Safety and effectivity of Kono-S anastomosis in Crohn's patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Kono-S anastomosis, an antimesenteric, functional, end-to-end handsewn anastomosis, was introduced in 2011. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and effectivity of the Kono-S technique. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), and Cochrane Central (Ovid) from inception to August 24th, 2023, was conducted. Studies reporting outcomes of adults with Crohn's disease undergoing ileocolic resection with subsequent Kono-S anastomosis were included. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines were used to screen, extract and synthesize data. Primary outcomes assessed were endoscopic, surgical and clinical recurrence rates, as well as complication rates. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics. ROBINS-I and ROB2 tools were used for quality assessment. RESULTS: 12 studies involving 820 patients met the eligibility criteria. A pooled mean follow-up time of 22.8 months (95% CI: 15.8, 29.9; I2 = 99.8%) was completed in 98.3% of patients. Pooled endoscopic recurrence was reported in 24.1% of patients (95% CI: 9.4, 49.3; I2 = 93.43%), pooled surgical recurrence in 3.9% of patients (95% CI: 2.2, 6.9; I2 = 25.97%), and pooled clinical recurrence in 26.8% of patients (95% CI: 14, 45.1; I2 = 84.87%). The pooled complication rate was 33.7%. The most common complications were infection (11.5%) and ileus (10.9%). Pooled anastomosis leakage rate was 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited and heterogenous data, patients undergoing Kono-S anastomosis had low rates of surgical recurrence and anastomotic leakage with moderate rates of endoscopic recurrence, clinical recurrence and complications rate.

Science students' perspectives on how to decrease the stigma of failure.

Failure is hard-wired into the scientific method and yet teaching students to productively engage with failure is not foundational in most biology curricula. To train successful scientists, it is imperative that we teach undergraduate science students to be less fearful of failure and to instead positively accept it as a productive part of the scientific process. In this article, we focus on student perceptions of the stigma of failure and their associated concerns to explore how failure could be better supported within and beyond a university context. Through a survey of first-year biology students, we found that societal and familial pressures to succeed were the greatest contributing factors to students' fear of failure. In student suggestions on how to reduce the stigma of failure within and beyond the university context, the most common theme identified across both contexts was for increased discussion and open communication about experiences of failure. Importantly, student comments in this study bring attention to the role of factors beyond the classroom in shaping student experiences of failure within their biology courses.