Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Palliat Med ; 9(5): 2508-2515, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, the combination of clinical and pleural fluid data can be used to calculate a score which helps facilitate differential diagnosis between tuberculous pleuritis (TBP) and No-TBP effusions. However, a reliable determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) remains difficult to obtain in Thailand. Therefore, the aim of our study was set out to develop a scoring which makes use of clinical and pleural fluid data. METHODS: A retrospective study involved 15 patients with TBP and 41 patients with no-TBP. The clinical and pleural fluid data of all patients from January 1, 2011, 32 to December 31, 2014, were collected. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: The parameters were superior in detecting TBP, including the ADA ≥17.5 U/L, In scoring I [ADA ≥40 U/L, age The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.35 years, temperature ≥37.8 ℃, and RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L] as ≥1.5 points, and scoring II [no previous history of cancer, age The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.35 years, temperature ≥37.8 ℃ RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L, pleural protein ≥50 g/L, and LDH ratio ≥2.2] as ≥4.5 points, since the area under curve (AUC) 74.0%, 74.0%, and 81.0%, sensitivity 73.3%, 73.3%, and 71.4%, and specificity 68.7%, 62.5%, and 71.1%, respectively). Moreover, no previous history of cancer and lower RBC The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.5×109 /L indicated sensitivity (90.6% and 65.5%), and specificity (70.0% and 44.4%), respectively. Summated scores of ≥5 points in model 1 and ≥6 points in model 2 yielded measures of sensitivity (46.7% and 57.1%), and specificity (84.4% and 80.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high pleural fluid ADA, high scores model 1, high scores model 2, lower RBC, and no previous history of cancer may help to categorize patients into probable TBP for further clinical decisionmaking.


Subject(s)
Pleural Effusion , Pleurisy , Tuberculosis, Pleural , Adenosine Deaminase , Adult , Humans , Pleural Effusion/diagnosis , Pleurisy/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Tuberculosis, Pleural/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL