A hood shield reduces postdoffing contamination during simulated COVID-19 airway management: an exploratory, simulation-based randomized study.

PURPOSE: SARS-CoV-2 poses a significant occupational health threat to health care workers performing aerosol-generating medical procedures, with a threefold increased risk of a positive test and predicted infection compared with the general population. Nevertheless, the personal protective equipment (PPE) configuration that provides better protection with lower contamination rates is still unknown. METHODS: We enrolled 40 practitioners with airway management training (anesthesiologists, anesthesia assistants/nurses) in an exploratory, simulation-based randomized study. We evaluated the performance of a novel, locally designed hood (n = 20) in terms of protection from surrogate contamination using an ultraviolet (UV) marker during a standardized urgent intubation procedure and a simulated episode of coughing in a high-fidelity simulation setting compared with standard PPE (n = 20). The primary outcome was the presence of residual UV fluorescent contamination on any base clothing or exposed skin of the upper body after doffing PPE assessed by a blinded evaluator. RESULTS: The proportion of participants with residual contamination on any base clothing or exposed skin of the upper body after doffing was less than half in the hood PPE group compared with the standard PPE group (8/20 [40%] vs 18/20 [90%], respectively; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard PPE, enhanced PPE with a locally designed prototype hood was associated with reduced contamination of the upper torso and fewer body areas being exposed to droplets after a simulated aerosol-generating scenario without designed airflow. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04373096); registered 4 May 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le SRAS-CoV-2 représente une menace importante pour la santé au travail des travailleurs de la santé réalisant des interventions médicales générant des aérosols, avec un risque trois fois plus élevé de test positif au SRAS-CoV-2 et d'infection prédite au SRAS-CoV-2 par rapport à la population générale. Néanmoins, la configuration optimale des équipements de protection individuelle (EPI) offrant la meilleure protection avec des taux de contamination plus faibles est encore inconnue. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté 40 praticiens ayant une formation en prise en charge des voies aériennes (anesthésiologistes, assistants en anesthésie/personnel infirmier) dans le cadre d'une étude exploratoire randomisée de simulation. Nous avons évalué la performance d'un nouveau capuchon conçu localement (n = 20) par rapport aux EPI standards (n = 20) en termes de protection contre la contamination de substitution à l'aide d'un marqueur ultraviolet (UV) au cours d'une procédure d'intubation urgente normalisée et d'un épisode simulé de toux dans un environnement de simulation haute fidélité. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la présence d'une contamination résiduelle par fluorescence UV sur les vêtements de base ou la peau exposée du haut du corps après le retrait des EPI telle qu'évaluée par un évaluateur en aveugle. RéSULTATS: La proportion de participants présentant une contamination résiduelle sur les vêtements de base ou la peau exposée du haut du corps après le retrait des équipements de protection était de moins de la moitié dans le groupe ayant porté le capuchon par rapport au groupe EPI standard (8/20 [40 %] vs 18/20 [90 %], respectivement; P = 0,002). CONCLUSION: Par rapport aux EPI standards, les EPI améliorés avec un prototype de capuchon conçu localement étaient associés à une contamination réduite du haut du torse et à moins de zones du corps exposées aux gouttelettes après une mise en situation simulée de génération d'aérosols sans flux d'air préconçu. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04373096); enregistrée le 4 mai 2020.

No Benefits of Adding Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, Dexamethasone, and Nerve Blocks to an Established Multimodal Analgesic Regimen after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: An optimal opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic regimen to treat severe pain can enhance recovery after total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that adding five recently described intravenous and regional interventions to multimodal analgesic regimen can further reduce opioid consumption. METHODS: In a double-blinded fashion, 78 patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either (1) a control group (n = 39) that received spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine, periarticular local anesthesia infiltration, intravenous dexamethasone, and a single injection adductor canal block or (2) a study group (n = 39) that received the same set of analgesic treatments plus five additional interventions: local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee, intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketamine, and postoperatively, one additional intravenous dexamethasone bolus and two additional adductor canal block injections. The primary outcome measure was 24-h cumulative opioid consumption after surgery and secondary outcomes were other analgesics, patient recovery, functional outcomes, and adverse events. RESULTS: Opioid consumption was not different between groups at 24 h (oral morphine equivalents, mean ± SD; study: 23.7 ± 18.0 mg vs. control: 29.3 ± 18.7 mg; mean difference [95% CI], -5.6 mg [-2.7 to 13.9]; P = 0.189) and all other time points after surgery. There were no major differences in pain scores, quality of recovery, or time to reach rehabilitation milestones. Hypotensive episodes occurred more frequently in the study group (25 of 39 [64.1%] vs. 13 of 39 [33.3%]; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of periarticular local anesthesia infiltration, intrathecal morphine, single-shot adductor canal block and dexamethasone, the addition of five analgesic interventions-local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee, intravenous dexmedetomidine, intravenous ketamine, an additional intravenous dexamethasone dose, and repeated adductor canal block injections-failed to further reduce opioid consumption or pain scores or to improve functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty.

Is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in acute pain a good measure of analgesic efficacy in regional anesthesia?

