Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
2.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 122: 106953, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36202199

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Single Institutional Review Boards (sIRB) are not achieving the benefits envisioned by the National Institutes of Health. The recently published Health Level Seven (HL7®) Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®) data exchange standard seeks to improve sIRB operational efficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a study to determine whether the use of this standard would be economically attractive for sIRB workflows collectively and for Reviewing and Relying institutions. We examined four sIRB-associated workflows at a single institution: (1) Initial Study Protocol Application, (2) Site Addition for an Approved sIRB study, (3) Continuing Review, and (4) Medical and Non-Medical Event Reporting. Task-level information identified personnel roles and their associated hour requirements for completion. Tasks that would be eliminated by the data exchange standard were identified. Personnel costs were estimated using annual salaries by role. No tasks would be eliminated in the Initial Study Protocol Application or Medical and Non-Medical Event Reporting workflows through use of the proposed data exchange standard. Site Addition workflow hours would be reduced by 2.50 h per site (from 15.50 to 13.00 h) and Continuing Review hours would be reduced by 9.00 h per site per study year (from 36.50 to 27.50 h). Associated costs savings were $251 for the Site Addition workflow (from $1609 to $1358) and $1033 for the Continuing Review workflow (from $4110 to $3076). CONCLUSION: Use of the proposed HL7 FHIR® data exchange standard would be economically attractive for sIRB workflows collectively and for each entity participating in the new workflows.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Ethics Committees, Research , Humans , Health Level Seven
3.
NPJ Digit Med ; 3: 84, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32550652

ABSTRACT

The Project Baseline Health Study (PBHS) was launched to map human health through a comprehensive understanding of both the health of an individual and how it relates to the broader population. The study will contribute to the creation of a biomedical information system that accounts for the highly complex interplay of biological, behavioral, environmental, and social systems. The PBHS is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study that aims to enroll thousands of participants with diverse backgrounds who are representative of the entire health spectrum. Enrolled participants will be evaluated serially using clinical, molecular, imaging, sensor, self-reported, behavioral, psychological, environmental, and other health-related measurements. An initial deeply phenotyped cohort will inform the development of a large, expanded virtual cohort. The PBHS will contribute to precision health and medicine by integrating state of the art testing, longitudinal monitoring and participant engagement, and by contributing to the development of an improved platform for data sharing and analysis.

4.
J Surg Res ; 188(1): 190-7, 2014 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24370454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between psychoactive substance use and injury is known, evidence remains conflicting on the impact of substance use on clinical outcomes after injury. We hypothesized that preinjury substance use would negatively impact clinical outcomes. METHODS: National Trauma Registry American College of Surgeons identified patients (n = 9793) presenting to Duke Hospital from 2006 to 2010. Logistic regression models assessed potential predictors of receiving substance screening, mortality, length of stay, ventilator requirement, intensive care admission, or emergency department disposition. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent (4607/9793) of patients received blood alcohol screen (BAS) and 31% (3017/9793) received urine drug screen (UDS). Men were more likely to receive both BASs (P < 0.001) and UDSs (P = 0.001) than women after controlling for potential confounders. There was no significant difference between men and women over the legal limit for alcohol (OLLA; 27.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.7%-28.8% versus 24.8%, 95% CI: 22.3%-27.5%). Similarly, younger patients more likely received both BASs (P < 0.001) and UDSs (P < 0.001) compared with older patients. The proportion of patients aged ≤45 y OLLA (26.5 %, 95% CI: 24.9%-28.2%) was similar to those aged >45 y OLLA (26.8%, 95% CI: 24.5%-29.3%). After controlling for potential confounders neither alcohol, nor tetrahydrocannabinol, nor cocaine was predictive of mortality, ventilator requirement, length of stay, or emergency department disposition, but a higher alcohol level (P = 0.0174) predicted intensive care admission. CONCLUSIONS: Females and those aged >45 y are less likely to receive BASs and UDSs. Differential screening that is biased may place patients at risk for receiving inadequate care.


