Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi: Simultaneous treatment by robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and transcutaneous retrograde flexible ureteroscopy. Technique description and early outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and renal calculi are associated in 20 to 30% of cases and treatment is mandatory. The simultaneous surgical management is a therapeutic challenge that is still a source of controversy. We describe our technique combining robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and transcutaneous retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS), assessing the feasibility of simultaneous treatment through an original technique. METHODS: This single centre series reports our initial experience with 12 patients. From January 2014 to September 2018, 12 patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with simultaneous fURS for UPJO and renal calculi. Mean age was 46 years (24-68). 92% had multiple renal stones and the mean cumulative stone diameter was 31,3mm. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty was performed with peroperative transcutaneous retrograde fURS through a ureteral access sheath introduced in an incision on the bassinet through a subcostal trocar. Stone extraction was performed using a basket. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgery successfully, achieving UPJ repair and complete stone extraction. Mean operating time was 92,5min (85-110). All reported Clavien-Dindo complications were grade 1. Non-contrast enhanced abdominal CT performed 1 month after surgery confirmed the absence of residual stones in all patients. Mean follow-up time was 10 months with no recurrence of UPJO. CONCLUSION: This small series confirms the feasibility with good surgical results of concomitant robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty and transcutaneous retrograde fURS stone extraction. No major complications were observed. This technique is easily reproducible but requires 2 experienced urologists to be achieved in a contained operative time.

[Pathological pelvic lymph node involvement in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy: A narrative review]. / Envahissement ganglionnaire pelvien anatomopathologique après cystectomie totale pour le traitement des tumeurs de vessie infiltrant le muscle : une revue narrative de la littérature.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a narrative review of the contemporary literature on the diagnosis, prognosis and adjuvant management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients with pathological pelvic lymph node involvement (pN+) at radical cystectomy. METHOD: A narrative review of the contemporary literature available on Medline was conducted to report studies evaluating the diagnosis, prognosis and/or adjuvant treatments for MIBC patients with pN+ disease at radical cystectomy. RESULTS: Open or robotic extended pelvic lymph node dissection up to the crossing of the ureter with common iliac vessels can enhance the diagnosis of pN+ MIBC, especially using separate packages for the submission of a maximum number of lymph nodes. The main prognosis factors for pN+ patients are the number of positive and retrieved lymph nodes, lymph node density, extranodal extension as well as lymph node metastasis diameter. Adjuvant chemotherapy is likely to prolong overall survival in pN+ patients treated with radical cystectomy alone while adjuvant immunotherapy using nivolumab has been shown to decrease the risk of recurrence in all pN+ patients, especially those with ypN+ disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, few data are currently available on the role of adjuvant radiation therapy, which remains currently experimental for these patients. CONCLUSION: Multiple parameters have been reported to impact the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with pN+ MIBC at radical cystectomy. Adjuvant management is currently based on chemotherapy and immunotherapy with preliminary data on radiation therapy.

Evaluación de la biopsia de fusión elástica vs. biopsia sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico en 1.119 pacientes / Elastic fusion biopsy versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Results of a multicentric study on 1.119 patients

Objetivos: Evaluar la precisión de las biopsias guiada y sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata (CP) y CP clínicamente significativo (CPCS) en la práctica diaria, analizando el requerimiento de biopsias sistemáticas adicionales en el momento de la biopsia guiada. Pacientes y métodos: De nuestra base de datos multicéntrica que incluye 2.115 pacientes sometidos a biopsia de fusión con el sistema Koelis(TM) entre 2010 y 2017, seleccionamos 1.119 pacientes que recibieron biopsias guiadas (una mediana de 3 por cada lesión), con posterior muestreo sistemático (12 a 14 núcleos). Se evaluó la tasa de detección de cáncer (TDC) global y clínicamente significativa de las biopsias de fusión de Koelis(TM), comparando la biopsia guiada con la sistemática. Como objetivo secundario, está la identificación de los predictores de detección de CP. Resultados: La TDC de la biopsia guiada fue del 48% para todos los tipos de cáncer y del 33% para el CPCS. El muestreo de próstata sistemático adicional mejoró la TDC global en un 15% y en un 12% para CPCS. Se detectó CP en el 35, 69 y 92% de los pacientes con lesiones calificadas como PI-RADS 3, 4 y 5, respectivamente. Una puntuación elevada de PI-RADS y un examen rectal digital positivo fueron factores predictores de CP, y la condición «biopsia naïve» se asoció con CPCS. Conclusión: En la práctica diaria, la biopsia guiada con Koelis(TM) logra una buena TDC para todos los CP y CPCS, y mejora significativamente con el muestreo sistemático posterior de la próstata. Los excelentes resultados de la biopsia por fusión se confirman también en pacientes naïve. La puntuación PI-RADS elevada y el examen rectal digital positivo están altamente asociados con la presencia de CP

