Reducing the knowledge to action gap in hospital nutrition care - Developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In hospital nutrition care the difficulty of translating knowledge to action often leads to inadequate management of patients with malnutrition. nutritionDay, an annual cross-sectional survey has been assessing nutrition care in healthcare institutions in 66 countries since 2006. While initial efforts led to increased awareness of malnutrition, specific local remedial actions rarely followed. Thus, reducing the Knowledge-to-action (KTA) gap in nutrition care requires more robust and focused strategies. This study describes the strategy, methods, instruments and experience of developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0, an audit and feedback intervention that uses quality and economic indicators, feedback, benchmarking and self-defined action strategies to reduce the KTA gap in hospital nutrition care. METHODS: We used an evidence based multi-professional mixed-methods approach to develop and implement nutritionDay 2.0 This audit and feedback intervention is driven by a Knowledge-to-Action framework complemented with robust stakeholder analysis. Further evidence was synthesized from the literature, online surveys, a pilot study, World Cafés and individual expert feedback involving international health care professionals, nutrition care scientists and patients. RESULTS: The process of developing and implementing nutritionDay 2.0 over three years resulted in a new audit questionnaire based on 36 nutrition care quality and economic indicators at hospital, unit and patient levels, a new action-oriented feedback and benchmarking report and a unit-level personalizable action plan template. The evaluation of nutritionDay 2.0 is ongoing and will include satisfaction and utility of nutritionDay 2.0 tools and short-, mid- and long-term effects on the KTA gap. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, nutritionDay 2.0 has the potential to promote behavioural and practice changes and improve hospital nutrition care outcomes. In research, the data generated advances knowledge about institutional malnutrition and quality of hospital nutrition care. The ongoing evaluation of the initiative will reveal how far the KTA gap in hospital nutrition care was addressed and facilitate the understanding of the mechanisms needed for successful audit and feedback. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration in clinicaltrials.gov: Identifier: NCT02820246.

Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the NutritionDay survey 2006.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition is a known risk factor for the development of complications in hospitalised patients. We determined whether eating only fractions of the meals served is an independent risk factor for mortality. METHODS: The NutritionDay is a multinational one-day cross-sectional survey of nutritional factors and food intake in 16,290 adult hospitalised patients on January 19th 2006. The effect of food intake and nutritional factors on death in hospital within 30 days was assessed in a competing risk analysis. RESULTS: More than half of the patients did not eat their full meal provided by the hospital. Decreased food intake on NutritionDay or during the previous week was associated with an increased risk of dying, even after adjustment for various patient and disease related factors. Adjusted hazard ratio for dying when eating about a quarter of the meal on NutritionDay was 2.10 (1.53-2.89); when eating nothing 3.02 (2.11-4.32). More than half of the patients who ate less than a quarter of their meal did not receive artificial nutrition support. Only 25% patients eating nothing at lunch receive artificial nutrition support. CONCLUSION: Many hospitalised patients in European hospitals eat less food than provided as regular meal. This decreased food intake represents an independent risk factor for hospital mortality.

Computer determined compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) in ventilated newborn infants.

We describe a simple, low cost technique for computerized measurements of compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) by airway occlusion technique in intubated newborn infants. Tidal volumes of 5, 7.5, and 10 mL/kg were injected from a calibrated syringe into the endotracheal tube via a three-way stop cock and a t-piece. Airway pressure was measured by means of a differential pressure transducer. The analog pressure signal was fed into an optically isolated signal conditioning termination panel and an analog input board which was connected to the PC bus. The signal was amplified and A/D converted by the input board and processed by the digital computer. Crs was determined as the ratio of the injected tidal volume to the difference between the endexpiratory pressure and the pressure at airway occlusion. The software is written in Turbo Pascal (Borland Int.) and includes a patient data base and facilities for system configuration, calibration of transducers, data acquisition, handling, calculation of Crs, reporting and archive storage. Data sampling frequency may be individually set at 60 to 200 Hz. Synchronous measurements in 10 newborn infants using analog pressure amplification and polygraphic recording showed that pressures were correctly determined by the computer and that amplitude and frequency response of the pressure recordings were adequate.