Nerve conduction during acute blood-flow restriction with and without low-intensity exercise Nerve conduction and blood-flow restriction.

Despite being apparently safe for most individuals, the impact of low intensity (LI) blood-flow restricted (BFR) exercise on nerve function and integrity is still obscure. We explored whether BFR (with and without exercise) alters the properties of nerve conduction measured at the level of the restricted limb. Thirteen healthy, young men (22.0 ± 1.7 years) were included in this study. Arterial occlusion pressure was taken at rest. Soleus M- and H-recruitment curves were constructed for all participants. H-wave latencies and amplitudes were obtained in three testing conditions (non-BFR vs. 60 vs. 80% BFR) at four different time points: [#1] non-restricted baseline, [#2] time control either with or without BFR, [#3] non-restricted pre-exercise, [#4] LI exercise either with or without BFR. Nerve conduction was estimated using the difference between the latency of H and M wave. BFR did not affect H-wave amplitude, either with or without exercise. The changes in the difference between H- and M-wave latency of over time were similar between all conditions (condition-by-time interaction: F = 0.7, p = 0.47). In conclusion, our data indicate that performing LI exercise with BFR, set at 60 or 80% BFR, does not exert a negative impact on sciatic-tibial nerve function. Thus, from a neurological standpoint, we provide preliminary evidence that LI BFR exercise may be regarded as a safe mode of resistance training in healthy young men.

Improving the Reliability of V-Wave Responses in the Soleus Muscle.

PURPOSE: The V wave is an electrophysiologic variant of the H reflex that is evoked with supramaximal stimulus intensity. In this study, we explored whether the between-day reliability of V-wave normalized amplitude varies as a function of the number of intrasession measurement trials. We also determined whether the reliability of the V wave improves after the exclusion of the initial testing trials. METHODS: Eighteen healthy, young participants (10 men and 8 women) were included in this study. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and the standard error of the measurement (1.96*SEM). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the V-wave normalized amplitude increased in a progressive fashion with the inclusion of more than two measurement trials (from 0.41 to 0.75). The 1.96*SEM scores also decreased from 12.47% to 7.60% after calculating the V-wave normalized amplitude from five versus two measurement trials. After excluding the first two trials from V-wave calculations, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the 1.96*SEM score attained values of 0.88 and 6.54%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the test-retest reliability of the V-wave response increases in a progressive fashion with more than two intrasession measurement trials (up to five trials). It also shows that to ensure maximal reliability, the first two measurement trials should be discarded from V-wave computations.