Comparison of the clinical chemistry score to other biomarker algorithms for rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction and risk stratification in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The clinical chemistry score (CCS) comprising high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn), glucose and estimated glomerular filtration rate has been previously validated with superior accuracy for detection and risk stratification of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compared to hs-cTn alone. METHODS: The CCS was compared to other biomarker-based algorithms for rapid rule-out and prognostication of AMI including the hs-cTnT limit-of-blank (LOB, <3 ng/L) or limit-of-detection (LOD, <5 ng/L) and a dual marker strategy (DMS) (copeptin <10 pmol/L and hs-cTnT ≤14 ng/L) in 1506 emergency department (ED) patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivities for AMI rule-out, and 12-month combined endpoint rates encompassing mortality, myocardial re-infarction, as well as stroke were assessed. RESULTS: NPVs of 100% (95% CI: 98.3-100%) were observed for CCS = 0, hs-cTnT LoB and hs-cTnT LoD with rule-out efficacies of 11.1%, 7.6% and 18.3% as well as specificities of 13.0% (95% CI: 9.9-16.6%), 8.8% (95% CI: 7.3-10.5%) and 21.4% (95% CI: 19.2-23.8%), respectively. A CCS ≤ 1 achieved a rule-out in 32.2% of all patients with a NPV of 99.6% (95% CI: 98.4-99.9%) and specificity of 37.4% (95% CI: 34.2-40.5%) compared to a rule-out efficacy of 51.2%, NPV of 99.0 (95% CI: 98.0-99.5) and specificity of 59.7% (95% CI: 57.0-62.4%) for the DMS. Rates of the combined end-point of death/AMI within 30 days ranged between 0.0% and 0.7% for all fast-rule-out protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The CCS ensures reliable AMI rule-out with low short and long-term outcome rates for a specific ED patient subset. However, compared to a single or dual biomarker strategy, the CCS displays reduced efficacy and specificity, limiting its clinical utility.

Absence of visible infarction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging despite the established diagnosis of myocardial infarction by 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

AIMS: Myocardial scarring due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be visualized by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. However, a recent study revealed a group of Type 1 AMI patients with undetectable myocardial injury on LGE. This study aims to describe these cases in detail and explore possible explanations for this new phenomenon. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 137 patients diagnosed with either ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) diagnosed according to the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction underwent LGE-CMR after invasive coronary angiography. Fourteen of them (10.2%) showed no LGE and were included in the final study population. Most patients presented with acute chest pain, 3 patients were diagnosed as STEMI, and 11 as non-STEMI. Peak high-sensitive cardiac troponin T ranged from 45 to 1173 ng/L. A culprit lesion was identified in 12 patients. Severe coronary stenoses were found in five patients, while seven patients had subtotal to total coronary artery occlusion. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 10 patients, while 2 patients required coronary artery bypass grafting and no intervention was required in 2 patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed 30 (4-140) days after the initial presentation. Most patients showed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on CMR. No alternative reasons for the rise/fall of high-sensitive cardiac troponin T were found. CONCLUSION: The absence of LGE on CMR in patients with Type 1 AMI is a new finding. While insufficient spatial resolution of LGE imaging, delayed CMR performance, spontaneous reperfusion, and coronary collaterals may provide some explanations, further investigations are required to fully understand this phenomenon.

Real-World Evidence on Disparities on the Initiation of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background Management of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is based on 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which recommend the preferential use of prasugrel over ticagrelor. Because the selection of the respective P2Y12 inhibitor has to consider label restrictions, we sought to evaluate the proportion of patients qualifying for either ticagrelor or prasugrel and reasons for noneligibility in an unselected cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods and Results In this retrospective observational study, patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or NSTE-ACS presenting consecutively during a 24-month period were enrolled. The eligibility of patients for a dual antiplatelet therapy option was assessed retrospectively. A total of 1502 patients had confirmed acute coronary syndrome (287 STEMI and 1215 NSTE-ACS). Eligibility for ticagrelor and full-dose prasugrel differed significantly for STEMI and NSTE-ACS (93% versus 51%, P<0.0001 versus 80% versus 31%, P<0.0001). Eligibility remained significantly lower (STEMI 78% versus NSTE-ACS 52%) if low-dose prasugrel was considered. Patients eligible for full-dose prasugrel had lower ischemic risk per GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score (109 points [90-129 points] versus 121 points [98-146 points], P<0.0001) and lower bleeding risk (14 points [13-15 points] versus 20 points [12-29 points], P<0.0001) per PRECISE-DAPT (Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) score. Conclusions In real life, eligibility for prasugrel in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy is considerably lower than for ticagrelor, even in a cohort with high rates of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. The recommended use of prasugrel over ticagrelor in current acute coronary syndrome guidelines contrasts with our observations of a substantial disparity on the eligibility. This important aspect has not received appropriate attention yet. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05774431.

