Impact of interferon-alpha treatment on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: an overview of published trials.

BACKGROUND: The impact of interferon treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on fibrosis progression in comparison with its natural history has yet to be assessed in any large-scale randomized studies. The present report is a review of the evidence-based data published so far. METHODS: Studies were included if they had at least two repeated estimates of liver fibrosis per patient treated with interferon-alpha (whether pegylated or not). Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Altogether, 13 studies were included in the review, involving a total of 707 HBV patients treated with interferon-alpha-2a or -2b for 12-83 months. Only one study included pegylated interferon as monotherapy. A total of 787 untreated patients were also followed. Only one study used a non-invasive biomarker. There was a significant reduction in the fibrosis progression rate, with a risk reduction of 0.49 (95% CI: -0.64--0.34; chi(2)=119; degrees of freedom [DF]=6; P<0.0001), and significant heterogeneity (Cochran Q=81; P<0.0001). This significant impact was similar for both randomized (reduction of risk: -0.45; 95% CI: -0.64--0.26; P<0.0001) and not-randomized (controlled) studies (reduction of risk: -0.53; 95% CI: -0.79--0.28; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: According to these findings, the benefit of interferon treatment on fibrosis progression is clinically significant in patients with advanced fibrosis by the reduction of fibrosis progression to cirrhosis. Pegylated interferon now needs to be compared, in terms of benefit-risk factors, with the new generation of HBV treatments (such as entecavir and tenofovir), using non-invasive biomarkers.

Methodological aspects of the interpretation of non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis: a 2008 update.

This review summarizes the methodological aspects of the interpretation of non-invasive biomarkers in liver fibrosis. A scoring system has been updated to better compare the quality of fibrosis biomarkers. Several methodological issues are related to the classical methodology using biopsy, as this is considered the gold standard. However, from evidence-based data, it appears that the methodology needs to change to prevent flawed conclusions among key opinion leaders as well as in obsolete guidelines. As waiting for the perfect biomarker for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis to come along is probably a waste of time, in the meantime, methods can be improved. The main proposals for improving the methodology are, to take into account the spectrum bias, to assess accuracy between adjacent stages, to compare biomarkers in the same patient, to assess the cause of failure among discordant cases and to use specific statistical methods adapted for imperfect gold standards.

[Alcohol, steatohepatitis, insulin resistance and hepatitis C]. / Alcool, stéatohépatite métabolique, insulinorésistance et hépatite C.

Patients with chronic hepatitis C have frequently other morbidities, either because they are frequent in the general population (metabolic syndrome) and/or because the route of contamination (chronic alcohol consumption succeeding to drug abuse). These co-morbidities have a harmfull impact on fibrosis progression during the natural history of HCV infection and reduce the efficacy of antiviral treatments. Thus, it is crucial to diagnose early and treat these different diseases which may be combined. They are the metabolic syndrome and/or chronic alcohol consumption resulting in insuline resistance, infection by the human immune deficiency virus or by the hepatitis B virus as well as chronic tobacco use or excessive consumption of cannabis. An optimal is based on a multidisciplinary approach to reduce fibrosis progression and improve the efficiency of antiviral therapies. However, the hepatologist has to come back to a global care, which is mandatory at the individual level as well as for the public health.

A prospective assessment of an 'a la carte' regimen of PEG-interferon alpha2b and ribavirin combination in patients with chronic hepatitis C using biochemical markers.

