Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 53(5): 220-224, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34369431

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at a high risk for immobility due to their high acuity and need for invasive devices including external ventriculostomy drains (EVDs). Prolonged patient immobilization is associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: Whittemore and Knafl's 5-stage framework was used to conduct an integrative review to synthesize findings from quantitative research studies on early patient mobilization for patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used as the reporting guideline. RESULTS: In 12 studies, a total of 412 patients with EVDs in neurological ICUs were actively mobilized with a goal of progressing to ambulation. Mobilization out of bed with a ventriculostomy drain was safe and feasible without significant adverse events. CONCLUSION: There is a need to clarify best practices for early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU and to explore the influence of early mobilization on patients' rates of venous thromboembolism, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, catheter line-associated blood stream infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and ventriculostomy-related infections. No studies measured the total time the EVD was clamped during the patient mobilization intervention or the total amount of cerebrospinal fluid drainage on the day of mobilization. Early mobilization of patients with EVDs in the neurological ICU who were permitted out of bed was universally safe and feasible, with minimal adverse events when safety checks were integrated into mobilization protocols.


Subject(s)
Early Ambulation , Ventriculostomy , Drainage , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Neurosci Nurs ; 41(2): 72-82; quiz 83-4, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19361123

ABSTRACT

Glycemic control is becoming a standard practice in the intensive care environment because it has been shown to produce positive patient outcomes and benefits. A 14-bed neurointensive care unit initiated a strict glycemic protocol and evaluated the results over a 1-year period through a performance improvement initiative. Results indicated that tight glycemic control could be achieved safely by adhering to an evidence-based established protocol. The average blood glucose level for all patients was between 90 and 130 mg/dl by Day 2 after the implementation of the glycemic control protocol. The purpose of this article was to explain how a strict glycemic protocol was safely implemented. Further research is necessary to determine long-term benefits of glycemic control in the population with neurocritical illness.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/complications , Clinical Protocols/standards , Critical Care/methods , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Brain Injuries/mortality , Critical Care/standards , Drug Monitoring , Evidence-Based Practice , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hyperglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Nursing Evaluation Research , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Safety Management
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...