ABSTRACT
Background: The treatment of proximal humerus fracture complicated by bone fragility is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the Neer classification and the Control Volume severity grade for the accuracy in the selection of the type of treatment and for prognostic evaluation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected the records of all patients admitted at the Emergency Department of our Institute, from 2013 to 2020, for a closed displaced proximal humerus fracture further investigated with a CT scan before treatment decision. We selected all patients with a minimum age of 65 years. The included fractures were retrospectively classified according to Neer, and Control Volume severity grade. The included patients were evaluated with Simple Shoulder Test (SST). A statistical analysis was performed to correlate the type of treatment and the clinical results to the Neer classification and the Control Volume severity grade. Results: Sixty-four patients (80%), were available for the telephonically interview at a mean follow up of 4 years and were included. According to the Control Volume model, we identified fracture with a low, medium and high severity grade, in 23 (36%), 13 (20%), and, 28 (44%) cases, respectively. Fifteen patients (23,5%) were conservatively treated, whether fourty-nine patients (76,5%) were operated. We find a statistical correlation between control volume severity grade and type of treatment. No Therapeutic correlation was detected for the Neer classification. A statistical correlation between the severity grade and clinical outcome could be observed only for patients with the same type of treatment. Conclusions: The use of Control Volume severity grade is associated with better therapeutic and prognostic informations in confront to the Neer classification.