In therapy with standard interferon and ribavirin, five independent risk factors (RF) were predictive of relapse. The aim was to prospectively validate an a la carte regimen of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha2b 1.5 microg/kg and ribavirin 11 mg/kg [PEG-IFN-ribavirin (PEG-IFN-R)], taking into account these five risk factors in order to determine whether to continue an additional 24 weeks of treatment in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative patients after 24 weeks. Treatment was stopped after 24 weeks in PCR positive patients. The same regimen was continued in PCR negative patients for an additional 24 weeks if patients had two or more RF. FibroTest and ActiTest assessed the impact of treatment on the histological features from baseline to end of follow-up. A total of 96 patients were included; 84 (87.5%) had at least two RF and 12 (12.5%) had no or one RF. A total of 70 patients were sustained virologic response (SVR; 73%), 19 were nonresponders (20%) and seven were relapsers (7%). The SVR in genotypes 2 or 3 was 85% (34/40) vs 64% in other genotypes (36/56; P = 0.02). There was a decrease (P = 0.003) in fibrosis as estimated by FibroTest, from 0.38 +/- 0.03 (mean +/- SE) at baseline to 0.33 +/- 0.03 at the 12-week follow-up, and a decrease in activity as estimated by ActiTest, from 0.49 +/- 0.02 to 0.19 +/- 0.03 (P < 0.0001). Improvement in activity was already significant at 12 weeks, even in virologic nonresponders. This study confirms that an a la carte regimen which takes into account not only genotype but also baseline viral load, fibrosis stage, gender and age, is efficient for the PEG-IFN-R combination. It achieves a 73% SVR and a significant decrease in fibrosis and activity as estimated by biochemical markers.

Reinforced interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin is more effective than standard combination therapy in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C previously nonresponsive to interferon: a randomized trial.

Interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy results in sustained virological clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a reinforced regimen combining ribavirin and high-dose IFN for 48 weeks compared with a nonreinforced regimen combining a standard IFN regimen and ribavirin for 24 weeks in nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 231 patients with chronic hepatitis C and previous nonresponse to IFN monotherapy were randomized. The reinforced group (n = 114) received IFN-2b 6 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW) and ribavirin for 48 weeks, and the nonreinforced group (n = 117) received IFN-2b 3 MU TIW and ribavirin for 24 weeks. The main outcome measure was a sustained virological response, defined as negative serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA 24 weeks following the end of treatment. This endpoint was determined in 98 patients of the reinforced group and 105 patients of the nonreinforced group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained virological response was observed in 29 of the 98 patients (29.6%) in the reinforced group vs 16 of the 105 patients (15.2%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a sustained virological response were treated with a reinforced regimen [odds ratio (OR) 2.9; P = 0.06] and genotype 2 or 3 (OR 8.8; P < 0.0002). A total of 160 patients had paired biopsies before and after treatment. Histological activity improvement was observed in 32 of 80 patients (40%) and fibrosis worsening in 26 of 80 patients (33%) in the reinforced group vs 13 of 80 (16%) and 19 of 80 (24%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.30 and 0.20, respectively). Hence in nonresponders, a high-dose 48-week regimen of IFN and ribavirin combination was more effective than a regimen with interferon at lower dose and ribavirin for 24 weeks only.

Fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

In numerous studies of symptoms in patients with chronic hepatitis C there has been no systematic assessment of both fatigue and extrahepatic manifestations. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of fatigue in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and to identify associations between fatigue and clinical and biological hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations. We studied 1614 patients. Data were prospectively recorded during the first visit of patients infected with HCV and the prevalence of fatigue and its association with dermatological, rheumatological, neurological and nephrological manifestations; diabetes; arterial hypertension; auto-antibodies, and cryoglobulinaemia were assessed. Then, using multivariate analysis, we identified demographic, biochemical, immunological, virological, and histological factors associated with the presence of fatigue. Fatigue was present in 53% of patients (95% confidence interval 51-56). In 17% of patients (95% confidence interval 15-19) fatigue was severe, impairing activity. Five other extrahepatic manifestations had a prevalence above 10% including, in decreasing order: arthralgia, paresthesia, myalgia, pruritus, and sicca syndrome. In univariate and multivariate analyses, fatigue, in comparison with the absence of fatigue, was associated with female gender, age over 50 years, cirrhosis, depression and purpura. Independent of these associations, fatigue was associated with arthralgia, myalgia, paresthesia, sicca syndrome and pruritus. The prevalence of fibromyalgia (as defined by the association of fatigue with arthralgia or myalgia) was 19% (95% confidence interval 17-21). There was no significant association between fatigue and the following characteristics: viral load or genotype, alcohol consumption, abnormal thyroid function, and type and level of cryoglobulinaemia. Hence, fatigue is the most frequent extrahepatic manifestation in patients infected with HCV. Fatigue is independently associated with female gender, age over 50 years, cirrhosis, depression and purpura.

Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in patients infected by hepatitis C virus: longitudinal validation in a randomized trial.

