ABSTRACT
The sustainable utilization of waste cooking oil (WCO) as an alternative to fossil fuels has gained considerable attention due to its potential for delivering substantial environmental and economic benefits. This research attempts to explore the impact of incorporating aluminum oxide nanoparticles (AONP) into WCO on the emissions, combustion characteristics, and overall performance of a single-cylinder compression ignition (CI) engine. Comparative analyses were conducted against conventional commercial diesel fuel and pure WCO, as well as varying blends of WCO with AONP at 25 ppm, 50 ppm, and 75 ppm concentrations. The experimental results demonstrate a notable enhancement in brake thermal efficiency (BTE), with a 13.2% increase observed in the WCO + 75 AONP fuel blend compared to neat WCO. Engines fueled by WCO nanoparticle blends showed significant augmentation in-cylinder pressure and heat release rates. Furthermore, these blends exhibited a substantial reduction in carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and soot emissions by 44%, 31%, and 48%, respectively, while nitrogen oxide (NO) emissions increased by 7% compared to neat WCO. Among the assessed fuel mixtures, the WCO + 75 AONP blend demonstrated higher engine performance. This study underscores the potential of aluminum oxide nanoparticle-enhanced WCO blends as viable and environmentally responsible options for sustainable energy solutions. However, challenges such as production costs and long-term fuel stability must be addressed to establish nano-fuels as financially viable alternatives.
ABSTRACT
In this study, microemulsion synthesized from chemically extracted Salvinia molesta oil with diesel was evaluated as fuel in stationary unmodified diesel engine. The microemulsions from S. molesta oil was prepared using the best combinations of 67% S. molesta oil, 15% ethanol, 13% water and 5% surfactant (span 80) and its properties were compared with that of diesel. The engine test conducted with M10, M20 and M30 blends and reported a brake thermal efficiency of 29.76% and brake specific fuel consumption of 0.3239 kg/kWh with M20. The emissions like NO and smoke reduced by 18.07% and 7.37%, respectively, with marginal increase in CO, CO2 and unburned hydrocarbon by 3.8%, 3.4% and 16.66% respectively, with M20 compared to diesel at maximum engine load of 3.73 kW. At lower engine loads with M10, M20 and M30 slightly lower CO2 emission than diesel. A drop in peak pressure and heat release rate was found to be 1.73% and 8.40%, correspondingly with M20, as that of diesel. Even though a slight reduction in brake thermal efficiency observed with M20 as compared to M10 and diesel by considering the lowest emissions of NO and smoke, it is feasible to use as promising fuel for unmodified diesel engines.