Subject(s)
Registries , Substance Abuse Detection/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 40(10): 963-8, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22609237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Major postoperative infections (MPIs) are poorly understood complications of cardiac surgery. We examined the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of MPIs occurring after cardiac surgery. METHODS: The study cohort was drawn from the Society of Thoracic Surgeon National Cardiac Database and comprised adults who underwent cardiac surgery at 5 tertiary hospitals between 2000 and 2004. We studied the incidence, microbiology, and risk factors of MPI (bloodstream or chest wound infections within 30 days after surgery), as well as 30-day mortality. We used multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the risk of MPI and mortality. RESULTS: MPI was identified in 341 of 10,522 patients (3.2%). Staphylococci were found in 52.5% of these patients, gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in 24.3%, and other pathogens in 23.2%. High body mass index, previous coronary bypass surgery, emergency surgery, renal impairment, immunosuppression, cardiac failure, and peripheral/cerebrovascular disease were associated with the development of MPI. Median postoperative duration of hospitalization (15 days vs 6 days) and mortality (8.5% vs 2.2%) were higher in patients with MPIs. Compared with uninfected individuals, odds of mortality were higher in patients with S aureus MPIs (adjusted odds ratio, 3.7) and GNB MPIs (adjusted odds ratio, 3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococci accounted for the majority of MPIs after cardiac surgery. Mortality was higher in patients with Staphylococcus aureus- and GNB-related MPIs than in patients with MPIs caused by other pathogens and uninfected patients. Preventive strategies should target likely pathogens and high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Sepsis/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Thoracic Surgery , Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/microbiology , Sepsis/mortality , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/mortality , Survival Analysis
6.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 5(3): 352-7, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22550131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension control is an important and modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The overall rate of hypertension control among patients followed in cardiology clinics, as well as clinician variability in control rates, is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hypertension (n=5979) routinely followed in a cardiology clinic (n=47 physicians). Overall, 30.3% of patients with hypertension had suboptimal control (blood pressure [BP] ≥ 140/90 mm Hg) at the end of a 13-month follow-up period. Patient-level factors associated with control were younger age, male sex, white ethnicity, having a primary care provider at Duke, private insurance, Medicare/Medicaid, and comorbid diagnoses of heart failure or coronary artery disease. Unadjusted rates of suboptimal BP control among clinicians' clinic patient panels ranged from 16% to 44%. Even after adjusting for patient factors, patients' odds of BP control varied 6-fold, depending on their treating clinician. Using a patient's average BP rather than their most recent BP did not result in significant changes in provider performance. In chart reviews (n=300), clinicians failed to document a plan to address hypertension in 38% of patients with elevated BP in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Up to one-third of patients followed routinely by cardiologists in clinic have suboptimally controlled BP, with wide variability in performance across individual clinicians. This variability, alongside evidence that elevated BP is often not acted on during clinic visits, demonstrates a potential opportunity for quality improvement.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Cardiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hypertension/drug therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination , Cardiology/standards , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , North Carolina , Odds Ratio , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 142(3): 575-80, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21724203

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary dysfunction/multiorgan failure syndrome is an important cause of mortality and morbidity after cardiac operations. In this series, results of immune augmentation were assessed in patients experiencing pulmonary dysfunction/multiorgan failure syndrome after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Since 2002, 44 consecutive patients with primary antibiotic-refractory pulmonary dysfunction/multiorgan failure syndrome were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (0.3 g/kg × 5 days; 1.5 g/kg total dose). Thirty patients had undergone complex valve or aortic surgery, and 14 patients had coronary bypass. Median age was 66 years, and risk profiles were especially high preoperatively. Clinical variables were assessed for 3 days prior (-3) to beginning intravenous immunoglobulin (on day 0) and for 5 days afterward (+5). A postoperative morbidity index was generated as a weighted sum of all relevant clinical variables. By using each patient as his or her own control, the therapeutic effect of intravenous immunoglobulin was assessed with linear regression of postoperative morbidity index over time with a spline and a knot at day 0, coincident with beginning intravenous immunoglobulin. RESULTS: At day 0, all patients were deteriorating clinically and refractory to major antibiotics. Overall morbidity was high, and immunoglobulin-G levels, obtained in the last 14 patients, were consistently low. By using linear regression of postoperative morbidity index over time, intravenous immunoglobulin administration was associated with significant improvement in clinical status (P < .0001). A total of 42 of 44 patients (95%) recovered uneventfully to hospital discharge. No significant complications of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This experience suggests that management of immune dysfunction with intravenous immunoglobulin is safe and effective for treatment of primary pulmonary dysfunction/multiorgan failure syndrome after cardiac surgery. Expanded application seems indicated.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases/therapy , Multiple Organ Failure/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Lung Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/immunology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Renal Insufficiency/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial , Thrombocytopenia/epidemiology , Thrombocytopenia/therapy
8.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 142(1): 89-98, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20880552

