Disparities in State Medicaid Coverage of Tretinoin for Pigmentary Disorders Compared to Acne Vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) are common cosmetic dermatologic conditions that predominantly affect patients with skin phototypes III-VI. Comparing treatment coverage for these pigmentary disorders to treatment coverage for acne vulgaris may demonstrate disparities in insurance coverage for diseases that primarily affect patients of color. OBJECTIVE: Describe differences in Medicaid coverage for topical tretinoin for melasma and PIH vs. acne vulgaris in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of Medicaid insurance plans in all 50 states and the District of Columbia conducted between February 1 and 28, 2023. Data was collected from online publicly available preferred drug lists, prior authorization criteria, and email/telephone inquiries. Information was collected regarding coverage restrictions, including age restrictions, diagnostic restrictions, preferred drug status, and prior authorization requirements. RESULTS: Complete coverage data for all three clinical indications was retrieved from 30 (58.8%) states; partial coverage data for acne vulgaris was retrieved from 16 (31.4%) states; no coverage data was retrieved from 5 (9.8%) states. Of states reporting coverage data, topical tretinoin is covered in 45 (97.8%) states for acne vulgaris and 10 (33.3%) states for melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. There was decreased Medicaid coverage of topical tretinoin for acne vulgaris compared to melasma and PIH (P<0.05).  Conclusion: There is differential Medicaid coverage for acne vulgaris compared to pigmentary disorders which disproportionately affect patients of color. Greater advocacy is required to ensure equal treatment for conditions that affect racial minority patients. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):e151-e153.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8069e  .

Evaluating the sources and types of dietary and nutritional advice for patients with alopecia areata.

Although there are now two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for severe alopecia areata (AA), many patients still resort to non-medical therapies and lifestyle modifications such as diet and nutrition. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sources and types of dietary and nutritional advice for patients with AA. We distributed a cross-sectional national survey using the National Alopecia Areata Foundation's email list-serv between August 2022 and January 2023. Most respondents were White (76.3%), employed (58.3%) females (84.4%) with a mean age of 52 years. 163 (19.1%) respondents reported receiving diet and/or nutritional advice and 418 (49.5%) respondents reported searching for diet and/or nutritional advice to help with their AA; the most common source of advice was online. The most common dietary changes were the use of vitamins or supplements (30.6%), adherence to diets (23.2%), and the addition of specific foods (21.4%). 209 (50.2%) respondents reported no change in their disease and 197 (47.4%) respondents reported no change in how they felt about their disease compared to before they tried the change. Many AA patients search for or receive unsolicited dietary and nutritional advice and subsequently modify their behavior to manage their disease. However, the efficacy of these changes is unclear. Providers should be mindful of the sources through which patients obtain treatment information as well as the lifestyle changes patients make to counsel patients with evidence-based information. Further investigation is needed to better characterize the direct and indirect costs of dietary and nutritional modification in the treatment of AA.

Validation of alopecia coding in US claims data among women of childbearing age.

BACKGROUND: Accurately identifying alopecia in claims data is important to study this rare medication side effect. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify alopecia in women of childbearing age. METHODS: We linked electronic health records from a large healthcare system in Massachusetts (Mass General Brigham) with Medicaid claims data from 2016 through 2018 to identify all women aged 18 to 50 years with an ICD-10 code for alopecia, including alopecia areata, androgenic alopecia, non-scarring alopecia, or cicatricial alopecia, from a visit to the MGB system. Using eight predefined algorithms to identify alopecia in Medicaid claims data, we randomly selected 300 women for whom we reviewed their charts to validate the alopecia diagnosis. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were computed for the primary algorithm and seven algorithm variations, stratified by race. RESULTS: Out of 300 patients with at least 1 ICD-10 code for alopecia in the Medicaid claims, 286 had chart-confirmed alopecia (PPV = 95.3%). The algorithm requiring two diagnosis codes plus one prescription claim for alopecia treatment identified 55 patients (PPV = 100%). The algorithm requiring 1 diagnosis code for alopecia plus 1 procedure claim for intralesional triamcinolone injection identified 35 patients (PPV = 100%). Across all 8 algorithms tested, the PPV varied between 95.3% and 100%. The PPV for alopecia ranged from 94% to 100% in White and 96%-100% in 48 non-White women. The exact date of alopecia onset was difficult to determine in charts. CONCLUSION: At least one recorded ICD-10 code for alopecia in claims data identified alopecia in women of childbearing age with high accuracy.

