Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Fertil Steril ; 116(5): 1220-1224, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373104

ABSTRACT

Mosaic results obtained through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy pose ongoing challenges to clinical practice. Thorough genetic counseling for patients considering mosaic embryo transfer is consistently recommended by many best-practice statements, and providers are charged with the task of assessing and explaining potential prenatal, neonatal, and long-term risks. However, an increasing amount of outcome data from transferred embryos with mosaic results do not show any evidence of increased risk to ongoing pregnancies or newborns. This article examines how to reconcile these data with the current practices for patient education about preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and mosaic embryo risk assessment, through an evidence-based lens.


Subject(s)
Blastocyst/pathology , Genetic Testing , Infertility/therapy , Mosaicism , Prenatal Diagnosis , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/adverse effects , Aneuploidy , Embryo Transfer , Female , Genetic Counseling , Humans , Infertility/diagnosis , Infertility/physiopathology , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 36(9): 1949-1955, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31359233

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the experiences of two large fertility clinics in which embryos with positive results following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) were transferred upon patient request, in order to explore the nature of the conditions for which these requests have been made and review ethical considerations. METHODS: Retrospective review of previous embryo transfers at the NYU Langone Fertility Center and ORM Fertility was performed. Embryo transfers prior to May 2019 in which embryo biopsy and PGT-M occurred were reviewed, and transferred embryos that were positive for a monogenic disorder (excluding autosomal recessive carriers) were identified. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified who elected to transfer 23 embryos that tested positive for nine different monogenic disorders. Most of the embryos transferred were positive for disorders that are autosomal dominant (15/23), are adult-onset (14/23), are associated with reduced penetrance (16/23), and have available management to lessen symptom severity (22/23). Transfer of positive embryos most commonly occurred for hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes (9/23 embryos), particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: When unaffected embryos are not produced following in vitro fertilization with PGT-M, some patients request to transfer embryos with positive test results. The majority of transfers were for embryos positive for adult-onset, reduced penetrance diseases. As these requests will likely increase over time, it is essential to consider the practical and ethical implications.


Subject(s)
Embryo Transfer , Neoplasms/genetics , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital/genetics , Age of Onset , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Fertility Clinics , Genes, Dominant , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 34(4): 369-374, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129970

ABSTRACT

The evolution of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for aneuploidy to blastocyst biopsy and more sensitive 24-chromosome screening techniques has resulted in a new diagnostic category of PGS results: those classified as mosaic. This diagnosis presents significant challenges for clinicians in developing policies regarding transfer and storage of such embryos, as well as in providing genetic counselling for patients prior to and following PGS. Given the high frequency of mosaic PGS results and the wide range of possible associated outcomes, there is an urgent need to understand how to appropriately counsel patients regarding such embryos. This is the first commentary to thoroughly address pre- and post-test genetic counselling recommendations, as well as considerations regarding prenatal screening and diagnosis. Current data on mosaic PGS results are summarized along with embryo selection considerations and potential outcomes of embryos diagnosed as mosaic.


Subject(s)
Genetic Counseling/methods , Mosaicism/embryology , Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods , Embryo Transfer/ethics , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Preimplantation Diagnosis/trends
5.
Fertil Steril ; 104(4): 866-872, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26183314

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare autosomal and sex chromosome aneuploidy rates of embryos derived from sperm with abnormal and normal parameters. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Assisted reproduction center. PATIENT(S): Three thousand eight hundred thirty-five embryos generated from 629 couples undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of aneuploidy in the trophectoderm of blastocyst embryos derived from standard IVF embryos and intracytoplasmic (ICSI) males with normal and oligozoospermic semen samples, in couples with donor eggs (mean maternal age, 25.0 years) and their own eggs (mean maternal age, 35.4 years). RESULT(S): The rate of sex chromosome aneuploidy was significantly (around threefold) higher in the oligozoospermic group compared with in both control groups (standard vs. ICSI insemination). This applied whether donor (young) or own (older) eggs were used. Significant differences were seen in the oligozoospermic samples for autosomes 1, 2, 11 (own eggs), and 18 (donor eggs) compared with both control groups; however, no significant difference was seen between each of the treatment groups for the overall rate of autosomal aneuploidy. No significant differences were seen between the two control groups (normozoospermic males, standard vs. ICSI insemination) in either of the egg group types for any chromosome pairs. CONCLUSION(S): Severe male factor infertility is associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of sex chromosome abnormalities in blastocyst embryos compared with in embryos derived from normal semen samples. Aneuploidy rates in embryos derived from sperm with normal parameters were not significantly different whether ICSI or standard insemination was used to achieve fertilization. These results highlight severe male factor infertility as a possible referral category for preimplantation comprehensive chromosomal screening.


Subject(s)
Aneuploidy , Blastocyst , Semen Analysis/adverse effects , Sex Chromosome Aberrations , Adult , Blastocyst/metabolism , Blastocyst/pathology , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infertility, Male/genetics , Male , Pregnancy , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Chromosome Aberrations/embryology , Sex Chromosome Aberrations/statistics & numerical data , Spermatozoa/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...