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The previous Pexelizumab for Reduction of Infarction and Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery I (PRIMO-CABG I) trial (n = 3099) indicated that C5 complement inhibition with pexelizumab might reduce myocardial infarction (MI) and postoperative mortality. PRIMO-CABG II was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of terminal complement inhibition in reducing perioperative MI and mortality in patients undergoing CABG surgery who have 2 or more predefined preoperative risk factors. METHODS: PRIMO-CABG II, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolled 4254 patients undergoing CABG with or without valve surgery at 249 hospitals in North America and Western Europe from June 2004 to July 2005. The patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous pexelizumab or placebo. The primary composite endpoint was the incidence of death or MI within 30 days of randomization. RESULTS: The PRIMO-CABG II trial did not meet its prespecified primary endpoint of death or MI at 30 days, the secondary endpoints of death at 30 days, or the development of new or worsening congestive heart failure (relative risk 0.91, 0.82, and 1.01, respectively; P > .05). However, in a combined analysis of both pivotal trials, PRIMO-CABG I and II (n = 7353), death at 30 days was significantly reduced for the greatest risk subset (n = 2156, pexelizumab 5.7% vs placebo 8.1%, P = .024). Furthermore, this mortality reduction persisted throughout the 180-day follow-up period (pexelizumab 11.1% vs placebo 14.4%, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: Pexelizumab was associated with a nonsignificant 6.7% reduction in the primary composite endpoint of death or MI at postoperative day 30 in CABG patients enrolled in the PRIMO-CABG II trial, despite the suggestion of a more favorable treatment effect in the previous PRIMO-CABG I trial. However, an exploratory analysis of the combined PRIMO I and II data set using an established predictive risk model showed a mortality benefit for high-risk surgical patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Complement C5/antagonists & inhibitors , Coronary Artery Bypass , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Single-Chain Antibodies/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Artery Disease/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Europe , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/immunology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , North America , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Single-Chain Antibodies/administration & dosage , Single-Chain Antibodies/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 3(2): 151-8, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20233979

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the informed consent process is supposed to help potential research participants make informed and voluntary decisions about participating in research, little is known about how participants react to language in the informed consent document and whether their reactions are related to their willingness to enroll in clinical trials. We examined the relationship between patients' reactions to standard informed consent language and their willingness to participate in a hypothetical clinical trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We simulated the consent process for a hypothetical cardiology clinical trial with 470 patients in an outpatient cardiovascular medicine clinic at a large academic medical center. We analyzed the spontaneous comments and questions that participants made during the interviews about each section of the informed consent document. Few participants made positive comments. Participants made the most negative comments about the sections on risks, study purpose or protocol, and payment for injury. Having a negative reaction to any section was associated with a lower likelihood of participating in the clinical trial. Using a multivariable model, we found that negative reactions in the patient rights, financial disclosure, and confidentiality sections predicted willingness to participate (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing elements of informed consent that elicit questions and concerns from potential research participants may help investigators design clinical research trials and model language in a way that reduces concerns or increases participant understanding, thereby enhancing informed consent for research.


