Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 59(4): 210-6, 2012 Apr.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22542879

ABSTRACT

We present this document as a guide to preparing a specific institutional pre-anaesthesia checklist, as recommended in the Helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology. Also, the recently recommended WHO "safe surgery check-list" includes a check-list for anaesthesia. A working group was established in accordance with the charter of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation (Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación [SEDAR]). The new patient safety culture introduced into medicine, and the recommendations of European anaesthesia societies has led us to design and update protocols in order to improve results in this important part of our speciality. We have prepared these recommendations or guidelines using, as examples, updates of pre-anaesthesia check-lists by other American (ASA), British, or Canadian societies of anaesthesia. With that aim, we enlisted the help of anaesthesia ventilator experts and the participation and advice of experienced anaesthesiologists from all parts of Spain. After various corrections and modifications, the document was available at www.sedar.es, so that any anaesthesiologist could propose any correction, or give their opinion. Finally, these guidelines have been approved by the SEDAR Board of Directors, before it was sent for publication in this journal. The aims of this document are to provide: a guideline applicable to all anaesthesia machines, a descriptive pre-anaesthesia check-list that include everything necessary for the anaesthesia procedure, and a resumed check-list to be available in all the anaesthesia machines or other equivalent, but prepared for each institution, which should include anaesthetic equipment and drugs. So, in order to ensure the aims and requirements of the European Board of Anaesthesiology, the European Society of Anaesthesiology, and the WHO are met, each institution should have a protocol for checking equipment and drugs. These guidelines are applicable to any anaesthesia equipment, enabling every institution to develop their own checking protocols, adapted to their anaesthesia machines and their procedures. With the consent of the SEDAR, this group will collaborate with anaesthesia machines providers in order to develop specific checklists for each of their models that will be available at www.sedar.es.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/standards , Preoperative Care/standards , Anesthesia, Inhalation/instrumentation , Anesthesia, Inhalation/standards , Anesthesiology/instrumentation , Anesthesiology/methods , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Calibration , Checklist , Clinical Alarms , Documentation , Equipment Failure , Equipment Safety , Forms and Records Control , Gas Scavengers/standards , Humans , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Monitoring, Intraoperative/standards , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/standards , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/instrumentation , Patient Safety/standards , Preanesthetic Medication/standards , Preoperative Care/methods , Spain , Ventilators, Mechanical/standards
2.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 59(4): 210-216, abr. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-100371

ABSTRACT

Este documento que presentamos pretende servir de guía para la elaboración por cada centro de una lista de chequeo previo a la anestesia o pre-anestesia, tal y como recomienda la reciente declaración de Helsinki sobre seguridad del paciente en anestesia. Además, la reciente implantación del «check-list quirúrgico de la OMS» (safe surgery check-list) incluye un epígrafe de chequeo de anestesia. El grupo de trabajo se constituyó con este fin según los estatutos de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor (SEDAR). La nueva cultura de seguridad del paciente que se está implantando en la práctica médica y las recomendaciones de las sociedades europeas de anestesia nos obligan a actualizar y realizar protocolos que mejoren los resultados en este aspecto fundamental de nuestra especialidad. Tomando como ejemplo las actualizaciones de las listas de comprobación de diferentes asociaciones de anestesiólogos como la americana, británica o canadiense, hemos elaborado esta propuesta. Para ello hemos contado con la ayuda de expertos en respiradores y la colaboración y consejos de anestesiólogos expertos de todas las comunidades autónomas. Después de sucesivas correcciones, fue publicada en la página web de la SEDAR para que cualquier anestesiólogo pudiera aportar sus correcciones o su opinión. Finamente el documento ha sido aprobado por la junta directiva de la SEDAR, antes de ser enviado para su publicación en esta revista. Los objetivos de este documento son: proporcionar unas directrices o recomendaciones de comprobación aplicables a todos los sistemas de anestesia, realizar un listado descriptivo de comprobación que incluya todos los elementos necesarios para el procedimiento anestésico y aportar un listado con los elementos del chequeo en forma de esquema para disponer de él en cada equipo de anestesia o de otro similar realizado por cada centro, que incluya respirador, monitores, material auxiliar y fármacos. Por tanto, para cumplir con las recomendaciones de seguridad del paciente del European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA), European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) y de la OMS, cada centro debe elaborar una lista de comprobación y verificación (en adelante «chequeo») previo a la anestesia. Este documento proporciona unas directrices aplicables a todos los sistemas de anestesia de tal manera que cada departamento pueda desarrollar sus propios protocolos de comprobación, adaptados a sus equipos de anestesia y a sus procedimientos de trabajo. De acuerdo con la directiva de la SEDAR, este grupo de trabajo colaborará con los fabricantes de equipos de anestesia para desarrollar listas de comprobación específicas de cada uno de sus modelos para que estén disponibles en www.sedar.es(AU)


We present this document as a guide to preparing a specific institutional pre-anaesthesia checklist, as recommended in the Helsinki declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology. Also, the recently recommended WHO "safe surgery check-list" includes a check-list for anaesthesia. A working group was established in accordance with the charter of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation (Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación [SEDAR]). The new patient safety culture introduced into medicine, and the recommendations of European anaesthesia societies has led us to design and update protocols in order to improve results in this important part of our speciality. We have prepared these recommendations or guidelines using, as examples, updates of pre-anaesthesia check-lists by other American (ASA), British, or Canadian societies of anaesthesia. With that aim, we enlisted the help of anaesthesia ventilator experts and the participation and advice of experienced anaesthesiologists from all parts of Spain. After various corrections and modifications, the document was available at www.sedar.es, so that any anaesthesiologist could propose any correction, or give their opinion. Finally, these guidelines have been approved by the SEDAR Board of Directors, before it was sent for publication in this journal. The aims of this document are to provide: a guideline applicable to all anaesthesia machines, a descriptive pre-anaesthesia check-list that include everything necessary for the anaesthesia procedure, and a resumed check-list to be available in all the anaesthesia machines or other equivalent, but prepared for each institution, which should include anaesthetic equipment and drugs. So, in order to ensure the aims and requirements of the European Board of Anaesthesiology, the European Society of Anaesthesiology, and the WHO are met, each institution should have a protocol for checking equipment and drugs. These guidelines are applicable to any anaesthesia equipment, enabling every institution to develop their own checking protocols, adapted to their anaesthesia machines and their procedures. With the consent of the SEDAR, this group will collaborate with anaesthesia machines providers in order to develop specific checklists for each of their models that will be available at www.sedar.es(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Guideline Adherence/trends , Guideline Adherence , Validation Studies as Topic , Societies, Medical/standards , Societies, Medical , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesia , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/standards , Pain Management/trends , Pain Management
3.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 65(9): 641-5, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10522135

ABSTRACT

Glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) deficiency is the most frequent cause of hemolytic anemias due to enzyme abnormality. Perioperative management must be careful to avoid the onset of hemolytic crisis. We present a complete review of the literature on this illness and describe the perioperative management of an adult with known G6PD deficiency and the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of the disorder and its possible anesthetic implications are discussed. A 49-year-old patient had undergone varum osteotomy in her left knee due to genu valgum. She had been diagnosed as having G6PDH deficiency sixteen years earlier provoked by ingesting beans. The perioperative circumstances capable of causing autohemolysis are described and discussed. In spite of the fact that the pattern is self-limited, it provokes the onset of jaundice and anemia which can complicate the recovery. Simple elimination of those elements which precipitate with oxyhemoglobin will allow an uneventful anesthetic procedure.


Subject(s)
Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency/therapy , Anemia, Hemolytic/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Joint Deformities, Acquired/surgery , Knee Joint/surgery , Middle Aged , Osteotomy , Postoperative Period
4.
Panminerva Med ; 39(4): 305-7, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9478072

ABSTRACT

The risk of damage to the femoral artery after its cannulation is low; it coincides with a series of risk factors that include the use of relatively large-diameter introductor sheaths. We present a case in which pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery developed after the introduction of a 16-gauge catheter (Abbocath, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois, USA) into this vessel for the invasive monitoring of the arterial pressure in a patient who was admitted to the Postsurgical Intensive Care Unit during the postoperative course because of hemodynamic instability secondary to septic shock. We also discuss the prophylactic and therapeutic measures that can prevent or alleviate, respectively, that complication.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, False/etiology , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Femoral Artery , Aged , Female , Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic/adverse effects , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Punctures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...