A liver fibrosis index was recently prospectively validated in a cross-sectional study where patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) had only one biopsy and no longitudinal follow-up. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the diagnostic value of this index in patients included in a randomized trial of interferon (IFN) using repeated measurements, two biopsies and hyaluronic acid as a comparative reference. One-hundred and sixty-five patients who had had two interpretable liver biopsies and at least one stored serum sample before IFN treatment were selected. Seventy-eight patients received 3 MU of IFN-alpha thrice weekly for 24 weeks and 87 followed a reinforced regimen for 48 weeks. A fibrosis index combining five biochemical markers (alpha2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and total bilirubin adjusted for gender and age) as well as hyaluronic acid was assessed on 461 samples available at baseline, at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up (72 weeks). There was a significant decrease of the fibrosis index score among the 17 sustained virologic responders, from 0.33 +/- 0.06 (mean +/- SE) at baseline to 0.18 +/- 0.06 at 72 weeks in comparison with 92 nonresponders (from 0.41 +/- 0.03 at baseline to 0.44 +/- 0.03 at 72 weeks; P < 0.001) and in comparison with 56 relapsers (from 0.36 +/- 0.03 at baseline to 0.32 +/- 0.03 at 72 weeks; P=0.05). No significant differences were observed for hyaluronic acid.Hence, this fibrosis index could be used as a surrogate marker of the antifibrotic effect of treatments in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Replication status and histological features of patients with triple (B, C, D) and dual (B, C) hepatic infections.

In patients with multiple hepatotropic viral infections (B and C, or B, C and D), the reciprocal influence of each virus remains controversial. The aims of this study were twofold: first, to determine the impact of multiple infection on the replication status of B, C and D viruses and on histological features; and second, to compare patients with multiple infection to patients infected only with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). We retrospectively included 50 patients with multiple infection and 50 control HCV patients, who were matched on independent factors associated with fibrosis, such as age, gender, alcohol consumption and duration of infection. The replication status of hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV and hepatitis D virus (HDV), and histological lesions, were determined. In patients with multiple infection, HCV RNA was present less frequently (44% vs 98%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of cirrhosis was higher (35% vs 8%, P < 0.001). Among patients with triple infection (n = 16), HBV replication was observed in 25%, HCV RNA was detectable in only two (P < 0.0001) and HCV viremia was significantly lower than in the matched HCV patients (0 vs 54.7, P < 0.0001). Among patients with dual infection (n = 34), HCV RNA was present less frequently in those with serological markers of active HBV infection than in those without (30% vs 79%, P = 0.01). Hence, multiple infection is associated with a decrease of HCV replication. Cirrhosis seems to be more frequently observed in patients with multiple infection. In patients with triple infection, serum HCV RNA and markers of HBV replication were absent in 80%, suggesting that HDV acts as a dominant virus. In patients with dual infection, HBV and HCV exert an alternative, dominant replication.

A short induction regimen of interferon-alpha is not effective for treatment of relapse in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized trial. For the multicentre GER-CYT-01 group.

The aim of this work was to assess the effect of a high-dose (10 million units, MU) short-duration (14 weeks) interferon-alpha2b (IFN-alpha2b) regimen in relapsers compared with the standard IFN regimen of 3 MU three times weekly (t.i.w.) for 6 months. Fifty-eight non-cirrhotic patients (who had relapsed after previous treatment with IFN) with chronic hepatitis were randomized: 29 to the high-dose, short-duration regimen and 29 to the standard regimen. By the end of IFN therapy, in the high-dose, short-duration group alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization was observed in 23 (79%) of 29 patients, and undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in eight (28%) vs 25 (86%) and 11 (38%) of the 29 patients in the standard group, respectively (P = NS). At the end of the 72-week follow-up, in the high-dose, short-duration group a sustained ALT normalization was observed in two (7%) patients, and undetectable HCV RNA in 0 (0%) vs five (17%) and four (14%) patients in the standard group (P = NS). There was less fibrosis improvement in the high-dose, short-duration group (two of 26 patients, 8%) than in the standard group (eight of 25 patients, 32%) (P = 0.04). Tolerance to IFN was good and similar in the two groups. In conclusion, in IFN relapsers, high-dose, short-duration treatment with IFN-alpha has no advantage when compared to a 6-month treatment with 3 MU IFN t.i.w.

