How do patients perceive the retirement of their general practitioner? A qualitative interview study in France.

OBJECTIVES: The perspective of general practitioners' (GPs) on retirement and the factors influencing their attitude towards retirement have been previously investigated. However, while the number of GPs has been declining for many years in France, leading to the emergence of medical deserts, the impact on their patients remains to be explored. The aim of this study was to understand patients' perceptions of their GP's retirement. DESIGN: A semistructured interview-based qualitative study was conducted, using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in two general practices located in Essonne, Ile-de-France, France, between January and April 2014. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen women and five men, aged 21-94 years, were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were the non-declaration of the physician as the declared doctor and being under 18 years of age. RESULTS: The GP-patient relationship is a link that is built up over time, over the course of several consultations. Patients choose their GP based on qualities or skills they value. In this way, the physician chosen is unique for their patients; this choice reflects a certain loyalty to their physician. The interaction with the family sphere reinforces this relationship through the multiple links created during care. When a GP retires, this link is broken. Patients' reactions can range from indifference to real grief. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of the link between the GPs and their patients and highlights the need to prepare patients for their GP's retirement.

Burden of infectious diseases among undocumented migrants in France: Results of the Premiers Pas survey.

Introduction: An increase in migration rates to the European Union has been observed over the last few years. Part of these migrants is undocumented. This work aimed to describe the reported frequency of infectious diseases and their associated factors among unselected samples of undocumented migrants in France. Methodology: The Premier Pas survey is a cross-sectional epidemiological survey of a random sample (two-stage sample design) conducted among undocumented migrants recruited in Paris and the Bordeaux region, in places and facilities likely to be frequented by undocumented migrants. The percentages were weighted. The analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 software. Results: A total of 1,223 undocumented migrants were recruited from 63 places and facilities, with a participation rate of 50%. Most of them were between 30 and 40 years of age (36%), 69% were men, aged mainly 30-40 (36%) years old, from sub-Saharan Africa (60%) or North Africa (25%), and 60% had arrived <3 years earlier. Among the participants, 24.8% declared a poor perceived health status and 33.5% a chronic health condition. Dental infections concerned 43.2% of the participants. Apart from dental issues, 12.9% reported suffering from at least one infectious disease: HIV infection (3.5%), chronic hepatitis B virus infection (3.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (1.7%), skin mycosis (1.2%), skin and soft tissue infection (0.8%), chronic hepatitis C infection (0.8%), urinary tract infection (0.7%), lower respiratory tract infection (0.7%), scabies (0.3%), tuberculosis disease (0.2%), vaginal mycosis (0.6%), and herpes (0.1%). Regarding HIV, HBV, and HCV infections, 56, 71, and 89%, respectively, were diagnosed after their arrival. Chronic viral infections were more often reported by undocumented migrants from sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. In multivariate analysis, a higher risk of reporting chronic viral infection was observed among people food insecure. Conclusion: This original study on a large random sample confirms the frequency of infectious diseases among undocumented migrants in France and the importance of integrating their screening during a health Rendezvous and their management into early access to care and inclusive medico-psycho-social management.

Are immigrants living in France more reluctant to receive vaccines than native-born French citizens? findings from the national health Barometer study.

BACKGROUND: France is one of the world's most vaccine hesitant countries and vaccine hesitancy (VH) is considered one of the world's leading threats to global health. However, little is known about VH in immigrant populations in France. Using data from the 2016 Health Barometer, we examined VH among newcomers, more established immigrants, and the native-born population in France. METHODS: Data was collected from French speaking individuals aged from 15 to 75 years old, residing in France. Individuals were selected through randomly generated landline and mobile phone numbers. Vaccine hesitancy was assessed through four questions and a "time spent in France" variable was created, using the year of arrival in France. Associations were studied using logistic regression. RESULTS: A sample of 15,216 participants residing in France included 1,524 foreign-born immigrants and 13,692 native-born individuals, with a mean age of 46-years. Most participants (75.7%) reported being favorable to vaccination regardless of country of origin but immigrants were less hesitant toward vaccinations than the host population. Foreign-born immigrants from North Africa had the most favorable views whereas those from sub-Saharan Africa held most unfavorable views on vaccination. With time spent in France, the opinions towards vaccination became more negative (aOR = 0.57, 95 %CI [0.40-0.79], p = 0.001) and the risk of vaccine refusal (aOR = 2.34, 95 %CI [1.45 - 3.78] p = 0.001) and reluctant acceptance of vaccines increased (aOR = 1.89 95 %CI [1.20 - 2.99], p = 0.006).Foreign-born individuals with the longest residency in France had more negative opinions than native-born individuals, regardless of region of origin. CONCLUSION: Immigrants were less hesitant toward vaccinations than the host population, but vaccine hesitancy increased with time spent in France. The provision of appropriate information and awareness to facilitate critical thinking towards antivaccine theories is necessary for immigrants in France.

