Effect of concurrent exposure to noise and hand-transmitted vibration on auditory and cognitive attention under simulated work with construction tools.

Objectives. This study aimed to investigate the effects of separate and concurrent exposure to occupational noise and hand-transmitted vibration (HTV) on auditory and cognitive attention. Methods. The experimental study was conducted with 40 construction workers who were exposed to noise (A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level of 90 dB) and to HTV (10 m/s2 at 31.5 Hz), and concurrent exposure to both for 30 min under simulated work with vibrating equipment used in construction. Cognitive performance aspects were then evaluated from each individual in two pre-exposure and post-exposure settings for each session. Results. The effect sizes of concurrent exposure (HTV + noise) and separate exposure to noise on auditory attention were very close (effect size = 0.648 and 0.626). The largest changes in the difference of response time in both types of attention (selective and divided attention) were related to the concurrent exposure scenario and then exposure to HTV, respectively. The highest effects for the correct response of selective and divided attention are related to concurrent exposure (HTV + noise) and then noise exposure, respectively. Conclusion. The HTV effect during concurrent exposure is hidden in auditory attention, and noise has the main effects. The divided attention was more affected than the selective attention in the different scenarios.

Combined Effects of Noise and Hand-transmitted Vibration on Workers' Muscle and Mental Fatigues in a Simulated Construction Operation.

BACKGROUND: The frequent use of hand-held vibrating tools by construction workers exposes them to hand-transmitted vibration (HTV) and noise. This study investigated the effect of combined exposure to HTV and noise on workers' fatigues under simulated work with a typical building destruction tool. METHODS: The repeated measures study was conducted on 40 construction workers exposed to HTV (5 m/s2 rms with frequencies of 31.5, 63, and 125 Hz), HTV (10 m/s2 rms- 31.5 Hz), noise (90 dBA), and concurrent exposure (noise (90 dBA) + HTV (10 m/s2 rms- 31.5 Hz)) with the typical vibrating hand-held tool for 30 minutes. Electromyography signals determined each worker's fatigue level in the Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle in two pre- and post-exposure periods. The subjects also filled out the visual analog scale to evaluate mental fatigue severity subjectively. RESULTS: The mean difference of muscle fatigue parameters was significant in all scenarios except for the two scenarios of alone exposure to HTV (5 m/s2 -125 Hz and noise exposure (p-value < 0.05). The mean difference of mental fatigue in all scenarios except for the two scenarios of exposure to HTV (5 m/s2 -125 Hz) and exposure to HTV (5 m/s2 -63 Hz) was significant (p-value < 0.05). The most differences in muscle fatigue parameters (Amplitude = 8.16±5.63, Mean frequency=-4.69±3.78) and mental fatigue (4.97±2.38) were observed in the simultaneous exposure to noise and HTV. CONCLUSION: Noise exposure alone cannot produce remarkable effects on muscle fatigue but can aggravate the effects of vibrations as a consequence of synergistic interaction. However, the role of noise on perceived mental fatigue was more dominant than the HTV. These findings should be considered to adapt the existing exposure limits to actual work conditions.