Relationship between the novel and traditional anthropometric indices and subclinical atherosclerosis evaluated by carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT).

Introduction: Over the last few years, novel anthropometric indices have been developed as an alternative to body mass index (BMI) and other traditional anthropometric measurements to enhance the estimate of fat proportion and its relationship to a future cardiovascular event. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT) estimated by Doppler ultrasound with current anthropometric indices (traditional and novel). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 789 Spanish patients. Traditional (BMI, WHR, and WHtR) and new (WWI, AVI, ABSI, BRI, BAI, CUN-BAE, and CI) anthropometric indices were determined, and carotid Doppler ultrasound was performed to evaluate c-IMT (≥0.90 mm). Results: Most of the anthropometric indices analyzed were significantly higher among patients with pathological c-IMT, except for BMI, BAI, and CUN-BAE. In multiple linear regression analysis, c-IMT was positively related to ABSI, AVI, BRI, CI, and WWI but not to CUN-BAE, BAI, or traditional anthropometric indices. Similarly, in univariate analysis, all indices were associated with a c-IMT of ≥0.90 mm (p < 0.05), except BMI, BAI, and CUN-BAE; however, only ABSI (adjusted OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.08-2.40; p = 0.017), CI (adjusted OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.15-2.60; p = 0.008), and WWI (adjusted OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.14-2.64; p = 0.009) were significantly associated in multivariate analysis. Finally, CI, ABSI, and WWI provided the largest AUC, and BMI and CUN-BAE showed the lowest AUC. Conclusion: ABSI, CI, and WWI were positively associated with pathological c-IMT (≥0.90 mm), independent of other confounders.

Proton pump inhibitors and risk for recurrent ischemic events or death in outpatients with symptomatic artery disease.

BAGKGROUND AND AIMS: The influence of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on outcome in patients with symptomatic artery disease remains controversial. METHODS: FRENA is a prospective registry of consecutive outpatients with symptomatic coronary (CAD), cerebrovascular (CVD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). We compared the risk for subsequent ischemic events or death according to the use of PPIs. RESULTS: As of December 2016, 5170 patients were recruited: 1793 (35%) had CAD, 1530 (30%) CVD and 1847 (35%) had PAD. Overall, 2289 patients (44%) were regularly using PPIs. During a median follow-up of 36 months, 172 patients suffered a recurrent myocardial infarction, 139 had ischemic stroke, 71 underwent limb amputation and 267 died (cardiovascular death, 109). On multivariable analysis, patients using PPIs were at a lower risk for subsequent limb amputation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.30-0.94), a similar risk for myocardial infarction (HR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.55-1.10) or stroke (HR: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.64-1.35) and at a higher risk of death (HR: 1.37; 95%CI: 1.04-1.79). CONCLUSIONS: Among stable outpatients with symptomatic artery disease, the use of PPIs was associated with a lower risk for subsequent ischemic events but a higher risk for death.

Supervised versus non-supervised exercise in patients with recent myocardial infarction: A propensity analysis.

BACKGROUND: The influence of supervised versus non-supervised exercise training on outcome in patients with a recent myocardial infarction (MI) is controversial. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study. METHODS: FRENA is an ongoing registry of stable outpatients with symptomatic coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral artery disease. We compared the rate of subsequent ischaemic events (MI, ischaemic stroke or lower limb amputation) and the mortality rate in patients with recent MI, according to the use of supervised versus non-supervised exercise training. The influence of physical activity on outcomes was estimated by using propensity score method in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: As of February 2014, 1124 outpatients with recent MI were recruited, of whom 593 (53%) participated in a supervised exercise training programme. Over a mean follow-up of 15 months, 25 patients (3.3%) developed 26 subsequent ischaemic events - 24 MI, one stroke, one lower-limb amputation - and 12 (1.6%) died. The mortality rate (0.15 vs. 2.89 deaths per 100 patient-years; rate ratio = 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.39) was significantly lower in supervised exercise than in non-supervised exercise patients. On propensity score analysis, the rate of the composite outcome was significantly lower in supervised exercise patients (1.80 vs. 6.51 events per 100 patient-years; rate ratio = 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The use of supervised exercise training in patients with recent MI was associated with a significant decrease in the composite outcome of subsequent ischaemic events and death.