Tocilizumab Outcomes in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the ICU and the Role of Non-Tocilizumab COVID-19-Specific Medical Therapeutics.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is a monoclonal antibody proposed to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS) associated with severe COVID-19. Previously published reports have shown that tocilizumab may improve the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, no precise data about the role of other medical therapeutics concurrently used for COVID-19 on this outcome have been published. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the overall outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU who received tocilizumab with the outcome of matched patients who did not receive tocilizumab while controlling for other confounders, including medical therapeutics for critically ill patients admitted to ICUs. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study was conducted among critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia between 1 March 2020, and October 31, 2020. Propensity-score matching was utilized to compare patients who received tocilizumab to patients who did not. In addition, the log-rank test was used to compare the 28 day hospital survival of patients who received tocilizumab with those who did not. Then, a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the matched groups was performed to evaluate the impact of the remaining concurrent medical therapeutics that could not be excluded via matching 28 day hospital survival rates. The primary outcome measure was patients' overall 28 day hospital survival, and the secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay and ICU survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 1470 unmatched patients were included, of whom 426 received tocilizumab. The total number of propensity-matched patients was 1278. Overall, 28 day hospital survival revealed a significant difference between the unmatched non-tocilizumab group (586; 56.1%) and the tocilizumab group (269; 63.1%) (p-value = 0.016), and this difference increased even more in the propensity-matched analysis between the non-tocilizumab group (466.7; 54.6%) and the tocilizumab group (269; 63.1%) (p-value = 0.005). The matching model successfully matched the two groups' common medical therapeutics used to treat COVID-19. Two medical therapeutics remained significantly different, favoring the tocilizumab group. A multivariate logistic regression was performed for the 28 day hospital survival in the propensity-matched patients. It showed that neither steroids (OR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.75-1.53)) (p = 0.697) nor favipiravir (OR: 1.08 (95% CI: 0.61-1.9)) (p = 0.799) remained as a predictor for an increase in 28 day survival. CONCLUSION: The tocilizumab treatment in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU improved the overall 28 day hospital survival, which might not be influenced by the concurrent use of other COVID-19 medical therapeutics, although further research is needed to confirm this.

Determining the Site of Upper Airway Narrowing in Snorers Using a Noninvasive Technique.

Background In this study, we aimed to determine the site of obstruction if surgical treatment is considered. Flexible nasopharyngoscopy is an invasive procedure currently used for the assessment of snoring and the level of obstruction. Here, we examine the role of Somnoscreen™ plus, a noninvasive cardiorespiratory polysomnographic device, in identifying the site of obstruction in patients presenting with snoring. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Sleep Research Center at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Polysomnography was conducted using Somnoscreen™ plus. All participants underwent flexible nasopharyngoscopy after polysomnography. Results Nasopharyngoscopy revealed that the most common site of obstruction was the nose and the soft palate (35.4%), followed by the soft palate alone (25%). Somnoscreen revealed that the site of obstruction was the nose and the soft palate in 18 (37.5%) patients and the nose alone in 16 (33.3%) patients. However, distal obstructions were not detected using Somnoscreen. The concordance of nasopharyngoscopy and Somnoscreen was 52.9%. However, it showed a discrepancy in identifying distal obstructions, which Somnoscreen™ plus failed to detect. Conclusions Somnoscreen appears to be sensitive for identifying proximal airway obstructions. The audio signal recordings can potentially be used as a tool to detect the site of airway obstruction in snoring; however, further studies are needed.

Machine learning decision tree algorithm role for predicting mortality in critically ill adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and is currently a major cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions globally. The role of machine learning in the ICU is evolving but currently limited to diagnostic and prognostic values. A decision tree (DT) algorithm is a simple and intuitive machine learning method that provides sequential nonlinear analysis of variables. It is simple and might be a valuable tool for bedside physicians during COVID-19 to predict ICU outcomes and help in critical decision-making like end-of-life decisions and bed allocation in the event of limited ICU bed capacities. Herein, we utilized a machine learning DT algorithm to describe the association of a predefined set of variables and 28-day ICU outcome in adult COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. We highlight the value of utilizing a machine learning DT algorithm in the ICU at the time of a COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a prospective and multicenter cohort study involving 14 hospitals in Saudi Arabia. We included critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between March 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020. The predictors of 28-day ICU mortality were identified using two predictive models: conventional logistic regression and DT analyses. RESULTS: There were 1468 critically ill COVID-19 patients included in the study. The 28-day ICU mortality was 540 (36.8 %), and the 90-day mortality was 600 (40.9 %). The DT algorithm identified five variables that were integrated into the algorithm to predict 28-day ICU outcomes: need for intubation, need for vasopressors, age, gender, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio. CONCLUSION: DT is a simple tool that might be utilized in the ICU to identify critically ill COVID-19 patients who are at high risk of 28-day ICU mortality. However, further studies and external validation are still required.

Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Outcomes: Findings From the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.

Background and objective The prevalence of aortic stenosis in Saudi Arabia is expected to increase owing to the rise in the life expectancy of the population. Such increase is expected to be met with higher demand for interventions including transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In this study, we aimed to identify the outcomes of this procedure among the population of the Western region of Saudi Arabia. Methods This was a retrospective observational study involving patients who underwent TAVI at the King Faisal Cardiac Center (KFCC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from June 2018 to January 2020. All patients who had undergone TAVI were included, and patients who were lost to follow-up for more than 90 days were excluded. The collected data included sociodemographic characteristics, peri-procedural assessment, and outcomes within 90 days. Results The study included a total of 52 patients. There were 28 males (53.8%) and 24 females (46.2%). The mean age of the cohort was 78 years. Type two diabetes mellitus was present in 67.3%, and hypertension and dyslipidemia were seen in 80.8% of patients. Coronary diseases were seen in 55.8%. The majority had prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (53.8%) and 3.8% had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Twenty patients (38.5%) had heart failure. Atrial fibrillation was encountered in 13 patients (25%). Chronic kidney disease was described in nine (17.3%) patients, and four (7.7%) were on regular hemodialysis. The median Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score was 2.4 (IQR: 1.97-5). High STS scores (>8) were only seen in 9% of the patients. The success rate was 98%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 3.8%. Vascular complications were seen in eight patients (15.4%), and the majority of them were minor. One patient (1.9%) had a major vascular complication. There was a tendency toward high blood transfusions (19.2%). Clinically manifest stroke was seen in three patients (5.8%). Eight patients (15.4%) had post-procedure complete heart block (CHB). Endocarditis was seen in two patients (3.8%). Thirty-day cardiac readmission was observed in 17.3% of patients, and acute kidney injury was seen in eight patients (15.4%). Mild aortic regurgitation was seen in 51.9% of the patients, but moderate or severe aortic insufficiency (AI) was not encountered. Conclusion Transfemoral TAVI using a self-expandable valve is a safe and feasible procedure at KFCC, an intermediate-sized center. Our data is comparable to local and international centers of similar size. Program sustainability depends on the development of robust referral networks and implementing regulatory quality and patient safety standards.

Anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently there is no systematic review and meta-analysis of the global incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the general adult population. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incidence rates of anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions after COVID-19 vaccines and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, triggers, presenting signs and symptoms, treatment and clinical course of confirmed cases. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] statement was followed. METHODS: Electronic databases (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2020 to 31 May 2021 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination: anaphylaxis, non-anaphylaxis, anaphylactic reaction, nonanaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock, hypersensitivity, allergy reaction, allergic reaction, immunology reaction, immunologic reaction, angioedema, loss of consciousness, generalized erythema, urticaria, urticarial rash, cyanosis, grunting, stridor, tachypnoea, wheezing, tachycardia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and tryptase. We included studies in adults of all ages in all healthcare settings. Effect sizes of prevalence were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To minimize heterogeneity, we performed sub-group analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1,734 papers that were identified, 26 articles were included in the systematic review (8 case report, 5 cohort, 4 case series, 2 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) and 14 articles (1 cohort, 2 case series, 1 randomized controlled trial and 1 randomized cross-sectional studies) were included in meta-analysis. Studies involving 26,337,421 vaccine recipients [Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 14,505,399) and Moderna (n = 11,831,488)] were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence estimate of anaphylaxis to both vaccines was 5.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 7.2, I2 = 81%, p = < 0.0001), while the overall pooled prevalence estimate of nonanaphylactic reactions to both vaccines was 53.9 (95% CI 0.0 to 116.1, I2 = 99%, p = < 0.0001). Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech resulted in higher anaphylactic reactions compared to Moderna (8.0, 95% CI 0.0 to 11.3, I2 = 85% versus 2.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 5.7, I2 = 59%). However, lower incidence of nonanaphylactic reactions was associated with Pfizer-BioNTech compared to Moderna (43.9, 95% CI 0.0 to 131.9, I2 = 99% versus 63.8, 95% CI 0.0 to 151.8, I2 = 98%). The funnel plots for possible publication bias for the pooled effect sizes to determine the incidence of anaphylaxis and nonanaphylactic reactions associated with mRNA COVID-19 immunization based on mRNA vaccine type appeared asymmetrical on visual inspection, and Egger's tests confirmed asymmetry by producing p values < 0.05. Across the included studies, the most commonly identified risk factors for anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were female sex and personal history of atopy. The key triggers to anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions identified in these studies included foods, medications, stinging insects or jellyfish, contrast media, cosmetics and detergents, household products, and latex. Previous history of anaphylaxis; and comorbidities such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic and contact eczema/dermatitis and psoriasis and cholinergic urticaria were also found to be important. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is very low; and nonanaphylactic reactions occur at higher rate, however, cutaneous reactions are largely self-limited. Both anaphylactic and nonanaphylactic reactions should not discourage vaccination.

Diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: One possible reason for increased mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with diabetes is from the complication of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). OBJECTIVES: To re-evaluate the association of SARS-CoV-2 and development of DKA and analyse the demographic and biochemical parameters and the clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients with DKA. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed. METHODS: Electronic databases (Proquest, Medline, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, Wiley online library, Scopus and Nature) were searched from 1 December 2019 to 30 June 2021 in the English language using the following keywords alone or in combination: COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 AND diabetic ketoacidosis OR DKA OR ketosis OR ketonemia OR hyperglycaemic emergency OR hyperglycaemic crisis. We included studies in adults and children of all ages in all healthcare settings. Binary logistic regression model was used to explore the effect of various demographic and biochemical parameters variables on patient's final treatment outcome (survival or death). RESULTS: Of the 484 papers that were identified, 68 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (54 case report, 10 case series, and 4 cohort studies). Studies involving 639 DKA patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 [46 (7.2%) were children and 334 (52.3%) were adults] were analyzed. The median or mean patient age ranged from < 1 years to 66 years across studies. Most of the patients (n = 309, 48.3%) had pre-existing type 2 diabetes mellitus. The majority of the patients were male (n = 373, 58.4%) and belonged to Hispanic (n = 156, 24.4%) and black (n = 98, 15.3%) ethnicity. The median random blood glucose level, HbA1c, pH, bicarbonate, and anion gap in all included patients at presentation were 507 mg/dl [IQR 399-638 mg/dl], 11.4% [IQR 9.9-13.5%], 7.16 [IQR 7.00-7.22], 10 mmol/l [IQR 6.9-13 mmol/l], and 24.5 mEq/l [18-29.2 mEq/l]; respectively. Mortality rate was [63/243, 25.9%], with a majority of death in patients of Hispanic ethnicity (n = 17, 27%; p = 0.001). The odd ratios of death were significantly high in patients with pre-existing diabetes mellitus type 2 [OR 5.24, 95% CI 2.07-15.19; p = 0.001], old age (≥ 60 years) [OR 3.29, 95% CI 1.38-7.91; p = 0.007], and male gender [OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.37-5.17; p = 0.004] compared to those who survived. CONCLUSION: DKA is not uncommon in SARS-CoV-2 patients with diabetes mellitus and results in a mortality rate of 25.9%. Mortality key determinants in DKA patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection are individuals with pre-existing diabetes mellitus type 2, older age [≥ 60 years old], male gender, BMI ≥ 30, blood glucose level > 1000 mg/dl, and anion gap ≥ 30 mEq/l.