Modification of the GRACE Risk Score for Risk Prediction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Importance: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score, a guideline-recommended risk stratification tool for patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), does not consider the extent of myocardial injury. Objective: To assess the incremental predictive value of a modified GRACE score incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T at presentation, a surrogate of the extent of myocardial injury. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospectively designed longitudinal cohort study examined 3 independent cohorts of 9803 patients with ACS enrolled from September 2009 to December 2017; 2 ACS derivation cohorts (Heidelberg ACS cohort and Newcastle STEMI cohort) and an ACS validation cohort (SPUM-ACS study). The Heidelberg ACS cohort included 2535 and the SPUM-ACS study 4288 consecutive patients presenting with a working diagnosis of ACS. The Newcastle STEMI cohort included 2980 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Data were analyzed from March to June 2023. Exposures: In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality risk estimates derived from an updated risk score that incorporates continuous hs-cTn T at presentation (modified GRACE). Main Outcomes and Measures: The predictive value of continuous hs-cTn T and modified GRACE risk score compared with the original GRACE risk score. Study end points were all-cause mortality during hospitalization and at 30 days and 1 year after the index event. Results: Of 9450 included patients, 7313 (77.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) age at presentation was 64.2 (12.6) years. Using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T conferred improved discrimination and reclassification compared with the original GRACE score (in-hospital mortality: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.835 vs 0.741; continuous net reclassification improvement [NRI], 0.208; 30-day mortality: AUC, 0.828 vs 0.740; NRI, 0.312; 1-year mortality: AUC, 0.785 vs 0.778; NRI, 0.078) in the derivation cohort. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. In the pooled population of 9450 patients, modified GRACE risk score showed superior performance compared with the original GRACE risk score in terms of reclassification and discrimination for in-hospital mortality end point (AUC, 0.878 vs 0.780; NRI, 0.097), 30-day mortality end point (AUC, 0.858 vs 0.771; NRI, 0.08), and 1-year mortality end point (AUC, 0.813 vs 0.797; NRI, 0.056). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, using continuous rather than binary hs-cTn T at presentation, a proxy of the extent of myocardial injury, in the GRACE risk score improved the mortality risk prediction in patients with ACS.

Effector T cell chemokine IP-10 predicts cardiac recovery and clinical outcomes post-myocardial infarction.

Background and aims: Preclinical data suggest that activation of the adaptive immune system is critical for myocardial repair processes in acute myocardial infarction. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical value of baseline effector T cell chemokine IP-10 blood levels in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for the prediction of the left ventricular function changes and cardiovascular outcomes after STEMI. Methods: Serum IP-10 levels were retrospectively quantified in two independent cohorts of STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Results: We report a biphasic response of the effector T cell trafficking chemokine IP-10 characterized by an initial increase of its serum levels in the acute phase of STEMI followed by a rapid reduction at 90min post reperfusion. Patients at the highest IP-10 tertile presented also with more CD4 effector memory T cells (CD4 TEM cells), but not other T cell subtypes, in blood. In the Newcastle cohort (n=47), patients in the highest IP-10 tertile or CD4 TEM cells at admission exhibited an improved cardiac systolic function 12 weeks after STEMI compared to patients in the lowest IP-10 tertile. In the Heidelberg cohort (n=331), STEMI patients were followed for a median of 540 days for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Patients presenting with higher serum IP-10 levels at admission had a lower risk for MACE after adjustment for traditional risk factors, CRP and high-sensitivity troponin-T levels (highest vs. rest quarters: HR [95% CI]=0.420 [0.218-0.808]). Conclusion: Increased serum levels of IP-10 in the acute phase of STEMI predict a better recovery in cardiac systolic function and less adverse events in patients after STEMI.

Correlation of serial high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T values to infarct mass determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a validation study.

