ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Various vital dyes exist on the market for intraoperative internal limiting membrane (ILM) identification. The aim of this study was to verify the added value of these dyes for ILM identification and in the difficulty of ILM peeling during pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) by a single surgeon highly experienced in this operation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 400 ppV surgical reports involving ILM peeling were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative assessment of identification or difficulty of intraoperative ILM peeling had to be documented in the surgical report. The total group consisted of 2 cohorts each with 200 surgical reports (first cohort without selective vital dyes, period 2004-2006; second cohort with vital dyes in the majority of ppVs, period 2013-2020). RESULTS: The difference between both groups in terms of intraoperative identification of ILM was statistically significant (pâ¯< 0.001); however, no statistically significant difference (pâ¯= 0.951) was found between the two groups in terms of difficulty of ILM peeling. In logistic regression analysis neither patient gender, age, eye side, lens status nor posterior vitreous limiting membrane status were significantly associated with ILM identification. CONCLUSION: The introduction of intravital dyes represents a decisive advancement in retinal surgery. In the investigated sample this benefit was evident from two precisely defined surgical cohorts of a single highly experienced surgeon. This underlines the additional benefit of using selective vital dyes to identify ILM in macular surgery for less experienced surgeons.