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of targeted and systematic biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the everyday practice, evaluating the need for additional systematic biopsies at the time of targeted biopsy. Patients and methods: From our multicentric database gathering data on 2,115 patients who underwent fusion biopsy with Koelis(TM) system between 2010 and 2017, we selected 1,119 patients who received targeted biopsies (a median of 3 for each target), followed by systematic sampling of the prostate (12 to 14 cores). Overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate (CDR) of Koelis(TM) fusion biopsies were assessed, comparing target and systematic biopsies. Secondary endpoint was the identification of predictors of PCa detection. Results: The CDR of targeted biopsies only was 48% for all cancers and 33% for csPCa. The performance of additional, systematic prostate sampling improved the CDR of 15% for all cancers and of 12% for csPCa. PCa was detected in 35%, 69%, and 92% of patients with lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination were predictors of PCa, whereas biopsy-naïve status was associated with csPCa. Conclusion: In the everyday practice target biopsy with Koelis(TM) achieves a good CDR for all PCa and csPCa, which is significantly improved by subsequent systematic sampling of the prostate. The outstanding outcomes of fusion biopsy are confirmed also in biopsy-naïve patients. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination are strongly associated with presence of PCa

Elastic fusion biopsy versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Results of a multicentric study on 1,119 patients. / Evaluación de la biopsia de fusión elástica vs. biopsia sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico en 1.119 pacientes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of targeted and systematic biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the everyday practice, evaluating the need for additional systematic biopsies at the time of targeted biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our multicentric database gathering data on 2,115 patients who underwent fusion biopsy with Koelis™ system between 2010 and 2017, we selected 1,119 patients who received targeted biopsies (a median of 3 for each target), followed by systematic sampling of the prostate (12 to 14 cores). Overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate (CDR) of Koelis™ fusion biopsies were assessed, comparing target and systematic biopsies. Secondary endpoint was the identification of predictors of PCa detection. RESULTS: The CDR of targeted biopsies only was 48% for all cancers and 33% for csPCa. The performance of additional, systematic prostate sampling improved the CDR of 15% for all cancers and of 12% for csPCa. PCa was detected in 35%, 69%, and 92% of patients with lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination were predictors of PCa, whereas biopsy-naïve status was associated with csPCa. CONCLUSION: In the everyday practice target biopsy with Koelis™ achieves a good CDR for all PCa and csPCa, which is significantly improved by subsequent systematic sampling of the prostate. The outstanding outcomes of fusion biopsy are confirmed also in biopsy-naïve patients. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination are strongly associated with presence of PCa.

Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: Evaluation of discriminant location criteria using multiparametric fusion-guided biopsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate precise location criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve detection of transition zone (TZ) and anterior stroma (AS) prostate cancers using targeted MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies as a reference standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six men (mean age: 65 years±7.7 [SD] [range: 46-83 years]) with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (PSA≥4ng/mL) who underwent standard and targeted biopsies on a TZ/AS suspicious lesion were included. The database was reviewed to assess topographical and morphological features of each suspicious lesion on MR images (T2-weighted anatomical images on 1.5T MRI or 3T) including PI-RADS score assessed by a senior radiologist. Histopathological examination of MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy specimens was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Ninety patients had a positive targeted biopsy with a median [IQR] lesion size of 16mm [13-20mm]. Homogeneous hypointensity on T2-weighted mages, lenticular shape, lack of capsule and indistinct margins were present in 77/90 (85%) patients. All TZ/AS prostate cancers were located in the anterior half of the prostate: 3% at the base, 69% in the mid gland and 28% at the apex. Lesions were mainly located close to or within the AS (74%) and more rarely laterally compressed close to the peripheral anterior horn. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that specific topographic criteria of TZ and AS prostate cancers could add independent information to the usual diagnostic criteria in prostate MRI. Transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsies based on these specific criteria improve volume estimation of prostate cancers with substantial impact for prognosis and treatment planning.