In the field of acute pain medicine research, we believe there is an unmet need to incorporate patient related outcome measures that move beyond reporting pain scores and opioid consumption. The term "minimal clinically important difference" (MCID) defines the clinical benefit of an intervention as perceived by the patient, as opposed to a mathematically determined statistically significant difference that may not necessarily be clinically significant. The present article reviews the concept of MCID in acute postoperative pain research, addresses potential pitfalls in MCID determination and questions the clinical validity of extrapolating MCID determined from chronic pain and non-surgical pain studies to the acute postoperative pain setting. We further suggest the concepts of minimal clinically important improvement, substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptom state should also represent aspirational outcomes for future research in acute postoperative pain management.

Diaphragm-sparing brachial plexus blocks: a focused review of current evidence and their role during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given that COVID-19 can severely impair lung function, regional anesthesia techniques avoiding phrenic nerve paralysis are relevant in the anesthetic management of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 patients requiring shoulder and clavicle surgical procedures. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of recently published studies examining ultrasound-guided diaphragm-sparing regional anesthesia techniques for the brachial plexus (BP) to favor their preferent use in patients at risk of respiratory function compromise. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last 18 months, study findings on various diaphragm-sparing regional anesthesia techniques have demonstrated comparable block analgesic effectivity with a variable extent of phrenic nerve paralysis. The impact of hemi-diaphragmatic function impairment on clinical outcomes is yet to be established. SUMMARY: Existing diaphragm-sparing brachial plexus regional anesthesia techniques used for shoulder and clavicle surgery may help minimize pulmonary complications by preserving lung function, especially in patients prone to respiratory compromise. Used as an anesthetic technique, they can reduce the risk of exposure of healthcare teams to aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs), albeit posing an increased risk for hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis. Reducing the incidence of phrenic nerve involvement and obtaining opioid-sparing analgesia without jeopardizing efficacy should be prioritized goals of regional anesthesia practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Managing rebound pain after regional anesthesia.

Rebound pain after regional anesthesia can be defined as transient acute postoperative pain that ensues following resolution of sensory blockade, and is clinically significant, either with regard to the intensity of pain or the impact on psychological well-being, quality of recovery, and activities of daily living. Current evidence suggests that it represents an unmasking of the expected nociceptive response in the absence of adequate systemic analgesia, rather than an exaggerated hyperalgesic phenomenon induced by local anesthetic neural blockade. In the majority of patients, it does not appear to significantly impact cumulative postoperative opioid consumption, quality of recovery, or patient satisfaction, and is not associated with longer-term sequelae such as persistent post-surgical pain. Nevertheless, it must be considered whenever regional anesthesia is incorporated into perioperative management. Strategies to mitigate the impact of rebound pain include routine prescribing of a systemic multimodal analgesic regimen, as well as patient education on appropriate expectations regarding block offset and expected surgical pain, and timely initiation of analgesic medication. Prolonging the duration of action of regional anesthesia with continuous catheter techniques or local anesthetic adjuncts may also help alleviate rebound pain, although further research is required to confirm this.

Mordedura canina / Dog bites

Introducción. La mordedura canina no es una consulta infrecuente al servicio de urgencias y es muy probable que el médico colombiano en su práctica clínica se vea enfrentado a ella. Es imperativo que conozca los protocolos y las guías nacionales para la atención de la víctima de mordedura de perro, pues debe actuar de manera pertinente,según los recursos con los que cuente.Métodos. Se hizo una revisión académica de las guías para la atención de mordedura humana y por animales publicadas en las “Guías para manejo de urgencias” del Ministeriode la Protección Social de Colombia, 2009. Dicha información se complementó con la obtenida de la “Guía práctica para la atención de personas agredidas por un animalpotencialmente transmisor de rabia” del Grupo de Zoonosis del Instituto Nacional de Salud de 2009 y de otros artículos indizados en Pubmed.Resultados. Se hizo una revisión práctica dirigida al médico de urgencias, abordando aspectos como la epidemiología, el enfoque del paciente, el examen físico, el manejo inicial, los cuidados de la herida, el uso o no uso de antibiótico profiláctico, la vacunacióninmunización para rabia y tétanos, y la prevención...

Introduction: Although no official data exists for Colombia, dog bites are not infrequent consults to the emergency department on a global scale. In theurban or rural setting, it is likely that Colombian emergency department physicians face patients with such consults in their clinical practice. It isimperative that those physicians become familiar with the current national guidelines and protocolsfor the attention of such patients, since he/she must act pertinently according to the resources available. Methods: An academic review of the Ministeriode la Protección Social current clinical guidelines for the attention of animal bites was carried out. Such information was complemented with the current guidelines for attention of aggression caused by animals posing risk of rabies transmission published by Colombian Instituto Nacional de Salud, and with other articles indexed in Pubmed. Results: A practical review was obtained directed to the emergency department physician in Colombia. Topics such as epidemiology, patientapproach, physical examination, initial management, wound care, antibiotic prophylaxis, vaccination-immunization for rabies/tetanus and prevention are all discussed..