Diplopia in a patient presenting with "blurred vision": a case report.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune condition affecting the neuromuscular junction and causing muscle weakness along with fatigue (myasthenia). When the clinical manifestations of myasthenia gravis are isolated to the eye muscles, only causing weak eye movements, it is referred to as ocular myasthenia gravis, which can mimic a 1 and ½ syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: An African-American female in her fifties with past medical history of hypertension presented to our outpatient clinic with complaints of blurred vision for two weeks. Her symptoms were associated with facial discomfort and a generalized headache. On physical examination upon her initial presentation, there was demonstratable swelling of the left upper eyelid with drooping. Her extraocular movements revealed defects with the abduction and adduction of the right eye, and the left eye would not adduct, although the outward movement was normal. The left eye failed to lift/elevate completely when looking upwards, a pseudo 1 and ½ syndrome. A positive Cogan lid twitch was also noticed. Imaging of the brain and orbit ruled out central causes. Diagnosis of ocular myasthenia gravis was made in accordance with positive anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. With 120 mg pyridostigmine oral dose, the patient experienced improvement subjectively and objectively, and the patient was discharged on oral pyridostigmine and prednisone. Six months later, with prednisone having been tapered off, the patient developed a myasthenic crisis and was treated with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins. After recovering from the myasthenic crisis, efgartigimod infusions were instituted, which helped our patient restore normal life. CONCLUSION: Our patient who presented with "blurred vision" was discovered to have binocular diplopia due to significant dysconjugate eye movements. After diligently ruling out central etiologies, we concluded that her presentation was due to a peripheral etiology. Her serologies and her presentation helped confirm a diagnosis of ocular myasthenia gravis. Also, as in most cases, our patient also progressed to develop generalized myasthenia gravis while on pyridostigmine. Efgartigimod infusions instituted after our patient recovered from a myasthenic crisis have helped her restore a normal life.

Incidence of Barotrauma in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study in a Community Hospital.

Background and aim Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe complication of COVID-19 and traditional ventilation strategies using ARDSNet protocol, including low tidal volumes, appear to cause barotrauma in COVID-19 patients at a higher rate than non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. The purpose of our study was to determine if COVID-19 patients with ARDS undergoing mechanical ventilation at St. Joseph's Medical Center (SJMC) developed barotrauma at a higher rate than non-COVID-19 ARDS patients. Methods and materials This study was a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to critical care units at SJMC with COVID-19 infection and requiring mechanical ventilation from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020. The sample included adult patients (aged 18 and above) with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 code for COVID-19 (U07.1) and patients who were placed on mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours, from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020. Barotrauma was confirmed via radiographic imaging including chest X-ray, CT, or CT angiography (CTA).  Results One hundred and forty COVID-19 patients underwent mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 hours from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2020 at our facility. Twenty-six COVID-19 patients (18.6%) met our inclusion criteria (development of barotrauma during hospital admission) of which 25 patients (17.9%) underwent mechanical (invasive and/or non-invasive) ventilation prior to the development of barotrauma. Around 80% of the patients were on non-invasive mechanical ventilation prior to intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. The categorical breakdown of barotrauma was as follows: pneumothorax 65.4%, subcutaneous emphysema 61.5%, pneumomediastinum 34.6%, and pneumoperitoneum 7.7%. None of the included patients had any previous history of documented barotrauma. Prior to the time of barotrauma, 17 patients were on volume control, seven were on pressure control, and one was not on mechanical ventilation. Of the 17 patients on volume control, only one patient was above the ARDSNet guideline of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). In comparison to ARDS patients at SJMC in 2019, only two out of 28 patients (7.14%) developed barotrauma during mechanical ventilation.  Conclusions Patients with COVID-19 who underwent mechanical ventilation developed barotrauma at a higher rate than traditional non-COVID-19 patients with ARDS.