 41.4%, and acute kidney injury 41.4%. The proportion of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation, required vasopressors, or were on renal replacement therapy were 58.6%, 41.4%, and 10.3%, respectively. Overall mortality was 32.8%. Age, Charlson-comorbidity index, tachypnea, lymphopenia at presentation, high APACHE score, shock, ARDS, mechanical ventilation, and steroid use were significantly associated with mortality. Of the patients who survived their ICU stay, 63.2% were discharged home and 44.7% had a new oxygen requirement at discharge. Conclusion and relevance Our study reports high mortality in COVID-19 patients requiring ICU care in Western Pennsylvania. Identifying factors associated with poor prognosis could help risk-stratify these patients. Prospective studies are needed to assess whether early risk stratification and triaging result in improved outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contraversive Lateropulsion, also referred to as contraversive pushing, pusher behavior, and pusher syndrome, can be associated with increased hospital length of stay, increased health care costs, and delayed outcomes in persons with stroke. The purpose of this updated systematic review was to identify scales used to classify contraversive lateropulsion, investigate literature that addresses their clinimetric properties, and create a resource for clinicians recommending use in clinical practice. METHODS: Three databases were searched for articles from inception to March 2017. The search strategy followed Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was applied to evaluate methodological quality. RESULTS: Four hundred three records were screened. Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Four scales were identified: the Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP), the Modified Scale for Contraversive Pushing (M-SCP), the Burke Lateropulsion Scale (BLS), and the Swedish Scale for Contraversive Pushing (S-SCP). Psychometric property investigation was most robust for the SCP and the BLS. Cross-cultural validity has not been fully investigated in scales used outside of their country of origin. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The BLS is recommended for identifying contraversive lateropulsion. The scale assesses the presence of contraversive lateropulsion across several functional tasks, from rolling to walking, and is the only scale originally written in English. The BLS is the only tool to receive ratings greater than poor for reliability and responsiveness. The BLS should be implemented as soon as contraversive lateropulsion is suspected to guide frontline clinicians' initial plan of care, allow objective identification of change over time, and facilitate easier investigation of interventional efficacy.Video Abstract available for additional insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A177).
