Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 117(5): 1130-1135, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21508752

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the feasibility and immunogenicity of an accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule of 0, 1, and 4 months in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a prospective clinical trial of high-risk pregnant women who were hepatitis B surface antigen-negative at presentation for prenatal care. A detailed questionnaire was administered and eligible women received a hepatitis B vaccine intramuscularly on a 0-, 1-, and 4-month schedule. Adverse reactions and hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion rates were documented. Factors influencing seroconversion were determined. RESULTS: Two hundred high-risk pregnant women were enrolled; 84% completed the three-dose vaccine series. Seroconversion (hepatitis B surface antigen 10 milli-international units/mL or greater) after one dose was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-63%), 77% (95% CI, 71-83%) after two doses, and 90% (95% CI, 85-94%) after completing three doses. Body mass index was inversely associated with seroconversion rates (P<.001). There was no single body mass index above which seroconversion did not occur. There were no serious adverse events; injection site discomfort was the most prevalent complaint (10.5%). CONCLUSION: An accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedule at 0, 1, and 4 months in high-risk pregnant women is effective, practical, and well tolerated. This accelerated vaccine strategy can be completed during the course of pregnancy and provides another means of decreasing hepatitis B virus disease and transmission.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B Vaccines/adverse effects , Hepatitis B Vaccines/immunology , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Prospective Studies
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 113(6): 1307-1312, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19461427

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether daily blood glucose self-monitoring reduces macrosomia when compared with weekly office testing in women with gestational diabetes. METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 1997, standard treatment at our hospital for women with diet-treated gestational diabetes included routine office monitoring of fasting blood glucose. Beginning in January 1998, blood glucose self-monitoring (four times daily) became the standard management. Women with diet-treated gestational diabetes who underwent routine office-based monitoring of fasting glucose values were compared with similar women who used blood glucose self-monitoring. The outcomes of interest were birthweight at or above 4,000 g and large for gestational age (LGA) in relation to the method of blood glucose self-monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 315 women used daily blood glucose self-monitoring, and they were compared with 675 women with weekly office-based glucose testing. Women with daily blood glucose self-monitoring had fewer macrosomic (29.5% compared with 21.9%, P=.013) and LGA neonates (34.4% compared with 23.1%, P < or = .001) and gained significantly less weight (median 0.56, interquartile range 0.22-1.08 lb per week compared with 0.74, interquartile range 0.33-1.17 lb per week, P=.009). CONCLUSION: Daily blood glucose self-monitoring, compared with weekly office-based testing, is associated with a reduction in the incidence of macrosomia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring/methods , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes, Gestational/blood , Diabetes, Gestational/diet therapy , Adult , Female , Fetal Macrosomia/prevention & control , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...