Quality of Life in Older Adults with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Post-hoc Analysis of the BARI 2D Trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the long-term differences in quality-of-life (QoL) metrics after treatment for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) in older adults with diabetes mellitus are lacking. METHODS: Older patients (age ≥65 years) in the BARI 2D trial were stratified into those who received intensive medical therapy (IMT) only versus revascularization (PCI vs CABG) with OMT. Self-health Score, Duke Activity Status Index, Energy Rating, and Health Distress Rating at 5 years were compared using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 929 older adults were included, of which 469 (50.5%) underwent medical therapy alone, 302 (32.5%) underwent PCI, and 158 (17.0%) patients had CABG. Patients who underwent CABG were more likely to have proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease, chronic total occlusion, and higher myocardial jeopardy index. At 5 years of follow-up, no differences in self-health Score, Duke activity status index, energy rating, and health distress rating were observed between PCI and IMT. There are also no differences in the four QoL measures between CABG and IMT alone. However, the Duke Activity Status Index was marginally higher with CABG but not statistically significant (mean difference 3.88, 95% CI: -0.10, -7.86, p=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: At 5 years of follow-up, no differences in QoL measures were observed between PCI and CABG with OMT versus OMT alone in older adult patients with diabetes mellitus and SIHD. Future blinded randomized trials are necessary to investigate the impact of SIHD treatment on the older adult population, taking into account the risks associated with multimorbidity, polypharmacy, frailty, and cognitive impairment.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Vernakalant in Rapid Cardioversion of Recent Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.

BACKGROUND: We use vernakalant, an intravenous anti-arrhythmic, to cardiovert paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) into sinus rhythm. It is a relatively atrium-selective, early-activating potassium and frequency-dependent sodium channel blocker with a half-life of 2 to 3 hours. Due to concerns regarding its safety profile, it is not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy of intravenous vernakalant in cardioversion of paroxysmal AF and the safety of its use. METHODS: Patients with paroxysmal AF who presented to the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC) between 2015 and 2020 and received vernakalant for cardioversion were included. Patients did not receive vernakalant if they had any of the following: QTc > 440 ms, heart rate < 50 bpm, acute coronary syndrome within the last 30 days, second- and third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block in the absence of a pacemaker, severe aortic stenosis (AS), use of intravenous antiarrhythmics (class I and class III) within four hours of vernakalant infusion, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, and heart failure (New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or NYHA IV class). The primary endpoint is conversion to sinus rhythm for at least one minute within 90 minutes of the start of the vernakalant infusion. The secondary endpoint included the presence of these side effects: bradycardia, QTc prolongation, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, hypotension, taste alteration/dysgeusia, sneezing, nausea, vomiting, paresthesia, cardiogenic shock, or death. RESULTS: The study included 23 patients with paroxysmal AF (15 men, mean age 54 ± 14 years). Fourteen patients (61%) cardioverted to sinus rhythm within 90 minutes of the start of the Vernakalant infusion. Seven patients (30%) reverted to sinus rhythm within 15 minutes after the first infusion. After treatment with vernakalant, four patients (17%) developed sinus bradycardia, and four patients (17%) developed first-degree AV block. No patient had a QTc greater than 460 ms. None of the patients experienced sinus pauses, high-grade AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, hypotension, dysgeusia, sneezing, nausea, vomiting, paresthesia, cardiogenic shock, or death. CONCLUSION: Vernakalant had 61% efficacy in the rapid cardioversion of paroxysmal AF to sinus rhythm, was well tolerated, and had a low rate of adverse events in our study population.

Sarcopenia and aortic valve disease.