[Male neurogenic stress urinary incontinence treated by artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800™ (Boston Scientific, Boston, USA): Very long-term results (>25 years)]. / Traitement de l'incontinence urinaire masculine neurologique par le sphincter urinaire artificiel AMS 800™ (Boston Scientific, Boston, États-Unis) : résultats à très long terme (>25 ans).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to report the very long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in male neurological patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Male neurological patients diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence due to sphincter deficiency and undergoing AUS (AMS 800®) implantation between 1985 and 1992 were enrolled. Continence, defined by no pad/condom usage, explantation and revision rates were reported. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with a median age of 27.3 years (IQR: 27.3-40.8) were included: four had a spinal cord injury and ten a spina bifida. Prior continence surgery was reported by 6 patients (42.9 %). Artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in a peribulbar (n=4) or periprostatic position (n=10). Median follow-up was 18.3 years (IQR: 10.1-20.3). At last follow-up, all patients were alive. Three native devices were still in place, eight were revised (four of them were secondarily explanted) and three were explanted due to erosion or infection. The 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-year explantation-free survival rates were respectively 85.7, 62.3, 52.0, 39.0 %. The 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-year revision-free survival rates were respectively 78.6, 42.9, 28.6, 7.1 %. At last follow-up, 50 % patients were continent. CONCLUSION: In the very long run, AUS provided a 50 % continence rate in male neurological patients but the revision rates were important. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of manual semi-automated and volumetric measurements to assess prostate cancer volume on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) using whole-mount histopathology for validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 30 consecutive men (median age, 65.7 years; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-70.9 years) with a median prostatic specific antigen of 8.5ng/dL (IQR, 5.5-10.5ng/dL), who underwent MP-MRI before radical prostatectomy. Index tumor volume was determined prospectively and independently on the basis of MRI and whole-mount section volumetric assessment using the maximum histologic diameter (MHD) and the histologic volume (HV). The MRI index tumor volume was determined by two independent radiologists using a single measurement of the maximum tumor dimension (MTD), a simplified MR ellipsoid volume (MREV) calculation and a MR region of interest volume (MROV) segmentation displayed by a commercially available OsiriX®. MTD was compared to MHD, whereas MREV and MROV were compared to HV. RESULTS: Thirty index lesions (median HV, 1.514 cm3; IQR, 0.05-3.780 cm3) were analyzed. The MREV, MROV and HD were significantly correlated with each other (r>0.5). Inter-observer agreement for measurements was good for each method (r>0.780). The MTD was the best predictor of maximum histologic diameter (r=0.980 and 0.791) and had an excellent inter-variability correlation (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer histologic volume can be assessed using MREV or MROV with a good accuracy and low inter-observer variability. MTD has the lowest inter-observer variability and provides best degrees of correlation with MHD. MTD should be used on MRI for selecting and following patients for active surveillance and staging before focal treatment of prostate cancer.

[Targeted MRI prostate biopsies]. / Les biopsies prostatiques et la fusion d'image IRM-échographie.

Prostate cancer is the first cancer and the second cause of cancer death in men in France. It is now a major public health issue, particularly given the increase of life expectancy. If screening is based on blood PSA and clinical examination (DRE), diagnosis requires the histological analysis of prostate samples. In current clinical routine, these biopsies are performed by endorectal through ultrasound guidance. In most cases, the cancer is not visible in the ultrasound image and the latter is used to make a dozen samples (or core), distributed as best as possible in the prostate. To increase the accuracy and the contribution of these biopsies, the use of data acquired by the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as the fusion of ultrasound and MRI images, is a therapeutic undergoing validation, and today performed in many institutions with dedicated tools. The objective of this work is to present the practical arrangements for the implementation of these biopsies using the image fusion, and discuss the advantages and benefits.