Prognostic value of the soluble interleukin-2 receptor in chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon-alfa. Multicenter GER-CYT 04 Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: High serum levels of the soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) have been reported in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aims of this study were to determine the evolution of sIL-2R considered as an indicator of activation of T cells in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with IFN-alpha and to correlate sIL-2R serum levels with parameters reflecting ongoing liver disease and with outcome of interferon treatment. METHODS: In a case-control study, we studied patients enrolled in a multicenter randomized clinical trial which had demonstrated the benefit of a reinforced regimen of interferon alpha. Each of the 26 sustained virological responders (SVR) was paired for treatment regimen with two non-responders (NR). RESULTS: Prior to treatment, higher levels of sIL-2R were found in the sera of 78 patients compared with healthy controls (3791+/-210 pg/ml versus 956+/-88 pg/ml (p<0.001)). In the 78 patients after 4 weeks of treatment, the levels of sIL-2R were higher than pretreatment levels (4308+/-206 pg/ml (p<0.01)). In the NR, levels of sIL-2R increased significantly after 4 weeks of treatment compared with pretreatment levels (p<0.01), and levels of sIL-2R at week 72 were not significantly different from those at pretreatment. Conversely, in the SVR, levels of sIL-2R at week 4 did not significantly increase compared to pretreatment values, and thereafter gradually decreased. At week 72, levels of sIL-2R were significantly lower than before treatment (p<0.001). The difference between levels of sIL-2R at week 4 and before initiation of treatment (delta s IL-2R) was smaller in the SVR than in the NR (142+/-219 pg/ml versus 704+/-107 pg/ml (p<0.02). The disappearance of HCV RNA from the serum at week 4 showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval 86-98) and a specificity of 60% (95% confidence interval 49-71), delta sIL-2R had a sensitivity of 42% (95% confidence interval 31-53) and a specificity of 81% (95% confidence interval 79-90) for the prediction of a sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment. The disappearance of HCV RNA from serum at week 4 and delta sIL-2R were independent and early predictive factors for a sustained virological response 6 months after stopping treatment. CONCLUSIONS: At week 4, delta sIL-2R may be a more specific parameter than the disappearance of HCV RNA for assessing total, and hence more sustained, elimination of HCV infection 6 months after stopping treatment.

A randomized trial of ribavirin and interferon-alpha vs. interferon-alpha alone in patients with chronic hepatitis C who were non-responders to a previous treatment. Multicenter Study Group under the coordination of the Necker Hospital, Paris, France.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Fifty percent of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) show no response to alpha-interferon, and no alternative therapy has thus far proven to be effective. Therapeutic combination with ribavirin and alpha-interferon has shown promising results in naive patients and in relapsers, but based on limited series, it was reported to be inefficient in non-responders. The aim of our study was therefore to explore and compare, in a randomized trial, the tolerance and potential efficacy of alpha-interferon alone with a sequential combination of ribavirin and the same alpha-interferon regimen in those patients. METHODS: Sixty-four non-responder patients were randomized in the alpha2b-interferon group (a 6-month course at a dosage of 6 MU followed by a 6-month course of 3 MU three times weekly subcutaneously) and 62 in the "combination" group (sequential combination of the same alpha2b-interferon therapy preceded by a 2-month course of ribavirin which was then associated for 2 months with alpha2b-interferon at a daily dosage of 1.0 or 1.2 g). RESULTS: Treatment withdrawal was necessary for six patients from the alpha-interferon and eight patients from the combination group. Normalization of aminotransferase activities was significantly more frequent after the 4-month course of ribavirin with 2 months of interferon than after 2 months of interferon alone (52.8 vs. 26.2%, p<0.01), but this difference was not maintained after ribavirin withdrawal. Disappearance of serum HCV RNA (PCR) was significantly more frequent at the end of treatment in the combination group (24.5 vs. 7.7%, p=0.02), but did not differ 6 months after the end of therapy (9.8 and 8.3%, respectively). The long-term response was not associated with liver status (cirrhosis vs. absence of cirrhosis) or genotype. Mean viremia was significantly lower in long-term responders than in non-responders or relapsers in both groups (p<0.001 for the interferon group and p<0.05 for the combination group), but the large extent of viral load precluded reliable prediction. The pre- and post-treatment hepatitis activity index did not differ between the two groups. While a crude histopathological improvement in the hepatitis activity index for a given patient was more frequently observed in the combination group (69.2 vs. 35.9%, p<0.01), improvement as defined by a decrease of at least 2 in the hepatitis activity index was significant only for lobular necrosis and degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy of the combination of ribavirin/alpha-interferon in non-responders. Indeed, (i) it is fairly tolerated; (ii) it increases the rate of the initial biological response, and of the virological response by decreasing breakthrough, though this benefit is not sustained; and (iii) it induces a significant histological improvement in necrosis. A simultaneous and prolonged combination of ribavirin/alpha-interferon should be further evaluated in non-responders.

