Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 39
Filter
1.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 13(7): 761-778, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32479129

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: . Massive hemorrhage continues to be a treatable cause of death. Its management varies from prefixed ratio-driven administration of blood components to goal-directed therapy based on point-of-care testing and administration of coagulation factor concentrates. AREAS COVERED: . We review the current role of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) for the management of massive hemorrhage, either administered without coagulation testing in life-threatening hemorrhage, or within an algorithm based on viscoelastic hemostatic assays and plasma fibrinogen level. We identified relevant guidelines, meta-analyzes, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies that included indications, dosage, and adverse effects of FC, especially thromboembolic events. EXPERT OPINION: . Moderate- to high-grade evidence supports the use of FC for the treatment of severe hemorrhage in trauma and cardiac surgery; a lower grade of evidence is available for its use in postpartum hemorrhage and end-stage liver disease. Pre-emptive FC administration in non-bleeding patients is not recommended. FC should be administered early, in a goal-directed manner, guided by early amplitude of clot firmness parameters (A5- or A10-FIBTEM) or hypofibrinogenemia. Further investigation is required into the early use of FC, as well as its potential advantages over cryoprecipitate, and whether or not its administration at high doses leads to a greater risk of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Fibrinogen/administration & dosage , Hemorrhage/therapy , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Coagulants/administration & dosage , Coagulants/adverse effects , Factor VIII/administration & dosage , Fibrinogen/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostatics/adverse effects , Humans , Point-of-Care Testing , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest ; 80(3): 179-184, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846350

ABSTRACT

This prospective study aimed at investigating the influence of surgery type and perioperative sampling times on the correlations between rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and standard laboratory coagulation tests assessing comparable coagulation phases. Patients undergoing glioblastoma multiforme resection (GBR group, n = 60) or laparoscopic colon cancer resection (CCR group, n = 40) were prospectively included. Blood samples for ROTEM and laboratory assessments were consecutively drawn within 24-hours prior to surgery (baseline), and at 2, 24 and 48-hours after surgery. Correlations between perioperative ExTEM clotting-time (CT-exTEM) and prothrombin time (PT), and between FibTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF-fibTEM) with and plasma fibrinogen (pFB) concentration (Clauss method), were evaluated using the Spearman's rho test. The efficiency of recommended cut-offs of CT-exTEM (>75 s) and MCF-fibTEM (<10 mm) for predicting a prolonged PT (>15 s) or a low pFB (<2 g/L), respectively, was assessed using Receiver-Operator Characteristic curves. Correlations between CT-exTEM and PT were weak in GBR (rho = 0.25 [0.12-0.38], p < .01), and very weak in CCR (rho = 0.06 [-0.12-0.27]). Those between MCF-fibTEM and pFB, were strong in both GBR (rho = 0.69 [0.61-0.76], p < .01) and CCR (rho = 0.70 [0.60-0.78], p < .01). These correlations remained largely unchanged over the studied perioperative period in both groups. Recommended CT-exTEM and MCF-fibTEM cut-offs had poor sensitivity for predicting a prolonged PT (17% [8-31]) or a low pFB (46% [32-62]), without group-related differences. Neither the type of surgery nor the perioperative sampling times had a significant influence on the correlations between ROTEM parameters and standard laboratory tests. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02652897.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/blood , Blood Coagulation , Brain Neoplasms/blood , Colonic Neoplasms/blood , Glioblastoma/blood , Aged , Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Fibrinogen/metabolism , Glioblastoma/diagnosis , Glioblastoma/pathology , Glioblastoma/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perioperative Period , Prospective Studies , Prothrombin Time/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve , Thrombelastography/instrumentation , Thrombelastography/methods
4.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 29(7): 644-650, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234544

