Género, infodemia y desinformación en salud. Revisión de alcance global, vacíos de conocimiento y recomendaciones.

OBJETIVO: explorar el estado de la literatura científica sobre los aspectos de infodemia y desinformación en salud vinculados al género y a la interseccionalidad, detectar vacíos de conocimiento y brindar recomendaciones. MÉTODOS: revisión de alcance global, con la detección de vacíos de conocimiento y recomendaciones. Se buscó en ocho bases de datos: MEDLINE (Pubmed), Anthropological Index Online, Studies on Women & Gender Abstracts, LILACS, Scielo, Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, Google académico y se hizo una búsqueda manual en Google de documentos de los últimos 10 años, sin restricciones de idioma y geográficas. Se realizó un análisis de contenido de los estudios incluidos. RESULTADOS: 855 registros fueron identificados y 21 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Predominan los estudios que tuvieron como primer autor/a una mujer (13/21), aunque en la autoría global se destacaron los hombres (10/21). El modelo binario fue el enfoque principal (16/21). La mayoría (18/21) se publicaron a partir del 2020. Se abordaron principalmente temas relacionados con la COVID-19 y la salud sexual y reproductiva (antes de la pandemia), y en menor medida la salud mental. Se identificaron interacciones entre diferencias de sexo/género en la desinformación/infodemia en salud especialmente en mujeres, colectivos de género diverso, personas mayores y población de bajo nivel socioeducativo. CONCLUSIONES: existen brechas de conocimiento en el tema explorado, con escaso número de estudios, y limitaciones de alcances y del enfoque de género y/o feminista (más allá del binario). No obstante, los resultados tentativos constatan la presencia de inequidades de género e interseccionalidad en la desinformación en salud. PALABRAS CLAVE: infodemia, desinformación, género, COVID-19, revisión sistemática.

Effectiveness of peer mentoring and self-monitoring to improve blood pressure control in a vulnerable population in Argentina: Pragmatic randomized open-label controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of blood pressure (BP) self-monitoring and peer mentoring to improve the control of hypertension in clinical practice in primary care centers (PCCs) located in low-resource settings in Argentina. METHODS: An individual randomized controlled trial was carried out to test two different approaches based on behavioral interventions in PCCs in Argentina. Hypertensive adults were randomly assigned to one of three arms: BP self-monitoring, peer mentoring, and usual care. The primary outcome was the change in BP values from baseline to the end of follow-up at 3 months. A qualitative approach of participants' experiences of the peer mentoring arm was also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 442 participants with hypertension were included in the study. Self-monitoring and peer mentoring interventions did not show a significant difference in BP control compared to usual care. However, this trial showed an improvement regarding antihypertensive medication adherence among those assigned to the peer mentoring intervention compared to the control at the end of follow-up (p = 0.031). DISCUSSION: Self-monitoring and peer mentoring interventions did not demonstrate to be effective in BP control compared to usual care. Implementing a peer support strategy was demonstrated to be feasible and effective in improving medication adherence in this population.

Gender and social protection and health policies promoted during the COVID-19 pandemic: Global scoping review and future challenges.

Background: Governmental interventions have been important tools for mitigating COVID-19 transmission, but they have also negatively impacted different gender-related components. We aimed to answer the following questions: What is the scope of the gender approach in the literature analysing health and social protection policies promoted during the COVID-19 pandemic? What are the challenges and recommendations for gender-sensitive policies for the post-pandemic and future crises? Methods: The study design is based on three stages: a global synthesis of the evidence through a scoping review, the generation of a framework of emerging inequalities based on sociocultural markers, and the creation of a matrix with the challenges and recommendations. In this scoping review, we searched 10 online databases for studies published until April 2022 and conducted a content analysis on the extracted studies. Results: Of the 771 identified records, 67 met our inclusion criteria. Most studies had a female person (52/67) as the first author. The binary model was the main approach addressed in the studies (61/67). The literature showed that the closure, distancing, and other social policies did not include a gender approach and generated negative gaps related to economic instability, reproductive roles, and gender violence. In the intersectionality dimension, multiple aspects emerged (macro, meso, micro-social level, and individual level). Greater gender gaps in connection with employment (related to increased housework) were observed during the closure and distancing stage of the pandemic. Asymmetries related to female participation in the management of the pandemic and an increase in discrimination and abuse of diversity groups were detected. Conclusions: We observed gaps both in the gender approach both in knowledge and in policy implementation during the pandemic in the different countries explored in this work. This is a call to attention and action for researchers, political decision-makers, and other interested parties to incorporate and accentuate the gender perspective in all policies related to the post-pandemic period and future social and health crises.

