[COVID-19 recurrence due to reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 in a hemodialysis patient: there and back again].

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of infections and deaths so far. After recovery, the possibility of reinfection has been reported. Patients on hemodialysis are at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and developing serious complications. Furthermore, they are a relatively hypo-anergic population, in which the development and duration of the immune and antibody response is still partially unknown. This may play a role in the possible susceptibility to reinfection. To date, only 3 cases of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection from strains prior to the Omicron variant in patients on chronic hemodialysis have been reported in literature. In all of them, the first infection was detected by screening in the absence of symptoms, potentially indicating a poor immune response, and there are no data about the antibody titre developed. We report a case of recurrence of COVID-19 in 2020 - first infection likely from Wuhan strain; reinfection likely from English variant (Alpha) after 7 months - in a hemodialysis patient with clinical symptoms and pulmonary ultrasound abnormalities. Swabs were negative in the interval between episodes (therefore excluding any persistence of positivity) and the lack of antibody protection after the first infection was documented by the serological test. The role of the potential lack - or rapid loss - of immune protection following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in hemodialysis patients needs to be better defined, also in consideration of the anti-COVID vaccination campaign and the arrival of the Omicron variant, which appears to elude the immunity induced by vaccines and by previous variants. For this purpose, prospective multicenter studies are in progress in several European countries. This case also highlights the need for a careful screening with nasopharyngeal swabs in dialysis rooms, even after patients overcome infection and/or are vaccinated.

[Renal Infarction: multicentric cases in Piedmont].

We describe factors associated to renal infarction, clinical, instrumental and laboratoristic features, and therapeutic strategies too. This is an observational, review and polycentric study of cases in Nephrologic Units in Piedmont during 2013-2015, with diagnosis of renal infarction by Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA). We collected 48 cases (25 M, age 57±16i; 23 F age 70±18, p = 0.007), subdivided in 3 groups based on etiology: group 1: cardio-embolic (n=19) ; group 2: coagulation abnormalities (n= 9); group 3: other causes or idiopathic (n=20). Median time from symptoms to diagnosis, known only in 38 cases, was 2 days (range 2 hours- 8 days). Symptoms of clinical presentation were: fever (67%), arterial hypertension (58%), abdominal o lumbar pain (54%), nausea/vomiting (58%), neurological symptoms (12%), gross hematuria (10%). LDH were increased (>530 UI/ml) in 96% of cases (45 cases out of 47), PCR (>0.5 mg/dl) in 94% of cases (45 out of 48), and eGFR <60 ml/min in 56% of cases (27 out of 48). Comparison of the various characteristics of the three groups shows: significantly older age (p=0.0001) in group 1 (76±12 years) vs group 2 (54±17 years) and group 3 (56±17 years); significantly more frequent cigarette smoking (p = 0.01) in group 2 (67%; 5 cases out of 9) and group 3 (60%; 12 cases out of 20) than group 1 (17%). No case has been subjected to endovascular thrombolysis. In 40 out of 48 cases, anticoagulant therapy was performed after diagnosis: in 12 (32%) cases no treatment, in 12 cases (30%) heparin, in 8 cases (20%) low molecular weight heparin, in 4 cases (10%) oral anticoagulants, in 3 cases fondaparinux (7%), in 1 case (2%) dermatan sulfate. CONCLUSIONS: Although some characteristics may guide the diagnosis, latency between onset and diagnosis is still moderately high and is likely to affect timely therapy.

[Severe hyperkalemia in patients referred to an emergency departement: the role of antialdosterone drugs and of renin-angiotensin system blockers]. / Iperpotassiemia severa in pazienti afferenti ad un pronto soccorso: ruolo degli antagonisti dell'aldosterone e dei modulatori del sistema renina-angiotensina.

We analyzed the clinical features and the factors associated with the presence of hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.3 mmol/L) in a cohort of patients presenting to an Emergency Department. A total of 168 cases were observed (89 males and 79 females), mean age 77.512 years. Fifty-six patients were diabetics (33.3%), 51 patients had chronic kidney disease (30%) and 36 patients with cardiac failure (21.4%). Sixty-nine patients (41%) were treated with RAS-blockers (ACE-I n = 50; ARBs, n = 19). 65 subjects were taking loop diuretics (39%), 17 (10%) thiazides. Thirty-one (18%) were assuming antialdosterone drugs; 16 (52%) out of these had a positive history of heart failure and 14 (41%) had a positive history of chronic kidney disease. In 85 cases (51%) patients were receiving an ACE/ARB or an antialdosterone drug. In 125 patients (74%) eGFR at presentation was <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Serum potassium values were significantly higher in patients treated with both ACE/ARB and antialdosterone drugs. In 20 cases (12%) serum potassium was 6.5 mmol/L; these patients assumed antialdosterone drugs more frequently, alone and mostly in association with ACE-I/ARBs (65% vs 7%; p<0.0001). The simultaneous assumption of ACE-I/ARBs and antialdosterone drugs emerges as the major cause of severe hyperkalemia in our cases, thus confirming the warnings about this association in the presence of advanced age and reduced glomerular filtration rate.