AIM: To validate correlations between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) infarct mass and high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT) values at different time points in patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients presenting with AMI and with available CE-MRI between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020 were included. Correlation coefficients between hs-cTnT on admission, after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, and peak hs-cTnT values and CE-MRI infarct mass were calculated. Correlations between hs-cTnT and CE-MRI infarct mass were compared with those of a third generation cTnT assay from a previously published study of our group. A total of 137 patients were included for the present analysis. Median CE-MRI infarct mass was 12,5 g [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.8-16.2 g]. Hs-cTnT values and infarct mass correlated well at all time points including admission (r = 0.474, 95% CI: 0.331-0.560, P < 0.0001), 24 h (r = 0.508, 95% CI: 0.370-0.625, P < 0.0001), 48 h (r = 0.547, 95% CI: 0.404-0.664, P < 0.0001), 72 h (r = 0.489, 95% CI: 0.320-0.628, P < 0.0001), 96 h (r = 0.509, 95% CI: 0.330-0.653, P < 0.001) including peak hs-cTnT values (r = 0.547, 95% CI: 0.416-0.656, P < 0.0001), and maximum absolute delta changes within 96 h (r = 0.507, 95% CI: 0.369-0.622, P < 0.001). Correlations of the third generation assay could be confirmed for hs-cTnT at all time points. A superior correlation with CE-MRI infarct mass was observed for hs-cTnT values on admission. CONCLUSION: Hs-cTnT values at different time points correlate well with CE-MRI infarct mass. Correlations of admission hs-cTnT values are superior to those of a third generation assay.

Cathepsin S Levels and Survival Among Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are at high residual risk for long-term cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Cathepsin S (CTSS) is a lysosomal cysteine protease with elastolytic and collagenolytic activity that has been involved in atherosclerotic plaque rupture. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the following: 1) the prognostic value of circulating CTSS measured at patient admission for long-term mortality in NSTE-ACS; and 2) its additive value over the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score. METHODS: This was a single-center cohort study, consecutively recruiting patients with adjudicated NSTE-ACS (n = 1,112) from the emergency department of an academic hospital. CTSS was measured in serum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All-cause mortality at 8 years was the primary endpoint. CV death was the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In total, 367 (33.0%) deaths were recorded. CTSS was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR for highest vs lowest quarter of CTSS: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.34-2.66; P < 0.001) and CV death (HR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.15-5.77; P = 0.021) after adjusting for traditional CV risk factors, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, left ventricular ejection fraction, high-sensitivity troponin-T, revascularization and index diagnosis (unstable angina/ non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction). When CTSS was added to the GRACE score, it conferred significant discrimination and reclassification value for all-cause mortality (Delta Harrell's C: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.012-0.047; P = 0.001; and net reclassification improvement = 0.202; P = 0.003) and CV death (AUC: 0.056; 95% CI: 0.017-0.095; P = 0.005; and net reclassification improvement = 0.390; P = 0.001) even after additionally considering high-sensitivity troponin-T and left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating CTSS is a predictor of long-term mortality and improves risk stratification of patients with NSTE-ACS over the GRACE score.

Prognostic value of circulating microRNAs compared to high-sensitivity troponin T in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the prognostic value of eleven microRNAs (miRNAs) compared to high-sensitivity Troponin T (hs-cTnT) in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: 1,042 patients presenting between August 2014 and April 2017 were included. Expression levels of eleven microRNAs (miR-21-5p, miR-22-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-92a-3p, miR-122-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-132-3p, miR-133a-3p, miR-134-5p, miR-191-3p, and miR-423-5p) were determined using RT-qPCR. All-cause mortality (ACM) and a composite of ACM, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke were defined as endpoints. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 399 (P25-P75: 381-525) days 58 patients (5.6%) died. The composite endpoint occurred in 86 patients (8.3%). Different expression levels of miR-21-5p (median, P25-P75: 5.28 [5.14-5.51] vs. 5.16 [4.97-5.35], p = 0.0033) and miR-122-5p (median, P25-P75: 5.17 [4.81-5.49] vs. 5.35 [5.01-5.69], p = 0.0184) were observed in patients who died compared to survivors. ROC-optimized cutoff of miR-21-5p (HR, P25-P75: 3.3 [1.2-9.4], p = 0.0239), but not miR-122-5p (HR, P25-P75: 0.4 [0.2-0.8], p = 0.0116), was predictive for all-cause mortality, even after adjustment in a multivariate model. Nevertheless, addition of miR-21-5p and miR-122-5p decreased prognostic accuracy of hs-cTnT for all-cause mortality (△AUC: 0.112, p = 0.0159). Hs-cTnT admission values had a high prognostic value for ACM (AUC [95%CI] = 0.794 [0.751-0.837]) and the composite of ACM, AMI and stroke (AUC [95%CI] = 0.745 [0.695-0.794]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a different expression depending on outcomes miR-21-5p and miR-122-5p do not add prognostic information to hs-cTnT in patients presenting with suspected ACS to the ED.