Implementation of new ECMO centers during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience and results from the Middle East and India.

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients has increased during the course of the pandemic. As uncertainty existed regarding patient's outcomes, early guidelines recommended against establishing new ECMO centers. We aimed to explore the epidemiology and outcomes of ECMO for COVID-19 related cardiopulmonary failure in five countries in the Middle East and India and to evaluate the results of ECMO in 5 new centers. METHODS: This is a retrospective, multicenter international, observational study conducted in 19 ECMO centers in five countries in the Middle East and India from March 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020. We included patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO for refractory hypoxemia and severe respiratory acidosis with or without circulatory failure. Data collection included demographic data, ECMO-related specific data, pre-ECMO patient condition, 24 h post-ECMO initiation data, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival to home discharge. Secondary outcomes included mortality during ECMO, survival to decannulation, and outcomes stratified by center type. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven COVID-19 patients received ECMO support during the study period, of whom 78 (25%) were treated in the new ECMO centers. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range IQR 37-52), and 81% were men. New center patients were younger, were less frequently male, had received higher PEEP, more frequently inotropes and prone positioning before ECMO and were less frequently retrieved from a peripheral center on ECMO. Survival to home discharge was 45%. In patients treated in new and established centers, survival was 55 and 41% (p = 0.03), respectively. Multivariable analysis retained only a SOFA score < 12 at ECMO initiation as associated with survival (odds ratio, OR 1.93 (95% CI 1.05-3.58), p = 0.034), but not treatment in a new center (OR 1.65 (95% CI 0.75-3.67)). CONCLUSIONS: During pandemics, ECMO may provide favorable outcomes in highly selected patients as resources allow. Newly formed ECMO centers with appropriate supervision of regional experts may have satisfactory results.

Awake Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is used as rescue therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in whom conventional therapy has failed prior to an Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenator to rescue Lung Injury in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome trial. Since then, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been incorporated as part of the standard treatment algorithm in many centers for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 in early 2020, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used effectively as rescue therapy and as a bridge to recovery in some patients with refractory respiratory failure. DESIGN SUBJECT AND INTERVENTION: We present a 38-year-old male healthcare worker diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and progressed to critical condition with severe surgical emphysema on a high-flow nasal cannula with Fio2 100%, a flow of 40 L/min, and a maximum oxygen saturation of 88%. He was successfully treated by applying awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, without a need for invasive mechanical ventilation, to avoid worsening barotrauma and hemodynamic compromise potentially induced by positive pressure ventilation. MAIN RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is one of the first cases to be reported in the literature on the use of awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a "treatment" for barotrauma due to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in a coronavirus disease 2019 patient, without the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. In selected patients with severe respiratory failure, awake extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be used as a salvage treatment and obviate the need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