Urinalysis: do not forget this type of cell in renal transplantation.

Microscopic sediment analysis of urine from a 56-year-old woman who underwent renal transplantation showed many uncommon clusters of rounded and translucent cells containing globular mucous cytoplasmic inclusions (HPF, x400). These cells were bigger than leukocytes and, compared with uroepithelial cells, showed a smaller nucleus to cytoplasm ratio and appeared eosinophilic, being pink rather than azurophilic with Sternheimer-Malbin stain. They were also unlikely to be tubular cells, which are usually smaller, singly distributed and associated with dysmorphic erythrocytes and/or casts and/or a worsening in renal function. A review of the patient's history showed that a pretransplantation urologic surgical treatment, including ileal bladder reconstruction, had been performed. Intestinal epithelial cells should be remembered when examining urinary sediment.

Dialysis choice in the context of an early referral policy: there is room for self care.

BACKGROUND: Predialysis care is vital for the patient and is crucial for dialysis choice: empowered, early referred patients tend to prefer out-of-hospital and self-care treatment; despite these claims, early referral remains too often a program more than a reality. Aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern and reasons for RRT choice in patients treated in a long-standing outpatient network, presently following 850 chronic patients (about 80% diabetics), working with an early referral policy and offering a wide set of dialysis options (home hemo and PD; self care and limited care hemodialysis; hospital hemodialysis). METHODS: Prospective historical study. All patients who started RRT in January 2001-December 2003 were considered. Correlations between demographical (sex, age, educational level) or clinical variables (pre-RRT follow-up, comorbidity, SGA and Karnofsky) and treatment choice have been tested by univariate (chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis) and multivariate models (logistic regression), both considering all choices and dichotomising choice into "hospital" versus "out of hospital dialysis". RESULTS: Hospital dialysis was chosen by 32.6% of patients; out of hospital in 67.4% (PD 26.5%, limited-care 18.4%, home hemodialysis 4.1%, self-care 18.4%). Hospital dialysis and PD were chosen by elderly patients (median age: 67.5 and 70 years respectively) with multiple comorbidities (75% and 92.3%); no difference for age, comorbidity, Karnofsky, SGA and educational level. 6/13 PD patients needed the help of a partner. Self-care/home hemodialysis patients were younger (median age 52), had higher educational level (p = 0.014) and lower prevalence of comorbidity (63.6% vs 94.7% in the other dialysis patients, p = 0.006). In the context of a long follow-up period (3.9 years) a statistically significant difference was found comparing hospital dialysis (3.3 years) vs out of hospital dialysis (4.9 years) (p = 0.035). In a logistic regression model, only pre-RRT follow-up was correlated with dialysis "hospital vs "out of hospital" choice (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Early nephrological follow-up may enhance self and home-based dialysis care.

The grafted kidney takes over: disappearance of the nephrotic syndrome after preemptive pancreas-kidney and kidney transplantation in diabetic nephropathy.

This report describes the rapid and complete reversal of proteinuria after preemptive transplantation in diabetic nephropathy. Case 1 was a 42-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes (before pancreas-kidney graft: serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL and proteinuria 9.1 g/day; 1 month after pancreas-kidney graft: proteinuria 0.3 g/day and creatinine 1.3 mg/dL). Case 2 was a 48-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (before kidney graft: creatinine 2 mg/dL and proteinuria 5.9 g/day; 1 month after: proteinuria 0.7 g/day and creatinine 1.1 mg/dL). The proteinuria pattern changed (pre: glomerular nonselective, tubular complete; post: physiologic). Renal scintiscan (99mTC-MAG3) demonstrated functional exclusion of the native kidneys, despite high pretransplant clearance (> 50 mL/min). The effect was not linked to euglycemia or readily explainable by pharmacologic effects (no difference in renal parameters after pancreas transplantation with the same protocols). These data confirm the efficacy of preemptive kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation in diabetic nephrotic syndrome and indicate that a regulatory hemodynamic effect should be investigated.

Referral of type 1 diabetic patients to a nephrology unit: will pre-emptive transplantation change our life?