The Use of 2 e-Learning Modalities for Diabetes Education Using Facebook in 2 Cities of Argentina During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and the confinement that was implemented in Argentina generated a need to implement innovative tools for the strengthening of diabetes care. Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is a core element of diabetes care; however, because of COVID-19 restrictions, in-person diabetes educational activities were suspended. Social networks have played an instrumental role in this context to provide DSME in 2 cities of Argentina and help persons with diabetes in their daily self-management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate 2 diabetes education modalities (synchronous and asynchronous) using the social media platform Facebook through the content of posts on diabetes educational sessions in 2 cities of Argentina during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we explored 2 modalities of e-learning (synchronous and asynchronous) for diabetes education that used the Facebook pages of public health institutions in Chaco and La Rioja, Argentina, in the context of confinement. Social media metrics and the content of the messages posted by users were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 332 messages were analyzed. We found that in the asynchronous modality, there was a higher number of visualizations, while in the synchronous modality, there were more posts and interactions between educators and users. We also observed that the number of views increased when primary care clinics were incorporated as disseminators, sharing educational videos from the sessions via social media. Positive aspects were observed in the posts, consisting of messages of thanks and, to a lesser extent, reaffirmations, reflections or personal experiences, and consultations related to the subject treated. Another relevant finding was that the educator/moderator role had a greater presence in the synchronous modality, where posts were based on motivation for participation, help to resolve connectivity problems, and answers to specific user queries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show positive contributions of an educational intervention for diabetes care using the social media platform Facebook in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although each modality (synchronous vs asynchronous) could have differential and particular advantages, we believe that these strategies have potential to be replicated and adapted to other contexts. However, more documented experiences are needed to explore their sustainability and long-term impact from the users' perspective.

Adaptación y confiabilidad inter-observador de un protocolo para evaluar la disponibilidad de alimentos en supermercados en Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Introducción: La Red Internacional para la Investigación, Monitoreo y Apoyo a la Acción para la Alimentación, Obesidad y Enfermedades No Transmisibles (INFORMAS por su sigla en inglés) ha desarrollado el Protocolo para evaluar la Disponibilidad de Alimentos en Supermercados. Objetivos: Describir el proceso de adaptación del protocolo para utilizarlo en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires (BA) y evaluar la variabilidad inter-observador al aplicarlo en supermercados de la ciudad. Metodología: El principal indicador del protocolo es la disponibilidad relativa de alimentos saludables (AS) vs. no saludables (ANS), calculado como el cociente entre la longitud (m) de estantes asignados a AS y ANS (longitudAS/ANS). Se adaptó la selección de alimentos a incluir en el indicador para utilizarlo en BA. Para explorar el funcionamiento del indicador se construyó una referencia, midiendo todos los alimentos y bebidas ofrecidos en 5 supermercados, que se clasificaron en AS y ANS según las guías alimentarias argentinas. El indicador se comparó con la disponibilidad relativa calculada a partir de la referencia. Para evaluar la confiabilidad inter-observador dos observadores realizaron mediciones en tres supermercados y se calculó el coeficiente de correlación intra-clase (CCI). Resultados: Según la referencia, el cociente longitudAS/ANS varió entre 0,16 y 0,61, con una media de 0,34 (DE 0,18). El indicador adaptado produjo resultados similares con una diferencia media de -0,05 (DE 0,04). El CCI entre la mediciones de ambos observadores resultó 0,92 (IC95% 0,86-0,98). Conclusión: Se adaptó el protocolo para aplicarlo en BA, con modificaciones en los alimentos a evaluar y una adecuada confiabilidad inter-observador.

Social and gender determinants related to health inequities in a community in Argentina / [Determinantes sociales y de género relacionados a las inequidades de salud en una comunidad de Argentina]

Introduction: The study analyzes social and gender health realities regarding access to public health systems in the Argentine interior. Objective: to analyze the relationship between social determinants, gender, with inequities of access in frequent users of the public health system in a region of Argentina. Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical study, data collected between March and November 2018 by maximum variation sampling, with analysis of absolute, relative frequencies, standard error, confidence intervals; Multivariate logistic regression analysis with 95% CI and statistical significance of p <0.05. Results: With an n = 345, in an adjusted model, being a woman increased the risk of having problems in accessing the health system 2.2 times more (p = 0.032). People with a primary education level or less are 2.4 times more at risk of paying values ​​equal to or greater than $ 71.4 for health care in the public health system compared to those with a higher educational level (p = 0.000). No statistically significant associations were found between urban / rural location, with the variables of inconveniences in access to health care and out-of-pocket spending. Conclusion: Social inequities measured by level of education and gender have a negative impact on the scope of the right to universal access to health in the analyzed population. It is recommended to review state initiatives that seek to reduce health inequities from a perspective of social and gender determinants.

Introducción: El estudio analiza realidades sanitarias sociales y de género en cuanto al acceso a los sistemas públicos de salud del interior argentino. Objetivo: analizar la relación entre determinantes sociales, género, con inequidades de acceso en usuarios frecuentes del sistema público de salud de una región de Argentina. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y analítico, datos relevados entre  marzo y noviembre del 2018 por muestreo de variación máxima, con análisis de frecuencias absolutas, relativas, error estándar, intervalos de confianza; análisis multivariado de regresión logística con IC del 95% y significancia estadística de p<0,05. Resultados: Con un n=345, en modelo ajustado, el ser mujer aumento 2,2 veces más el riesgo de tener inconvenientes en el acceso al sistema de salud (p=0,032).  Las personas con nivel educativo primario o menor tienen 2,4 veces más de riesgo de pagar valores iguales o mayores a 71,4 dólares por atención en salud en sistema sanitario público con respecto  a los de mayor nivel educativo (p=0,000). No se encontraron asociaciones estadísticamente significativas entre localización urbana/rural, con las variables de inconvenientes en el acceso a la atención de salud y el gasto de bolsillo. Conclusión: Las inequidades sociales medido por nivel de educación y género tienen un impacto negativo en el alcance del derecho al acceso universal de salud en población analizada. Se recomienda revisar iniciativas estatales que busquen reducir inequidades en salud desde un enfoque de determinantes sociales y de género.