The Saudi Critical Care Society extracorporeal life support chapter guidance on utilization of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome and special considerations in the era of coronavirus disease 2019.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is considered as a supportive treatment that provides circulatory and ventilatory support and can be thought off as a bridge to organ recovery. Since 2009, it has been applied as a rescue treatment for patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) mainly due to viral causes. In December 2019, several patients presented with a constellation of symptoms of viral pneumonia in China. A new strain of the corona virus family, called COVID-19, has been discovered to be the cause of this severe mysterious illness that was named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2). This new virus continued to spread across the globe leading to the World Health Organization announcing it as a pandemic in the early 2020. By the end of March 2021, the number of COVID-19 cases worldwide exceeded 126 million cases. In Saudi Arabia, the first confirmed case of COVID-19 was reported in the 2nd March 2020. By the end of March 2021, the total number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Saudi Arabia is just above 360,000. In anticipation of the need of ECMO for the treatment of patients with SARS­CoV­2 based on the previous Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus pandemic experience, the Saudi Extra-Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) chapter that is under the umbrella of the Saudi Critical Care Society (SCCS) convened a working group of ECMO experts. The mission of this group was to formulate a guidance for the use of ECMO as a last resort for patients with severe ARDS, especially with COVID-19 based on available evidence. The ECLS-SCCS chapter wanted to generate a document that can be used to simple guide, with a focus on safety, to provide ECMO service for patients with severe ARDS with a special focus on SARS­CoV­2.

Effect of Isolated Obesity on Left Ventricular Function and Structure: A Single-Center Experience.

Background and objectives Obesity can increase cardiac mass and affect cardiac performance independently from other risk factors. Several studies have identified an association in patients who already have comorbidities, however, few studies focused on obesity as an isolated risk factor. This study aimed to assess the associations between isolated obesity and heart morphological and functional characteristics. Methods This was a cross-sectional study that recruited 114 patients referred for echocardiographic study in King Faisal Cardiac Center. Adult patients who had a body mass index (BMI) above 25 kg/m2 were included, while patients with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, or those who use medications for chronic diseases were excluded from this study. Variables of interest that we collected were age, gender, weight, BMI, and those related to morphological and functional changes in the heart including left ventricular mass index (LVMI), LV end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results Most of the study participants (63.8%) were class II or class III obesity and about 80% were males. The mean ± SD of LVEF was 55.7% ± 2.8%, while the mean of the left ventricular mass index was 28.5±5.84. The mean of LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) was slightly higher among males than females (48.8±11.6 versus 46.4±11.7 ml/m2), however, this difference was not statistically significant (p-value= 0.395). There was no correlation between BMI and LVMI in females (R - 0.226, R2 0.05, P-value 0.37), while the LVMI was found to have a negative correlation between BMI and male gender that was significant (R - 0.292, R2 0.09, P-value 0.0052). It was found that there is no correlation between LVEF and BMI for males and females (male= R 0.093, R2 0.032, P-value 0.093; female= R 0.172, R2 0.029, P-value 0.434). With regards to the LVEDVI, there was a negative correlation between higher BMI and male gender that was significant (male= R - 0.396, R2 0.157, P-value 0.0001) while it was not significant in females (R -0.0298, R2 0.0009, P-value 0.893). Conclusions We have found that cardiac function is not affected by isolated obesity. However, indexed cardiac parameters like LVM and LV end diastolic volume were negatively correlated with higher BMI and positively correlated with relative wall thickness (RWT) only in males. This negative correlation might be one of the triggers to the development of obesity-induced cardiomyopathy.

Beyond Frontiers: Feasibility and Outcomes of Prolonged Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use in acute respiratory failure is increasing. We aim to compare characteristics and outcomes of patients with prolonged (≥21 days) veno-venous (VV) ECMO runs (pECMO), to patients with short (<21 days) VV ECMO runs (sECMO). The observational retrospective single-center study compared patients who received VV ECMO from January 2018 to June 2019 at Prince Mohamed Bin Abdulaziz Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Forty-three patients were supported with VV ECMO during the study period, of whom 37 are included as six patients were still receiving ECMO at time of data collection: 24 sECMO and 13 pECMO patients. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities were similar except pECMO patients were older and had a lower P/F ratio (61 [58-68] vs. 71[58-85.5], p = 0.05). Survival to hospital discharge (69% vs. 83%, p = 0.32; pECMO vs. sECMO) and 90 day survival (62% vs. 75%, p = 0.413; pECMO vs. sECMO) were similar among groups. At 1 year follow-up, all patients were still alive and independently functioning except for one patient in the pECMO group who required a walking aid related to trauma. In this single-center study, patients requiring pECMO had similar short- and long-term survival to those requiring sECMO duration.