Understanding patient perspectives on vaccine decision making in adults with autoimmune bullous diseases: a qualitative study.

Patients with autoimmune bullous diseases are at an increased risk of infection, both from the underlying skin disease and from immunosuppressive treatments. Limited information is available on vaccine beliefs and behaviors in dermatology patients and adults with autoimmune bullous diseases in particular. To understand vaccine decision making, identify perceived risks and benefits of vaccinations, and discuss individual experiences in patients with autoimmune bullous diseases in the United States. A qualitative study was performed utilizing semi-structured interviews, and analysis was conducted on NVivo. Patterns were identified in the coded data, and representative quotations were recorded for each major theme. Interviews were conducted between February 15, 2022 and September 15, 2022. Twenty patients with a diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, or pemphigus foliaceous were interviewed. Of the 20 participants, 14 (70%) were female, with a mean (SD, range) age of 64.8 (13.2, 34-83) years. Key themes that emerged from qualitative analysis of the interviews included patient concerns regarding their increased susceptibility to infection, potential exacerbation of skin disease following vaccination, and the effect of immunosuppressive medications on humoral response to vaccines. Lack of appointment availability, difficulty accessing vaccines, and cost were commonly identified barriers to vaccination. These findings provide valuable knowledge for dermatologists in regard to providing counseling specific to patient concerns and to improve communication surrounding vaccination in the dermatology setting.

Perioperative management and clinical outcomes of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum.

Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum is an uncommon subtype of pyoderma gangrenosum mainly affecting stoma sites of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. While surgical treatments are often used to assist healing, little is known about the relationship between surgical interventions and the rate of recurrence of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. The aim of this study was to identify patient and clinical factors associated with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum recurrence following surgical intervention. A multi-institutional retrospective case series and literature review was conducted to evaluate patient characteristics and perioperative treatment. Patients of any age with peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum undergoing surgical operations related to their pyoderma gangrenosum or due to another comorbidity were included. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographic information. Associations were evaluated using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Thirty-seven cases were included, 78.3% of which had a history of inflammatory bowel disease. Overall, 13 (35.1%) cases experienced recurrence at 30 days. There was no significant association identified between patient demographics, stoma location, surgical intervention, or perioperative treatment with rate of recurrence at 30 days post-operation. While no clinical risk factors or treatments were associated with recurrence, our work underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to this disease to address gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and surgical components of treatment.

Characterizing differences in outpatient dermatologic care utilization among disaggregated Asian American subgroups.

Despite having significantly higher rates of atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders compared to White patients, studies suggest that Asian Americans are underrepresented in outpatient dermatology clinics. In this study, we utilize the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and prioritize disaggregated analyses to evaluate differences between the most populous Asian American subgroups (Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and "Other") in utilization of outpatient dermatologic care. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to compare outpatient dermatologic care use between each Asian American subgroup and Non-Hispanic Whites. Out of 96,559 adults, our study included 5264 self-identified Asian American and 91,295 non-Hispanic White adults. Most Asian participants were female, had health insurance, and had incomes > 2 times above the federal poverty line. We found that, compared to 21.4% for NH whites, lifetime prevalence of total body skin exam was highest among Filipino Americans (12.3%) and lowest among Indian Americans (7%). Additionally, all Asian American subgroups had a significantly lower odd than NH Whites of ever having a total body skin exam, with Indian Americans having the lowest odds. While the benefit of TBSEs in Indian Americans is unclear, it is possible that differing cultural perceptions about dermatologic needs, barriers to care, or immigration status may be contributing to the observed difference. Furthermore, the Indian diaspora encapsulates a range of skin tones, risk factors, and behaviors that may differentially influence dermatologic disease risk, similar to trends identified among Hispanic patients (Trepanowski et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol 88:1206-1209, 2023). Additional research utilizing the seven national databases that have been identified as providing disaggregated Asian racial information (Kamal et al. in J Am Acad Dermatol, 2023) may be useful to further illuminate avenues for intervention.