ABSTRACT

: The current prospective study was aimed at investigating whether a portable coagulometer (qLabs) can be used to reliably monitor activated thromboplastin time (aPTT) and international normalized ratio (INR) in critically ill patients, as compared with standard central laboratory measurement. Both precision and accuracy of INR and aPTT measured by qLabs were assessed in this observational study by finger prick group (N = 30 patients) and blood droplet group from central venous catheter drawn (N = 60). For accuracy, clinical agreement percentage was ±0.3 for INR and ±10 s for aPTT. Precision of INR measurement in qLabs showed excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 90%). Precision of aPTT measurement in qLabs was less acceptable for both finger prick [ICC: 0.70; Bland-Altman plot: 2.2 s (-19.8, 24.2)] and blood droplet [ICC: 0.50; Bland-Altman plot: 0.4 s (-70.9, 71.8)] groups. Accuracy of qLabs was acceptable for INR assessment (clinical agreement 90 and 81%, for finger prick and blood droplet groups, respectively), but not for aPTT (clinical agreement 55 and 68%, respectively). Accuracy of finger prick and blood droplet measurements in qLabs was better for INR and aPTT values near-to-normal (1.2 and 37 s, respectively). INR values from qLabs were consistent with the 'gold standard'. qLabs measurement is only reliable for aPTT values near-to-normal.


Subject(s)
International Normalized Ratio/methods , Partial Thromboplastin Time/methods , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Critical Illness , Humans , International Normalized Ratio/standards , Partial Thromboplastin Time/standards , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
9.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 149(11): 496-503, dic. 2017. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-169118

ABSTRACT

La anemia es frecuente en los ancianos y se asocia con un mayor riesgo de deterioro físico, funcional y cognitivo, hospitalización y mortalidad. Aunque desconocemos si es un factor causal o un marcador subrogado de un peor estado de salud, su corrección puede mejorar la capacidad física y funcional. Su detección, su clasificación y su tratamiento deberían ser objetivos prioritarios para el sistema de salud. Sus principales causas son las deficiencias nutricionales y las enfermedades crónicas, con y sin insuficiencia renal, aunque algunas son de origen desconocido. La historia clínica y la exploración física ayudan a aclarar su etiología. Un algoritmo diagnóstico basado en los datos del laboratorio permite su clasificación con orientación terapéutica. Los suplementos de hierro y factores madurativos y los agentes estimuladores de la eritropoyesis constituyen la base del tratamiento, junto con el de la enfermedad de base, reservándose la transfusión de hematíes para los casos graves (AU)


Anaemia is common in the elderly and is associated with an increased risk of physical, functional, and cognitive impairment, hospitalization and mortality. Although it is unknown whether anaemia is a causal factor or a subrogated marker of worse health status, its correction can improve the patients' physical and functional capacity. Detection, classification, and treatment of anaemia should be a priority for the health system. The main causes of anaemia in the elderly are nutritional deficiencies and chronic disease, with or without kidney failure, although some cases are of indeterminate origin. Medical history and physical examination help to clarify it’s a etiology. A diagnostic algorithm based on data from the lab allows anaemia classification with a therapeutic orientation. Supplements of iron and maturation factors, as well as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, constitute the mainstay of treatment, along with that of the underlying disease, whereas red blood cell transfusion should be reserved for severe cases (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/epidemiology , Anemia/prevention & control , Health of the Elderly , Frail Elderly , Elderly Nutrition , Elder Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Malnutrition/diet therapy , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Malnutrition/prevention & control
10.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 149(11): 496-503, 2017 Dec 07.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28743402

ABSTRACT

Anaemia is common in the elderly and is associated with an increased risk of physical, functional, and cognitive impairment, hospitalisation and mortality. Although it is unknown whether anaemia is a causal factor or a subrogated marker of worse health status, its correction can improve the patients' physical and functional capacity. Detection, classification, and treatment of anaemia should be a priority for the health system. The main causes of anaemia in the elderly are nutritional deficiencies and chronic disease, with or without kidney failure, although some cases are of indeterminate origin. Medical history and physical examination help to clarify its aetiology. A diagnostic algorithm based on data from the lab allows anaemia classification with a therapeutic orientation. Supplements of iron and maturation factors, as well as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, constitute the mainstay of treatment, along with that of the underlying disease, whereas red blood cell transfusion should be reserved for severe cases.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/drug therapy , Anemia/etiology , Dietary Supplements , Hematinics/therapeutic use , Humans , Iron/therapeutic use , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination , Risk Factors , Trace Elements/therapeutic use
11.
J Neurotrauma ; 34(17): 2553-2559, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486023