Impact of Pre-operative Hemoglobin A1C Level and Microbiological Pattern on Surgical Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery.

Background Surgical site infection (SSI) after cardiac surgery is a major concern. A limited number of studies have addressed the relationship of preoperative glycemic control on the risk of developing SSI after cardiac surgery. We aim to determine the incidence, microbiological pattern, and impact of preoperative hemoglobin A1C (Hgb A1C) on the development of SSI after cardiac surgery. Methods This is a single-center retrospective chart review that was performed on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery from January 2017 to December 2018. Results Two hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent 233 procedures. The median age was 60 years; 71% males, 64% were diabetic, and 67% had a Hb A1C above 7% preoperatively. Around 7% of patients developed deep SSI. For patients that developed SSI, 63% had gram-negative bacteria. Hb A1C >7% was not found to be associated with an increased incidence of SSI. Conclusion Our results show that there is no apparent relationship between pre-operative Hgb A1C levels and SSI after cardiac surgery. Although we follow a comprehensive SSI perioperative bundle based on international guidelines that advocates using antibiotics to cover gram-positive organisms, it is interesting that the rate of gram-negative organisms in our patients' cohort is unexpectedly high. We believe that adjusting the perioperative antibiotic regimen based on local microbiological patterns seems to be a reasonable and easily achievable target to decrease the incidence of SSI.

Assessment of Different Risk Factors Among Adult Cardiac Patients at a Single Cardiac Center in Saudi Arabia.

Background  Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has remained the leading cause of death in the last 15 years and is one of the main health problems in Saudi Arabia. Our study aims to assess the prevalence of different CVD risk factors and correlate them among King Faisal Cardiac Center patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using a convenient sampling technique. Data were collected by interviewing adult patients admitted to King Faisal Cardiac Center and diagnosed with hemodynamically stable cardiac disease. We excluded patients with multiple medical conditions that contribute to acute mental disorders. The sample size was calculated to be 200 patients. Results Overall, 163 patients completed the survey. The majority of the participants (49.1%) were between 46-65 years of age, males, non-smokers, and had more than 11 children. Diabetes was found to be the most common risk factor (66.3%). Most participants had mild to moderate anxiety (63.8%) and depression (66.9%). Most of the patients (51.5%) have a high 10-year risk of developing CVD, followed by moderate and low risk (33.1% and 15.3%, respectively). In our study, a high 10-year risk of CVD was significantly associated with age between 46-80 years with a p-value=0.002, male gender with a p-value=0.007, cigarette smoking with a p-value=0.031, and diabetes with a p-value=0.035. Conclusion The study demonstrated a high prevalence of the following CVD risk factors: age, male gender, immobility, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. In addition, a significant association was found between high 10-year risk of CVD and age, gender, smoking, number of children, and diabetes with a p-value<0.05. No significant association was found in the other risk factors such as obesity, body mass index (BMI), immobility, caregiver, dyslipidemia, depression, and anxiety.

Role of Carotid Artery Ultrasound Duplex Prior to Cardiac Surgery in Adults in Predicting Neurocognitive Complications.