Subject(s)
Cardiology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Confidentiality , Informed Consent , Liability, Legal , Patient Selection , Research Design , Research Subjects/psychology , Academic Medical Centers , Aged , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Cardiology/economics , Cardiology/ethics , Cardiology/legislation & jurisprudence , Chi-Square Distribution , Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Comprehension , Confidentiality/ethics , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Conflict of Interest , Decision Making , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Interviews as Topic , Language , Liability, Legal/economics , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection/ethics , Research Design/legislation & jurisprudence , Research Subjects/economics , Research Subjects/legislation & jurisprudence
10.
Am Heart J ; 157(6): 971-82, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19464406

ABSTRACT

Clinical data registries are valuable tools that support evidence development, performance assessment, comparative effectiveness studies, and the adoption of new treatments into routine clinical practice. Although these registries do not have important information on long-term therapies or clinical events, administrative claims databases offer a potentially valuable complement. This article focuses on the regulatory and ethical considerations that arise from the use of registry data for research, including linkage of clinical and administrative data sets. (1) Are such activities primarily designed for quality assessment and improvement, research, or both, as this determines the appropriate ethical and regulatory standards? (2) Does the submission of data to a central registry, which may subsequently be linked to other data sources, require review by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating organization? (3) What levels and mechanisms of IRB oversight are appropriate for the existence of a linked central data repository and the specific studies that may subsequently be developed using it? (4) Under what circumstances are waivers of informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act authorization required? (5) What are the requirements for a limited data set that would qualify a research activity as not involving human subjects and thus not subject to further IRB review? The approaches outlined in this article represent a local interpretation of the regulations in the context of several clinical data registry projects and focuses on a specific case study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.


Subject(s)
Confidentiality , Databases as Topic/ethics , Databases as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Registries/ethics , Biomedical Research/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Confidentiality/ethics , Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics Committees, Research/ethics , Ethics Committees, Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Ethics, Clinical , Ethics, Research , Government Regulation , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/ethics , Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Quality Assurance, Health Care , United States
11.
Am J Med ; 122(2): 170-80, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19185093

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Residence in a lower-income area has been associated with higher mortality among patients receiving dialysis. We sought to determine whether these differences persist and whether the effect of income-area on mortality is different for African Americans versus patients of other races. METHODS: We evaluated relationships between lower- and higher-income versus middle-income area residence and mortality to 5 years after adjusting for differences in baseline clinical, dialysis facility, and socioeconomic characteristics in 186,424 adult patients with end-stage renal disease initiating hemodialysis at stand-alone facilities between 1996 and 1999. We also compared mortality differences between race and income level groups using non-African Americans residing in middle-income areas as the reference group. RESULTS: Patients with end-stage renal disease who reside in lower-income areas were younger and more frequently African American. After adjustment, there were no mortality differences among income level groups. However, African Americans in all income level groups had lower adjusted mortality compared with the reference group (lower-income hazard ratio [HR]=0.771, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.736-0.808; middle-income HR=0.755, 95% CI, 0.730-0.781; higher-income HR=0.809, 95% CI, 0.764-0.857), whereas adjusted mortality was similar among non-African-American income level groups (lower-income HR=1.019, 95% CI, 0.976-1.064; higher-income HR=1.003, 95% CI, 0.968-1.039). CONCLUSION: Adjusted survival for patients receiving hemodialysis in all income areas was similar. However, this result masks the paradoxically higher survival for African American versus patients of other race and demonstrates the need to adjust for differences in demographic, clinical, provider, and socioeconomic status characteristics.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Income , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Aged , Female , Health Facilities , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/ethnology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Poverty Areas , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology
12.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(3): 242-8, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19199534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Staphylococcus aureus infections after cardiac surgery result in significant morbidity and mortality. Identifying patients at elevated risk for these infections preoperatively could facilitate efforts to reduce infection rates. The objectives of this study were to estimate the incidence of postoperative S. aureus infections in cardiac surgery patients, to identify preoperative risk factors for these infections, and to establish a patient risk profile by means of data available to clinicians prior to surgery. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Eight medical centers that participate in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. PATIENTS: Patients who were undergoing elective cardiac surgery during the period January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004. METHODS: Clinical and microbiological data from 16,386 patients were combined. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to predict S. aureus infection, which was defined by culture results. RESULTS: Of the 16,386 patients, 205 (1.3%) developed S. aureus bloodstream or chest wound infection within 90 days after surgery. On multivariable analysis, bootstrap-validated preoperative risk factors for S. aureus bloodstream or chest wound infection included a body mass index greater than 40 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.1-3.2]), chronic renal failure (aOR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.9]), and chronic lung disease (aOR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0-2.0]). Only 8 patients had all 3 risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although preoperative risk factors can be easily identified, the majority of patients who developed S. aureus infections after cardiac surgery did not have any risk factors. Preventive measures should not be restricted to a select group of cardiac surgery patients and should rather address the entire patient population.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Thoracic Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery
13.
Health Policy ; 88(2-3): 317-25, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18502534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether dialysis patient mortality rates are associated with differences in dialysis facility size, and whether this relationship differs among higher risk diabetic and lower-risk non-diabetic patients. METHODS: Using 186,554 adult end-stage renal disease patients initiating hemodialysis at standalone facilities in the United States between 1996 and 1999, we evaluated relationships between dialysis facility size and survival to 5 years. We performed separate analyses for patients with and without diabetes as their primary cause of end-stage renal disease. Facility size was defined according to the number of hemodialysis patients at year's end (smallor=120). RESULTS: Increasing facility size was associated with a reduced risk of mortality at 4 years for both diabetic (HR=0.983 per 10 unit increase, 95% CI=0.967, 0.999) and non-diabetic patients (HR 0.977 per 10 unit increase, 95% CI=0.963, 0.992) dialyzing in small facilities, and for diabetic patients (HR 0.989 per 10 unit increase, 95% CI=0.980, 0.998) dialyzing in medium size facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller facility size is associated with increasing long-term mortality for in-center hemodialysis patients. This relationship appears to be more pronounced among higher-risk diabetic vs. lower-risk non-diabetic patients.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Renal Dialysis , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Facility Size , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , United States
14.
Clin Trials ; 5(1): 70-4, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18283083

