ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the capacity of clinical nutrition services in secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Sichuan Province, China. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Convenience sampling was used. E-questionnaires were distributed to all eligible medical institutions in Sichuan through the official network of provincial and municipal clinical nutrition quality control centers. The data obtained were sorted in Microsoft Excel and analyzed by SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 519 questionnaires were returned, of which 455 were valid. Only 228 hospitals were accessible to clinical nutrition services, of which 127 hospitals had independently set up clinical nutrition departments (CNDs). The ratio of clinical nutritionists to beds was 1:214. During the last decade, the rate of constructing new CNDs was maintained at approximately 5 units/year. A total of 72.4% of hospitals managed their clinical nutrition units as part of their medical technology departments. The specialist number ratio of senior, associate, intermediate and junior is approximately 1:4:8:10. There were 5 common charges for clinical nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The sample representation was limited, and the capacity of clinical nutrition services may have been overestimated. Secondary and tertiary hospitals in Sichuan are currently in the second high tide of department establishment, with a positive trend of departmental affiliation standardization and a basic formation of a talent echelon.
Subject(s)
Nutritional Status , Research Design , Humans , Tertiary Care Centers , ChinaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Chinese government stipulates all food for special medical purposes (FSMP) designed for specific diseases to be tested in clinical trials before approving it for registration. The process of developing core outcome sets (COSs), the minimum sets of outcomes supposed to be measured and reported, provides an economical and practical option for stakeholders to communicate and cooperate in conducting clinical trials as well as in reporting FSMP outcomes. This study uses type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as an example to develop COS for clinical trials of FSMP. METHODS: The COS for FSMP-T2DM will be divided into 3 phases and developed following COS-STAP and COS-STAD: (1) Generate a list of relevant outcomes identified from a systematic review, in which information sources will mainly include published studies, regulatory documentation, and qualitative interviews of stakeholders. The identified outcomes will be categorized using a conceptual framework and formatted into the first round of the Delphi survey questionnaire items. (2) At least 2 rounds of Delphi surveys will be performed among stakeholders to create the COS for FSMP-T2DM. Patients, clinical dietitians, physicians, COS researchers, journal editors, FSMP manufacturers, and regulatory representatives will be invited to score each outcome from aspects of importance. (3) Hold a face-to-face or online consensus meeting to refine the content of the COS for FSMP-T2DM. Key stakeholders will be invited to attend the meeting to discuss and agree on the final COS. DISCUSSION: We have prepared an alternative solution of the Likert scale selection, Delphi survey rounds, scoring group, and consensus definitions in case of an unexpected situation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COMET (1547). Registered on March 23, 2020.