Prognostic value of changes in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T beyond biological variation in stable outpatients with cardiovascular disease: a validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic implications of longitudinal long-term changes beyond the biological variation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in outpatients with stable or asymptomatic cardiovascular disease (CV) and to assess possible differences in the prognostic value while using reference change value (RCV) and minimal important differences (MID) as metric for biological variation. METHODS: Hs-cTnT was measured at index visit and after 12 months in outpatients presenting for routine follow-up. The prognostic relevance of a concentration change of hs-cTnT values exceeding the biological variation defined by RCV and MID of a healthy population within the next 12 months following the stable initial period was determined regarding three endpoints: all-cause mortality (EP1), a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke (EP2), and a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or decompensated heart failure, and planned and unplanned percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI, EP3). RESULTS: Change in hs-cTnT values exceeding the biovariability defined by MID but not by RCV discriminated a group with a higher cardiovascular risk profile. Changes within MID were associated with uneventful course (NPV 91.6-99.7%) while changes exceeding MID were associated with a higher occurrence of all endpoints within the next 365 days indicating a 5.5-fold increased risk for EP 1 (p = 0.041) a 2.4-fold increased risk for EP 2 (p = 0.049) and a 1.9-fold increased risk for EP 3 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In stable outpatients MID calculated from hs-cTnT changes measured 365 ± 120 days apart are helpful to predict an uneventful clinical course. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT01954303.

Interpretation of myocardial injury subtypes in COVID-19 disease per fourth version of Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Application of the 4th version of Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) to characterize rates and prognostic relevance of myocardial injury in COVID-19 disease. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre observational study enrolled 104 patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression were used to identify influence of acute or chronic myocardial injury on a composite primary (mortality, incident acute respiratory distress syndrome, incident mechanical ventilation) and secondary endpoint (mortality, incident acute myocardial injury during hospitalization, incident venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or stroke). RESULTS: A total of 27 (26.0%) patients presented with chronic myocardial injury, and 19 (18.3%) with acute myocardial injury. 42 patients(40.4%) developed an incident myocardial injury during hospitalization. The presence of acute or chronic myocardial injury on admission and incident myocardial injury during hospitalization were associated with higher rates of endpoints. Independent predictors for the primary endpoint were higher severity stages according to Siddiqi et al. classification system and history of dyslipidaemia. Maximal hs-cTnT and D-dimer concentrations during hospitalization showed an association (r = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Objective description of myocardial injury according to the 4th UDMI in the current COVID-19 pandemic is crucial in order to discriminate patients with acute myocardial infarction and acute, chronic or incident myocardial injury.

Validation of two severity scores as predictors for outcome in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND: An established objective and standardized reporting of clinical severity and disease progression in COVID-19 is still not established. We validated and compared the usefulness of two classification systems reported earlier-a severity grading proposed by Siddiqi and a system from the National Australian COVID-19 guideline. Both had not been validated externally and were now tested for their ability to predict complications. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre observational study, patients hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 across all severity stages were enrolled. The clinical severity was graded at admission and during hospitalization. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify independent risk factors for mortality, a composite primary (mortality, incident acute respiratory distress syndrome, incident mechanical ventilation), a secondary endpoint (mortality, incident acute myocardial injury, incident venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or stroke) and progression of severity grades. RESULTS: Of 109 patients 17 died, 31 and 48 developed the primary and secondary endpoint, respectively. Worsening of the severity grade by at least one stage occurred in 27 and 28 patients, respectively. Siddiqi and Australian classification were identified as independent predictors for the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.30, p<0.001 and aHR 2.08, p<0.001), for the secondary endpoint (aHR 2.12, p<0.001 and aHR 1.79, p<0.001) and mortality (aHR 2.30, p = 0.071 and aHR 1.98, p = 0.017). Both classification systems showed very good agreement regarding initial grading and good agreement regarding progression of severity stages. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized and objective severity grading is useful to unequivocally stratify patients presenting with COVID-19 for their individual risk of complications.

