Original Research: Can a Palliative Care Lay Health Advisor-Nurse Partnership Improve Health Equity for Latinos with Cancer?

PURPOSE: A palliative care infrastructure is lacking for Latinos with life-threatening illness, especially in rural regions of the United States. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a community-based palliative care lay health advisor (LHA) intervention for rural-dwelling Latino adults with cancer. METHODS: An exploratory mixed-methods participatory action research design was carried out by an interprofessional research team that included community and academic members. Fifteen Latino community leaders completed a 10-hour palliative care training program and then served as palliative care LHAs. Although 45 Latinos with cancer initially agreed to participate, four withdrew or died and six were not reachable by the LHAs, for a final total of 35 patient participants.The trained palliative care LHAs delivered information on home symptom management and advance care planning to assigned participants. Palliative care nurses led the training and were available to the LHAs for consultation throughout the study. The LHAs made an average of three telephone calls to each participant. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-r) and the four-item Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (ACPES-4) were administered pre- and postintervention to determine the intervention's effectiveness. Encounter forms were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using case comparison. RESULTS: The major finding was that significant improvements were shown for all four items of the ACPES-4 among both the LHAs (posttraining) and the participants (postintervention). Information on advance care planning was shared with 74.3% of the 35 participants. Participants showed clinical improvement in physical symptom scores and clinical deterioration in emotional symptom scores following the intervention, although these changes did not reach statistical significance. The advisors noted that participants were anxious about how to explain cancer to children, the uncertainty of their prognosis, and medical expenses. This sample was younger than those of other cancer studies; 51.4% were under age 50 and 73.1% had at least one child in the home. CONCLUSIONS: A community-based palliative care LHA-nurse partnership was shown to be a feasible way to engage in conversations and deliver information about advance care planning to rural-dwelling Latino adults with cancer. The positive results led to the regional cancer center's decision to select "cultural care" as its 2022 goal for maintaining its accreditation with the Commission on Cancer.

Four Kinds of Hard: An Understanding of Cancer and Death among Latino Community Leaders.

Early integration of palliative care after a diagnosis of cancer improves outcomes, yet such care for Latino populations is lacking in rural regions of the United States. We used a participatory action research design with Latino community leaders from emerging immigrant communities in North Carolina to explore sociocultural perspectives on cancer and death. Thematic analysis was conceptualized as Four Kinds of Hard represented by four themes: Receiving an Eviction Notice, Getting in the Good Book, Talking is (Sometimes) Taboo, and Seeing Their Pain Makes us Suffer. These themes captured fears of deportation, coping with cancer through faithfulness, ambivalence about advance care planning, and a desire to spare families from suffering. Findings suggest strategies to improve conversations about end-of-life wishes when facing advanced illness and death. This study demonstrates the importance of training Latino community leaders to improve palliative care and bridge service gaps for Latino families living in emerging rural communities.

Using Demographics to Predict Palliative Care Access in Inpatient Facilities in Rural North Carolina.

PURPOSE: For individuals with cancer, palliative care improves quality of life, mood, and survival. Rural residents experience limited access to palliative care. In eastern North Carolina, a rural area, little is known about access to inpatient cancer-related palliative care. This study describes access to inpatient palliative care and developed a predictive model of who was most likely to be admitted to an inpatient facility without a palliative care provider. METHODS: A descriptive, exploratory design was used to examine demographics, clinical variables, and inpatient admissions from 2017 and 2018, in a major regional teaching hospital system that included 8 hospitals (7 rural hospitals). Descriptive statistics and a binary logistic regression were used to analyze data. FINDINGS: The mean age was 62.2 years (N = 2,161, range: 18-88, SD = 15.52): 49.4% were female, 54% lived in a rural county, and 44.4% were black. The outlying rural hospitals, with no palliative care providers on staff, had 388 admissions (18%). Only gender (P = .0128), county (P < .0001), and age (P < .05) contributed to the logistic model. The predicted probability of being admitted to an inpatient facility with a palliative care provider is higher for younger males living in urban counties. That probability decreases with age regardless of the gender or type of county. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the limited availability of inpatient palliative care for those with cancer. Women, older adults, and rural residents are more likely to be admitted to 1 of the 7 rural hospitals with no palliative care provider on staff.

Stigma and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To identify groups of participants with high and low levels of stigma and to examine the influence of stigma on social support, social constraints, symptom severity, symptom interference, and quality of life (QOL). SAMPLE & SETTING: 62 individuals with lung cancer were identified and recruited from a comprehensive cancer center in the southeastern United States. METHODS & VARIABLES: Participants completed a questionnaire that included demographic information and measures of stigma, symptom severity and interference, social support, social constraints, and QOL. IBM SPSS Statistics TwoStep Cluster Analysis was used to identify high- and low-stigma groups. Independent sample t tests were used to compare differences between the groups. RESULTS: 22 participants had a high level of stigma; they had significantly higher symptom severity on feeling distressed, problems remembering things, and feeling sad, and greater symptom interference related to mood, relations with others, and enjoyment of life. Participants also had significantly higher levels of social support and lower social constraints. Stigma was significantly related to lower levels of QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses should be aware that stigma may influence various factors throughout the disease trajectory; they can privately assess individuals with lung cancer for access to social supports, feelings of stigma, and QOL, and make appropriate referrals as needed.

Growing ambulatory care nurse leaders: building talent from the primed pipeline.

Leadership succession planning is an extremely important exercise for individuals and organizations to prepare for ambulatory health care in the future. There are several opportunity points and approaches to consider for identifying emerging leaders and developing leaders. Ambulatory care nurses should consider their own potential for leadership and take steps to develop their leadership competencies.

Growing ambulatory care nurse leaders in a multigenerational workforce.

Ambulatory care faces challenges in sustaining a nursing workforce in the future as newly licensed nurses are heavily recruited to inpatient settings and retirements will impact ambulatory care sooner than other areas. Building a diverse team by recruiting nurses of different ages (generations) and skills may result in a more successful and robust organization. Knowledge about generational characteristics and preferences will aid nurse leaders and recruiters in attracting high-quality, talented nurses. Nurses of Generations X and Y can increase their likelihood of success in ambulatory care by better understanding intergenerational issues.