ABSTRACT
Background: This two-center pilot study combined for the first time an intra-arterial glucose sensor with a decision support system for insulin dosing (SGCplus system) in critically ill patients with hyperglycemia. Methods: Twenty-two patients who were equipped with an arterial line and required iv insulin therapy were managed by the SGCplus system during their medical treatment at the intensive care unit. Results: Time to target was 111 ± 195 min (80-150 mg/dL) and 135 ± 267 min (100-160 mg/dL) in the lower and higher glucose target group. Mean blood glucose (BG) was 142 ± 32 mg/dL with seven BG values <70 mg/dL. Mean daily insulin dose was 62 ± 38 U and mean daily carbohydrate intake 148 ± 50 g/day (enteral nutrition) and 102 ± 58 g/day (parenteral nutrition). Acceptance of SGCplus suggestions was high (93%). Conclusions: The SGCplus system can be safely applied in critically ill patients with hyperglycemia and enables good glycemic control.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Critical Care/methods , Critical Illness , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Aged , Algorithms , Data Accuracy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
To compare the performance of a professional continuous glucose monitoring (proCGM) and a personal continuous glucose monitoring (persCGM) system worn in parallel under standardized conditions in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D), two CGM systems (iPro2 - proCGM; Minimed 640G - persCGM) worn in parallel using the same sensor (Enlite 2) were compared. Ten people with T1D were included in this single-centre, open-label study in which CGM performance was evaluated. The study consisted of a 24-hours inpatient phase (meals, exercise, glycaemic challenges) and a 4-day home phase. Analyses included fulfilment of ISO 15197:2013 criteria, mean absolute relative difference (MARD), Parkes Error Grid and Bland-Altman plots. During the inpatient stay, ISO 15197:2013 criteria fulfilment was 58.4% (proCGM) and 57.8% (persCGM). At home, the systems met ISO 15197:2013 criteria by 66.5% (proCGM) and 65.3% (persCGM). No difference of MARD in inpatient phase (19.1 ± 16.7% vs. 19.0 ± 19.6; P = 0.83) and home phase (18.6 ± 26.8% vs. 17.4 ± 21.3%, P = 0.87) was observed. All sensors performed less accurately during hypoglycaemia. ProCGM and persCGM showed similar performance during daytime and night-time for the inpatient and the home phase. However, sensor performance was reduced during hypoglycaemia for both systems.
