Gallstone Ileus Decades after Cholecystectomy and Pylorus-Preserving Whipples.

We report a case of small bowel obstruction due to gallstone ileus found in a patient with previous pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure). Investigation by computed tomography of the abdomen showed a transition point in the midjejunum due to a radioopaque intraluminal mass. Following resuscitation, the patient underwent laparotomy to remove the offending mass from the midjejunum. Subsequent stone analysis confirmed a cholesterol-rich gallstone. This is thus the first description of gallstone ileus following Whipple procedure. The rarity of this presentation and a literature review is presented.

Prophylactic Wound Drainage in Renal Transplant: A Survey of Practice Patterns in Australia and New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES: Drains are used routinely in many centers at the conclusion of kidney transplant, despite a paucity of evidence to guide practice in kidney transplant. Studies have not shown benefit from prophylactic drain placement following other major abdominal and vascular operations, and usage is consequently declining. Our aim was to understand practice patterns and rationale for behavior in drain placement and management in kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an online survey of surgeons who routinely perform kidney transplants across Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: The response rate was 66% (43/66). Of respondents, 61% reported routine drain insertion, whereas 21% seldom inserted drains. Concerns about bleeding and anticoagulation (63%) and routine practice (58%) were the dominant reasons for drain insertion. The factors selected as most significant in determining drain removal were both volume and time (44%) and volume alone (33%). A volume of < 50 mL/day (51%) was the most commonly reported threshold for removal. The postoperative period of days 3 to 5 was the most commonly selected time point for drain removal (63%). Seventy-four percent of respondents would consider enrolling their patients in a randomized controlled trial to determine the benefits and harms of drain insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Although drain insertion is a common practice, transplant surgeons in Australia and New Zealand reported sufficient uncertainty concerning the potential benefits and harms to warrant design and conduct of a randomized controlled trial.

Is repairing giant hiatal hernia in patients over 80 worth the risk?

Patients with giant hiatal hernia (GHH) are often symptomatic and have significantly reduced quality of life (QoL). Advanced age is a predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in open hiatal surgery, however, outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in patients over the age of 80 are limited to case reports and small case series. Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Consecutive patients over the age of 80 with GHH that have undergone surgery were included. Peri-operative mortality, complications, recurrence rates, use of acid suppressive medication and QoL was analysed. Search of Ryerson index was performed to determined post-operative survival. Inclusion criteria were met by 89 patients. Mean age was 84 (80-93). The mean volume of herniated stomach was 70.9% range 30-100%; SD 27.25). There was one death in this cohort on day 30 from myocardial infarction and one mediastinal collection requiring percutaneous radiological drainage and antibiotics. There were no other major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV). Mean post-operative survival was 74.5 months (SD 47.8). GIQLI was reduced pre-operatively (mean 91.8; SD 19.4). There was significant improvement in GIQLI scores at early (mean 101.45; SD 21.2) and late (mean 106.7; SD 19.2) post-operative follow-up (p = 0.005). Pre-operative Visick scores (mean 2.92; SD 0.98) have improved significantly in early (mean 1.94; SD 0.97; p = 0.000) and late (mean 2.03; SD 0.99; p = 0.001) post-operative periods. Satisfaction with surgery was 97% during early and 93.3% during late post-operative follow up. Laparoscopic repair of GHH in appropriately selected elderly patients is safe and results in significant improvement in quality of life.