Background Neurocognitive complications (NCCs) after cardiac surgery are one of the most devastating complications. Significant internal carotid artery stenosis is assumed to be a predictor of NCCs. Carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) is a non-invasive imaging study that remains the modality of choice and is routinely used in many centers for screening adult cardiac surgery patients prior to surgery. This study aims to assess the utility of preoperative carotid DUS in the prediction of NCCs in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in our center. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), valvular or combined surgery, at King Faisal Cardiac Center in Jeddah between January 2017 and December 2018 (n = 229). The preoperative carotid DUS findings were evaluated. Risk factors associated with NCC were analyzed. Results Over the study period, a total of 229 patients underwent 233 procedures. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 51-67 years), of whom 71% were males. Out of the diabetic patients, 67% had an HbA1C level above 7% pre-operatively. Carotid DUS was performed on 63% of patients, but only 6.9% developed a post-operative NCC. Patients who were actively smoking were more likely to develop NCC compared to nonsmokers or ex-smokers (14.7% vs 4.6%; p = 0.02), with an odds ratio of 3.6 (95% CI = 1.2-10.5). Patients who developed NCC had a significantly higher median intensive care length of stay (7 vs. 5 days; p = 0.05). Conclusions Although international guidelines clearly define which patient should get preoperative carotid DUS screening, the level of evidence is low. Based on our findings, preoperative routine use of carotid DUS prior to cardiac surgery has low utility in predicting NCC. We recommend a more tailored approach based on signs, symptoms, and high-risk features to optimize the utilization of resources, avoid unwarranted delays, and personalize patient care.

Association Between Post-Operative Infection and Blood Transfusion in Cardiac Surgery.

Background Blood transfusion is a commonly used therapy in cardiac surgery, whether it is given during the surgery or in the intensive care unit. It is important to evaluate the risks and benefits of exposure to blood transfusion. The use of blood transfusions can influence patient outcome. Previous studies have implicated blood transfusion as a causative factor in post-operative infection. Objectives We aim to determine the effect of blood transfusion on post-operative infection in cardiac surgery patients at the King Faisal Cardiac Center, Jeddah, Saudia Arabia, from January 2017 to January 2019. Methods The regular six-week follow-up of cardiac surgery patients allowed us to maintain a six-week infection span. The main variables included patient characteristics, operative characteristics, pre-operative hemoglobin, six-week infection, blood transfusion, and clinical outcomes. A logistic regression model was developed to identify patient and procedure variables that were associated with blood transfusion and infection. The baseline variables were entered into the model. Variables with p-value less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results The incidence of transfusion out of 197 patients was 93.4% (n = 184). The occurrence of infection was 31.82% (n = 63). There was no difference in post-operative infection for patients who received blood transfusions compared with those who did not receive blood transfusions (p = 0.902). In comparing patients receiving 1-2 units of red blood cells (RBCs) (48%) and those receiving >2 units of RBCs (52%), there was no significance (p = 0.549). Conclusions There was no association between the incidence of infection and blood transfusion. While there are other reasons for withholding blood, it would not be recommended to do so based on the concern of infection.

The Perception of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Catheterization in Saudi Arabia: "What the Public Know".

Objective Coronary artery disease (CAD) constitutes a significant health hazard in middle-aged individuals in Saudi Arabia. We sought to assess the level of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and describe the perception of coronary intervention among the general population in the city of Jeddah in the western part of Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the city of Jeddah during the period from April 2019 to September 1, 2019, by using a structured online questionnaire to assess the participants' awareness of risk factors for CAD and coronary intervention. The survey included questions about socio-demographic data, risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, symptoms of heart attack, knowledge of coronary catheterizations, as well as resources of knowledge about coronary heart disease. Results The study included 984 participants. The majority of the participants had university diplomas (78.1%). Only 38.5 % were healthcare workers. Dyslipidemia and smoking were identified by 70.5% and 66.7%, respectively, as a recognized risk factor for CAD. Diabetes was mentioned by 32.1%. Participants without CAD risk factors had a significantly lower level of knowledge regarding the strong association between diabetes mellitus (DM) II and CAD (p-value=0.02). Healthcare professionals had a significantly lower level of knowledge regarding cardiac catheterization as compared to non-healthcare professionals. A higher percentage of healthcare professionals would agree to have cardiac catheterization if indicated (p-value=0.003). Awareness campaigns were the most common source of information for the public. Conclusion The current level of knowledge of CAD in the western part of Saudi Arabia is fair. National awareness campaigns are required to improve the level of healthcare education.

Correction: The Perception of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Catheterization in Saudi Arabia: "What the Public Know".

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6570.].

