Survey on the Situation of Medical Departments in the Pharmaceutical Industry in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Medical departments have evolved from a position of support to one of strategic leadership. The number of tasks and the complexity of interactions in which they are involved is increasing. However, the spectrum of their activity in the sector differs significantly from one company to another. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe their situation within the pharmaceutical industry, analyzing the positions, functions, and profiles of their professionals. METHODS: This study consisted of an online survey containing 25 questions grouped into four blocks (structure, medical direction, training, and activities and responsibilities). Medical departments in the Spanish pharmaceutical industry of different sizes and scope were invited to participate. The survey took place in 2021, with a designated response period of three months. It is important to note that all responses collected during this time were treated as anonymous. RESULTS: Thirty companies participated. A total of 93.3% of respondents worked for an international laboratory, with a size of 0-5 or 11-20 people (20.7%). For 27.6% of the companies, the number of medical advisors per medical department was 1 or 4, with varying numbers of medical scientific liaisons (1, 6-10, and > 20). A total of 56.7%, 33.3%, and 6.7% indicated that the country manager, head of regional medical affairs, and head of global medical affairs, respectively, had a solid-line reporting relationship with the medical directorate. Medical directors were mostly graduates in medicine (86.2%) with a doctorate (34.5%), and medical managers were mainly graduates in medicine (77.8%) and pharmacy (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that respondents predominantly work in internationally focused laboratories, with professionals ranging from experienced medical directors to managers with 6-20 years of experience, each with distinct roles.

Use of edoxaban in clinical practice: Comparison of data from the Spanish population in the ETNA-AF-Europe registry.

Aim: To ascertain the clinical profile and management of edoxaban in clinical practice. Materials & methods: Prospective, noninterventional postauthorization study of nonselected patients with atrial fibrillation treated with edoxaban from 12 European countries. Patients' baseline characteristics are presented. Results: A total of 13,638 patients (73.6 ± 9.5 years; 76.6/23.4% edoxaban 60/30 mg; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.1; 838 [6.1%] from Spain) were included. In Spain, the percentage of very elderly and fragile patients was greater and the risk of thromboembolism (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2, 98.0 vs 87.3%; p < 0.001) and bleeding (HAS-BLED, 3.2 vs 2.7; p < 0.001) was greater in patients treated with edoxaban 30 mg. The proportion of patients taking edoxaban 30 mg was similar than in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48. Conclusion: In Spain, patients treated with edoxaban were older and fragile.