H-ras and c-fos exhibit similar expression patterns during most stages of oral oncogenesis.

BACKGROUND: H-ras and c-fos oncogenes interact in signalling pathways but their level and time course of expression during oral cancer development are unclear. The present study used an animal model for the simultaneous investigation of H-Ras and c-Fos expression in sequential stages of oral oncogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experimental groups of Syrian golden hamsters (A, B and C; 10 animals each) and one control group (7 animals) were used. The buccal pouches of hamsters in groups A, B and C were treated with 0.5% of the carcinogen 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene and were excised at 10, 14 and 19 weeks, respectively. The biopsies, which included tissue stages ranging from normal oral mucosa to moderately differentiated carcinoma, were studied immunohistochemically. RESULTS: A reduction in both H-Ras and c-Fos expression was observed from group A to B and from hyperplasias to early tumour stages, while a simultaneous increase was noted from group B to C and from well-differentiated to moderately-differentiated carcinomas. The H-ras/c-fos expression ratio had a value of approximately (1.09 +/- 0.21) in five out of seven studied tissue stages. CONCLUSION: H-Ras and c-Fos exhibit a similar expression pattern throughout most stages of oral carcinogenesis, an observation supported by the known molecular pathway connecting H-ras signalling with subsequent c-fos gene transcription.

Expression of ets-1 is not affected by N-ras or H-ras during oral oncogenesis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether ras-activated cascades lead to activation of ets-1 expression in sequential histological stages of oral oncogenesis in an experimental animal model. METHODS: Thirty-seven Syrian golden hamsters were divided into three experimental groups (A, B, C) and one control group. The hamsters' buccal pouches in experimental groups were treated with 0.5% 9, 10-dimethyl-1, 2-benzanthracene (DMBA) for 14 weeks and were excised at 10, 14, 19 weeks, respectively. The biopsies were classified pathologically (normal mucosa, hyperkeratosis, hyperplasia, dysplasia, early invasion, well and moderately differentiated carcinoma) and studied immunohistochemically. The two-tailed Student's t test was performed for each animal group and for each histological category. RESULTS: The ets-1 expression increased in early stages of oral tumor formation and invasion. The expression of N-ras gradually decreased during oral oncogenesis, as previously observed with H-ras. CONCLUSIONS: Neither N-ras nor H-ras affects ets-1 expression in contrast to other types of cancer in which N-ras and ets-1 are implicated in the same signalling pathway. Therefore, the existing pathway implicating these proteins might be somehow altered in oral cancer. It seems that ets-1 is a good prognostic marker for invasiveness and progression of oral cancer.