Construction and Validation of an Individual Deprivation Index: a Study Based on a Representative Cohort of the Paris Metropolitan Area.

The association between health status and deprivation is well established. However, it is difficult to measure deprivation at an individual level and already-existing indices in France are not validated or do not meet the needs of health practitioners. The aim of this work was to establish a validated, easy-to-use, multidimensional, relevant index that was representative of the population in the Paris metropolitan area. From the SIRS 2010 cohort study, 14 socio-economic characteristics were selected: health insurance, educational background, socio-professional category, professional status, feelings of loneliness, emotional situation, household type, income, perceived financial situation, social support (support in daily life, financial and emotional), housing situation, and migration origin. In addition, a total of 12 health status, healthcare use, and nutrition-related variables were also selected. Content validity and internal validity of the index were explored. The 14 socio-economic indicators were associated to varying degrees with poorer health status, less use of healthcare, and poorer nutrition and were distributed across the 14 multiple-choice questions of the index. Each answer was rated from 0 to 2. The index value of 10 that isolates 20% of the most deprived individuals was used as threshold. "Being deprived," as defined with this value, was significantly associated with 9 of the 12 studied health variables. This index could be a relevant instrument in the assessment of deprivation and social inequalities of health.

Intrauterine Pregnancy Detection and Gestational Age Assessment During Early Pregnancy by a Handheld Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Device Compared to a High-End Ultrasound System. An Accuracy and Reliability Study.

Objective: The main objective of this study is the evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of a handheld point of care ultrasound device (POCUS-hd) for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to comprehensive reference transabdominal ultrasound (TU). The secondary objectives were to evaluate POCUS-hd for intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) detection compared to transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TUTV), evaluate the inter-device agreement and inter-rater reliability of gestational age during early pregnancy. Methods: It is an observational transverse study with consecutive patient recruitment. Two blinded operators systematically used POCUS-hd and reference transabdominal ultrasound for IUP diagnosis. The accuracy of POCUS-hd for IUP diagnosis was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV). The gestational age (GA) was assessed based on the crown-rump length. The reliability and agreement of gestational age evaluation were assessed by Bland-Altman plots, kappa statistic, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results: POCUS-hd compared to TU had a sensitivity of 95-100%, a specifcity of 90-100%, PPV of 95-100% and NPV of 90-100%. Inter-rater agreement for IUP detection using POCUS-hd was very good, kappa=1.0; CI95% [0.9-1.0]. The inter-device agreement limits (mean difference ± 2SD) for GA were: -3 to +2.3 days by Operator 1, -3.4 to +3.3 days by Operator 2 for POCUS-hd vs. TU and -3.1 to +2.3 days for POCUS-hd versus TUTV. Conclusion: This handheld POCUS device is an accurate and reliable diagnostic tool that can be used for IUP positive findings and GA assessment during early pregnancy by clinicians in family planning settings or general practice.

Immunization Catch-Up for Newly Arrived Migrants in France: A Cross-Sectional Study among French General Practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Migrants often undergo an incomplete vaccination program in regards to the French recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the practices of French General Practitioners' (GPs) in terms of catch-up vaccination. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried-out in 2017-2018 in France. An online questionnaire was disseminated by email through scholarly societies to GPs involved in the care and the vaccination of migrants. Analyses included univariate and multivariate analysis with a logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 216 GPs completed the survey. A majority identified themselves with an average level regarding the prevention of infectious diseases among migrant populations (56.7%) and confirmed this is part of their daily practice (83.3%). The majority of respondents do not perform more than two injections on the same day. When compared to GPs working in health centres, those with a private practice are more likely to report returning to a full primary vaccination schedule (adjusted OR = 2.90, 95% CI [1.29-6.53]). Aside from the serology for hepatitis B and to a lesser extent for measles, other pre-vaccination serologies were not frequently used by GPs. When a migrant declares to be up-to-date with his immunisations, only 56.5% of doctors consider this information reliable. CONCLUSIONS: This study clarified the vaccination practices of GPs receiving migrant patients in consultation and showed its heterogeneity. An important need for benchmarks has been identified and these results were used for the elaboration of the French guidelines on vaccines catch-up.