ABSTRACT

In neurocritically ill patients (NCPs), the use of hemoglobin level as the sole indicator for red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) can result in under- or over-transfusion. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to ascertain whether a transcranial oxygen saturation (rSO2) threshold, as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, reduces RBCT requirements in anemic NCPs (closed traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid, or intracerebral hemorrhage), compared with a hemoglobin threshold alone. Patients with hemoglobin 70-100 g/L received RBCTs to attain an rSO2 > 60% (rSO2 arm) or to maintain hemoglobin between 85 and 100 g/L (hemoglobin arm). A total of 102 NCPs (51 in each group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 97 were included in the per-protocol analysis (51 and 46, respectively). Compared with those from the hemoglobin arm, patients in rSO2 arm received fewer RBC units (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.4 units/patient; p < 0.05) and showed lower hemoglobin levels while in protocol. There were no differences between the study arms regarding the percentage of transfused patents (59% vs. 71%; relative risk 0.83 [95% CI 0.62-1.11]), stay on neurocritical care unit (21 vs. 20 days), unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale scores on hospital discharge (57% vs. 71%), in-hospital mortality (6% vs. 10%), or 1 year mortality (24% vs. 24%). Among NCPs with hemoglobin concentrations of 70-85 g/L, withholding transfusion until rSO2 is <60% may result in reduced RBCs requirements compared with routinely transfusing to attain a hemoglobin level >85 g/L. Further studies are required to confirm this finding and its possible impact on clinically significant outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anemia/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/blood , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Intracranial Hemorrhages/blood , Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared/methods , Adult , Anemia/blood , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intracranial Hemorrhages/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
12.
Neurocrit Care ; 24(3): 371-80, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26627227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This 3-year prospective study examined the association between red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) and 1-year neurocognitive and disability levels in 309 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to the neurological intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS: Using a telephone interview-based survey, functional outcomes were assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Rancho Los Amigos Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale (RLCFS), and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and dichotomized as favorable and unfavorable (dependent variable). The adjusted influence of RBCT on unfavorable results was assessed by conventional logistic regression, controlling for illness severity and propensity score (introduced as a continuous variable and by propensity score-matched patients). RESULTS: Overall, 164 (53 %) patients received ≥1 unit of RBCT during their NICU stay. One year postinjury, transfused patients exhibited significantly higher unfavorable GOS (46.0 vs. 22.0 %), RLCFS (37.4 vs. 15.4 %), and DRS (39.6 vs. 18.7 %) scores than nontransfused patients. Although transfused patients were more severely ill upon admission, their adjusted odds ratios (95 % confidence intervals) for unfavorable GOS, RLCFS, and DRS scores were 2.5 (1.2-5.1), 3.0 (1.4-6.3), and 2.3 (1.1-4.8), respectively. These odds ratios remained largely unmodified when the calculated propensity score was incorporated as an independent continuous variable into the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in 76 pairs of propensity score-matched patients, the rate of an unfavorable RLCFS score at the 1-year (but not 6-month) follow-up was significantly higher in transfused than nontransfused patients [3.0 (1.1-8.2)]. CONCLUSION: Our results strongly suggest an independent association between RBCT and unfavorable long-term functional outcomes of patients with TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
20.
Intensive Care Med ; 39(3): 445-53, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23184038

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) at reversing the deleterious effects of moderate anemia in critically ill, non-bleeding patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, pair-matched (ratio 1:1) cohort study. Non-bleeding critically ill patients with moderate anemia (nadir hemoglobin level between 70 and 95 g/l), admitted to the ICU over a 27-month period, were included. Anemic patients were included upon meeting five matching criteria of having the same nadir hemoglobin (±5 g/l), APACHE II score (±5), SOFA score (±2), admission diagnostic group, and age (±5 years). Outcome events occurring over the whole ICU stay and after RBCT were collected. After hospital discharge, all patients had a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen non-transfused anemic patients (NTAPs) were successfully matched with 214 transfused anemic patients (TAPs). In addition to the matching criteria, at baseline, both groups were homogenous with respect to multiple comorbidities. Compared with TAPs, NTAPs showed significantly lower rates of hospital mortality (21 vs.13 %, respectively; p < 0.05) and ICU re-admission (7.4 vs. 1.9 %, respectively; p < 0.05). Additionally, NTAPs had significantly lower rates of nosocomial infection (12.9 vs. 6.7 %, respectively; p < 0.05) and acute kidney injury (24.8 vs. 16.7 %, respectively; p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analysis where only more anemic patients (68 matched pairs) or patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (63 matched pairs) were considered. CONCLUSIONS: RBCT does not improve the clinical outcome in non-bleeding critically ill patients with moderate anemia.


Subject(s)
Anemia/therapy , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Aged , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...