Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 43(9): 680-90, 2014 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24135017

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital discharge data (PMSI) with data in the reference databases: vital statistics and National Perinatal Surveys (NPS) for the principal perinatal indicators. METHODS: Data concerning hospitalizations for delivery and childbirth were extracted from the PMSI 2010 database. The exhaustiveness was assessed by comparing discharge data with data from birth certificates. Indicators were compared with those in the 2010 NPS, which was based on a representative sample of births (n=15,000), using 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: About 823,360 hospital abstracts with delivery and 829,351 hospital abstracts with live births were considered. The exhaustiveness of the PMSI was 99.6% for live births in Metropolitan France. The distribution of maternal age, mode of delivery, birth weight and gestational age in the PMSI and NPS were very similar. In Metropolitan France, the prematurity rate was 6.9% (PMSI) vs. 6.6% [6.2-7.0] (NPS) and the rate of caesarean was 20.6% vs. 20.4% [19.8-21.1]. There were marked differences for the percentage of birth weights<2500g and for maternal diseases. CONCLUSION: The routine use of the PMSI for some indicators for follow-up purposes is foreseeable. Validation studies are still necessary for maternal diseases, for which recording is less standardized.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Vital Statistics , Adult , Birth Certificates , Birth Weight , Databases, Factual , Female , France , Gestational Age , Health Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth , Male , Maternal Age , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy
2.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss ; 98(10): 948-58, 2005 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16294539

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: French modalities of myocardial revascularization were unknown, whereas beneficial effect on outcome was controversial. The study describes current practices in 2001 and analyzes those data according to regional coronary heart disease incidence and mortality. METHODS: Data are obtained from the French hospital national database (PMSI). Mortality is obtained from French mortality registry, and myocardial infarction incidence is estimated with French registries of MONICA project. RESULTS: Myocardial revascularization utilization fluctuate from 25% of patients hospitalized for coronary disease in Limousin to more than 40% of patients in Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (PACA), Languedoc-Roussillon and Ile-de-France. Standardized rate per 100,000 individuals is 109 in Pays de la Loire and 309 in Corse. Medical care offers seem to influence the practice. In the six regions where the rates are the lower, the density of interventional unit and on-pump center are below the national average, and the cardiologist density is very low. Consequences on regional clinical outcome of coronary heart disease are discussed based on mortality rate and levels of evidenced based medicine in myocardial revascularization. CONCLUSION: For the first time, we describe a wide variation of regional practices for myocardial revascularization in France. A part of those variations can be attributed to regional differences in medical care offers. Finally, the impact on clinical outcome appears clearly but seems limited. Cardiovascular prevention strategy remains of first line importance and emphasizes this main mission of cardiologists.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Myocardial Revascularization/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Disease/mortality , Databases, Factual , Demography , France/epidemiology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...