Design of novel isoxazole derivatives as tubulin inhibitors using computer-aided techniques: QSAR modeling, in silico ADMETox, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, biological efficacy, and retrosynthesis.

In the current work, computational methods were used to investigate new isoxazole derivatives that could be used as tubulin inhibitors. The study aims to develop a reliable quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model, following the criteria set by Golbraikh, Tropsha, and Roy. As a result, seven candidate compounds were developed, all having higher activity than the well-established anticancer agent Cisplatin (Cisp). According to the ADMETox in silico test, the candidates Pr4, Pr5, and P6 can be toxic. As a result, we have chosen to focus our study on compounds Pr1, Pr2, and Pr3. Molecular docking analysis revealed that drug candidate Pr2 exhibits the highest stability within the oxidized quinone reductase 2 (PDB ID: 4zvm), target receptor (ΔG(Pr2) = ΔG(Pr3) = -10.4 < ΔG(Pr1) = -10.0 < ΔG(Cisp) = -7.3 kcal/mol). This finding aligns with the activity predictions made by the QSAR model. Furthermore, molecular dynamics simulations of the Pr2-4zvm complex over 100 ns confirm the ligand's robust stability within the receptor's active site, supporting the results obtained from molecular docking and the QSAR model predictions. The CaverDock software was utilized to identify the tunnels likely to be followed by ligands moving from the active site to the receptor surface. This analysis also helped in determining the biological efficacy of the target compounds. The results indicated that the Pr2 compound is more effective than the others. Finally, the computer-assisted retrosynthesis process of two high confidence sequences was used to synthesize drug candidates.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

3D-QSAR methods were used to design eight new compounds and anti-tubulin agents.3D-QSAR models were validated by Golbraikh­Tropsha and Roy methods.The toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the proposed compounds were identified by the Lipinski rule of five, Veber rules, and ADMETox.Pr2 and Pr3 had a reasonable affinity to the receptor protein (ID PDB: 4zvm) based on molecular docking, reactivity indices, and molecular dynamics simulation.Metadynamics was used to study ligand transport in the receptor (ID PDB:3zvm).

Computational Prediction of 3,5-Diaryl-1H-Pyrazole and spiropyrazolines derivatives as potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for alzheimer disease treatment by 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and ADME-Tox.

The efficacy of 40 synthesized variants of 3,5-diaryl-1H-pyrazole and spiropyrazoline' derivatives as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors is verified using a quantitative three-dimensional structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) by comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and molecular similarity index analysis (CoMSIA) models. In this research, different field models proved that CoMSIA/SE model is the best model with high predictive power compared to several models (Qved2 = O.65; R2 = 0.980; R2test = 0.727). Also, contour maps produced by CoMSIA/SE model have been employed to prove the key structural needs of the activity. Consequently, six new compounds have been generated. Among these compounds, M4 and M5 were the most active but remained toxic and had poor absorption capacities. While the M1, M2, M3 and M6 remained highly active while respecting ADMET's characteristics. Molecular docking results showed compound M2 better with acetylcholinesterase than compound 22. The interactions are classical hydrogen bonding with residues TYR:124, TYR:72, and SER:293, which play a critical role in the biological activity as AChE inhibitors. MD results confirmed the docking results and showed that compound M2 had satisfactory stability with (ΔGbinding = -151.225 KJ/mol) in the active site of AChE receptor compared with compound 22 (ΔGbinding = -133.375 KJ/mol). In addition, both compounds had good stability regarding RMSD, Rg, and RMSF. The previous results show that the newly designed compound M2 is more active in the active site of AChE receptor than compound 22.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.