Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trustee ; 39(9): 24, 26-7, 1986 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10277832
2.
J Urol ; 132(3): 602-5, 1984 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6471204

ABSTRACT

The independence of stage and grade as prognostic factors for prostatic carcinoma is unclear. Previous studies have been hampered by both the uncertain reproducibility of subjective grading systems and the lack of a scalar grading measure, and have reached opposing conclusions. To examine this question, we quantitated via point-counting the per cent of tumor cells showing glandular differentiation in 90 cases of primary prostatic adenocarcinoma. Patient records were examined retrospectively to verify both the stage at presentation and follow-up. Stage and morphometric grade were found to be inversely correlated, (p less than 0.001), with the mean per cent of tumor cells showing glandular differentiation at each stage as follows: A--71 per cent; B--59 per cent; C--33 per cent; D--28 per cent. Analysis of variance revealed these differences to be significant (p less than 0.001), and Newman-Keuls test showed significant differences between the following stage pairs: A-C, A-D, B-C, B-D (p less than 0.05). In spite of the marked correlation between stage and grade, multiple regression analysis showed them to be independent predictors of survival, although their combined effect was not much greater than that of morphometric grading alone. We conclude that, for prostatic carcinoma, the close correlation of stage and grade makes it difficult to combine them in determining the prognosis of the individual patient, although both together may be useful in studies of large populations.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Cell Count , Cell Differentiation , Computers , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Prognosis , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies
3.
Lancet ; 1(8390): 1315-8, 1984 Jun 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6145024

ABSTRACT

52 patients with serious urinary tract infections were randomised to receive either aztreonam (35) or gentamicin (17). In the aztreonam group 23 patients had unqualified cures, 6 cures with relapse, and 6 cures with reinfection; the comparable numbers in the gentamicin group were 9, 1, and 4. There were no failures with aztreonam and 3 with gentamicin. The most important determinant of outcome was the presence or absence of urological abnormalities. 11 further patients, with renal failure or gentamicin-resistant isolates, treated with aztreonam were all cured. Toxic effects were limited to symptomless liver-function-test abnormalities with aztreonam , whereas deterioration in renal function occurred in 4 gentamicin-treated subjects. Urinary colonisation with group D streptococci occurred in 14 of 46 aztreonam -treated patients (1 required treatment) compared with only 1 of 17 gentamicin-treated patients. 97% of 309 consecutive gram-negative urinary isolates tested, including 50 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were susceptible in vitro to aztreonam and 91% to gentamicin. Aztreonam may prove an effective and safe alternative to the aminoglycosides.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Aztreonam , Bacteria/drug effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/complications , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Urologic Diseases/complications
4.
Appl Microbiol ; 16(11): 1790-1, 1968 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16349824
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL