Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Public Health Rep ; 128(6): 454-62, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179257

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We measured lead and other heavy metals in dust during older housing demolition and effectiveness of dust suppression. METHODS: We used American Public Housing Association Method 502 and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Methods SW3050B and SW6020 at 97 single-family housing demolition events with intermittent (or no) use of water to suppress dust at perimeter, non-perimeter, and locations without demolition, with nested mixed modeling and tobit modeling with left censoring. RESULTS: The geometric mean (GM) lead dust fall during demolition was 6.01 micrograms of lead per square foot per hour (µg Pb/ft(2)/hour). GM lead dust fall was 14.18 µg Pb/ft(2)/hour without dust suppression, but declined to 5.48 µg Pb/ft(2)/hour (p=0.057) when buildings and debris were wetted. Significant predictors included distance, wind direction, and main street location. At 400 feet, lead dust fall was not significantly different from background. GM lead concentration at demolition (2,406 parts per million [ppm]) was significantly greater than background (GM=579 ppm, p=0.05). Arsenic, chromium, copper, iron, and manganese demolition dust fall was significantly higher than background (p<0.001). Demolition of approximately 400 old housing units elsewhere with more dust suppression was only 0.25 µg Pb/ft(2)/hour. CONCLUSIONS: Lead dust suppression is feasible and important in single-family housing demolition where distances between houses are smaller and community exposures are higher. Neighbor notification should be expanded to at least 400 feet away from single-family housing demolition, not just adjacent properties. Further research is needed on effects of distance, potential water contamination, occupational exposures, and water application.


Subject(s)
Dust/analysis , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Facility Design and Construction , Housing , Metals, Heavy/analysis , Chicago , Dust/prevention & control , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Humans
2.
Am J Public Health ; 99(8): 1496-504, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19197088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the response of the Chicago Department of Public Health with respect to its effectiveness in providing health care to Hurricane Katrina evacuees arriving in the city. METHODS: Between September 12 and October 21, 2005, we conducted a real-time qualitative assessment of a medical unit in Chicago's Hurricane Victim Welcome and Relief Center. A semistructured guide was used to interview 33 emergency responders in an effort to identify key operational successes and failures. RESULTS: The medical unit functioned at a relatively high level, primarily as a result of the flexibility, creativity, and dedication of its staff and the presence of strong leadership. Chronic health care services and prescription refills were the most commonly mentioned services provided, and collaboration with a national pharmacy proved instrumental in reconstructing medication histories. The lack of a comprehensive and well-communicated emergency response plan resulted in several preventable inefficiencies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for improved planning for care of evacuee populations after a major emergency event and the importance of ensuring continuity of care for the most vulnerable. We provide an emergency response preparedness checklist for local public health departments.


Subject(s)
Cyclonic Storms/statistics & numerical data , Emergencies/epidemiology , Health Services/supply & distribution , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Relief Work/statistics & numerical data , Rescue Work/statistics & numerical data , Chicago/epidemiology , Chronic Disease , Communication , Health Planning/statistics & numerical data , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Louisiana/epidemiology , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
3.
Environ Res ; 109(2): 143-8, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19105996

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Over 3000 older homes containing lead-based paint are demolished in Chicago each year. While previous studies investigating large multifamily housing demolitions have shown high levels of lead in dustfall, dispersed single-family housing demolition have yet to be assessed. Presently, no standards exist to regulate the extent of lead dustfall from housing demolition. OBJECTIVES: We studied ten residences in Chicago undergoing demolition and debris removal and compared dustfall rates to five standing homes from March to October 2006. METHODS: Dustfall was measured using a modification of APHA Method 502; samplers consisted of plastic buckets filled with 1l of deionized water, elevated to breathing zone height and placed around the demolition site perimeter. Laboratory analysis consisted of filtration, acid digestion and analysis by ICP/MS. RESULTS: During demolition, the geometric mean lead dustfall (n=43 at 10 locations) was 64.1 microgPb/m(2)/h (range: 1.3-3902.5), while the geometric mean lead dustfall for areas with no demolition (n=18 at 6 locations) was 12.9 microgPb/m(2)/h (range: 1.8-54.5). This difference was highly statistically significant (p=0.0004). When dust suppression measures were used, dustfall lead levels were lower, although the difference was not statistically significant. The geometric mean lead dustfall with dust suppression (n=25 at five locations) and without (n=22 at six locations) was 48 Pbmicrog/m(2)/h and 74.6 microgPb/m(2)/h, respectively. CONCLUSION: Demolition dustfall lead levels are much higher than background levels of lead during demolition of single-family housing and may constitute a yet uncharacterized but important source of lead exposure to nearby residents. Simple dust suppression methods are likely to reduce the contamination considerably.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Dust/analysis , Environmental Exposure , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Lead/analysis , Chicago , Cities , Construction Materials , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Facility Design and Construction , Housing , Humans , Lead/adverse effects , Lead Poisoning/prevention & control , Paint , Public Health , Urban Renewal
4.
J Environ Health ; 70(1): 42-6, 63, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17802816