Valvular heart disease, including calcific or degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), is increasingly prevalent among the older adult population. Over the last few decades, treatment of severe AS has been revolutionised following the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite improvements in outcomes, older adults with competing comorbidities and geriatric syndromes have suboptimal quality of life outcomes, highlighting the cumulative vulnerability that persists despite valve replacement. Sarcopenia, characterised by loss of muscle strength, mass and function, affects 21%-70% of older adults with AS. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes after TAVR and should be incorporated as a prognostic marker in preprocedural planning. Early diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia may reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life following TAVR. The adverse effects of sarcopenia can be mitigated through resistance training and optimisation of nutritional status. This is most efficacious when administered before sarcopenia has progressed to advanced stages. Management should be individualised based on the patient's wishes/preferences, care goals and physical capability. Exercise during the preoperative waiting period may be safe and effective in most patients with severe AS. However, future studies are needed to establish the benefits of prehabilitation in improving quality of life outcomes after TAVR procedures.

Safety of Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Multiple devices were used for LAA closure, with the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) and Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) being the most commonly used in clinical practice. In August 2021, the FDA approved the use of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder. There is still a knowledge gap in the safety profile of the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder device in comparison to the Watchman device. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the safety profile peri-procedure and post-procedure between the Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder and Watchman devices. METHODS: Patients who underwent LAA closure using Watchman or Amulet devices from July 2015 to August 2020 at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were included in the analysis. Primary endpoints included peri-operative and post-procedural complications (thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, vascular access complications, pericardial effusion/tamponade, device positional complications and in-hospital death). RESULTS: The study included 37 patients (21 had Watchman devices, 16 had Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluder devices, and 28 were men, mean age 76.57 ± 9.3 years). Seven patients developed post-procedural iatrogenic atrial septal defects (four in the Watchman group vs three in the Amulet group, p-value=0.982). Three patients developed pericardial effusion (one in the Watchman vs two in the Amulet group, p-value=0.394). Only one patient developed peri-device leak (one in the Watchman group vs none in the Amulet group, p-value=0.283). One device could not be deployed (one in the Amulet group vs none in the Watchman group, p-value=0.191). None of the patients developed in-hospital death, cardiac tamponade, device embolism, device thrombosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), cranial bleeding, or arrhythmias after the procedure. The rate of peri-operative complications was similar between both groups. Both groups displayed low rates of adverse events in the peri-operative and post-operative periods. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the safety profile of Amplatzer Amulet LAA Occluders and Watchman devices. There was a low incidence of peri-operative and post-operative adverse events with the implanted devices.

Frailty in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Assessment and Impact.

Frailty, a clinical syndrome of increased vulnerability, due to diminished cognitive, physical, and physiological reserves is a growing concern in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). It contributes to morbidity, mortality, and complications and often exerts a bidirectional association with cardiovascular disease. Althought it predominately affects older adults, frailty can also be observed in younger patients less than 65 years of age, with approximately 30% of those admitted CICU are frail. Acute cardiovascular illness can also impair physical and cognitive functioning among survivors and these survivors often suffer from frailty and functional declines post-CICU discharge. Patients with frailty in the CICU often have higher comorbidity burden and they are less likely to receive optimal therapy for their acute cardiovascular conditions. Given the significance of this geriatric syndrome, this review will focus on assessment, clinical outcomes, and interventions, in an attempt to establish appropriate assessment, management, and resource utilization in frail patients during and after CICU admission.

Beyond MACE: a multidimensional approach to outcomes in clinical trials for older adults with stable ischemic heart disease.

The global population of older adults is expanding rapidly resulting in a shift towards managing multiple chronic diseases that coexist and may be exacerbated by cardiovascular illness. Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is a predominant contributor to morbidity and mortality in the older adult population. Although results from clinical trials demonstrate that chronological age is a predictor of poor health outcomes, the current management approach remains suboptimal due to insufficient representation of older adults in randomized trials and the inadequate consideration for the interaction between biological aging, concurrent geriatric syndromes, and patient preferences. A shift towards a more patient-centered approach is necessary for appropriately and effectively managing SIHD in the older adult population. In this review, we aim to demonstrate the distinctive needs of older adults who prioritize holistic health outcomes like functional capacity, cognitive abilities, mental health, and quality of life alongside the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes reported in cardiovascular clinical trials. An individualized, patient-centered approach that involves shared decision-making regarding outcome prioritization is needed when any treatment strategy is being considered. By prioritizing patients and addressing their unique needs for successful aging, we can provide more effective care to a patient population that exhibits the highest cardiovascular risks.