Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Res Vet Sci ; 93(3): 1329-33, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22840335

ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate if the presence of Trypanosoma caninum can lead to a confuse diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL), we investigated the serological status of dogs infected by T. caninum and assessed the serological cross-reactivity with CVL. A set of 117 serum samples from dogs infected by T. caninum, Leishmania chagasi and not infected dogs (n=39 in each group) was tested using commercial kits--indirect immunofluorescence (IFI-LVC), ELISA (EIE-LVC) and immunochromatographic test (DPP)--and in house tests with T. caninum (IIF-Tc and ELISA-Tc) and L. chagasi antigens (IIF-Lc and ELISA-Lc). IIF-Tc and ELISA-Tc presented sensitivity of 64.1% and 94.9% and specificity of 23.1% and 35.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of the IFI-LVC, EIE-LVC and DPP tests was 100% and the specificity was 70.5%, 68% and 97.5% respectively. The concordance between the tests was considered as satisfactory. The specificities of IFI-LVC, EIE-LVC and DPP were higher when the group Tc was excluded, with significant values for IFI-LVC (χ2=4.36, P-value=0.036), thus suggesting that the infection by T. caninum can confuse the diagnosis of CVL.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/parasitology , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/veterinary , Serologic Tests/veterinary , Trypanosoma/classification , Trypanosomiasis/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Cross Reactions/immunology , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dogs , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/blood , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Trypanosoma/immunology , Trypanosomiasis/blood , Trypanosomiasis/diagnosis
2.
Res Vet Sci ; 87(2): 260-2, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19364614

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate intact skin of seroreactive dogs as a possible target for the parasitological confirmation of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL). For this purpose, 394 dogs identified in serological surveys carried out in the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte were studied. Blood was collected from all animals for serology and a tissue sample was obtained from two sites for parasitological diagnosis. Skin obtained from the ear and scapular region was simultaneously analyzed in 247 animals and lesion samples and ear skin were analyzed in 147 dogs. Leishmania parasites were isolated from 310 (78.7%) animals, and all isolates were identified as Leishmania chagasi. Simultaneous isolation from two sites was possible in 240 of the 310 animals, including ear and scapular skin in 151/247 (61.1%) and ear skin and skin lesions in 89/147 (60.5%). Ours results suggest that intact skin is one of the main target sites for the parasitological confirmation of CVL in seroreactive dogs.


Subject(s)
Dog Diseases/parasitology , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/veterinary , Skin/parasitology , Animals , Brazil , Dog Diseases/blood , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dogs , Ear/parasitology , Leishmania donovani/isolation & purification , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/blood , Odds Ratio , Scapula/parasitology
3.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 103(4): 383-9, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19211118

ABSTRACT

We compared the accuracy of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using Leishmania braziliensis and L. major-like antigens and antigens from the Bio-Manguinhos kit for serological diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL). Cut-off values were defined by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. For ELISA, statistical analyses revealed better accuracy [95.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), 97.5% negative predictive value (NPV)] and reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.940] for L. braziliensis antigen compared with L. major-like antigen (78.7% sensitivity, 82.8% specificity, 73.3% PPV, 86.6% NPV, ICC: 0.833). ELISA optical density values obtained for both antigens were higher in mucosal forms of ATL. For IIF, sensitivity and specificity were 81.5 and 86.2%, respectively, for the L. braziliensis antigen, compared with 95.4 and 77.7% for the L. major-like antigen and 75.4 and 89.2% for the Bio-Manguinhos kit. No difference in the specificity of the IIF test was observed between antigens, whereas sensitivity differed between the L. braziliensis and L. major-like antigens and the Bio-Manguinhos kit. Parallel ELISA and IIF testing increased sensitivity, irrespective of the antigen employed, and serial testing increased overall specificity. These results support the recommendation that ELISA employing L. braziliensis antigen be used as a diagnostic tool for suspected cases of ATL in L. braziliensis-endemic areas.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/analysis , Leishmania braziliensis/immunology , Leishmania major/immunology , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Animals , Antigens, Protozoan/immunology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...