ABSTRACT

Justifiable concerns about the use of personal data in many aspects of daily life have led to the recent introduction in many countries of laws intended to regulate data use. Although participation in randomized clinical trials is generally with informed consent, recruitment procedures, complete follow-up, and the efficient conduct of trials may be substantially affected by such national or local privacy legislation. The relevant laws often have exceptions that allow the use of patient information in the public interest - including the use of data collected to improve or monitor public health or as part of medical research. However, regulatory bodies often give conflicting interpretations of the law, and this affects the conduct of large-scale trials. In particular, unnecessarily restrictive interpretation of the law may be a serious impediment to identification of potential participants for a trial, access to records to confirm events, continued follow-up of patients after the trial has been concluded, and secondary use of the trial data for purposes not directly related to the original purpose of the study. These obstacles could be overcome by better informing patients of the uses of records for medical research purposes, by using informed consent procedures that explain the nature of the research and the uses of the data, and by the use of identifiers, such as social security numbers that allow central follow-up. The clinical trial research community needs to ensure that the substantial benefits of large-scale randomized trials are explained both to the public and to those responsible for introducing legislation. The negative impact of privacy legislation on the use of personal health information and on conducting large studies needs to be understood and minimized.


Subject(s)
Confidentiality/legislation & jurisprudence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Access to Information/legislation & jurisprudence , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence
15.
Neuro Oncol ; 9(3): 240-4, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17522334

