Determinants contributing to claudin ion channel formation.

Pore-forming properties of claudins (Cld) are likely defined by residues of their first extracellular loop (ECL1). Detailed mechanisms are unclear. MDCK cells overexpressing FLAG-Cld-1 wild-type and mutants were characterized by transepithelial resistance (TER) and ion permeability measurements. Replacing ECL1 residues of sealing Cld-1 by corresponding Cld-2 residues we aimed to identify new determinants responsible for sealing and/or pore formation. We found that E48K and S53E substitutions in human Cld-1 strongly reduced TER and increased permeability for Na(+) and Cl(-) . In contrast, K65D, D68S, and other single substitutions showed no significant change of TER and permeability for Na(+) and Cl(-) . Double substitution S53E/K65D did not change TER and ion permeability, whereas S53E/D68S decreased TER, albeit weaker than S53E. Ratio of permeabilities for Na(+) and Cl(-) revealed no clear charge specificity of the pore induced by S53E or S53E/D68S in Cld-1, suggesting that primarily S53 and potentially D68 in Cld-1 are involved in sealing of the paracellular cleft and that charge-unselective pores may be induced by substituting S53E.

Structure and function of claudins.

Claudins are tetraspan transmembrane proteins of tight junctions. They determine the barrier properties of this type of cell-cell contact existing between the plasma membranes of two neighbouring cells, such as occurring in endothelia or epithelia. Claudins can completely tighten the paracellular cleft for solutes, and they can form paracellular ion pores. It is assumed that the extracellular loops specify these claudin functions. It is hypothesised that the larger first extracellular loop is critical for determining the paracellular tightness and the selective ion permeability. The shorter second extracellular loop may cause narrowing of the paracellular cleft and have a holding function between the opposing cell membranes. Sequence analysis of claudins has led to differentiation into two groups, designated as classic claudins (1-10, 14, 15, 17, 19) and non-classic claudins (11-13, 16, 18, 20-24), according to their degree of sequence similarity. This is also reflected in the derived sequence-structure function relationships for extracellular loops 1 and 2. The concepts evolved from these findings and first tentative molecular models for homophilic interactions may explain the different functional contribution of the two extracellular loops at tight junctions.