ABSTRACT

The Great Lakes Center of Excellence in Environmental Health (GLCEEH), an innovative capacity-building component of the University of Illinois, performs health hazard evaluations in collaboration with the Illinois Department of Public Health and local health departments. GLCEEH has provided state and local health departments with faculty, industrial-hygiene expertise, and research expertise to help them investigate a variety of environmental health issues. This article describes health hazard evaluations performed with support from the National Center for Environmental Health, lessons learned, and recommendations for successful collaboration between academic and public health departments. From the academic perspective, health hazard evaluations are beneficial because they provide faculty and students with the opportunity to engage in public health practice and encounter new issues that advance the science of environmental health through research. From the perspective of a public health department, health hazard evaluations are beneficial because they address priority environmental health concerns and build the capacity of department personnel to conduct health hazard evaluations with internal resources. A collaborative health hazard evaluation program increases public health capacity by developing new approaches to environmental health problems and by sharing limited resources.


Subject(s)
Community-Institutional Relations , Cooperative Behavior , Environmental Health/methods , Public Health Practice , Risk Management/methods , Environmental Health/organization & administration , Hazardous Substances , Humans , Illinois , Interdepartmental Relations , Public Health Administration , Risk Management/organization & administration , Universities
5.
Environ Res ; 102(1): 83-9, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16729996

ABSTRACT

No comprehensive data on sources or risk factors of cadmium exposure in Ukrainian children are available. In this we measured the blood levels of cadmium among 80 Ukrainian children and evaluated sources of exposure. A nested case-control study from a prospective cohort of Ukrainian 3-year-old children was conducted. We evaluated predictors of elevated blood cadmium using a multivariable logistic regression model. The model included socioeconomic data, parent occupation, environmental tobacco smoke, hygiene, body-mass index, and diet. Dietary habits were evaluated using the 1992 Block-NCI-HHHQ Dietary Food Frequency survey. Elevated cadmium was defined as blood levels in the upper quartile (0.25 microg/L). The mean age for all 80 children was 36.6 months. Geometric mean cadmium level was 0.21 microg/L (range = 0.11-0.42 microg/L; SD = 0.05). Blood cadmium levels were higher among children taking zinc supplements (0.25 vs 0.21 microg/L; P = 0.032), children who ate sausage more than once per week (0.23 vs 0.20; P = 0.007) and children whose fathers worked in a by-product coking industry (0.25 vs 0.21; P = 0.056). In the multivariable model, predictors of elevated blood cadmium levels included zinc supplementation (adjusted OR = 14.16; P < 0.01), father working in a by-product coking industry (adjusted OR = 8.50; P = 0.03), and low body mass index (<14.5; adjusted OR = 5.67; P = 0.03). This is the first study to indicate a strong association between elevated blood cadmium levels and zinc supplementation in young children. Whole-blood cadmium levels observed in this group of Ukrainian children appear to be similar to those reported in other Eastern European countries.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/blood , Cadmium Poisoning/blood , Cadmium/blood , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Anthropometry , Cadmium Poisoning/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Diet , Female , Humans , Industry , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Smoking , Socioeconomic Factors , Ukraine/epidemiology
6.
Environ Health Perspect ; 114(4): 603-9, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16581553

ABSTRACT

Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) is a biomarker of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure. We measured urinary 1-OHP in 48 children 3 years of age in Mariupol, Ukraine, who lived near a steel mill and coking facility and compared these with 1-OHP concentrations measured in 42 children of the same age living in the capital city of Kiev, Ukraine. Children living in Mariupol had significantly higher urinary 1-OHP and creatinine-adjusted urinary 1-OHP than did children living in Kiev (adjusted: 0.69 vs. 0.34 micromol/mol creatinine, p < 0.001; unadjusted: 0.42 vs. 0.30 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Combined, children in both cities exposed to environmental tobacco smoke in their homes had higher 1-OHP than did children not exposed (0.61 vs. 0.42 micromol/mol creatinine; p = 0.04; p = 0.07 after adjusting for city). In addition, no significant differences were seen with sex of the children. Our sample of children in Mariupol has the highest reported mean urinary 1-OHP concentrations in children studied to date, most likely due to their proximity to a large industrial point source of PAHs.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/urine , Environmental Exposure , Polycyclic Compounds/urine , Pyrenes/analysis , Child, Preschool , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...