Modeling the impact of interferon alfa treatment on liver fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C: a dynamic view. The Multivirc Group.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Impact of hepatitis C treatment has never taken into account the dynamics of fibrosis progression. This study assessed the impact of interferon on liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C according to 3-month aminotransferase activity response. METHODS: We recruited 287 patients, 185 treated and 102 control, with paired biopsy specimens. Before follow-up, the fibrosis progression rate per year was estimated as the ratio between fibrosis stage in METAVIR units (1 U, 1 stage; 4 U, cirrhosis) and the duration of infection. During follow-up, fibrosis progression was assessed by the observed difference between stages divided by duration between biopsies. RESULTS: The median fibrosis progression rate in treated patients decreased compared with the rate before treatment from 0.103 F METAVIR U/yr (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.087-0.120) to 0.000 (95% CI, 0.000-0.000; P

Effect of interferon therapy on the natural history of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C who have a sustained virologic response to IFN therapy, there is a dramatic effect on the natural history of the disease, with ALT levels becoming normal, histologic activity improving or disappearing, and the progression of fibrosis slowing. A sustained virologic response 6 months after the end of treatment is predictive of a sustained remission 4 years later. From these results, a long-term survival benefit is expected from IFN treatment in patients with an intermediate or rapid rate of fibrosis. For patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not experience a sustained eradication of virus, there is evidence that IFN treatment significantly reduces the viral load and serum ALT level, improves histologic activity, and blocks fibrosis progression, in comparison with the natural history of this disease. Therefore, patients who still have a detectable level of HCV RNA should no longer be considered nonresponders to IFN therapy. Although the number of randomized trials is [figure: see text] small, cumulative data suggest that IFN therapy can reduce the incidence of and the mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

[Do general practitioners want to manage chronic hepatitis C and take part in hepatitis C health networks? A national survey]. / Les médecins généralistes souhaitent-ils prendre en charge l'hépatite chronique virale C et participer aux réseaux ville-hôpital?

OBJECTIVES: To assess information that general practitioners had on hepatitis C and on the hepatitis C network in hospitals and private practice. METHODOLOGY: A national telephone survey of 604 general practitioners was conducted between March 18 and 23, 1998. RESULTS: Screening and management of hepatitis C was important for 89% and 97% of general practitioners. Screening was performed in relation to the relative risk (IV drug users 89%, blood transfusion before 1991 88%). General practitioners wanted more information on treatment (54%), patient counselling (42%) and the potential risks of the disease (42%). Of 604 general practitioners, 6% were involved in a hepatitis C network, while 21% were involved in another network (drug users 9%, AIDS 8%). Of the 94% general practitioners who were not part of the network, 33% were willing to join a hepatitis C network. Only 56% were aware of a hepatitis C network (press article 30%, mailing 17% or local meeting 12%). The difficulties for the involvement of general practitioners were: lack of time, topics not adapted to daily practice and geographic constraints (74%), too few patients in their practice (52%), no need (38%), the idea itself of a network and lack of information (28%). CONCLUSION: General practitioners screen patients at risk of hepatitis C. They want to be better informed about treatment, patient counselling, and the potential risks of hepatitis C. They are less involved in hepatitis C networks than in other networks (drug, AIDS). However, one third of general practitioners would like to be involved in a hepatitis C network. These results could be useful for implementing post-graduate courses and general practitioner training.

Reinforced regimen of interferon alfa-2a reduces the incidence of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a multicentre randomised trial. Multicentre GER-CYT-04 Group.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aim was to assess and compare the long-term effect of interferon at standard (6 months) and reinforced dose and duration regimens in chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: A multicentre institutional trial included 244 previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C, without cirrhosis, who were randomly allocated to either standard (3 MU thrice a week for 24 weeks; n=120) or reinforced (6 MU daily for 12 days, 6 MU thrice a week for 22 weeks, 3 MU thrice a week for 24 weeks; n=124) regimens. The main endpoint was sustained ALT response at 72 weeks (18 months); secondary end-points were virological (branched DNA and PCR) and histological responses (incidence of cirrhosis) at month 18. RESULTS: Sustained ALT response was observed in five patients (4%, 95% confidence interval 0-8%) in the standard group and in 21 patients (18%, 95% confidence interval 11-25%), from the reinforced group (p=0.002), in agreement with virological response in 21 (81%) patients. Cirrhosis at month 18 was observed in ten (10%) patients in the standard group and one (1%) in the reinforced group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The standard regimen of interferon, in chronic hepatitis C, confers a minimal sustained response rate at 18 months and may not prevent the occurrence of cirrhosis. Reinforced regimens allow sustained response to be reached in a limited number of patients and reduce the risk of cirrhosis during 18 months of follow-up.

Management of hepatitis C.

Chronic hepatitis C is a major health care problem throughout the world. The disease may progress to cirrhosis, with complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma. The usual primary goal of therapy is viral eradication, as patients with long-term remission are generally regarded as unlikely to develop cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Another primary goal should be the reduction in liver fibrosis progression. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is the only drug approved for the treatment of hepatitis C in Europe and North America. Its effectiveness appears to be related to dose and duration of therapy. The best efficacy/risk ratio seems to be in favour of 3 million units (MU) IFN-alpha three times per week on a 12-month schedule. With this regimen, a sustained alanine aminotransferase (ALT) response is achieved in nearly 35% of patients. Ribavirin has emerged as potentially the second most effective drug. While it appears unsatisfactory when given alone, it seems much more effective in combination with IFN. Combining them seems to exert a synergistic effect between the two drugs and sustained remission might be achieved in nearly 50% of patients with combination therapy. Controversy persists concerning the long-term benefit of therapy in transient responders and non-responders. It is possible that IFN therapy, in comparison to natural history, might reduce liver fibrosis progression and prevent hepatocellular carcinoma, even in non-responders, and have greater efficacy if used in long-term treatment. Whatever the treatment schedule, prolonged viral eradication may not be achieved in all patients and new drugs should be sought to improve the results of therapy.

Slow progression rate of fibrosis in hepatitis C virus patients with persistently normal alanine transaminase activity.

In hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with persistently normal alanine transaminase (ALT), the progression rate of fibrosis is unknown. The aims of this study were: 1) to compare HCV patients with normal ALT (group I) with HCV patients with elevated ALT (group II) matched on independent factors associated with fibrosis; and 2) to assess the progression rate of fibrosis. One hundred two HCV patients were included in each group. Histological lesions were staged using the METAVIR score. We defined fibrosis progression per year as the ratio of the fibrosis stage in METAVIR units to the duration of infection. In group I, ALT values were normal, and lower than in group II (25 vs. 127 IU/L; P < .0001). HCV RNA was present less frequently in group I (66% vs. 97%; P < .0001). There were no significant differences for viremia and genotypes. Histological activities were lower in group I (0.6 vs. 1.38; P < .0001). The stage of fibrosis was lower in group I (0.95 vs. 1.8; P < .001). The median progression rate of fibrosis was lower in group I (0.05 vs. 0.13; P < .001). In group I, after exclusion of negative HCV-RNA patients, the median progression rate of positives remained lower (0.05 vs. 0.13; P < .001). In group I, all cirrhotic patients (n = 3) were heavy drinkers. HCV patients with normal ALT showed weaker histological activity and lower fibrosis scores, and the progression rate of fibrosis was twice as slow as in HCV patients with elevated ALT. In these patients, severe fibrosis was associated with high alcohol consumption.