Psychological Effects on Health Science Students After Implementation of COVID-19 Quarantine and Distance Learning in Saudi Arabia.

Background The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the globe dramatically. It has affected daily life noticeably and the teaching process is one of the significantly affected aspects as the learning approach has been shifted to distance learning (DL). These new changes may affect student performance and emotional well-being. This study aimed to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and distance learning on healthcare students. Method An online self-administered cross-sectional survey was distributed to healthcare students for the period between April 2020 to June 2020. The study included students from different universities in Saudi Arabia. Knowledge and perception of COVID-19 and the experience of distance learning during the pandemic period were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Psychological effect was evaluated using Four-Item Patient Health Questionnaire for Anxiety and Depression (PHQ-4). Results A total of 721 students completed the survey with the majority being females. Around 25% of students had experienced anxiety, while 35% had depression. Severe anxiety and depression were noted in over 6% of the participants. Younger age and female gender were more affected psychologically. Students with higher scores in PHQ-4 were strongly disagreeing that hand gloves and surgical masks may help in preventing COVID-19 transmission. Students with normal psychological assessment were more likely to favor DL, while students with moderate to severe anxiety and depression disagreed. Conclusion Healthcare students have alarmingly high levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. General knowledge of the pandemic is not associated with the psychological impact. DL is a convenient approach for students with normal PHQ-4 scores. Programs to help students overcome the psychological impact of COVID-19 are highly recommended.

Patients With Systemic Right Ventricle Are at Higher Risk of Chylothorax After Cavopulmonary Connections.

BACKGROUND: Chylothorax is a rare but severe complication after pediatric cardiac surgical procedures and is related to significant morbidity and mortality. It is suspected to be more frequent after single-ventricle staged palliation procedures, but focused studies on chylothorax in patients with univentricular heart physiology are scarce. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2016, a total of 289 patients underwent 376 cavopulmonary connection (CPC) procedures over 9 years (superior cavopulmonary connection [SCPC], 199; Fontan completion, 177). Patients were classified according to whether they had a chylothorax (group 1) or not (group 2). Chylothorax was confirmed on a pleural fluid test. RESULTS: The rate of chylothorax after a CPC procedure was 19.7% (74 of 376): 15.6% after SCPC and 24.3% after Fontan completion. Mean follow-up was 4.3 ± 0.1 years. Systemic right ventricle was more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (64.9% vs 46%, respectively; p = 0.003). Chylothorax was associated with a higher rate of early reoperation (p = 0.001) and late failure of the CPC (p < 0.001). Late mortality was also more frequent in group 1 than in group 2 (17.6% vs 4.3%; p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, having a systemic right ventricle was the only identified predictor for the development of chylothorax (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.7; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of chylothorax in patients undergoing the univentricular pathway procedure is higher than previously suggested. Having a systemic right ventricle is a significant risk factor for developing a chylothorax after a CPC.

Perioperative prediction of agitated (hyperactive) delirium after cardiac surgery in adults - The development of a practical scorecard.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a temporary mental disorder that occurs frequently among hospitalized patients. In this study we sought to develop a user-friendly scorecard based on perioperative features to identify patients at risk of developing agitated delirium after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in a single center. A parsimonious predictive model was created, with subsequent internal validation. Then a simple scorecard was developed that can be used to predict the probability of agitated delirium. RESULTS: Among the 5584 patients who met the study criteria, 614 (11.4%) developed postoperative agitated delirium. Independent predictors of postoperative agitated delirium were age, male gender, history of cerebrovascular disease, procedure other than isolated Coronary Arteries Bypass Surgery, transfusion of blood products within the first 48h, mechanical ventilation for >24h, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit. The scorecard stratified patients into 4 categories at risk of postoperative agitated delirium ranging from <5% to >30%. CONCLUSION: Using a large cohort of adult patient's undergoing cardiac surgery, a user-friendly scorecard was developed and validated, which will facilitate the implementation of timely interventions to mitigate adverse effects of agitated delirium in this high risk population.