Diagnostic value of circulating microRNAs compared to high-sensitivity troponin T for the detection of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To assess the diagnostic value of microRNAs (miRNAs) for the detection of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1042 patients presenting between August 2014 and April 2017 to the emergency department with the suspected acute coronary syndrome were included. Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was diagnosed per criteria of the fourth Universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) using high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT). Expression levels of eleven microRNAs (miR-21, miR-22, miR-29a, miR-92a, miR-122, miR-126, miR-132, miR-133, miR-134, miR-191, and miR-423) were determined using RT-qPCR. Discrimination of NSTEMI was assessed for individual and a panel of miRNAs compared to the hs-cTnT reference using C-statistics and reclassification analysis. NSTEMI was diagnosed in 137 (13.1%) patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the hs-cTnT based reference was 0.937. In a multivariate model, three miRNAs (miR-122, miR-133, and miR-134) were found to be associated with NSTEMI with AUCs between 0.506 and 0.656. A panel consisting of these miRNAs revealed an AUC of 0.662 for the diagnosis of NSTEMI. The AUC of the combination of the miRNA panel and troponin reference was significantly lower than the reference standard (AUC: 0.897 vs. 0.937, P = 0.006). Despite a significant improvement of NSTEMI reclassification measured by IDI and NRI, miRNAs did not improve the specificity of hs-cTnT kinetic changes for the diagnosis of NSTEMI (ΔAUC: 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although single miRNAs are significantly associated with the diagnosis of NSTEMI a miRNA panel does not add diagnostic accuracy to the hs-cTnT reference considering baseline values and kinetic changes as recommended by the fourth version of UDMI. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT02116153.

Age- and gender-related reference values of cardiac morphology and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference standard for the quantitative assessment of cardiac morphology and function. The aim of the study was to determine age- and gender-related reference values for cardiac morphology and function according to current recommendations. 454 healthy volunteers (235 men, median age 52.0 (44.0-59.0) years) underwent a standard CMR scan and were divided into six groups of nearly equal size with regard to sex (male, female) and age (21-47 years, 48-57 years, 58-84 years). Left ventricular end-diastolic (LV-EDV) and end-systolic (LV-ESV) volumes and LV mass (LV-M) were measured at end-diastole and end-systole in steady-state free precession series with including papillary muscles and trabecular tissue in the LV-M. Absolute and indexed volumetric parameters were significantly different between gender groups with higher values in men compared to women (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant age-dependent decline could be observed for left ventricular and right ventricular volumes (all p < 0.001), while LV-M did not show differences between the different age-groups. Parameters of longitudinal function for the left and right ventricle were higher in female compared to male subjects with a significant age-dependent decline. We provided normal values for cardiac volumes, function, and mass derived in accordance with current guidelines from a large population of healthy subjects, which can be implemented in clinical routine as a standard of reference.

Prognostic Value of Elevated Copeptin and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients with and without Acute Coronary Syndrome: The ConTrACS Study.

AIMS: We aimed to assess the prognostic role of copeptin in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute symptoms and increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. METHODS: A total of 3890 patients presenting with acute symptoms to the emergency department of Heidelberg University Hospital were assessed for increased hs-cTnT (>14 ng/L) from three cohorts: the Heidelberg Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Registry (n = 2477), the BIOPS Registry (n = 320), and the ACS OMICS Registry (n = 1093). In a pooled analysis, 1956 patients remained, comprising of 1600 patients with ACS and 356 patients with non-ACS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 1468 days in the ACS cohort and 709 days in the non-ACS cohort. Elevated copeptin levels (>10 pmol/L) were found in 1174 patients (60.0%) in the entire cohort (58.1% in ACS and 68.5% in non-ACS, respectively) and mortality rates were significantly higher than in patients with normal copeptin levels (29.0% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). In a multivariate Cox regression, elevated copeptin was independently associated with all-cause death in the ACS (HR = 1.7, 1.3-2.3, p = 0.002) and non-ACS cohort (HR = 2.7, 1.4-5.0, p = 0.0018). CONCLUSION: Copeptin may aid in identifying patients at risk for adverse outcomes in patients with increased levels of hs-cTnT in ACS patients and in non-ACS conditions.