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetic patients are a small but challenging subset of chronic kidney disease. The new frontiers of pancreas-kidney transplantation may enhance the need for early referral. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the referral pattern of type 1 diabetics to a specialized Nephrology Unit, and to quantify the indications for pancreas or pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation at referral in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Setting of study was a Nephrology Outpatient Unit, dedicated to diabetics, active since 1986; period of study 1991--2002. The main biochemical and clinical parameters were analyzed at referral. Indications for transplantation were put at: serum creatinine (sCr)> or =2 mg/dL or > or =3 mg/dL and/or nephrotic syndrome. Pancreas: lesser degrees of functional impairment without worsening after FK-506 challenge. RESULTS: 90 type 1 diabetics were referred: 48 males, 42 females; median age: 38 (18-65) years; median diabetological follow-up 20 (3-37) years; sCr 1.2 (0.6-7) mg/dL, proteinuria 0.9 (0-12.3) g/day; creatinine clearance: 58 (6-234) ml/min; Hbalc: 8.8% (5.9-14), diastolic blood pressure: 80 (55-100) mmHg, systolic blood pressure: 137.5 (70-180) mmHg. 85.6% had signs of end-organ damage due to diabetes. 67% of the patients had diabetic nephropathy, 20.7% hypertensive with or without diabetic nephropathy. According to the chosen criteria, 30.6% had indications for pancreas-kidney graft (sCr > or = 2 mg/dL), 25.9% considering sCr > or = 3 mg/dL; 28.2% further patients could be considered for isolated pancreas graft. CONCLUSIONS: At referral to the nephrologist, over 50% of type 1 diabetics may have indications for pancreas-kidney or pancreas graft; an earlier multidisciplinary work-up is needed to optimize an early pre-emptive transplant approach.

Low-protein vegetarian diet with alpha-chetoanalogues prior to pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pre-emptive pancreas-kidney transplantation is increasingly considered the best therapy for irreversible chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 1 diabetics. However, the best approach in the wait for transplantation has not yet been defined. AIM: To evaluate our experience with a low-protein (0.6 g/kg/day) vegetarian diet supplemented with alpha-chetoanalogues in type 1 diabetic patients in the wait for pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prospective study. Information on the progression of renal disease, compliance, metabolic control, reasons for choice and for drop-out were recorded prospectively; the data for the subset of patients who underwent the diet while awaiting a pancreas-kidney graft are analysed in this report. RESULTS: From November 1998 to April 2004, 9 type 1 diabetic patients, wait-listed or performing tests for wait-listing for pancreas-kidney transplantation, started the diet. All of them were followed by nephrologists and diabetologists, in the context of integrated care. There were 4 males and 5 females; median age 38 years (range 27.9-45.5); median diabetes duration 23.8 years (range 16.6-33.1), 8/9 with widespread organ damage; median creatinine at the start of the diet: 3.2 mg/dl (1.2-7.2); 4 patients followed the diet to transplantation, 2 are presently on the diet, 2 dropped out and started dialysis after a few months, 1 started dialysis (rescue treatment). The nutritional status remained stable, glycemia control improved in 4 patients in the short term and in 2 in the long term, no hyperkalemia, acidosis or other relevant side effect was recorded. Proteinuria decreased in 5 cases, in 3 from the nephrotic range. Albumin levels remained stable; the progression rate was a loss of 0.47 ml/min of creatinine clearance per month (ranging from an increase of 0.06 to a decrease of 2.4 ml/min) during the diet period (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula). CONCLUSIONS: Low-protein supplemented vegetarian diets may be a useful tool to slow CKD progression whilst awaiting pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Lost to follow-up: the bottleneck of early referral to renal units?

BACKGROUND: Early referral is a major goal in chronic kidney diseases; however, loss to follow-up, potentially limiting its advantages, has never been studied. MATERIAL/METHODS: In order to assess the prevalence and causes of loss to follow-up, a telephone inquiry was performed in a renal outpatient unit, mainly dedicated to early referral of diabetic patients. Patients were considered to be in follow-up if there was at least one check-up in the period February 2001-February 2002, and lost to follow-up if the last check-up had occurred in the previous year. The reasons for loss to follow-up were related to typical clinical-biochemical parameters to define a "drop-out profile". RESULTS: 195 patients were on follow-up: median creatinine 1.4 mg/dL, age 64, 76.9% diabetics. 81 patients were lost to follow-up: creatinine 1.4 mg/dL, age 70, 73.8% diabetics. A telephone number was available in 87.6% of the cases; 25 were not found, 7 had died, 24 were non-compliant, 1 was bed-ridden, 12 had changed care unit, 2 had started dialysis. Renal care was shorter in those lost to follow-up; among the latter, serum creatinine and age were significantly lower in non-compliant patients. A logistic regression model confirmed the significance of lower serum creatinine at last check-up in non-compliant patients (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Loss to follow-up is a problem in nephrology; lack of awareness probably causes the higher drop-out rate at lower creatinine levels. The initial period of care may be crucial for long-term compliance. Further studies are needed to tailor organizational and educational interventions.