Superficial and Bullous Neutrophilic Dermatoses: Sneddon-Wilkinson, IgA Pemphigus, and Bullous Lupus.

Sneddon-Wilkinson disease (SWD), IgA pemphigus, and bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (BSLE) are superficial and bullous neutrophilic dermatoses. They are all characterized by sterile neutrophilic infiltrate but differ in the level of skin affected and presence of autoantibodies. Both SWD and IgA pemphigus present with grouped flaccid pustules and have epidermal involvement; it is unclear whether they are distinct or exist on a spectrum of the same disease. IgA pemphigus is distinguished from SWD by positive direct immunofluorescence showing intercellular IgA deposition. BSLE presents with tense bullae, dermal neutrophilic infiltrate, and direct immunofluorescence showing linear IgG deposition along the dermal-epidermal junction.

Estimated Spending on Beremagene Geperpavec for Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Importance: New gene therapies can offer substantial benefits to patients, particularly those with rare diseases who have few therapeutic options. In May 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first topical gene therapy, beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC), for treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). However, FDA approval was based on limited data in patients with autosomal dominant disease, even though they comprise approximately 50% of all DEB cases. Objective: To estimate projected spending in the US on B-VEC therapy for treating autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation used data from the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry to estimate the current population of US patients with autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive DEB, with the aim of estimating US spending on B-VEC therapy from an all-payers perspective during 1- and 3-year periods after FDA approval. A base-case cost of $300 000 per patient per year was assumed based on a report from the manufacturer (Krystal Biotech). Exposure: Treatment with B-VEC. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated overall spending on B-VEC in the first year and over a 3-year period after FDA approval. Several prespecified sensitivity analyses with different assumptions about the eligible patient population and the cost of therapy were performed, and lifetime total costs of treatment per patient were estimated. Results: The estimated number of US patients with DEB who were eligible for treatment with B-VEC in the first year after FDA approval was 894. The estimated total expenditure for B-VEC therapy was $268 million (range, $179 million-$357 million). Over a 3-year period, estimated spending was $805 million (range, $537 million-$1.1 billion). Estimated lifetime total costs per patient were $15 million (range, $10 million-$20 million) per patient with autosomal recessive DEB and $17 million (range, $11 million-$22 million) for patients with autosomal dominant DEB. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this economic evaluation suggest that the FDA's broad indication for the use of B-VEC in treating both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant DEB will have significant implications for payers.

Prevalence of Pretreatment Testing Recommended for Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases.