Effects of crowding in the emergency department on the diagnosis and management of suspected acute coronary syndrome using rapid algorithms: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Fast diagnostic algorithms using high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are regarded as beneficial to expedite diagnosis and safe discharge of patients in crowded emergency departments (ED). This study investigates the effects of crowding on process times related to the diagnostic protocol itself or other time delays, and outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective single-centre observational study. SETTING: ED (Germany). PARTICIPANTS: Final study population of 2525 consecutive patients with suspected ACS within 12 months, after exclusion of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, missing blood samples, referral from other hospitals or repeated visits. INTERVENTIONS: Use of fast algorithms as per 2015 European Society of Cardiology guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crowding was defined as mismatch between patient numbers and monitoring capacities, or mean physician time per case, categorised as normal, high and very high crowding. Outcome measures were length of ED stay, direct discharge from ED, laboratory turn around times (TAT), utilisation of fast algorithms, absolute and relative non-laboratory time, as well as mortality. RESULTS: Crowding was associated with increased length of ED stay (3.75-4.89 hours, p<0.001). While median TAT of the first hsTnT increased (53-57 min, p<0.001), total TAT of serial hsTnT did not increase significantly with higher crowding (p=0.170). Lower utilisation of fast algorithms (p=0.009) and increase of additional hsTnT measurements after diagnosis (p=0.001) were observed in higher crowding. Most importantly, crowding was significantly associated with prolonged absolute (p<0.001), and particularly relative non-laboratory time (63.3%-71.3%, p<0.001). However, there was no significant effect of crowding on mortality, even after adjustment for relevant clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Process times, and particularly non-laboratory times, are prolonged in a crowded ED diminishing some positive effects of fast diagnostic algorithms in suspected ACS. Higher crowding levels were not significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03111862.

RAPID-CPU: a prospective study on implementation of the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm and safety of discharge after rule-out of myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Although the value of fast diagnostic protocols in suspected acute coronary syndrome has been validated, there is insufficient real world evidence including patients with lower pre-test probability, atypical symptoms and confounding comorbidities. The feasibility, efficacy and safety of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 and 0/3-hour algorithms using high-sensitivity troponin T were evaluated in a consecutive cohort with suspected acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: During 12 months, 2525 eligible patients were enrolled. In a pre-implementation period of 6 months, the prevalence of protocols, disposition, lengths of emergency department stay and treatments were registered. Implementation of the 0/1-hour protocol was monitored for another 6 months. Primary endpoints comprised the change of diagnostic protocols and 30-day mortality after direct discharge from the emergency department. RESULTS: Use of the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm increased by 270% at the cost of the standard 0/3-hour protocol. After rule-out (1588 patients), 1309 patients (76.1%) were discharged directly from the emergency department, with an all-cause mortality of 0.08% at 30 days (one death due to lung cancer). Median lengths of stay were 2.9 (1.9-3.8) and 3.2 (2.7-4.4) hours using a single high-sensitivity troponin T below the limit of detection (5 ng/L) at presentation and the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm, respectively, as compared to 5.3 (4.7-6.5) hours using the ESC 0/3-hour rule-out protocol (P<0.001). Discharge rates increased from 53.9% to 62.8% (P<0.001), without excessive use of diagnostic resources within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm is feasible and safe, is associated with shorter emergency department stay than the ESC 0/3-hour protocol, and an increase in discharge rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , Unique identifier: NCT03111862.

Management and outcomes of patients with unstable angina with undetectable, normal, or intermediate hsTnT levels.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unstable angina (UA) are regarded to be at low risk for future coronary events. Guidelines discourage routine coronary angiography and recommend early discharge after individualized risk stratification. The relative value of clinical risk indicators as compared to cardiac troponin (cTn) alone is unsettled in the era of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) assays. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, therapies, and outcomes of UA patients with different hsTnT concentrations. METHODS: During 12 months, 2525 patients were enrolled. UA was defined as unstable symptoms and either undetectable (< 5 ng/L), normal (5-14 ng/L) or stable elevated hsTnT (15-51 ng/L). Follow-up for 1-year mortality was available in 98.7%. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients (11.1%) received a diagnosis of UA. Mortality rates at 12 months were 0%, 1.9% and 6.9% in presence of undetectable, normal and stable elevated hsTnT. Elevated hsTnT > 99th percentile but not unstable symptoms carried an independent 3.25-fold (1.78-5.93) higher risk for all-cause death after adjustment for other clinical risk indicators or the GRACE score. Utilization of guideline-recommended therapies was high albeit lower than for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Significantly fewer patients with UA received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, odds ratio (OR) 0.51 [95% CI 0.44-0.59], P < 0.0001), coronary angiography (CA, OR 0.79, [95% CI 0.74-0.87], P < 0.0001), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, OR 0.50, [95% CI 0.40-0.61], P < 0.0001), compared to NSTEMI. However, prevalence of significant obstructive coronary artery disease requiring PCI was 31.8%, even in patients with undetectable hsTnT, indicating the need for stress testing. CONCLUSIONS: The current dichotomization of patients into UA and NSTEMI is no longer appropriate. Additional risk stratification seems warranted including the presence and magnitude of hsTn concentration and additional risk indicators. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT03111862.

Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine gender-specific reference limits of high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponins (cTn) and validity of hs assay designation for both genders. METHODS: After screening with a questionnaire, 827 presumably healthy individuals were further selected based on clinical criteria (n = 740), clinical criteria plus cardiac imaging including stress magnetic resonance imaging or stress echocardiography (n = 726), and extended cardio-pulmonary parameters (n = 626). Blood samples were measured with hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) on a cobas e602 analyzer as well as hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) on an ARCHITECTi2000SR. The impact of health definition, statistical methods, instrument selection and limit of detection (LoD) on overall and gender-specific 99th percentiles was assessed. RESULTS: Median age was 56 years (50.9% female) for the total study cohort. 99th percentiles for females and males ranged between 13.1 and 13.3 ng/L and 16.8-19.9 ng/L for hs-cTnT as well as 10.3-12.5 ng/L and 27.4-29.7 ng/L for hs-cTnI depending on health definition. Utilization of stricter health definition criteria reduced the difference of the gender-specific 99th percentiles between males and females for hs-cTnT to 3.7 ng/L (males 16.8 ng/L, females 13.1 ng/L), whereas the difference rather increased for hs-cTnI to 19.4 ng/L (males 29.7 ng/L, females 10.3 ng/L). Values > LoD could be measured in the majority of males and females using hs-TnT (81.4-83.3% and 96.5-96.9%, respectively). In contrast, values > LoD could not be observed in the majority of females using hs-cTnI (38.4-41.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In a well-phenotyped healthy cohort, reference values for hs-cTnT were slightly higher, whereas hs-cTnI cut-offs were considerably lower than previously observed. Gender differences were more pronounced in hs-cTnI than in hs-cTnT and were further reduced for hs-cTnT by application of stricter health definition criteria. Contrary to hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT fulfilled criteria for hs designation for both genders.

Multicentre cross-sectional observational registry to monitor the safety of early discharge after rule-out of acute myocardial infarction by copeptin and troponin: the Pro-Core registry.

OBJECTIVES: There is sparse information on the safety of early primary discharge from the emergency department (ED) after rule-out of myocardial infarction in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This prospective registry aimed to confirm randomised study results in patients at low-to-intermediate risk, with a broader spectrum of symptoms, across different institutional standards and with a range of local troponin assays including high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn), cardiac troponin (cTn) and point-of-care troponin (POC Tn). DESIGN: Prospective, multicentre European registry. SETTING: 18 emergency departments in nine European countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Spain, UK, Turkey, Lithuania and Hungary) PARTICIPANTS: The final study cohort consisted of 2294 patients (57.2% males, median age 57 years) with suspected ACS. INTERVENTIONS: Using the new dual markers strategy, 1477 patients were eligible for direct discharge, which was realised in 974 (42.5%) of patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. RESULTS: Compared with conventional workup after dual marker measurement, the median length of ED stay was 60 min shorter (228 min, 95% CI: 219 to 239 min vs 288 min, 95% CI: 279 to 300 min) in the primary dual marker strategy (DMS) discharge group. All-cause mortality was 0.1% (95% CI: 0% to 0.6%) in the primary DMS discharge group versus 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6% to 1.8%) in the conventional workup group after dual marker measurement. Conventional workup instead of discharge despite negative DMS biomarkers was observed in 503 patients (21.9%) and associated with higher prevalence of ACS (17.1% vs 0.9%, p<0.001), cardiac diagnoses (55.2% vs 23.5%, p<0.001) and risk factors (p<0.01), but with a similar all-cause mortality of 0.2% (95% CI: 0% to 1.1%) versus primary DMS discharge (p=0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin on top of cardiac troponin supports safe discharge in patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of ACS under routine conditions with the use of a broad spectrum of local standard POC, conventional and high-sensitivity troponin assays. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02490969.