Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (1): 54-58, 2022.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35080827

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of emergency surgical care under COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed the results of treatment of 1.749 patients who were treated from May 01 to September 30 in 2018-2020. The study group consisted of 48 COVID-19 patients with urgent surgical diseases. The control group consisted of patients with emergency surgical diseases and no coronavirus infection. RESULTS: The new coronavirus infection significantly increases in-hospital mortality by 8 times and postoperative mortality by 6.5 times compared to pre-pandemic period. CONCLUSION: Emergency surgical care to COVID-19 patients is accompanied by increase of in-hospital mortality up to 31.3% and postoperative mortality up to 33.3%.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Emergency Treatment , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (9): 13-17, 2019.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31532161

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of pancreatic duct stenting on the results of treatment of acute pancreatitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analysis included 99 patients with acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic stentingwas appliedin the study group, conventional approach - in the control group. RESULTS: Pancreatic duct stenting at theearly stages ofacute pancreatitis results decreased level of enzyme toxemia and manifestations of systemic inflammatory response. CONCLUSION: Stenting interrupts course of pathological process and minimizes the possibility of transition of aseptic to infected pancreatic necrosis. Therefore, reduced early mortalityis observed.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Ducts/surgery , Pancreatitis/surgery , Stents , Acute Disease , Endoscopy, Digestive System , Humans , Prosthesis Implantation
3.
Khirurgiia (Mosk) ; (1): 32-35, 2017.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28209951

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of various methods of endoscopic hemostasis in patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Several surgical techniques in treatment of 117 patients with ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding were anayzed. Isolated and combined methods of endoscopic hemostasis were used in control and study groups. RESULTS: Combined endoscopic hemostasis is bettercompared with isolated techniques. It reduces the incidence of recurrence, surgical activity and mortality. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of combined endoscopic hemostasis was 88.2% for primary hemostasis in acute ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding. Herewith, surgical activity and mortality were decreased.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Hemostasis, Endoscopic , Intraoperative Care/methods , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Blood Loss, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Female , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/adverse effects , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/methods , Hemostasis, Endoscopic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/mortality , Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/surgery , Russia/epidemiology , Secondary Prevention/methods , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...