[Functional outcomes obtained after vesicoureteral reimplantation surgery in adults: A review]. / Étiologies et résultats fonctionnels après réimplantation urétéro-vésicale chez l'adulte : revue de la littérature.

OBJECTIVES: Vesico-ureteral reimplantations (VUR) for adults are complex procedures, often practicing for distal ureteral lesions. Our goal was to synthesis the main indications for VUR, different techniques and their functional outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review in English by Medline, Embase and Google scholar was performed using the following keywords: ureter; laparoscopy; robotics, reimplantation; surgery; obstruction; morbidity; complications; psoas hitch; Boari flap; ureteroneocystostomy. RESULTS: In more than half of the cases, aetiology was a iatrogenic ureteral lesion. When the ureteral defect was less than 2 cm, direct or non-refluxing VUR was the technique of choice. If defect was superior than 2 cm the Boari flap or vesicopsoas hitch were preferred. Several surgical approaches were feasible: open, laparoscopic only, robot assisted laparoscopic. Estimated blood loss, pain and mean hospital stay seemed better with conventional or robotic coelioscopy. Nevertheless, complications, pre-/post-operative renal function and mean operative time seemed similar. The most frequent major complication was the anastomotic urine leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The VUR techniques are well codified now even if it's a rare procedure. Functional outcomes are satisfied according to literature and morbidity is more and more decreasing but the level of evidence of the studies is low.

[Update for the management of kidney stones in 2013. Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology]. / Mise au point sur la prise en charge des calculs du rein en 2013. Comité Lithiase de l'Association française d'urologie.

Since the publication of the latest recommendations of the Lithiasis Comity of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU) on the management of ureteral and renal stones, practices have evolved. This text provides an update for the treatment of kidney stones. It is especially the important advances in the field of laser-ureterorenoscopy that changed practices. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has been enriched by technical modifications and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy confirmed its predominant place in the first line of treatment. For stones less than 20mm, extracorporeal lithotripsy remains the standard, but in some cases the possibility of recommending a flexible ureterorenoscopy is possible in first line. For stones more than 20mm, percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the standard treatment, but optional flexible ureteroscopy and extracorporeal lithotripsy are possible. The treatment carried out, collect the stone fragments for a morpho-constitutional analysis and achieve a metabolic evaluation is necessary, to investigate etiologic and give dietary advices to prevent recurrence.

[Medical and surgical treatments of congenital and acquired penile curvatures: a review]. / Traitements médicaux et chirurgicaux des courbures de verge congénitales et acquises: revue de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study was to provide an overview about the surgical and medical management of acquired and congenital penile's curvature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: [corrected] A systematic review of the literature was done from the PubMed database by searching the following keywords alone or in combination: Congenital penile curvature; Congenital penile deviation; Acquired penile curvature; Acquired penile deviation; Peyronie's disease. RESULTS: The treatment of congenital curvature is only surgical. The most common technique is the Nesbit's technique which consists in making elliptical excisions of the tunica albuginea. There are also incison or plication procedures which are efficient as well. Acquired curvature is most of the time represented by the Peyronie's disease or is post-traumatic. Among oral treatments available, the Potaba is the only drug which has proved a significant reduction in penile plaque size. Injections of interferon and nicardipine have also shown their efficacy. Ionotophoresis and extracorporeal shock-wave therapy may be beneficial for penile pain. Other therapies (vacuum, traction devices, topical Verapamil) can be interesting but other studies are necessary to recommend them. Surgical treatment is recommended during the fibrotic phase. The most common technique is also the Nesbit's technique. In case of severe curvature (curve superior to 60°), small penis, major deformations, graft techniques can be used. Moreover, if there is a sexual dysfunction, penile prosthesis is recommended. CONCLUSION: Other studies are necessary to prove the efficacy of most of the drugs already available in the treatment of the penile curvature. It seems to be interesting to combine the different treatments to improve the results of those therapies.