ABSTRACT

VNP40101M, or 1,2-bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-choloroethyl)-2-(methylamino)carbonylhydrazine (Cloretazine), is a bifunctional prodrug that belongs to a class of DNA-modifying agents-the sulfonylhydrazines-that has been synthesized and been shown to have activity against a wide spectrum of xenografts. The current study was designed to assess the activity of VNP40101M administered at a dose of 18 mg/kg daily for five days against a panel of human adult and pediatric CNS tumors growing subcutaneously or intracranially in athymic nude mice. The results demonstrated statistically significant (p < 0.05) growth delays of 15.0, 8.3, 51.0, 60+, 60+, and 60+ days in subcutaneous xenografts derived from childhood glioblastoma multiforme (D-456 MG), childhood ependymoma (D-528 EP and D-612 EP), childhood medulloblastoma (D-425 MED), and adult malignant glioma (D-245 MG and D-54 MG), respectively, with corresponding tumor regressions in 10 of 10, 4 of 10, 8 of 10, 9 of 10, 9 of 10, and 10 of 10 treated mice, respectively. Delayed toxicity was seen more than 60 days after treatment, with 23 deaths in 100 treated animals, despite a median weight loss of only 0.06%. In mice bearing intracranial D-245 MG xenografts, treatment with VNP40101M at a dose of 18 mg/kg daily for five days produced a 50% increase in median survival compared with controls. Additional experiments conducted against subcutaneous D-245 MG xenografts by using reduced doses of 13.5 or 9.0 mg/kg daily for five days demonstrated tumor growth delays of 82.2 and 53.5 days, with corresponding tumor regressions in 8 of 9 and 9 of 10 treated mice, respectively (all values, p < 0.001), with one toxic death. These findings suggest that VNP40101M is active in the treatment of a wide range of human central nervous system tumors and warrants translation to the clinic.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hydrazines/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Prodrugs/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Animals , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Transplantation , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
16.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 83(1): 100-7, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17184638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative stays after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) decreased substantially in the 1990s. Although shorter stays offer clinical benefits, premature discharge could increase adverse events and offset initial savings. This study examined the effect of early discharge after CABG on readmission/death and cost within 60 days of discharge home. Variability in hospitals' tendencies for early discharge and adverse outcomes was also explored. METHODS: Analyses were based on clinical and claims data for 55,889 New York CABG patients discharged home 1995 to 1998. Early discharge was defined as a postoperative stay below the 15th percentile for patients with similar risk. The likelihood of early discharge and its effect on readmission/death were examined using hierarchical logistic regression, accounting for patient risk and within-hospital correlation. The correlation between early discharge and adverse outcomes at the hospital level was assessed. The effect of early discharge on subsequent inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing, and home health costs was examined in the Medicare subset. RESULTS: Overall, 17% of patients were discharged early, with increasing prevalence over time. The tendency to discharge early varied widely among hospitals (2% to 42% of patients). We found no association between hospitals' tendencies for early discharge and adverse outcomes. Lower postdischarge costs among patients discharged early (mean = 3,491 dollars versus 5,246 dollars for typical stays) resulted in average cumulative savings of 6,309 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Patients selected for earlier discharge after CABG did not have increased adverse event rates or higher costs. Variation among hospitals in early discharge suggests that more efficient patient management could be achieved at some hospitals.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass , Length of Stay , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/economics , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Patient Discharge , Postoperative Care
17.
Am Heart J ; 152(6): 1194-200, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161075

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although single-site studies have reported reductions in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery length of stay (LOS) over the last 15 years, less information is available regarding overall temporal trends and interhospital variability. This study examined trends in postoperative LOS, associated rates of transfer at discharge and variation among hospitals in LOS at CABG hospitals in New York State. METHODS: Trends in postoperative LOS and transfers at discharge for 105,842 CABG patients treated in 30 hospitals in New York between 1992 and 1998 were first described graphically. Mixed models were then used to assess temporal trends and interhospital variability in LOS, accounting for differences in patient risk and within-hospital correlation in outcomes. Clinical and LOS data were obtained from the Cardiac Surgery Reporting System. Additional information was extracted from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. RESULTS: Postoperative LOS decreased 30% between 1992 and 1998 after adjusting for patient risk. A concurrent increase in the probability of nonacute patient transfers occurred over time, with the most pronounced increase in patients with stays exceeding 5 days. Underlying the downward trend in LOS was substantial interhospital variability that peaked in 1994 and remained significant in 1998. Stays were longer at hospitals located in New York City. CONCLUSIONS: The downward shift in LOS observed in the 1990s was achieved in part by an increase in nonacute care transfers, reflecting a shift in care setting. After decreasing trends in postoperative stays tapered off, significant variability among hospitals remained.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/trends , Length of Stay/trends , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , New York , New York City , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors
18.
Arch Surg ; 141(7): 637-41; discussion 642, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16847232

ABSTRACT

HYPOTHESIS: Decreased preoperative levels of antiendotoxin core antibody (EndoCAb) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with increased long-term mortality. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 474 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative serum IgM EndoCAb levels were determined, and established preoperative risk factors were assessed. Patients were assigned a risk score using a validated method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was mortality. Statistical analysis used the Cox proportional hazards regression model with log EndoCAb as the predictor of interest and Parsonnet additive risk score as a covariate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to visually compare groups with high vs low EndoCAb levels. RESULTS: Forty-six deaths occurred in 5 years. Annual follow-up rates during the 5 years were 100%, 94%, 93%, 98%, and 98% for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year periods, respectively. Parsonnet additive risk score (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.11; P < .001) and log EndoCAb (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.99; P = .04) were independent predictors of long-term mortality in the final model. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the preoperative EndoCAb level was significantly associated with mortality up to 5 years (P = .01 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Lower preoperative serum EndoCAb level is a significant predictor of long-term mortality independent of other known risk factors.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Coronary Disease/immunology , Coronary Disease/mortality , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulins/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Coronary Disease/surgery , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulins/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors
19.
Am Heart J ; 151(5): 992-8, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite a survival benefit and guideline recommendation for beta-blockers in left ventricular systolic dysfunction, beta-blockers are underused in clinical practice. METHODS: Medical practices with > or = 15 patients with heart failure (HF) in the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (DDCD) were identified for a prospective, randomized study using a multifaceted intervention to improve beta-blocker use. Intervention practices received provider education, patient education materials, feedback on beta-blocker use of their patients with HF, and access to telephone consultation with an HF expert. The primary outcome was a comparison between intervention and control practices of the proportion of patients with HF self-reporting beta-blocker use on their first routine DDCD follow-up in the postintervention year. A random effects model was used for the analysis. RESULTS: Post intervention, 2631 patients (1701 in 23 intervention practices and 930 in 22 control practices) completed DDCD follow-up. No significant difference in the proportion of patients with HF reporting beta-blocker use was found in the intervention versus control groups (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.94-1.43, P = .2), although more patients in the intervention group started a beta-blocker than stopped a beta-blocker during the study period (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted intervention did not significantly increase the mean proportion of patients taking beta-blockers within practices exposed to the intervention, although favorable trends were observed. Further studies are needed to identify and evaluate strategies for translating evidence into clinical practice to reduce the global health burden associated with HF.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cardiac Output, Low/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical, Continuing , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Knowledge of Results, Psychological , Remote Consultation
20.
Circulation ; 113(2): 203-12, 2006 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16401776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies have examined the use of evidence-based therapies for coronary artery disease (CAD) in the short term and at hospital discharge, but few have evaluated long-term use. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease for the years 1995 to 2002, we determined the annual prevalence and consistency of self-reported use of aspirin, beta-blockers, lipid-lowering agents, and their combinations in all CAD patients and of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in those with and without heart failure. Logistic-regression models identified characteristics associated with consistent use (reported on > or =2 consecutive follow-up surveys and then through death, withdrawal, or study end), and Cox proportional-hazards models explored the association of consistent use with mortality. Use of all agents and combinations thereof increased yearly. In 2002, 83% reported aspirin use; 61%, beta-blocker use; 63%, lipid-lowering therapy use; 54%, aspirin and beta-blocker use; and 39%, use of all 3. Consistent use was as follows: For aspirin, 71%; beta-blockers, 46%; lipid-lowering therapy, 44%; aspirin and beta-blockers, 36%; and all 3, 21%. Among patients without heart failure, 39% reported ACEI use in 2002; consistent use was 20%. Among heart failure patients, ACEI use was 51% in 2002 and consistent use, 39%. Except for ACEIs among patients without heart failure, consistent use was associated with lower adjusted mortality: Aspirin hazard ratio (HR), 0.58 and 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54 to 0.62; beta-blockers, HR, 0.63 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.67; lipid-lowering therapy, HR, 0.52 and 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; all 3, HR, 0.67 and 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.77; aspirin and beta-blockers, HR, 0.61 and 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.65; and ACEIs among heart failure patients, HR, 0.75 and 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: Use of evidence-based therapies for CAD has improved but remains suboptimal. Although improved discharge prescription of these agents is needed, considerable attention must also be focused on understanding and improving long-term adherence.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/drug therapy , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Databases, Factual , Drug Therapy, Combination , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Prevalence , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...