Importance: Laboratory testing for the presence of tuberculosis, hepatitis, and other conditions before starting most systemic immunomodulatory agents is recommended in patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases (CISD) but current testing patterns in the US are unclear. Objective: To determine the prevalence of pretreatment testing that is recommended for patients with CISD (psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or atopic dermatitis). Design, Setting, and Participants: This descriptive analysis of US commercial insurance claims databases from December 31, 2002, to December 31, 2020, included adult patients with CISD (psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or atopic dermatitis) who started an immunomodulatory agent, including methotrexate, tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17Ai, ustekinumab, IL-23i, dupilumab, or apremilast. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients who underwent the screening tests as suggested by professional societies-including for tuberculosis, hepatitis, and liver function; complete blood cell counts; and lipid panels-were determined within 6 months before and during 2 years after treatment start. Results: A total of 122 308 patients with CISDs (median [IQR] age, 49 [38-58] years; 63 663 [52.1%] male) starting systemic immunomodulatory treatment in the US were included. Treatment for patients with CISDs comprised methotrexate (28 684), tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (40 965), ustekinumab (12 841), IL-23i (6116), IL-17Ai (9799), dupilumab (7787), or apremilast (16 116). Complete blood cell count was the most common test, performed in 41% (3161/7787) to 69% (19 659/28 684) of individuals before initiation across treatments. Between 11% (889/7787) and 59% (3613/6116) of patients had tuberculosis screening within 6 months before treatment, and 3% (149/4577) to 26% (1559/6097) had updated tests 1 year later. Between 13% (1006/7787) and 41% (16 728/40 965) had hepatitis panels before treatment. Low pretreatment testing levels before apremilast (15% [2331/16 116] to 45% [7253/16 116]) persisted a year into treatment (9% [816/8496] to 36% [2999/8496]) and were similar to dupilumab (11% [850/7787] to 41% [3161/7787] vs 3% [149/4577] to 25% [1160/4577]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this descriptive analysis of patients with CISDs starting systemic immunomodulatory treatment in the US, less than 60% received the recommended pretreatment testing. Additional research is required to understand whether variations in testing affect patient outcomes.

Alopecia Areata.

This Patient Page describes the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of alopecia areata.

Mortality and Autopsy Findings in Patients with Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Multi-Institutional Series.

INTRODUCTION: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with an increased risk of mortality compared to the general population. The causes of this increased risk are not well understood. Misdiagnosis is common in PG, and many studies are limited by the inclusion of misdiagnosed cases. The goal of this study was to review autopsy findings, identify causes of death, and identify factors that may worsen outcomes among deceased patients confirmed to have PG. METHODS: Data was retrospectively reviewed from the electronic medical records at five academic hospitals. A search was conducted for deceased patients with a diagnosis of PG who had an autopsy performed between 2010 and 2020. We report a descriptive analysis of 11 patients and their clinical characteristics, causes of death, and autopsy findings. RESULTS: The average age of death was 62.9 years. Seven patients had at least one underlying condition known to be associated with PG including inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, or a hematologic disorder. The most common cause of death was infection (n = 6, 54.5%), followed by pulmonary embolism (n = 3, 27.3%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 2, 18.2%). Six patients (54.5%) were taking systemic steroids at the time of death. CONCLUSION: The development of PG may shorten life expectancy among those with underlying conditions associated with PG, and common treatments for PG may contribute to the risk of fatal complications. Awareness of the risk of infection, thrombosis, and malignancy among those with PG is necessary for proper management. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between PG and thromboembolism.

Comorbid psychiatric disease significantly mediates increased rates of alcohol use disorder among patients with inflammatory and pigmentary skin disorders: a case-control study in the All of Us Research Program.

Dermatologic diseases have a well-documented association with depression and anxiety, which are in turn often comorbid with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Nonethleess, the relationship between dermatologic disease and AUD, and the relative contribution of depression and anxiety, are poorly understood. Here, we utilize the National Insittutes of Health All of Us Research Program to investigate the association between inflammatory and pigmentary dermatologic diseases with AUD. Furthermore, we investigate whether comorbid depression and anxiety mediates this relationship. We employed a matched case-control model with multivariable logistic regression. We also employed a mediation analysis. We found an increased odds of AUD among patients with atopic dermatitis, acne/rosacea, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis, and pigmentary disorders (vitiligo, melasma, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation). This was partially mediated by anxiety and depression, especially for diseases with a significant cosmetic component. Overall, these findings highlight the profound psychological and physical health effects that inflammatory and pigmentary disease can have on patients, both independently and in combination with comorbid psychiatric disease.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.